Skip to main content

Border Processes in Contemporary Baltic–Black Sea Region: Between (Re)Bordering and Debordering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Baltic-Black Sea Regionalisms

Abstract

Brańka, Donaj, and Jańczak deal with the problem of space and borders in the political region spreading between the Baltic and Black seas. Starting with the conceptual considerations on territoriality, borders, and border change, they look for elements constituting spatial dynamics in the region. At the same time, however, they also try to investigate the structural characteristics of the region itself as well as the ways it is constructed and deconstructed. By testing examples of territory-based cooperation and conflict—in an environment framed by an expanding European Union, and mutual and collective interactions among single states—they not only review debordering and (re)bordering tendencies there, but also conceptualize the spatial–political meaning of this part of Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexandrova-Arbatova, N. (2016). A Russian view on the eastern partnership. EU Forum. https://www.clingendael.org. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Bagłajewski, M. (2017). Międzymorze – palimpsesty i powierzchnie. Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego, Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartuzi, W., Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, K., Strachota, K., in association with: Falkowski, M., Górecki, W. (2008). Abchazja, Osetia Południowa, Górski Karabach: rozmrożone konflikty pomiędzy Rosją a Zachodem. Raport Specjalny Ośrodka Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia, Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black Sea Forum for Dialogue and Partnership. (2018). https://web.archive.org/web. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Black Sea Trade and Development Bank. (2018). https://www.bstdb.org. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Black Sea Universities Network. (2018). http://www.bsun.org. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Boffey, D. (2017, August 24). ‘We know how to live next to Russia’: Lithuania builds border fence with Kaliningrad. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brańka, T. (2017). Demilitarization and neutralization—The case of the Åland Islands. Przegląd Politologiczny, 4, 203–217 (2017). https://doi.org/10.14746/pp.2017.22.4.15.

  • Byers, M. (2017). Crises and international cooperation: An Arctic case study. International Relations, 31(4), 375–402 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117817735680.

  • Chong, B. (2017). The role of the Black Sea in Russia’s strategic calculus. Center for International Maritime Security. http://cimsec.org. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Donaj, Ł. (2010). States with limited recognition—The case of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. ЄвpoAтлaнтикa - Чacoпиc IЄAC, 3, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dura, M. (2017). Rosja łamie Traktat INF. Zagrożenie, ale i szansa dla Polski. Defence24. https://www.defence24.pl. Accessed July 12, 2018.

  • Estonia ‘plans Russia border fence’ amid Ukraine tensions. (2017). BBC. https://www.bbc.com. Accessed July 23, 2017.

  • Fence on border with Russia targets specifically illegal immigration—Latvian ambassador. (2018, January 18). The Baltic Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fence stretching 23-km already up on Latvia-Russia border. (2018, February 5). The Baltic Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Great Estonian Wall’: Country decides to cut itself off from Russia … with 2.5-meter fence. (2016). https://www.rt.com. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Insinna, V. (2017). Interview: Gen. Jarmo Lindberg, head of Finland’s Defence Forces. https://www.defensenews.com. Accessed July 18, 2018.

  • Jańczak, J. (2013). Integracja i dezintegracja w Europie Środkowej. Graniczne miasta bliźniacze jako laboratoria współpracy transgranicznej. Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej, 7, 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jańczak, J. (2015). The “Forgotten Border” between Poland and Kaliningrad Oblast. De- and Re-boundarization of the Russian-EU. In J. W. Scott, & M. Pete (Eds.), Cross-border review (25–48). Budapest: European Institute of Cross-Border Studies (Esztergom)—Central European Service for Cross-border Initiatives (CESCI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janczys, W. (2017). Mur bałtycki. Litwa, Łotwa i Estonia odgradzają się od Rosji. https://wiadomosci.wp.pl. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Janulewicz, Ł. (2017). Dismissing the three seas initiative is counterproductive for Brussels. https://worldview.stratfor.com. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Katajala, K. (2013). Bordering the Baltic. Scandinavian boundary drawing processes, 1900–2000. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 28(1), 151–152 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2013.796212.

  • Koch, K. (2015). Region-building and security: The multiple borders of the Baltic Sea region after EU enlargement. Geopolitics, 20, 535–558 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2015.1026964.

  • Konrad, V. (2015). Toward a theory of borders in motion. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 30(1), 1–17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2015.1008387.

  • Lewandowski, Ł. (2017). Trójmorze – ABC inicjatywy 12 państw unijnych. Euractive. https://www.euractiv.pl/section/polityka-regionalna/news/trojmorze-abc-inicjatywy-12-panstw-unijnych. Accessed August 23, 2018.

  • Lithuania to build Kaliningrad border fence with EU money. (2018). https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/lithuania-to-build-kaliningrad-border-fence-with-eu-money. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Litwa skończyła budowę płotu na granicy z Rosją (2017). http://belsat.eu. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Makarychev, A. (2005). The Baltic-Black sea connection. A region in the making or political project. PONARS Policy Memo No. 390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarychev, A., & Segbers, K. (2017). Introduction: The Baltic Sea region—Scars, seams and stitches. In A. Makarychev & K. Segbers (Eds.), Borders in the Baltic Sea region. Suturing the ruptures. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson, F. (2018). The three-seas-initiative: European regionalism of supranational nature. http://www.nouvelle-europe.eu. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Michałek, M. (2017). Wielki plan małych państw. Jak Trójmorze wzmocni lub podzieli Unię. https://www.tvn24.pl. Accessed September 23, 2018.

  • Odpowiedź na interpelację nr 9766 w sprawie małego ruchu granicznego z Federacją Rosyjską. (2017). Sejm RP. http://www.sejm.gov.pl. Accessed July 12, 2018.

  • O’Dwyer, G. (2017). Russia promises ‘countermeasures’ if Finland joins NATO. https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2017/10/13/russia-promises-countermeasures-if-finland-joins-nato/. Accessed July 21, 2018.

  • Olszański, T. A., Sarna, A., Wierzbowska-Miazga, A. (2014). Konsekwencje aneksji Krymu. Analizy: Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich. https://www.osw.waw.pl. Accessed July 12, 2018.

  • Organization of Black Sea Economic Cooperation. (2018). http://www.bsec-organization.org. Accessed September 23, 2018.

  • Orttung, R., & Walker, C. (2015). Putin’s frozen conflicts. Each of Russia’s reform-minded neighbors is plagued by separatism. It’s no coincidence. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com. Accessed September 23, 2018.

  • Palmowski, T. (2003). Kaliningrad a proces integracji bałtyckiej. In Księga poświęcona pamięci profesora Marcina Marii Rościszewskiego. Geopolitical Studies; Polish Academy of Sciences (Vol. X).

    Google Scholar 

  • Piskorska, B. (2018). Synergia Czarnomorska: zbliżenie państw Morza Czarnego do Unii Europejskiej. http://www.academia.edu. Accessed September 23, 2018.

  • Popescu, N. (2014). Eurasian Union: The real, the imaginary and the likely. https://www.iss.europa.eu. Accessed September 23, 2018.

  • Potyrała, A. (2010). Niepodległość Kosowa w świetle opinii doradczej Międzynarodowego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości. Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne, 3, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssp.2010.3.02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reza, Z. (2017). What is the three seas initiative? https://www.worldatlas.com/. Accessed September 23, 2018.

  • Rosja “możliwym agresorem”. Litwa odgradza się płotem. (2017). TVN24. https://www.tvn24.pl. Accessed July 22, 2018.

  • Ruritania. (2018). https://www.globalsecurity.org. Accessed September 23, 2018.

  • Russia-Latvian Border Fence. (2017). https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/lv-russian-fence.htm. Accessed September 23, 2018.

  • Sakson, A. (2015). Obwód Kaliningradzki w otoczeniu NATO i Unii Europejskiej. Rocznik Bezpieczeństwa Międzynarodowego, 9(1), 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F. (2013). Rethinking regions and regionalism. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 14(2), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, H. (2006). International borders: What they are, what they mean, and why we should care. The SAIS Review of International Affairs, 26(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolyarov, G. (2018). Trucker Putin opens Russia bridge link with annexed Crimea. Reuter. https://www.reuters.com. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Studzieniecki, T. (2016). The development of cross-border cooperation in an EU Macroregion – A case study of the baltic sea region. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30318-5.

  • Szczepaniuk, C. (2017). Partnerstwo Wschodnie – polski sukces, czy porażka? http://www.eastbook.eu. Accessed September 23, 2018.

  • Szczerek, Z. (2017). Międzymorze. Podróże przez prawdziwą i wyobrażoną Europę Środkową. Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesławski, B. (2017). Partnerstwo Wschodnie Plus to porażka UE. http://www.eastbook.eu. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • The International Centre for Black Sea Studies (2018). https://www.icbss.org. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • The Three Seas Initiative and Donald Trump. (2017). Hungarian spectrum. http://www.hungarianspectrum.org/2017/06/29/the-three-seas-initiative-and-donald-trump/. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • The Three Seas Initiative: Central and Eastern Europe takes charge of its own destiny. (2016). Visegrad post. https://visegradpost.com. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Three Seas Initiative. (2018). http://three-seas.eu. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Trusewicz, I. (2018, September 15). Krym: most z Rosji nie pomógł gospodarce. Rzeczpospolita.

    Google Scholar 

  • Väyrynen, R. (2003). Regionalism: Old and new. International Studies Review, 5(1), 25–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.501002.

  • Wastl-Walter, D. (Ed.). (2011). The Ashgate research companion to border studies. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbowska-Miazga, A. (2014). Konsekwencje aneksji Krymu. Analiza Ośrodka Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia. Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wspólna deklaracja w sprawie Inicjatywy Trójmorza. (2016). http://www.prezydent.pl. Accessed September 23, 2018.

  • Zhurzhenko, T. (2012). Bordering and ordering the twenty-first century: Understanding borders. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 27(3), 365–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2012.750954.

  • Apceнiй Яцeнюк пpeдcтaвив Плaн дiй “Biднoвлeння Укpaїни”: Hoвa oбopoннa дoктpинa, пpoeкт “Cтiнa”, cтaтyc пapтнepa HATO нoмep oдин для Укpaїни. (2014). https://www.kmu.gov.ua. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Кинякин, A. A. (2017). Eвpaзийcкий Экoнoмичecкий Coюз: в пoпыткe избeжaть пocтcoвeтcкoй интeгpaциoннoй path dependence. Becтник PУДH. Cepия: Пoлитoлoгия, 19(4), 425–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Кoзлюк, C. (2015). Oкoпaний кopдoн. Як бyдyють “Cтiнy” нa Xapкiвщинi. http://tyzhden.ua. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Укaз Пpeзидeнтa Укpaїни №744/2014. (2014). https://www.president.gov.ua. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Укpaїнa мaє вci пiдcтaви пpoвecти oднocтopoнню дeмapкaцiю кopдoнy з PФ – Дeщиця. (2014). https://www.unian.ua. Accessed September 15, 2018.

  • Шpaмoвич, B., & Гpiбaнoвa, A. (2017). Cтiнa чи тин: як Укpaїнa вiдгopoджyєтьcя вiд Pociї. https://www.bbc.com. Accessed September 15, 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tomasz Brańka , Łukasz Donaj or Jarosław Jańczak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brańka, T., Donaj, Ł., Jańczak, J. (2020). Border Processes in Contemporary Baltic–Black Sea Region: Between (Re)Bordering and Debordering. In: Bogdanova, O., Makarychev, A. (eds) Baltic-Black Sea Regionalisms. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24878-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics