Skip to main content

Women’s Land Rights and Agricultural Productivity in Uganda

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Women and Sustainable Human Development

Abstract

This chapter examines the status of women’s land rights and their implications for agricultural productivity in Uganda. The study finds that women had ownership rights over 32% of the surveyed parcels and use rights over 16% of the parcels. It also finds that granting land rights to women enhances productivity, but ownership rights are more important than use rights. Yield was significantly higher on parcels owned by women compared to those where women only had use rights. Therefore, granting use rights alone is not sufficient to promote efficient land use by women, but granting ownership rights can and does enhance yield. These results suggest that there is a need to strengthen female land ownership rights to promote agricultural productivity and reduce poverty. Enhancing women’s land rights is key in achieving the first and fifth sustainable development goals—alleviating poverty and promoting gender equality, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    A parcel is considered to be in freehold and leasehold if the owner has a title. Titling and leasing are still rare in Uganda because of high costs such as surveying and demarcation costs involved in obtaining land a title.

References

  • Agarwal, B. (1994). Gender and Command over Property: A Critical Gap in Economic Analysis and Policy in South Asia. World Development, 22(10), 1455–1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, D. A., Deininger, K., & Ronchi, L. (2015). Costs and Benefits of Land Fragmentation: Evidence from Rwanda. Policy Research Working Paper 7290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. (1995, October). Property Rights and Investment Incentives: Theory and Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Political Economy, 103(5), 903–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, C., & Kobusingye, D. N. (2014). Women’s Land Rights in Northern Uganda (West Nile, Acholi, Lango, Teso and Karamoja). Oxfam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busingye, H. (2002). Customary Land Tenure Reform in Uganda: Lessons for South Africa. International Symposium on Communal Tenure Reform. Johannesburg: Programme for Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K. (2010). Towards Sustainable Systems of Land Administration: Recent Evidence and Challenges for Africa. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 5(1), 205–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., & Ali, D. A. (2008, November). Do Overlapping Land Rights Reduce Agricultural Investment? Evidence from Uganda. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(4), 869–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., Ali, D. A., & Yamano, T. (2008). Legal Knowledge and Economic Development: The Case of Land Rights in Uganda. Land Economics, 84(4), 593–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., & Castagnini, R. (2006, July). Incidence and Impact of Land Conflict in Uganda. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60(3), 321–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., & Jin, S. (2006). Tenure Security and Land-Related Investment: Evidence from Ethiopia. European Economic Review, 50, 1245–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feder, G., & Feeny, D. (1991). Land Tenure and Property Rights: Theory and Implications for Development Policy. World Bank Economic Review, 5(1), 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenske, J. (2011). Land Tenure and Investment Incentives: Evidence from West Africa. Journal of Development Economics, 95, 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M., & Udry, C. (2008, December). The Profits of Power: Land Rights and Agricultural Investment in Ghana. Journal of Political Economy, 116(6), 981–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S. T., & Otsuka, K. (2014). The Roles of Land Tenure Reforms and Land Markets in the Context of Population Growth and Land Use Intensification in Africa. Food Policy. Article in Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.03.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawry, S., Samii, C., Hall, R., Leopold, A., Hornby, D., & Mtero, F. (2017). The Impact of Land Property Rights Interventions on Investment and Agricultural Productivity in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 9(1), 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monchuk, D. C., Deininger, K., & Nagarajan, H. K. (2010). Does Land Fragmentation Reduce Efficiency: Micro Evidence from India. Paper prepared for presentation at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwesigye, F., Matsumoto, T., & Otsuka, K. (2017). Population Pressure, Rural-to-Rural Migration and Evolution of Land Tenure Institutions: The Case of Uganda. Land Use Policy, 65, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochieng, J., Ouma, E., & Birachi, E. (2014). Gender Participation and Decision Making in Crop Management in Great Lakes Region of Central Africa. Gender Technology and Development, 18(3), 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palacios-Lopez, A., Christiaensen, L., & Kilic, T. (2017). How Much of the Labor in African Agriculture Is Provided by Women? Food Policy, 67, 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Place, F. (2009). Land Tenure and Agricultural Productivity in Africa: A Comparative Analysis of the Economics Literature and Recent Policy Strategies and Reforms. World Development, 37(8), 1326–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Place, F., & Otsuka, K. (2002). Land Tenure Systems and Their Impacts on Agricultural Investments and Productivity in Uganda. The Journal of Development Studies, 38(6), 105–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Republic of Uganda. (1998). The Land Act, 1998. Entebbe: Uganda Government Printing and Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of Uganda. (2013). The Uganda National Land Policy. Kampala: Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of Uganda. (2015). Second National Development Plan (NDPII). Kampala: National Planning Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uganda Bureau of Statistics. (2016). National Population and Housing Census 2014—Main Report. Kampala, Uganda.

    Google Scholar 

  • WFP & NPA. (2017). Towards Zero Hunger. A Strategic Review of Sustainable Development Goal 2 in Uganda. Kampala: National Planning Authority.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis Mwesigye .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mwesigye, F., Guloba, M., Barungi, M. (2020). Women’s Land Rights and Agricultural Productivity in Uganda. In: Konte, M., Tirivayi, N. (eds) Women and Sustainable Human Development. Gender, Development and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14935-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics