Skip to main content

The Politics of the Personal: The Evolution of Anti-rape Activism From Second-Wave Feminism to #MeToo

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
#MeToo and the Politics of Social Change

Abstract

In this chapter, Loney-Howes traces the historical trajectory between early feminist efforts to highlight the prevalence of sexual violence in the 1970s and the emergence of #MeToo in October 2017. In doing so, she places the #MeToo movement in dialogue with previous forms of anti-rape activism demonstrating the complex relationship between the personal and the political across the history of anti-rape activism. Loney-Howes concludes by reflecting on this tension in relation to some of the institutional responses to #MeToo to discuss the ongoing challenges making the personal political creates for fostering an agenda for social change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this chapter, I use the terms rape and sexual violence interchangeably. I acknowledge that legally rape refers to the very specific act of forced penetration of the vagina or anus, whereas sexual violence refers to a range of behaviours and experiences that are not necessarily penetrative but are nonetheless sexual and equally harmful. The literature describes the “anti-rape movement” as encompassing a broad spectrum of sexually violent experiences (see Bevacqua 2000).

  2. 2.

    Scholars have questioned whether the #MeToo movement meets the criteria of a true social movement (see Rosewarne, this collection). For simplicity, I refer to the ‘#MeToo movement’ throughout this chapter, although I acknowledge that this approach is uncritical and problematic. I also acknowledge that the relationship between ‘feminism’ and #MeToo is highly complex and nuanced—something that I do not specifically address in this chapter.

  3. 3.

    Broadly speaking, ‘rape culture’ refers to social attitudes, policies and laws that normalize and trivialize sexual violence or blame women for their own sexual victimization (see Buchwald, Fletcher, & Roth, 1993).

  4. 4.

    This is a more nuanced argument than that posed by Susan Brownmiller (1975), who famously (and controversially) stated, ‘When men discovered they could rape, they proceeded to do it’.

  5. 5.

    ‘Date rape’ became a popular term in the late 1980s and 1990s following the publication of a study undertaken by Mary Koss and her colleagues (1987) about incidences of sexual assault on college campuses in the United States. Their findings revealed that one in four women had experienced sexual violence and that young men they were on dates with predominantly perpetrated these assaults—hence the term ‘date rape’.

References

  • Alcoff, L. (2018). Rape and resistance. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, C. (1978). Women at W.A.R.: Women against rape London and Bristol. London: Falling Wall Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevacqua, M. (2000). Rape on the public agenda: Feminism and the politics of sexual assault. New England: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevacqua, M. (2008). Reconsidering violence against women: Coalition politics in the anti-rape movement. In S. Gilmore (Ed.), Feminist coalitions: Historical perspectives on second-wave feminism in the United States (pp. 163–177). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (1995). States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchwald, E., Fletcher, P., & Roth, M. (1993). Transforming a rape culture. Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumiller, K. (2008). In an abusive state: How neoliberalism appropriated the feminist movement against sexual violence. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A., & Holmstrom, L. (1974). Rape trauma syndrome. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 131(9), 981–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, N., & Wilson, C. (1974). Rape: The first sourcebook for women by New York Radical Feminists. New York: Plume Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echols, A. (1989). Daring to be bad: Radical feminism in America, 1967–1975. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavey, N. (2009). Fighting rape. In R. Heberle & V. Grace (Eds.), Theorizing sexual violence (pp. 96–124). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R., & Orgad, S. (2018). The shifting terrain of sex and power: From the ‘sexualization of culture’ to #MeToo. Sexualities, online first.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotell, L. (2012). Third wave anti-rape activism on neoliberal terrain: The mobilisation of the Garneau Sisterhood. In E. Sheehy (Ed.), Sexual assault in Canada: Law, legal practice and women’s activism (pp. 243–265). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotell, L. (2015). Reassessing the place of the critique of carceral feminism. In A. Powell, N. Henry, & A. Flynn (Eds.), Rape justice: Beyond the criminal law (pp. 53–71). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heberle, R. (1996). Deconstructive strategies and the movement against sexual violence. Hypatia, 11(4), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, J. (1997). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—From domestic abuse to political terror. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., Mendes, K., & Ringrose, J. (2018). Speaking “unspeakable things”: Documenting digital feminist responses to rape culture. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(1), 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M., Gidycz, C., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(2), 162–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loney-Howes, R. (2018). Shifting the rape script: “coming out” online as a rape victim. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 39(2), 26–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, S. (1992). Fighting bodies, fighting words: A theory and politics of rape prevention. In J. Butler & J. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 385–403). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardorossian, C. (2002). Toward a new feminist theory of rape. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27(3), 743–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, Z. (2014, March 27). Rape culture is real. Time. Retrieved February 15, 2017, from http://time.com/40110/rape-culture-is-real/.

  • Mendes, K. (2015). SlutWalk: Feminism, activism, media. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rentschler, C. (2014). Rape culture and the feminist politics of social media. Girlhood Studies, 7(1), 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roiphe, K. (1993). The morning after: Sex, fear and feminism. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M. (2013). Justice and revenge in online counter-publics: Emerging responses to sexual violence in the age of social media. Crime Media Culture, 9(3), 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serisier, T. (2007). Speaking out against rape: Feminist (her)stories and anti-rape politics. Lilith, 16, 84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serisier, T. (2018). Speaking out: Feminism, rape and narrative politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, N. (1993). Fire with fire: The new female power and how it will change the 21st Century. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Loney-Howes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Loney-Howes, R. (2019). The Politics of the Personal: The Evolution of Anti-rape Activism From Second-Wave Feminism to #MeToo. In: Fileborn, B., Loney-Howes, R. (eds) #MeToo and the Politics of Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15213-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15213-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15212-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15213-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics