Abstract
Western governments and policy-makers generally agree that older people should be included in the discourse on how their welfare needs are met, notwithstanding declining welfare provisions. In this chapter I argue that both the socio-cultural context for older people’s participation in policy development, and the manner in which it is sought, militate against hearing the “authentic” voices of older people. When policy makers fail to meet challenges to the status quo in their knowledge about ageing, policy development continues to occur within dichotomous contradictory frameworks that characterize late life as decline, disease, and decay, or as productive and active. Thus they fail to include diversity in older people’s abilities, resources, needs, desires, and opportunities. When researchers inadequately address the complexities of accessing the voices of older people they fail in their listening.
I begin by commenting on how older people are constructed within the evolving welfare context. I then introduce the idea of “authentic voice” and its links, first to the emergence of critical gerontology, and more recently to “age studies” that incorporate cultural studies, the arts, and humanities. Taking an historical and global perspective I select examples from government policy-making and academic research to illustrate and explore how policy and research frameworks combine to contain and constrain older people’s voices. Finally I discuss the need for policy makers, and researchers to support older people’s agency by revisiting and reintegrating the slippery concept of “authentic voice” in old age.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aronson, J. (1992). Are we really listening? Beyond the official discourse on the needs of older people. Canadian Social Work Review, 9(1), 73–87.
Aronson, J. (1993). Giving consumers a say in policy development: Influencing policy or just being heard? Canadian Public Policy, 19(2), 151–164.
Aronson, J., & Neysmith, S. M. (2001). Manufacturing social exclusion in the home care market. Canadian Public Policy, 27(2), 151–165.
Ayalon, L., & Tesch-Römer, C. (Eds.). (2018). Contemporary perspectives on ageism (International perspectives on aging 19). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8_1.
Baars, J., & Phillipson, C. (2013). Introduction. In J. Baars, J. Dohmen, A. Grenier, & C. Phillipson (Eds.), Ageing, meaning and social structure: Connecting critical and humanistic gerontology. Bristol: Policy Press.
Band-Winterstein, T., Doron, I., & Naim, S. (2012). Elder self neglect: A geriatric syndrome or a life course story? Journal of Aging Studies, 26(2), 109–118.
Beard, R. L., & Williamson, J. B. (2011). Social policy and the internal dynamics of the senior rights movement. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(1), 22–33.
Biggs, S. (1997). Choosing not to be old? Masks, bodies, and identity management in later life. Ageing and Society, 17(5), 553–570.
Bradshaw, J. (1972). The concept of need. New Society, 30, 640–643.
Brown, C. (2017). Creating counter-stories: Critical clinical practice and feminist narrative therapy. In D. Baines (Ed.), Doing anti-oppressive practice: Social justice social work (3rd ed., pp. 212–232). Halifax/Winnipeg: Fernwood.
Bytheway, B., Ward, R., Holland, C., & Peace, S. (2007). The road to an age-inclusive society. In M. Bernard & T. Scharf (Eds.), Critical perspectives on ageing societies (pp. 105–121). Bristol: Policy Press.
Canadian Centre for Elder Law (CCEL). (2013, September). Your words are worth something: Identifying barriers to the well-being of older women. Women’s Dialogue Project Report (Report No. 6). Vancouver: Author.
Chivers, S. (2012). Care culture and creativity: A disability perspective on long-term residential care. In P. Armstrong & S. Braedley (Eds.), Troubling care: Critical perspectives on research and practices (pp. 47–58). Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Cole, T. R. (1993). Preface. In T. R. Cole, W. A. Achenbaum, P. L. Jakobi, & R. Kastenbaum (Eds.), Voices and visions of aging: Toward a critical gerontology (pp. vii–vxi). New York: Springer.
Cox, L. S., Mason, P. A., Bagley, M. C., Steinsaltz, D., Stefanovska, A., Bernjak, A., McClintock, P. V. E., Phillips, A. C., Upton, J., Latimer, J. E., & Davis, T. (2014). Understanding ageing: Biological and social perspectives. In A. Walker (Ed.), The new science of ageing (pp. 25–75). Bristol: Policy Press.
Dillaway, H. E., & Byrnes, M. (2009). Reconsidering successful aging: A call for renewed and expanded academic critiques and conceptualizations. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28(6), 702–722.
Doyle, A. (2007). Introduction: Trust, citizenship and exclusion in the risk society. In The Law Commission of Canada (Ed.), Risk and trust: Including or excluding citizens (pp. 7–22). Black Point: Fernwood.
Ehrenreich, J. (1978). The cultural crisis of modern medicine. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Estes, C. L. (1979). The aging enterprise: A critical examination of social policies and services for the aged. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
Evans, R. G., McGrail, K. M., Morgan, S. M., Barer, M. L., & Hertzman, C. (2001). Apocalypse no: Population aging and the future of health care systems. Canadian Journal on Aging, 20(Supplement 1), 160–191.
Ferrara, A. (1998). Reflective authenticity: Rethinking the project of modernity. London: Routledge.
Foot, D., & Stoffman, D. (1996). Boom, bust and echo: Profiting from the demographic shift in the new millenium. Toronto: Macfarlane, Walter, and Ross.
Formosa, M. (2014). Four decades of the Universities of the third age: Past present and future. Ageing and Society, 34, 42–66.
Foster, L., & Walker, A. (2015). Active and successful aging: A European policy perspective. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 83–90.
Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2005). Contexts of aging: Class, cohort, and community. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2009). The power of silver: Age and identity politics in the 21st century. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 21(3), 277–295.
Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2017). Ageing, corporeality and social divisions in later life. Ageing & Society, 37(8), 1681–1702.
Gubrium, J. F. (1993). Voice and context in a new gerontology. In T. R. Cole, W. A. Achenbaum, P. L. Jakobi, & R. Kastenbaum (Eds.), Voices and visions of aging: Toward a critical gerontology (pp. 46–63). New York: Springer.
Gullette, M. M. (2004). Aged by culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gullette, M. M. (2011). Agewise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gullette, M. M. (2017). Ending ageism or how not to shoot old people. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Hall, F. (2005). Old rage and the issue of mistreatment and neglect of older people. MSW thesis. School of Social Work, Dalhousie University, Canada.
Harbison, J. R. with Coughlan, S., Karabanow, J., VanderPlaat, M., Wildeman, S., & Wexler, E. (2016). Contesting elder abuse and neglect: Ageism, risk, and the rhetoric of rights in the mistreatment of older people. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Higgs, P., & Gilleard, C. (2015). Rethinking old age: Theorizing the fourth age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jumisko, E. (2016). Elderly homecare recipients’ experiences of home care: Client centred or not? In P. Naskali, M. Seppänen, & S. Begum (Eds.), Ageing, wellbeing and climate change in the Arctic: An interdisciplinary analysis (pp. 164–177). New York: Routledge.
Katz, S. (1996). Disciplining old age: The formation of gerontological knowledge. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Katz, S. (2005). Busy bodies: Activity, aging and the management of everyday life. In S. Katz (Ed.), Cultural aging: Life course, lifestyle, and senior worlds (pp. 121–139). Peterborough: Broadview Press.
Katz, S., & Calasanti, T. (2015). Critical perspectives on successful aging: Does it “appeal more than it illuminates”? The Gerontologist, 55(1), 26–33.
Katz, S., & Laliberte-Rudman, D. (2005). Exemplars of retirement: Identity and agency between lifestyle and social movement. In S. Katz (Ed.), Cultural aging: Life course, lifestyle, and senior worlds (pp. 140–160). Peterborough: Broadview Press.
Kaufmann, S. R. (1994). The social construction of frailty: An anthropological perspective. Journal of Aging Studies, 8(1), 45–58.
Kelley-Moore, J. (2010). Disability and aging: The social construction of causality. In D. Dannefer & C. Phillipson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social gerontology (pp. 96–110). London: Sage.
Keskitali-Foley, S., & Naskali, P. (2016). Tracing gender in political ageing strategies and the press in Finnish Lapland. In P. Naskali, M. Seppänen, & S. Begum (Eds.), Ageing, wellbeing and climate change in the Arctic: An interdisciplinary analysis. New York: Routledge.
Kohn, N. A. (2009). Outliving civil rights. Washington University Law Review, 86(5), 1053–1115.
Kohn, N. A. (2012). A civil rights approach to elder law. In I. Doron & A. M. Soden (Eds.), Beyond elder law (pp. 19–34). New York: Springer.
Kvist, J., Fritzell, J., Hvinden, B., & Kangas, O. (2012). Changing social equality: The Nordic welfare model in the 21st century. Bristol: Policy Press.
Laceulle, H. (2017). Ageing and the ethics of authenticity. The Gerontologist, 00(00), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx037. Advance Access publication May 2, 2017.
Laliberte Rudman, D. (2006). Shaping the active, autonomous and responsible modern retiree: An analysis of discursive technologies and their links with neo-liberal political rationality. Ageing & Society, 26(2), 181–201.
Lamb, S. (2014). Permanent personhood or meaningful decline? Toward a critical anthropology of successful aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 29, 41–52.
Lansley, P. (2012). Multi-disciplinarity, user engagement and the design of special programs of ageing research in the United Kingdom. Ageing & Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X12000190.
Laslett, P. (1989). A fresh map of life. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
Lindh, T. (2012). Social investment in the ageing populations of Europe. In N. Morel, B. Palier, & J. Palme (Eds.), Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies and challenges (pp. 261–284). Bristol: Policy Press.
Macey, D. (2001). The penguin dictionary of critical theory. London: Penguin Books.
Martinson and Minkler. (2006). Civic engagement and older adults: A critical perspective. The Gerontologist, 46(3), 318–324.
McDaniel, S. A., & Rozanova, J. (2011). Canada’s aging population (1986) redux. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30(3), 511–521.
McKenzie-Mohr, S., & Lafrance, M. N. (2017). Narrative resistance in social work research and practice: Counter-storying in the pursuit of social justice. Qualitative Social Work, 16(2), 189–205.
Moody, H. R. (1993). Overview: What is critical gerontology and why is it important. In T. R. Cole, W. A. Achenbaum, P. L. Jakobi, & R. Kastenbaum (Eds.), Voices and visions of aging: Toward a critical gerontology (pp. xv–xli). New York: Springer.
Naughton, C., Drennan, J., Lyons, I., & Lafferty, A. (2013). The relationship between older people’s awareness of the term elder abuse and actual experiences of elder abuse. International Psychogeriatrics, 25(8), 1257–1266.
Neysmith, S., & Macadam, M. (1999). Controversial concepts. In S. Neysmith (Ed.), Critical issues for future social work practice with aging persons (pp. 1–26). New York: Columbia University Press.
Owen, T. (2006). Towards a post-Foucauldian sociology of aging. In J. Powell & A. Wahidin (Eds.), Foucault and aging (pp. 183–196). New York: Nova Science.
Phillipson, C. (2013). Ageing. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ploeg, J., Lofeld, & Walsh, C. A. (2013). What is “elder abuse”? Voices from the margin: The views of underrepresented Canadian older adults. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 25(5), 396–424.
Powell, J. L., & Wahidin, A. (2006). Foucault and aging. New York: Nova Science.
Pritchard-Jones, L. (2017). Ageism and autonomy in health care: Explorations through a relational lens. Health Care Analysis, 25(1), 72–89.
Raymond, E., & Grenier, A. (2013). Participation in policy discourse: New form of exclusion for seniors with disabilities. Canadian Journal on Aging, 32(2), 117–129.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging. New York: Pantheon Books.
Rozanova, J., Dosman, D., & de Jong Gierveld, J. (2008). Participation in rural contexts: Community matters. In N. Keating (Ed.), Rural ageing (pp. 75–86). Bristol: The Policy Press.
Tanner, D. (2016). Sustaining the self in the “fourth age”: A case study. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 17(3), 157–167.
Taylor, C. (1991). The malaise of modernity. Concord: House of Anansi Press.
Twigg, J., & Martin, W. (2015). The challenge of cultural gerontology. The Gerontologist, 55(3), 353–359.
Van Dyk, S. (2016). The othering of old age: Insights from postcolonial studies. Journal of Aging Studies, 39, 109–120.
Vera-Sano, P., Barrientos, A., Damodaran, L., Gilhooly, K., Goulding, A., Hennessey, C., et al. (2014). Participation and social connectivity. In A. Walker (Ed.), The new science of ageing (pp. 181–208). Bristol: Policy Press.
Vincent, J. A. (2006). Globalization and critical theory: Political economy of world population issues. In J. Baars, D. Dannefer, C. Phillipson, & A. Walker (Eds.), Aging, globalization and inequality: The new critical gerontology (pp. 245–271). Amityville/New York: Baywood.
Walker, A. (Ed.). (2014). The new science of ageing. Bristol: Policy Press.
Ward, D., & Mullender, A. (1991). Empowerment and oppression: An indissoluble pairing for contemporary social work. Critical Social Policy, 11(32), 21–30.
Woodward, K. (1991). Aging and its discontents: Freud and other fictions. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Ziegler, F., & Scharf, T. (2013). Community-based participatory action research: Opportunities and challenges for critical gerontology. In J. Baars, J. Dohmen, A. Grenier, & C. Phillipson (Eds.), Ageing, meaning and social structure: Connecting critical and humanistic gerontology (pp. 157–179). Bristol: Policy Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harbison, J.R. (2019). Are We Really Listening? Ageism, Voice, and Older People’s Diversity in Nordic Societies Undergoing Welfare Change. In: Naskali, P., Harbison, J., Begum, S. (eds) New Challenges to Ageing in the Rural North. International Perspectives on Aging, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20603-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20603-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20602-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20603-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)