Abstract
Adorno emphasizes the processual nature of works of art, in contrast to the notions of essences as static formal structures. Essence and context of music can be configured in terms of Adorno’s understanding of dialectical temporality as the interweaving of subjective and objective dimensions of temporality. The central concepts of Adorno’s aesthetics (works of art as processes of becoming, the autonomy and social significance of music, and the fragmentary nature of truth) are at the foundation of Nono’s understanding of the essence of music as an “intervention in the sonic reality of our time” and are aligned with his exploration of musical material transcending the boundaries of tonality and atonality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
This is elaborated in Adorno’s criticism of Stravinsky:
Stravinsky’s music remains a peripheral phenomenon […] because it avoids the dialectical confrontation with the musical progress of time. (Adorno 1973: 187)
- 2.
The libretto is available at Fodazione Archivo Luigi Nono website: http://www.dicoseunpo.it/N_files/Prometeo.pdf [last checked 2 July 2018].
- 3.
Phillips (2009) states that Nono shares Adorno’s thinking on historical consciousness in his lecture, “History and the Present in the Music of Today” (1959).
- 4.
Quoted in Petazzi 2000.
- 5.
Jürgen Vogt’s discussion of Adorno’s interpretation of Schoenberg is illuminating (Vogt 2014).
- 6.
Ce n’est pas avec des idées qu’on fait des vers, c’est avec des mots (Maria Elisabeth Kronegger, Literary Impressionism, Rowman & Littlefield, 1973: 77).
- 7.
I am indebted to Professor Richard Taruskin’s comments on clarifying Adorno’s views on autonomy and social dimensions of art.
- 8.
Jarvis refers to Lukács’ theory of reification (Jarvis 1998: 9).
- 9.
Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 7: 138. Phillips has observed that:
Adorno is […] less skeptical about utopian promise in his aesthetic theory. (Phillips 2009: 169)
- 10.
Bürger has noted that Walter Benjamin upheld this concept of criticism (Bürger 1984: 40, 46). This positive view of the task of criticism is also sustained by Adorno as well as Ernst Bloch in Geist der Utopie (1918).
References
Abbado, Claudio. 1999. My Silent Friend: Remembering Luigi Nono. Contemporary Music Review 18 (1): 3–5.
Adorno, T.W. 1960. Bloch’s Traces: The Philosophy of ‘Kitsch’. New Left Review 12 (May–June): 49–61.
Adorno, T.W. 1967. Prisms. Samuel and Shierry Weber (transl.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Adorno, T.W. 1973. Philosophy of Modern Music. London: Sheed and Ward. Also In Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 12: Philosophie der neuen Musik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1975.
Adorno, T.W. 1974. Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life. (1951), E.F.N. Jephcott (transl.). London: New Left Books, 1974. Also In Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 4. R. Tiedemann et al. (eds.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1970–1986.
Adorno, T.W. 1977. Introduction to the Sociology of Music. E.B. Ashton (transl.). New York: Seabury Press.
Adorno, T.W. 1982. On the Fetish-Character in Music and the Regression of Listening. In The Essential Frankfurt School Reader, A. Arato and E. Gebhardt (eds.), 270–299. New York: Continuum Publishing Company.
Adorno, T.W. 1984. Aesthetic Theory. C. Lenhardt (transl.). London: Routledge.
Adorno, T.W. 1991. The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. London: Routledge.
Adorno, T.W. 1995. On Some Relationships Between Music and Painting. The Musical Quarterly 79 (1): 66–79.
Adorno, T.W. 1998. The Philosophy of Music; Fragments and Texts, R. Tiedemann (ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Adorno, T.W. 2002. Late Style in Beethoven. In Essays on Music, 564–568. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Adorno, Theodor W., Rolf Tiedemann, and Edmund Jephcott. 1998. Beethoven. The Philosophy of Music. Fragments and Texts. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bloch, Ernst. 1986. The Principle of Hope, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bürger, Peter. 1984. Theory of the Avant-Garde. Theory and History Literature, vol. 4. Manchester University Press.
Covell, Grant Chu. 2004. Nono’s Shrug at Immortality: La lontananza nostalgica utopica futura. La Folia Musical Review. http://www.lafolia.com/nonos-shrug-at-immortality-la-lontananza-nostalgica-utopica-futura/. Last checked 4 July 2018.
Deliége, Célestin. 2003. Cinquante ans de modernité musicale: de Darmstadt à l’IRCAM, Contribution historiographique à une musicologie critique. Bruxelles: Editions Mardaga.
Drees, Stefan. 1998. Architektur und Fragment. Studien zu späten Kompositionen Luigi Nonos. Saarbrücken: Pfau-Verlag.
Drees, Stefan. 2001. Liner notes to Luigi Nono—Clemens Merkel/Wolfgang Heiniger—La Lontananza Nostalgica Utopica Futura, CD, Edition Wandelweiser Records, EWR 0102.
Eddins, Stephen. 1988. All Music Review. http://www.allmusic.com/album/luigi-nono-como-una-ola-de-fuerza-y-luz-sofferte-onde-serene-contrappunto-dialettico-alla-mente-mw0001849487. Last checked 4 July 2018.
Feneyrou, Laurent. 1993. Luigi Nono: Prometeo, Tragedia dell’ascolto. Genesis 4: 87–109.
Flamm, Christoph. 1995. Preface. In II canto Sospeso (score), Luigi Nono (ed.), iii–x. London: Eulenburg.
Fondazione Renzo Piano. 1985. Spazio musicale per l’opera prima ‘Prometeo’ [Prometeo Musical Space]. http://www.fondazionerenzopiano.org/en/project/spazio-musicale-per-lopera-prima-prometeo/. Last checked 4 July 2018.
Guerrero, Jeannie Ma. 2006. Serial Intervention in Nono’s Sospeso. Music Theory Online 12 (1). http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.06.12.1/mto.06.12.1.guerrero_frames.html. Last checked 4 July 2018.
Hall, Mirko M. 2010. Dialectical Sonority: Walter Benjamin’s Acoustics of Profane Illumination. Telos 152 (Fall): 83–102.
Hohendahl, Peter Uwe. 2013. The Fleeting Promise of Art: Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory Revisited. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hulat, Owen. 2016. Adorno’s Theory of Philosophical and Aesthetic Truth. New York: Columbia University Press.
Iddon, Martin. 2013. New Music at Darmstadt: Nono, Stockhausen, Cage, and Boulez. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Impett, Jonathan. 2004. The tragedy of listening—Nono, Cacciari, Critical Thought and Compositional Practice. Radical Philosophy 125: 29–36.
Jarvis, Simon. 1998. Adorno: A Critical Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1968. The Monadology. Robert Latta (transl.). Oxford University Press. Mahnkopf, Claus-Steffen. 2015. Kritische Theorie der Musik. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
Mahnkopf, Claus-Steffen (ed.). 2006. Critical Composition Today. Hofheim: Wolke Verlag.
Mahnkopf, Claus-Steffen, F. Cox, and W. Schurig (eds.). 2006. New Music and Aesthetics in the 21st Century, Vol. 5.
Nono, Luigi. 1975. Texte, Studien zu seiner Musik, J. Stenzl (ed.). Zürich: Atlantis.
Nono, Luigi. 1993. Ecrits. L. Feneyrou (transl.). Paris: Christian Bourgois.
Nono, Luigi. 2001. Lo Sviluppo della Tecnica Seriale [The Development of Serial Technique]. In Scritti e Colloqui, 19–42, Luigi Nono, Angela Ida de Benedictis, and Veniero Rizzardi (eds.), Milan: Ricordi.
Nono, Luigi, and M. Cacciari. 1984. Verso Prometeo. Venice: Ricordi.
Paddison, Max. 1997. Adorno’s Aesthetics of Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Petazzi, Paolo. 2000. Luigi Nono e il suono elettronico. 10° Festival di Milano Musica, Teatro, Studio, 9 Oct 2000. http://warszawska-jesien.art.pl/en/wj2012/program/work/429619844. Last checked 4 July 2018.
Phillips, Wesley. 2009. Waiting in Vain? Metaphysics, Modernity and Music in the Work of T.W. Adorno, Martin Heidegger and Luigi Nono. Ph.D. dissertation, Middlesex University.
Piano, Renzo. 1985. Il Prometeo. Daidalos, 1 Sept 1985.
Sallis, Friedemann. 2000. Le paradoxe postmoderne et l’oeuvre tardive de Luigi Nono. Circuit: musiques contemporaines 11 (1): 68–84.
Schulte-Sasse, Jochen. 1984. Foreword: Theory of Modernism Versus Theory of the Avant-Garde. In Theory of the Avant-Garde, vol. 4, vii–xIvii, Peter Bürger (ed.). Theory and History Literature. Manchester University Press.
Stenzl, Jürg. 2013. Werkverzeichnis Bibliographie seiner Schriften und der Sekundärliteratur Diskographie Filmographie Bandarchiv. 3. Auflage Salzburg/Wien 1996.
Vieira de Carvalho, Mário. 1999a. Towards Dialectical Listening: Quotation and Montage in the Work of Luigi Nono. Contemporary Music Review 18 (2): 37–85.
Vieira de Carvalho, Mário. 1999b. New Music Between Search for Identity and Autopoiesis: Or, the ‘Tragedy of Listening’. Theory, Culture & Society 16 (4): 127–135.
Vogt, Jürgen. 2014. Drei Studien: Kants Ekel, Adornos Idiosynkrasie, Nietzsches Ressentiment. Zeitschrift für Kritische Musikpädagogik 29: 1–56.
Wellmer, Albrecht. 1991. The Persistence of Modernity: Essays on Aesthetics, Ethics, and Postmodernism. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Zuidervaart, Lambert. 1991. Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory: The Redemption of Illusion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Höchsmann, H. (2019). Essence and Context: Process of Becoming and Dialectical Temporality in Adorno and Nono. In: Stanevičiūtė, R., Zangwill, N., Povilionienė, R. (eds) Of Essence and Context. Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14471-5_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14471-5_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14470-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14471-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)