Skip to main content

The Messy Process of Making Environmental Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
US Environmental Policy in Action

Abstract

This chapter builds upon the frameworks demonstrated in the first two chapters by delving into the process of policymaking in the United States We provide an overview of public policy through an examination of the stages heuristic model as a gateway to understanding how policy is made. Then we review the shortcomings of the stages model in understanding environmental policy, and introduce other policy models (e.g., policy streams model; advocacy coalition framework), along with specific examples of environmental policy to help illustrate how the process of making environmental policy. We use these different models to demonstrate that environmental policy is not often made in the neat, linear fashion many would think; rather, it is a complex process that is often messy, vague, and unpredictable. We update this chapter to include a more robust discussion of policy failure, as it is a particularly salient topic in today’s political landscape. After demonstrating the complexity of the policymaking process, we then consider the challenge of federalism in crafting policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Such a claim, however, is contentious in the realm of environmental regulation as there are countless examples of where environmental goals do not jeopardize economic goals, even though society oftentimes views these aims as mutually exclusive. The use of this debate here is more for example purposes rather than advocacy of one view over another.

Suggested Resources

Readings and Websites

  • Birkland, Thomas A. An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making. New York: Routledge, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, Lois Marie. Love Canal and the Birth of the Environmental Health Movement. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, John W. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. 2nd edition. New York: Longman, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, Michael E., and Scott R. Furlong. Public Policy: Politics, Analysis and Alternatives. 2nd edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinfret, Sara R., Denise Scheberle, and Michelle C. Pautz. Public Policy: A Concise Introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage/CQ Press, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Anne L., and Helen Ingram. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Deborah. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. 3rd edition. New York: W. W. Norton, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

Films or Videos

  • Schoolhouse Rock: America Rock. 1973. American Broadcasting Company. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • War on the EPA. 2017. PBS Frontline. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Anderson, James E. Public Policymaking. 5th edition. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, Thomas A. An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, Thomas A. An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making. New York: Routledge, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • deLeon, Peter. “The Stages Approach to the Policy Process: What Has It Done? Where Is It Going?” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Paul A. Sabatier. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, Liam. “California to Rely on 100% Clean Electricity by 2045 Under Bill Signed by Gov. Jerry Brown.” Los Angeles Times, September 10, 2018. Available at http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-renewable-energy-law-signed-20180910-story.html#.

  • Dunlap, Riley E. “An Enduring Concern.” Public Perspective 13, no. 10–14 (September/October 2002): n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, Dave. “Jerry Brown Is Too Busy with Climate Change to Worry About His Legacy.” Vanity Fair, July 7, 2017. Available at https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/07/jerry-brown-climate-change.

  • Gallup Poll. 2018, March 1–8. Available at http://www.pollingreport.com/enviro.htm.

  • Ganos, Todd. 2011. “Diamond Lanes: Another Failed Energy/Environmental Policy.” Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/toddganos/2011/07/18/diamond-lanes-another-failed-energy-environmental-policy/#7b1e731744c4.

  • Hulse, Carl, and David M. Herszenhorn. “Democrats Call Off Climate Bill Effort.” The New York Times, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, Helen, Anne L. Schneider, and Peter deLeon. “Social Construction and Policy Design.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Paul A. Sabatier, 93–128. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, John W. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. 2nd edition. New York: Longman, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, Michael E., and Scott R. Furlong. Public Policy: Politics, Analysis and Alternatives. 2nd edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles E. “The Science of ‘Muddling Through’.” Public Administration Review 19, no. 2 (Spring 1959): 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael E. The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, Robert T. “The Textbook Policy Process and Implementation Research.” Policy Studies Review 7, no. 1 (Autumn 1987): 142–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. Guy. American Public Policy: Promise and Performance. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, James Lawrence. The Inquisition of Climate Science. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J.L., and Aaron Wildavsky. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; or, Why It’s Amazing That Federal Programs Work at All. Oakland: University of California Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinfret, Sara R., Denise Scheberle, and Michelle C. Pautz. Public Policy: A Concise Introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage/CQ Press, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, Paul A., and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. New York: Routledge, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Anne L., and Helen Ingram. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Deborah. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. Revised edition. New York: W. W. Norton, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. 3rd edition. New York: W. W. Norton, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg, Stephen. “What Sank the Senate’s Climate Bill.” Washington Post, July 29, 2010. A23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, Glen, Byron W. Daynes, and Jonathan P. West. American Politics and the Environment. New York: Longman, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau. “Census Bureau Reports There Are 89,004 Local Governments in the United States.” US Census Bureau, 2012. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/governments/cb12-161.html.

  • US Congress. “Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.” US Environmental Protection Agency. Update/Modified/Accessed Date 2013. https://www.epa.gov/rcra/resource-conservation-and-recovery-act-rcra-overview.

  • US EPA. “Superfund: National Priorities List.” 2018. Accessed April 27, 2018. Available at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/superfund-national-priorities-list-npl.

  • Whitaker, Bill. “The Governor Who’s Castigating the President on Climate Change.” CBS News, December 10, 2017. Available at https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-governor-whos-castigating-the-president-on-climate-change/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara R. Rinfret .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rinfret, S.R., Pautz, M.C. (2019). The Messy Process of Making Environmental Policy. In: US Environmental Policy in Action. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11316-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics