Skip to main content

Pip’s Nightmare and Orlick’s Dream

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Victorian Environmental Nightmares
  • 560 Accesses

Abstract

Great Expectations is notable when compared to Dickens’s other late-period novels—especially Little Dorrit and Our Mutual Friend—for how immaterial and non-elemental the London environment appears. The dirt, mud, smoke, and waste that are such salient, memorable aspects of the city in those texts are here ignored, muted, or only glancingly described, as if Pip’s program of self-fashioning depends upon a kind of willed forgetting of the nature of the place in which it is to happen. In this and other ways, Pip attempts to maintain an untenable divide between the London of his expectations and the elemental swamplands of his origins, which he fears define him both as a social being and as an embodied self. In this essay, I discuss the character of Dolge Orlick as Pip’s ecological nightmare. Orlick stands as a kind of return of the ecological repressed, forcing upon Pip’s awareness, through his strange status as both a separate being and another version of himself, the monsters we create when we attempt to deny our own porous and necessary relationship to the living environment. Orlick represents for Pip the terrifying prospect of what the eco-theorist Stacy Aliamo has termed “transcorporeality”—the idea that the individual person is an open, porous system in an ongoing exchange with the material world that surrounds it. Orlick, I argue, both represents in his person the swamp-like elemental condition Pip struggles to deny and threatens him with the prospect of becoming nothing more than those very elements, an undifferentiated part of that landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Works Cited

  • Abram, David. Becoming Animal: An Earthly Cosmology. Random House, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaimo, Stacy. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Indiana UP, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. “The Bildungsroman and Its Significance in the History of Realism.” Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Edited by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, translated by Vern W. McGee. U of Texas P, 2010, pp. 10–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Iain. “Pip and the Monster: The Joys of Bondage.” Studies in English Literature, vol. 28, no. 4, 1988, pp. 625–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. D. Appleton, 1882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, Charles. Great Expectations. Edited by Charlotte Mitchell. Penguin, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, Helena. Ecocriticism and the Idea of Culture: Biology and the Bildungsroman. Routledge, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreilkamp, Ivan. “Dying Like a Dog in Great Expectations.” Victorian Animal Dreams: Representations of Animals in Victorian Literature and Culture, edited by Deborah Morse and Martin Danahay. Ashgate, 2007, pp. 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, Geoffrey. “Style in Fiction Revisited: The Beginning of Great Expectations.Style, vol. 41, no. 2, 2007, pp. 117–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgentaler, Goldie. “Meditating on the Low: A Darwinian Reading of Great Expectations.Studies in English Literature, vol. 38, no. 4, 1998, pp. 707–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parham, John. “Bleak Intra-Actions: Dickens, Turbulence, Material Ecology.” Victorian Writers and the Environment: Ecocritical Perspectives, edited by Laurence W. Mazzeno and Ronald D. Morrison. Routledge, 2017, pp. 114–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, Val. “Prey to a Crocodile.” Aisling Magazine, issue 30, 2002. http://www.aislingmagazine.com/aislingmagazine/articles/TAM30/ValPlumwood.html.

  • ———. Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. Routledge, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacht, Paul. “Dickens and the Uses of Nature.” Victorian Studies, vol. 34, no. 1, 1990, pp. 77–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Edited by Paul Cantor. Cambridge UP, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipley, Tristan. “The Revenge of ‘Swamp Thing’: Wetlands, Industrial Capitalism, and the Ecological Contradiction of Great Expectations.” Journal of Ecocriticism, vol. 3, no. 1, 2011, pp. 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennyson, Alfred Lord. In Memoriam A.H.H. Modern Library, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ghent, Dorothy. “A View from Todgers.” The Sewanee Review, vol. 58, no. 3, 1950, pp. 419–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Joy. Ill Nature: Reflections on Humanity and Other Animals. Lyons Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. Biophilia. Harvard UP, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allen MacDuffie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

MacDuffie, A. (2019). Pip’s Nightmare and Orlick’s Dream. In: Mazzeno, L., Morrison, R. (eds) Victorian Environmental Nightmares. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14042-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics