Abstract
This chapter provides information about treatment options in brain tumors, namely surgical radiotherapy and systemic treatments. In addition, clinical approaches to gliomas, benign tumors, and metastases are reviewed. Radiotherapy techniques used in the treatment of brain tumors are viewed with sample cases.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Treatment Options
Brain tumor treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach. Symptoms appear in the patient according to the area in which the tumor is located. A variety of therapies are used to treat brain tumors. The type of treatment recommended depends on the size, type, growth rate, and location of the tumor and performance status (PS) of the patient. Treatment options include surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, targeted biological agents, or a combination of these.
1.1 Surgery
Brain tumors comprise a wide range of different neoplasms that grow within the central nervous system (CNS) [1]. The aim of neurosurgery in most brain tumors is maximal safe tumor resection. However, in selected cases such as certain deep-seated brain tumors or suspected brain lymphomas, either an open or stereotactic tumor biopsy is indicated. To optimize resection of brain tumors, specific intraoperative techniques were established in recent decades. The application of neuronavigation is nowadays considered as standard for preoperative approach planning, intraoperative localization, and guidance during surgery of brain tumors [2]. In recent years, the use of “advanced navigation” additionally enables the inclusion of multimodality image data such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and functional MRI in order to increase the precision of tissue sampling and patient safety [3, 4]. Furthermore, intraoperative ultrasound and MRI constitute the methods for visualization of brain tumors during surgery [5, 6].
1.2 Radiation Therapy (RT)
RT has been established as a mainstay of treatment for brain tumors, and for many brain tumor subtypes such as germinoma, may be curative [7]. Use of RT can also prolong survival or provide palliative relief and is a treatment modality used for both primary and metastatic tumors [8].
1.3 Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy, along with radiation (concurrent therapy), has become the standard of care for primary malignant brain tumors. It can be used before, during, or after surgery and/or radiotherapy to help.
1.4 Targeted Therapy
The focus on a specific element of a cell, such as molecules or pathways required for cell growth, in order to use them as a target.
2 Treatment Recommendations
2.1 Gliomas
Low-grade tumors (grade I and II), which are not aggressive, are treated with watchful monitoring or surgery alone. Surgery may be the only treatment needed especially if all of the tumor can be removed. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy is used for high risk patients. Radiotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for glioma since the 1980s when it was established that postoperative treatment improves survival [9, 10]. No consensus exists regarding the proper timing of postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in low-grade glioma. Although delaying RT in young, healthy patients without progressive neurologic decline can be controversial, there is a consensus to proceed with immediate postoperative RT in older patients after a less than total resection, because their survival is as poor as patients with anaplastic astrocytoma. High-risk patients with low-grade gliomas benefit with respect to both progression-free survival and overall survival with early up-front RT [11].
The standard RT dose for low-grade astrocytoma is 45–54 Gy, delivered in 1.8–2.0 Gy fractions [12]. Consider RT dose escalation to 59.4–60 Gy for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wild-type low-grade gliomas, as these patients may have a more aggressive course of disease. Chemotherapy is not a traditional mainstay of upfront treatment for low-grade gliomas. There are some data that support temozolomide or PCV (procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine) as adjuvant therapy especially in high-risk patients (age ≥40 following any resection or younger patients who were subtotally resected) [13, 14].
Higher grade tumors (grade III and IV), which are malignant and grow quickly, are more difficult to remove and require additional treatments beyond surgery, followed by RT and chemotherapy. Fractionated EBRT after surgery is standard adjuvant therapy for patients with high-grade astrocytoma [15]. The typical dose is 60 Gy in 1.8–2.0 Gy fractions. Use of hypofractionated courses of RT has been shown to be efficacious in poorly performing or older patients with glioblastoma. Typical schemes are 34 Gy in 10 fractions, 40 Gy in 15 fractions, or 50 Gy in 20 fractions. Alternatively, a shorter fractionation schedule of 25 Gy in 5 fractions may be considered for elderly and/or frail patients with smaller tumors for whom a longer course of treatment would not be tolerable [16,17,18]. Studies including a radiosurgery or brachytherapy boost to conventional RT did not show a survival benefit [19, 20].
Combined chemoradiation has emerged as a new standard of care for patients with 1p/19q co-deleted anaplastic oligodendroglioma or oligoastrocytoma as well as good PS non-elderly glioblastoma [21, 22]. Survival improves when chemotherapy is added to postoperative RT [23, 24]. Temozolomide, an alkylating agent, is now the standard of care in conjunction with postoperative RT for younger, good performance patients with glioblastoma [25, 26]. For frail patients, temozolomide or RT alone may be administered in old age [27].
Bevacizumab, an antiangiogenic agent, can be used for recurrent glioblastoma. Bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan, carmustine or lomustine, carboplatin or temozolomide has also been used in anaplastic gliomas. These combinations may be considered for patients who have failed bevacizumab monotherapy.
Alternating electric field therapy is a type of electromagnetic field therapy using low-intensity electrical fields to treat for recurrent glioblastoma [28].
2.2 Ependymoma
Surgery is the primary treatment for ependymoma. For more aggressive tumors or for tumors that can’t be removed completely with surgery, additional treatments, such as radiation therapy or chemotherapy, may be recommended. Whole brain and spine receive 36 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions, followed by limited field to spine lesions to 45 Gy [29, 30]. For intracranial ependymomas, the primary brain site should receive a total of 54–59.4 Gy in 1.8–2.0 Gy fractions. To reduce toxicity from craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in adults, consider the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or protons if available. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been used as a boost after EBRT or to treat recurrence with some success, although long-term results are still lacking [31]. Research on chemotherapeutic regimens has also centered on pediatric ependymomas, while the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of adult patients remains poorly defined.
2.3 Adult Medulloblastoma and Supratentorial PNET
There is consensus that surgical resection should be the routine initial treatment to establish diagnosis, relieve symptoms, and maximize local control. Complete resection is associated with improved survival. Adjuvant RT following surgery is the current standard of care. The conventional dose is 23.6–36 Gy of CSI and a boost to a total 54–58.8 Gy to the primary brain site with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. The use of post-irradiation chemotherapy to allow RT dose reduction is becoming increasingly common especially for children, but optimal use of adjuvant chemotherapy is still unclear for adult patients [32, 33].
2.4 Primary CNS Lymphomas
Methotrexate is the most effective agent in systemic therapy. It is commonly used in combination with other drugs such as vincristine, procarbazine, cytarabine, rituximab, and ifosfamide, but it may also be administered as monotherapy if toxicity tolerance is a concern [34, 35]. Chemotherapy is usually followed by consolidation RT to maximize response and improve outcome [36]. When used, low-dose whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) should be limited to 23.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions following a complete response (CR) to chemotherapy. For less than CR, consider WBRT to 30–36 Gy followed by a limited field to gross disease to 45 Gy.
2.5 Benign Brain Tumors
2.5.1 Meningiomas
Asymptomatic tumors 30 mm or larger should be surgically resected or observed. If neurologic impairment is imminent, surgery or RT (EBRT or SRS) is feasible. Complete surgical resection may be curative. Both the tumor grade and the extent of resection impact the rate of recurrence. Meningiomas may be treated by fractionated RT with doses of 45–60 Gy. The use of stereotactic RT in the management of meningiomas continues to evolve [37,38,39].
2.5.2 Vestibular Schwannomas
Tumors may be managed with microsurgical resection, SRS to 12–13 Gy, or fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) using either a standard approach (i.e., 45 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction) or a hypofractionated approach (i.e., 20 Gy at 4 Gy per fraction). Local control is more than 90% with all treatment modalities. There are no prospective randomized trials to guide treatment decisions, and multidisciplinary evaluation of each patient is an integral component of appropriate management [40, 41].
2.5.3 Pituitary Tumors and Craniopharyngiomas
Primary therapy is optimized by a multidisciplinary approach. Depending on the endocrine abnormality, tumor size, location, and clinical presentation, management strategies can range from observation to surgery, medical management, radiation therapy, or a combination of these options. The standard surgical approach is transsphenoidal microsurgery. Adjuvant medical and radiation therapy options may be used to manage pituitary adenomas [42]. Gross total resection (GTR) or subtotal resection (STR) followed by EBRT may be used to manage craniopharyngiomas [43].
2.6 Brain Metastases
Advances in surgical technique have rendered upfront resection followed by WBRT, the standard of care for solitary brain metastases [44]. The advent of SRS offered a minimally invasive option as opposed to surgery. Accumulating evidence suggests that low disease volume is a better selection criterion for SRS than a low number of metastatic lesions [45, 46]. Additionally, patients with a favorable histology of the primary tumor (such as breast cancer) or controlled primary tumors can often benefit from SRS regardless of the number of brain metastases present [47].
Historically, WBRT was the mainstay of treatment for metastatic lesions in the brain. For WBRT, doses vary between 20 and 40 Gy delivered in 5–20 fractions. For SRS, maximum marginal doses from 24 to 15 Gy based on tumor volume is recommended.
For patients with limited (1–3) metastatic lesions, aggressive management (surgical resection plus postoperative WBRT and for SRS plus WBRT if only one lesion is involved) should be strongly considered. Other options include SRS alone or SRS following resection [48, 49]. All patients diagnosed with more than three metastatic lesions should be treated with WBRT or SRS as primary therapy. Systemic therapy is rarely used as primary therapy for brain metastases.
3 Radiotherapy Techniques
Radiation leads to DNA damage in irradiated cells, ultimately leading to cell death by apoptosis or necrosis. RT uses high-energy beams, such as X-rays or protons. A conventional form of radiation treatment delivery uses a specific arrangement of X-ray beams designed to conform to the shape of the tumor to maximize tumor dose and minimize normal surrounding tissue dose. Several techniques can help focus the radiation more precisely.
3.1 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D-CRT)
A conventional form of radiation treatment delivery that uses a specific arrangement of X-ray beams designed to conform to the shape of the tumor. This form of treatment is tailored to the patient’s specific anatomy and tumor location. CT and/or MRI scan is often required for treatment planning. Intracranial tumor volumes are best defined using pre- and postoperative imaging, usually enhanced T1 and/or FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery)/T2 (Fig. 9.1) [50, 51].
3.2 Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)
IMRT is a type of 3D-CRT that can more directly target a tumor. In IMRT, the radiation beams are broken up into smaller beams and the intensity of each of these smaller beams can be changed. This means that the more intense beams, or the beams giving more radiation, can be directed only at the tumor (Fig. 9.2) [52, 53].
3.3 Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)
In recent years, the combination of IMRT delivery and optimization methods with arc therapy, VMAT has become an important method for the delivery of conformal therapy. VMAT is a relatively new IMRT method that combines rotational delivery and MLC-based IMRT (Fig. 9.3) [54, 55].
3.4 Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)
A highly precise form of radiation therapy that directs narrow beams of radiation to the tumor from different angles. There are different types of technology used in radiosurgery to deliver radiation to treat brain tumors, such as a Gamma Knife (Fig. 9.4) [56], a cyber knife, [57] or a linear accelerator [58]. In general, there can be many different combinations of technologies used to develop and implement sophisticated conformal therapy. SRS is an established method of ablating brain metastases and AVMs as well as treating certain benign intracranial neoplasms and trigeminal neuralgia.
All these conformal therapy delivery methods are greatly improved by the use of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) techniques to accurately position and set up the patient, using integrated megavoltage or kilovoltage diagnostic imaging, cone beam CT, radiofrequency beacons or radiographic fiducials, and other image-guidance methods.
4 Brachytherapy
The temporary placement of radioactive sources within the body, usually employed to give an extra dose or boost of radiation to the area of the excision site or to any residual tumor [59].
5 Proton Beam
Proton irradiation may offer more localized delivery of radiation than conventional RT, which use photon irradiation. Therefore, it can permit higher radiation doses to the tumor with decreased risk of damage to surrounding tissue; this form of RT may be chosen for tumors with close proximity to important brain structures [60,61,62].
References
Louis D, Ohgaki H, Wiestler O, et al. World Health Organization histological classification of tumors of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–20.
Roberts DW, Strohbehn JW, Hatch JF, et al. A frameless stereotaxic integration of computerized tomographic imaging and the operating microscope. J Neurosurg. 1986;65:545–9.
Mert A, Gan LS, Knosp E, et al. Advanced cranial navigation. Neurosurgery. 2013;72:A43–53.
Mert A, Kiesel B, Wöhrer A, et al. Introduction of a standardized multimodality image protocol for navigation-guided surgery of suspected low-grade gliomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;38:E4.
Black PM, Alexander E III, Martin C, et al. Craniotomy for tumor treatment in an intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging unit. Neurosurgery. 1999;45:423.
Moiyadi AV. Intraoperative ultrasound technology in neuro-oncology practice-current role and future applications. World Neurosurg. 2016;93:81–93.
Minniti G, Goldsmith C, Brada M. Radiotherapy. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;104:215–28.
Nieder C, Berberish W, Schnabel K. Tumor-related prognostic factors for remission of brain metastases after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;39:25–30.
Laperriere N, Zuraw L, Cairncross G. Radiotherapy for newly diagnosed malignant glioma in adults: a systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2004;64:259–73.
Walker MD, Strike TA, Sheline GE. An analysis of dose–effect relationship in the radiotherapy of malignant gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;5:1725–31.
Karim AB, Afra D, Comu P, et al. Randomized trial on the efficacy of radiotherapy for cerebral low-grade glioma in the adult: European Organization for Research Council study BRO4: an interim analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52:316–24.
Shaw EG, Tater SB, Gj L, et al. Current controversies in the radiotherapeutic management of adult low-grade glioma. Semin Oncol. 2004;31:653–8.
Quinn JA, Reardon DA, Friedman AH, et al. Phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with progressive low-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:646–51.
Shaw EG, Wang M, Coons SW, et al. Randomized trial of radiation therapy plus procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine chemotherapy for supratentorial adult low-grade glioma: initial results of RTOG 9802. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3065–70.
Walker MD, Alexander E Jr, Hunt WE, et al. Evaluation of BCNU and/or radiotherapy in the treatment of anaplastic gliomas. A cooperative clinical trial. J Neurosurg. 1978;49:333–43.
Keime-Guibert F, Chinot O, Taillandier L, et al. Radiotherapy for glioblastoma in the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1527–35.
Roa W, Brasher PM, Bauman G, et al. Abbreviated course of radiation therapy in older patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1583–8.
Malmstrom A, Gronberg BH, Morosi C, et al. Temozolomide versus standard 6-week radiotherapy versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients older than 60 years with glioblastoma: the Nordic randomized, phase 3 trail. Lancet Oncol. 2004;13:916–26.
Laperriere NJ, Leung PM, McKenzie S, et al. Randomized study of brachytherapy in the initial management of patients with malignant astrocytoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;41:1005–11.
Souhami L, Seiferheld W, Brachman D, et al. Randomized comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery followed by conventional radiotherapy with carmustine to conventional radiotherapy with carmustine for patients with glioblastoma multiforme: report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 93-05 protocol. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:853–60.
Cairncross G, Wang M, Shaw E, et al. Phase III trial of chemoradiotherapy for anaplastic oligodendroglioma: long-term results of RTOG 9402. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:337–43.
Van den Bent MJ, Brandes AA, Taphoorn MJ, et al. Adjuvant procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine chemotherapy in newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglioma: long-term follow-up of EORTC brain tumor group study 26951. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:344–50.
Stewart LA. Chemotherapy in adult high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 12 randomized trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1011–8.
Fine HA, Dear KB, Loeffler JS, et al. Meta-analysis of radiation therapy with and without adjuvant chemotherapy for malignant gliomas in adults. Cancer. 1993;71:2585–97.
Stupp R, Mason WP, Van den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987–96.
Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomized phase III study: 5 year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:459–66.
Wick W, Platten M, Meisner C, et al. Temozolomide chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone for malignant astrocytoma in the elderly: the NOA-08 randomized, phase 3 trail. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:707–15.
Stupp R, Wong E, Kanner A, et al. Novo TTF-100A versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomized phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:2192–202.
Paulino AC, Wen BC, Buatti JM, et al. Intracranial ependymomas: an analysis of prognostic factors and patterns of failure. Am J Clin Oncol. 2002;25:117–22.
Reni M, Brandes AA, Vavassori V, et al. A multicenter study of the prognosis and treatment of adult brain ependymal tumors. Cancer. 2004;100:1221–9.
Kano H, Niranjan A, Kondziolka D, et al. Outcome predictors for intracranial ependymoma radiosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:279–87.
Chargari C, Feuvret L, Levy A, et al. Reappraisal of clinical outcome in adult medulloblastomas with emphasis on patterns of relaps. Br J Neurosurg. 2010;24:460–7.
Merchant TE, Kun LE, Krasin MJ, et al. Multi-institution prospective trial of reduced-dose craniospinal irradiation (23.4 Gy) followed by conformal posterior fossa (36 Gy) and primary site irradiation (55.8 Gy) and dose-intensive chemotherapy for average-risk medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70:782–7.
Batchelor T, Carson K, O’Neill A, et al. Treatment of primary CNS lymphoma with methotrexate and deferred radiotherapy: a report of NABTT 96-07. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1044–9.
Chamberlain MC, Johnston SK. High-dose methotrexate and rituximab with deferred radiotherapy for newly diagnosed primary B-cell CNS lymphoma. Neuro-Oncology. 2010;12:736–44.
DeAngelis LM, Seiferheld W, Schold SC, et al. Combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 93-10. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:4643–8.
Soyuer S, Chang EL, Selek U, et al. Radiotherapy after surgery for benign cerebral meningioma. Radiother Oncol. 2004;71:85–90.
Aghi MK, Carter BS, Cosgrove GR, et al. Long-term recurrence rates of atypical meningiomas after gross total resection with or without postoperative adjuvant radiation. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:56–60.
Kondziolka D, Mathieu D, Lunsford LD, et al. Radiosurgery as definitive management of intracranial meningiomas. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:53–8; discussion 58–60.
Yang I, Aranda D, Han SJ, et al. Hearing preservation after stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;16(6):742–7.
Anderson BM, Khuntia D, Bentzen SM, et al. Single institution experience treating 104 vestibular schwannomas with fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy or stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurooncol. 2014;116(1):187–93.
Laws ER, Sheehan JP, Sheehan JM, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas: a review of the literature. J Neurooncol. 2004;69:257–72.
Masson-Cote L, Masucci GL, Atenafu EG, et al. Long-term outcomes for adult craniopharyngioma following radiation therapy. Acta Oncol. 2013;52:153–8.
Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of single metastases to the brain: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1998;280:1485–9.
Bhatnagar AK, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC. Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors for patients with four or more intracranial metastases treated with radiosurgery. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2007;6:153–60.
Banfill KE, Bownes PJ, St Clair SE, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastases: impact of cerebral disease burden on survival. Br J Neurosurg. 2012;26:674–8.
Karlsson B, Hanssens P, Wolff R, et al. Thirty years’ experience with Gamma Knife surgery for metastases to the brain. J Neurosurg. 2009;111:449–57.
Mintz AH, Kestle J, Rathbone MP, et al. A randomized trial to assess the efficacy of surgery in addition to radiotherapy in patients with a single cerebral metastasis. Cancer. 1996;78:1470–6.
Andrews DW, Scott CB, Sperduto PW, et al. Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomized trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1665–72.
Fraass BA, McShan DL. 3D treatment planning. I. Overview of a clinical planning system. In: IAD B, van der Giessen FH, van Kleffens HJ, et al., editors. The use of computers in radiation therapy. North Holland: Amsterdam; 1987. p. 273–6.
Webb S. Optimization by simulated annealing of three-dimensional treatment planning for radiation fields defined by a multileaf collimator. Phys Med Biol. 1991;36:1201–26.
Boyer AL, Butler EB, DiPetrillo TA, et al. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Collaborative Working Group. Intensity modulated radiotherapy: current status and issues of interest. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;51:880–914.
Kessler ML, McShan DL, Epelman MA, et al. Costlets. A generalized approach to cost functions for automated optimization of IMRT treatment plans. Optim Eng. 2005;6:421–48.
Shepard DM, Cao D, Afghan MK, et al. An arc-sequencing algorithm for intensity modulated arc therapy. Med Phys. 2007;34:464–70.
Otto K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy. IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys. 2008;35:310–7.
Larson E, Peterson H, Lamoreaux W. Clinical outcomes following salvage Gamma Knife radiosurgery for recurrent glioblastoma. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5:142–8.
Veeravagu A, Jiang B, Patil CG, et al. CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent, metastatic, and residual hemangiopericytomas. J Hematol Oncol. 2011;4(1):1–7.
Lutz W, Winston KR, Maleki N. A system for stereotactic radiosurgery with a linear accelerator. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988;14:373–81.
Tatter S. Recurrent malignant glioma in adults. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2002;3:509–24.
Fuss M, Hug EB, Schaefer RA, et al. Proton radiation therapy (PRT) for pediatric optic pathway gliomas: comparison with 3D planned conventional photons and a standard photon technique. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45(5):1117–26.
Weber DC, Lomax AJ, Rutz HP, et al. Spot-scanning proton radiation therapy for recurrent, residual or untreated intracranial meningiomas. Radiother Oncol. 2004;71(3):251–8.
Habrand JL, Haie-Meder C, Rey A, et al. [Radiotherapy using a combination of photons and protons for locally aggressive intracranial tumors. Preliminary results of protocol CPO 94-C1]. Cancer Radiother 1999;3(6):480–488.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Çetin, İ.A. (2020). Treatment of Brain Tumor. In: Özsunar, Y., Şenol, U. (eds) Atlas of Clinical Cases on Brain Tumor Imaging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23273-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23273-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23272-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23273-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)