Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to offer the grounds for a double rehabilitation: that of hermeneutics on the one hand, and of the virtual, a concept that became popular especially between the 1980s and 1990, on the other hand. More precisely, hermeneutics will be used to lay foundations for the hypothesis according to which the virtual never ended. The argument will follow three steps. In the first section, the author accounts for theories on the end of the virtual, distinguishing between those who think that the real has invaded the virtual and those who say that it is rather the opposite. The second section, entitled “The Virtual Never Ended”, is a tribute to Philip K. Dick and his crazy idea that the Roman Empire never came to an end. The digital works through representational distanciation and performative appropriation, and it is precisely this process that makes the virtual a valid concept that still gives rise to thought, and which allows hermeneutics to be used in the context of digitality. Finally, in the concluding section, the author will briefly present the epistemological and ontological advantages of such a perspective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
It is noteworthy how Verbeek (2013: 51–54) has misunderstood Latour’s notion of mediation. For Latour (1994), indeed, of the four forms of mediations he presents—translation, composition, reversible blackboxing and delegation—the latter in certainly the most important. In delegation, techniques do not properly mediate a present human action; they rather work in the absence of those who wanted, created and installed them. One could say that they still represent human intentions, since the term “delegate” means precisely “representative”, “deputy”, “emissary”. But one could even argue that they are henceforth “un-tied” from those intentions. Through a process of emergence, there is then a shift from mere mediation to autonomy; it is precisely such an autonomy that Verbeek refuses to recognize, partially against Latour, to the technologies (Floridi and Sanders 2004).
- 4.
See “LICRA contre Yahoo!”, https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/LICRA_contre_Yahoo. Accessed 15 June 2017.
- 5.
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/sites/digital-agenda/files/Manifesto.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2017. The Manifesto has been originally edited by Floridi for Springer. An extended version of the Manifesto, with further analysis and comments, is freely available at https://springerlink.bibliotecabuap.elogim.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-04093-6.
- 6.
In the first volume of Time and Narrative, Ricoeur has criticized quantitative history and its use of databases, computers, and information theory. According to him, quantitative history should be understood as a methodological detour, whose aim is to bring to an extension of our collective living memories.
- 7.
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89ditorialisation. Accessed 15 June 2017.
References
Bachimont, Bruno. 2010. Le sens de la technique. Le numérique et le calcul. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Beaude, Boris. 2014. Les fins d’Internet. Limoges: FYP.
Boyd, Danah. 2001. Sexing the Internet: Reflections on the Role of Identification in Online Communities. Paper presented at Sexualities, Media, Technologies, University of Surrey, 21–22 June 2001. http://www.danah.org/papers/SexingTheInternet.confe-rence.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2017.
Capurro, Rafael. 2010. Digital Hermeneutics: An Outline. AI & Society 35: 35–42.
Diamante, Oscar. 2014. The Hermeneutics of Information in the Context of Information Technology. Kritike 8: 168–189.
Ferraris, Maurizio. 2014. Total Mobilization. The Monist 97: 201–222.
Floridi, Luciano. 2010. Information. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Floridi, Luciano. 2014. The Fourth Revolution. How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Floridi, Luciano, and Sanders, Jeff. 2004. On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines, 349–379.
Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Fuchs, Christian. 2014. Digital Labour and Karl Marx. New York: Routledge.
Gerbaudo, Paolo. 2016. From Data Analytics to Data Hermeneutics. Online Political Discussions, Digital Methods and the Continuing Relevance of Interpretive Approaches. Digital Culture & Society, 2/2. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0207.
Heidegger, Martin. 1995. Aristotle’s Metaphysics 9, 1–3. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Ihde, Don. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld. From Garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnosn. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Latour, Bruno. 1994. On Technical Mediation. Philosophy, Sociology, Genealogy. Common Knowledge 3 (2): 29–64.
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 2013. An Inquiry into the Modes of Existence. An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Law, John. 2009. Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics. In The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, ed. Bryan S. Turner, 141–158. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lazer, David, Ryan Kennedy, Gary King, and Alessandro Vespignani. 2014. The Parable of Google Trends. Traps in Big Data Analysis. Science 343: 1203–1205.
Manovich, Lev. 2013. Software Takes Command. London: Bloomsbury.
Mohr, John, Wagner-Pacifici, Robin, and Breiger, Ronald. 2015. Toward a Computational Hermeneutics. Big Data & Society 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715613809.
Rastier, François, and Bachimont, Bruno. 1998. Herméneutique matérielle et artéfacture: des machines qui pensent aux machines qui donnent à penser. Texto! Textes et Cultures. http://www.revue-texto.net/Lettre/Bachimont_Her-men.html. Accessed 15 June 2017.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1984. Time and Narrative, I. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1991. From Text to Action. Essays in Hermeneutics, II. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Rogers, Richard. 2009. The End of the Virtual. http://www.govcom.org/rogers_paris_medialab.pdf. Accessed June 10 2017.
Romele, Alberto. 2018. Imaginative Machines. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 22 (1): 98–125.
Romele, Alberto, and Marta Severo. 2014. Une approche philosophique de la ville numérique: méthodes numériques et géolocalisation. In Devenirs urbains, ed. Marise Carmes and Jean-Max Noyer, 205–226. Paris: Presses des Mines.
Romele, Alberto, and Marta Severo. 2016. The Economy of the Digital Gift. From Socialism to Sociality Online. Theory, Culture & Society 33: 43–63.
Romele, Alberto, Francesco Gallino, Camilla Emmenegger, and Daniele Gorgone. 2017. Panopticism is Not Enough: Social Media as Technologies of Voluntary Servitude. Surveillance & Society 15: 204–221.
Scholz, Trebor (ed.). 2013. Digital Labor. The Internet as Playground and Factory. New York: Routledge.
Van Den Eede, Yoni. In Between Us: On the Transparency and Opacity of Technological Mediation. Foundations of Science 16: 139–159.
Van Zundert, Joris. 2016. Screwmeneutics and Hermenumericals. The Computationality of Hermeneutics. In: A New Companion to Digital Humanities, ed. Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens, and John Unsworth, 331–347. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Vattimo, Gianni. 2000. Histoire d’une virgule. Gadamer et le sens de l’être. Revue internationale de philosophie 213: 499–513.
Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2003. Material Hermeneutics. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 6 (3): 181–184.
Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2005. What Things Do. Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2013. Moralizing Technology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Winner, Langdon. 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus 109: 121–136.
Zhao, Shanyang, Sherri Grasmuck, and Jason Martin. 2008. Identity Construction on Facebook: Digital Empowerement in Anchored Relationships. Computers in Human Behaviors 24: 1816–1836.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Romele, A. (2019). The End of the Virtual? A Hermeneutical Approach to Digitality. In: Braga, J. (eds) Conceiving Virtuality: From Art To Technology. Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24751-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24751-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24750-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24751-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)