Abstract
This chapter reflects on the valuation and value creation processes within the editing of the feature documentary film and practice-based research project, Colours of the Alphabet (2016), directed and co-edited by the author. The film focuses on the global challenge of the lack of mother-tongue education, and tells the story of three Zambian primary one students and their families over their first year at school, as they enter an education system where they must learn in a language that is not their own. The chapter uses the editing process of the film as the basis of a proposal for a two-phase perspective as a means to examine the specificities of the practice of editing within creative documentary filmmaking, particularly in films constructed from observational and interview-based content. It suggests the wider editing process of the film can be separated into, first, an evaluation phase, which focuses on the revision, reduction and selection of content, and, second, a value creation phase where the film is brought to its final form, calling attention to the negotiation of syntax, form and narrative. It argues that these processes delineate documentary film editing, and can also be better understood through the theoretical examination of valuation processes as suggested by the work of anthropologist David Graeber (Towards an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our Own Dreams. New York: Palgrave, 2001) and his proposals for an understanding of concepts of value and valuation, and their interconnectedness, with the evaluative purview of the individuals at their centre. The chapter also leans on the work of film practice scholars, including David MacDougall (Transcultural Cinema. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998), Michael Chanan (Filming the Invisible. In T. Austin & W. De Jong (Eds.), Rethinking Documentary: New Perspectives, New Practices (pp. 121–133). Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Education) and Gideon Koppal (Journal of Media Practice, 8(3): 305–323, 2008), to help illustrate this model through a reflective examination of the editing of the film at its centre, suggesting that this two-phase perspective not only aids understanding of the specificity of editing processes within documentary filmmaking more broadly, but also provides a framework through which documentary film practice students can develop their own editing approaches as they critically engage with their own way of working.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For more information on Colours of the Alphabet see http://www.coloursofthealphabet.com/ or the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/ColoursOfTheAlphabetFilm/.
- 2.
Graeber expands his definition outside the ‘object’ and, through ethnographic examples, such as the performance of Kayapo chiefly chanting, he describes his notions of ‘measures’ and ‘media of value’ (2001: 75).
- 3.
The first external editor who worked on the project was Nick Gibbon, and the second, who brought the film to its final version, was Colin Monie.
- 4.
Because of the students’ development, and atmosphere changes, it was rare that material from outside of the same days of filming was able to be edited together.
- 5.
The opening sequence introduces the linguistic and social context of the film, through some text on screen, including to explain the multicoloured subtitling, as well as the agricultural community setting of Lwimba to the audience.
References
Banks, M. (2001). Visual Methods in Social Research. London: Sage.
Chanan, M. (2008). Filming the Invisible. In T. Austin & W. De Jong (Eds.), Rethinking Documentary: New Perspectives, New Practices (pp. 121–133). Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Education.
Cole, A. (2015). Good Morning, Grade One. Language Ideologies and Multilingualism Within Primary Education in Rural Zambia. Practice Based PhD Thesis, Trans-Disciplinary Documentary Film. The University of Edinburgh.
Cole, A. (2016). Documentary Film as a Research Tool – Exploring Schooling for Modernity in Rural Zambia. In D. Bell & R. Stoneman (Eds.), Mind the Gap! Seachain an Bhearna! Working Papers on Practice Based Doctoral Research in the Creative Arts and Media. Dublin: Distillers Press.
Cole, A., & Higgins, N. (2018). From Doctoral Project to Cinematic Release: A Dialogue on the Impact Pathway of Colours of the Alphabet, Media Practice and Education,19(3), 243–255.
Dant, T. (1996). Fetishism and the Social Value Objects. The Sociological Review, 3, 495–516.
Graeber, D. (2001). Towards an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our Own Dreams. New York: Palgrave.
Kerrigan, S., & McIntyre, P. (2010). The “Creative Treatment of Actuality”: Rationalizing and Reconceptualizing the Notion of Creativity for Documentary Practice. Journal of Media Practice, 11(2), 111–130.
Knudsen, E. (2012). Narrative Strategies. The Nature of Stories and Narratives. In W. De Jong, E. Knudsen, & J. Rothwell (Eds.), Creative Documentary: Theory and Practice (pp. 88–96). Harlow: Pearson.
Koppal, G. (2008). Documentary – The Evocation of a World. Journal of Media Practice, 8(3), 305–323.
MacDougall, D. (1998). Transcultural Cinema. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nelson, R. (2013). Practice as Research in the Arts: Principles, Protocols, Pedagogies, Resistances. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ondaatje, M., & Murch, W. (2002). The Conversations: Walter Murch and the Art of Editing Film. New York: A.A. Knopf.
Quinn, J. (2013). This Much Is True, 14 Directors on Documentary Filmmaking. London: Bloomsbury.
Voloshinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press.
White, H. (1980). The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality. Critical Inquiry, 7(1), 5–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cole, A. (2019). Editing the Observed: Evaluation and Value Creation Processes in the Editing of a Feature Documentary Film. In: Batty, C., Berry, M., Dooley, K., Frankham, B., Kerrigan, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Screen Production. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21744-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21744-0_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21743-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21744-0
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)