Abstract
The Mumbai-based Hindi film industry, or Bollywood, has been producing films on many themes, with genres ranging from romance to action thrillers. While romance has been a staple ingredient of many Bollywood blockbusters, the nature of romance has changed and one has witnessed the slow erasure of the family of the protagonists into the background, portraying them as individuals in their own right. On-screen representation of loneliness in Bollywood films has adopted certain conventional tropes such as artists living reclusive lives, lonely men looking for a purpose and lonely housewives. These three tropes have their own specific settings such as lonely men often finding purpose through romantic association with the female lead (thereby rendering the women as passive tools) or the lonely housewives “finding themselves” by being seductresses in relationships outside marriage. Broadly speaking, Bollywood cinema grounds loneliness, more often than not, in the context and background of (often absence of) romantic relationships. This paper seeks to examine the gendered portrayal of loneliness on-screen through two Bollywood films—The Lunchbox (2013) and English Vinglish (2012). Both films involve lonely Indian housewives (evidently not receiving the validation and love they expect from their husbands) though while the latter focusses on the housewife as the key protagonist, the former once again employs the housewife as a cure to the male protagonist’s loneliness. Importantly, both are significant departures from the ‘housewife as a seductress’ trope while food plays a key role in shaping the identity of the two women. Through our paper, we argue that loneliness, as it plays out on-screen, is a gendered idea, particularly in the case of the tropes employed to portray the emotion. The spaces (both physical and social) occupied by men and women in their loneliness as well as their relationships which are portrayed on-screen vary greatly. While there is on-screen acceptance of men finding “themselves” with the help of women, women protagonists are portrayed within the borders of their (marital) relationship and the protagonist’s conflict resolution is scrutinised on the basis of how far they have stuck to the relationship’s boundaries or gone past them. Invariably, the social milieu and the constraints imposed by narrow gender roles are replicated on-screen even while portraying the emotion of loneliness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abarghouei, V. 2015. The Phenomenon of Loneliness. PhD dissertation. City University of Seattle.
Aguiar, M. 2013. Arranged Marriage: Cultural Regeneration in Transnational South Asian Popular Culture. Cultural Critique 84 (Spring): 181–214.
Ahmed, O. 2015. Studying Indian Cinema. Leighton Buzzard: Auteur.
Arokach, A. 2006. Alienation and Domestic Abuse: How Abused Women Cope with Loneliness. Social Indicators Research 78 (2) (September): 327–340.
Batra, R. (director). 2013. The Lunchbox [Motion Picture].
Bhattacharya Mehta, Rini. 2010. Bollywood, Nation, Globalization: An Incomplete Introduction. In Bollywood and Globalization: Indian Popular Cinema, Nation, and Diaspora, ed. Rini Bhattacharya Mehta and Rajeshwari V. Pandharipande, 1–15. London: Anthem Press.
Chowdhury, Purna. 2010. Bollywood Babes: Body and Female Desire in Bombay Films Since the Nineties and Darr, Mohra and Aitraaz: A Tropic Discourse. In Bollywood and Globalization: Indian Popular Cinema, Nation, and Diaspora, ed. Rini Bhattacharya Mehta and Rajeshwari V. Pandharipande, 51–75. London: Anthem Press.
Deshpande, A. 2007. Indian Cinema and the Bourgeois Nation State. Economic & Political Weekly 42 (50) (December): 95–101.
Dudrah, Rajinder Kumar. 2006. Bollywood: Sociology Goes to the Movies. New Delhi: Sage.
Gopal, Sangita. 2010. Sentimental Symptoms: The Films of Karan Johar and Bombay Cinema. In Bollywood and Globalization: Indian Popular Cinema, Nation, and Diaspora, ed. Rini Bhattacharya Mehta and Rajeshwari V. Pandharipande, 15–35. London: Anthem Press.
Hengehold, L. 2011. When Safety Becomes a Duty: Gender, Loneliness, and Citizenship for Urban Women. Women’s Studies Quarterly 39: 48–69.
Joshi, P. 2015. Bollywood’s India: A Public Fantasy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kolker, R. 2000. Introduction. In Cinema of Loneliness: Penn, Stone, Kubrick, Scorsese, Spielberg, Altman, ed. Kolker, 14–25. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kreitler, K. 2013. Sad Spinsters and Crazy Cat Ladies. Everyday Feminism, February 26. https://everydayfeminism.com/2013/02/why-society-shames-single-women-and-how-to-celebrate-the-single-life/.
Mascarenhas, A. 2012. Not Her Mother Tongue. The Indian Express, September 1. http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/pune/not-her-mother-tongue/.
Mazumdar, Ranjani. 2007. Bombay Cinema: An Archive of the City. Ranikhet: Permanent Black.
Olds, J., and R.S. Schwartz. 2009. The Lonely American: Drifting Apart in the Twenty-First Century. Boston: Beacon Press.
Phadke, Shilpa. 2007. Re-mapping the Public: Gendered Spaces in Mumbai. In Gender and the Built Environment in India, ed. Madhavi Desai, 53–74. New Delhi: Zubaan.
Rokach, A., T. Orzeck, J. Cripps, K. Lackovic-Grgin, and Z. Penezic. 2001. The Effects of Culture on the Meaning of Loneliness. Social Indicators Research 53 (1) (January): 17–31.
Schmid, K. 2018. Why Would Anyone Ever Want to Be a Wife? The Establishment, February 19. https://theestablishment.co/why-would-anyone-ever-want-to-be-a-wife-b48d81d097c4.
Shinde, G. (director). 2012. English Vinglish [Motion Picture].
Singh, J.P. 2003. Nuclearisation of Household and Family in Urban India. Sociological Bulletin 52 (1) (March): 53–70.
Stack, S. 1998. Marriage, Family and Loneliness: A Cross-National Study. Sociological Perspectives 41 (2): 415–432.
Trivedi, I. 2014. India in Love: Marriage and Sexuality in the 21st Century. New Delhi: Aleph Book Company.
Verma, E. 2014. The Evolution of the ‘Kiss’ in Hindi Cinema. Pandolin: Indian Cinema Revealed. https://pandolin.com/evolution-kiss-hindi-cinema/.
Virani, A. 2014. Q&A with Ritesh Batra. Travel + Leisure, February 27. http://www.travelandleisure.com/blogs/qanda-with-ritesh-batra-director-of-the-film-the-lunchbox.
Virdi, Jyotika. 2003. The Cinematic ImagiNation: Indian Popular Films as Social History. New Brunswick, New Jersey and London: Rutgers University Press.
Wilson, Elizabeth. 1991. The Sphinx in the City: Urban Life, the Control of Disorder, and Women. London: Virago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arundhathi, Zia, S. (2019). Lonely Indian Housewives: Gendered Portrayal of Loneliness in Bollywood Cinema. In: Fox, B. (eds) Emotions and Loneliness in a Networked Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24882-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24882-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24881-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24882-6
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)