Skip to main content

Methodological Regulations Regarding the Assessment of the Innovation Activity of the Economic System Taking into Consideration the Peculiarities of the Activity of the Innovation Process Entities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Technologies and Innovations in Design for Control of Technological Processes and Objects: Economy and Production (FarEastСon 2018)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 139))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 472 Accesses

Abstract

The need for the innovative development of the national economy and the elimination of the country’s resource dependence has been a priority in recent decades. However, the costs of innovation to ensure national economic leadership do not lead to the desired results; which requires not only special attention from the state, authorities and private business, but also additional research.

The aim of the work is to develop an approach to assessing the level of innovation activity of the economic system, taking into account the activities of the entities in the development of innovation.

During the research, the methods of comparative analysis, theoretical modeling, induction and generalization were used.

The paper identifies three key characteristics of the innovation process that determine the level of innovation activity of the economic system (innovative orientation, effectiveness of innovative activity, innovative susceptibility). At the same time, innovation orientation is viewed as an aggregate of the two categories which reflect the objective and subjective aspects of the innovation process: the system’s capabilities to create innovative ideas and implement plans; the ability of the subjects or entities to create ideas in accordance with the skills and expertise. The effectiveness of innovative activity is treated as an innovation that represents the embodiment of innovative potential in a specific product with the involvement of the resources in the innovation process. Innovative susceptibility of the economic system consists of the readiness of the economic system to disseminate and use the innovations created.

A set of indicators reflecting the level of innovation activity of the economic system, based on the analysis of the activities of entities at different stages of innovation development, has been formed. A scientifically substantiated method is proposed that allows to evaluate the innovation activity of the system through the comparison of the results of the innovation process with the indicators of management accounting. The developed approach can be used while defining the results of efforts on activation of innovative activity in the economy due to the analysis of the development indicators of separate organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Porter, M., Bond, G.C.: Innovative Capacity and Prosperity. The Global Competitiveness Report. Word Economic Forum, Geneva (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook. OECD (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Astafyev, E.V., Astafieva, O.V.: The formation of the industrial direction of development of the national economy to ensure transition to a new technological structure. Reg. Econ. Theory Pract. 5, 109–120 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eskindarov, M.A.: Economic development of Russia requires a new economic model. In: Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, vol. 203, pp. 195–204 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cooke, P.: Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Ind. Corp. Change 10(4), 945–974 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Glazyev, S.Yu.: On the alternative system of state policy measures for the modernization and development of the Russian economy. Russ. Econ. J. 4, 68–86 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Golichenko, O.G.: National Innovation System of Russia: Its Present Condition and the Ways of Development. Science, Moscow, 425 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dosi, G.: Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy 11(3), 147–162 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Freemen, C., Soete, L.: The Economics of Industrial Innovations. MIT Press, Cambridge, 480 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kleiner, G.B.: Evolution of Institutional Systems. Science, Moscow, 343 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kleiner, G.B.: The systemic paradigm and economic policy. Soc. Sci. Mod. 2, 141–149 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kondratiev, N.D.: Problems of Economic Dynamics. Economics, Moscow (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lundvall, B.-A.: National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Anthem Press, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer, J., Rowan, B.: Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am. J. Sociol. 83, 340–363 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Milner, B.Z.: Innovative Development: The Economy, Intellectual Resources. Knowledge Management. INFRA-M, Moscow (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. North, D.C.: Institutions and economic growth: an historical introduction. World Dev. 17(9), 1319–1332 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. North, D.C.: Government and the cost of exchange. J. Econ. Hist. 44, 255–264 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Romer, P.: Endogenous technological change. J. Polit. Econ. 98(5–2), 71–102 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schumpeter, J.: A History of Economic Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York, 1260 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yakovets, Yu.V, Kuzyk, B.N., Kushlin, V.I.: Forecast of the innovative development of Russia for the period until 2030, taking into account world trends. Innovations 1–2, 19–28 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kiseleva, I.A., Tramova, A.M.: Innovative strategy of the development of the industrial complexes as a condition for sustainable economic growth. Reg. Econ. Theory Pract. 1(328), 2–9 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hegerstrand, T.: Diffusion of innovation as a spatial process, Moscow (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. V. Astafieva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Astafieva, O.V., Astafyev, E.V., Osipova, I.A. (2019). Methodological Regulations Regarding the Assessment of the Innovation Activity of the Economic System Taking into Consideration the Peculiarities of the Activity of the Innovation Process Entities. In: Solovev, D. (eds) Smart Technologies and Innovations in Design for Control of Technological Processes and Objects: Economy and Production. FarEastСon 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 139. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18553-4_59

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics