Abstract
This introduction aims to contextualise the Internet of Toys (IoToys) within the tradition of media and communications, set out the theoretical foundations for this volume and explore the notions of mediatization, datafication and robotification. First, it makes the argument that IoToys should be conceived of as media that are triply articulated in children’s everyday lives. Their network connectivity and sensor-based functions provide the basis for the mediatization and datafication of children’s lives. Second, it analyses IoToys as toys that enable forms of hybrid play and embedded play and as social robots that are automated in such a way that they elicit social responses from or interaction with children. Finally, it provides a summary of the chapters of the book.
In accordance with the Italian academic convention, we specify that while the general structure and the conceptual framework of the chapter were designed by the two authors jointly, Giovanna Mascheroni specifically wrote the following sections: The Internet of Toys as Media and The Internet of Toys and the Datafication of Everyday Life; Donell Holloway wrote the sections The Internet of Toys as Toys and The Internet of Toys as Social Robots.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barassi, V. (2017). BabyVeillance? Expecting parents, online surveillance and the cultural specificity of pregnancy apps. Social Media + Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/205630511770718.
Belpaeme, T., Baxter, P., De Greeff, J., Kennedy, J., Read, R., Looije, R., … Zelati, M. C. (2013). Child-robot interaction: Perspectives and challenges. Paper presented at the International Conference on Social Robotics.
boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679.
Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems,42(3–4), 167–175.
Breazeal, C., Harris, P. L., DeSteno, D., Kory Westlund, J. M., Dickens, L., & Jeong, S. (2016). Young children treat robots as informants. Topics in Cognitive Science,8(2), 481–491.
Bunz, M., & Meikle, G. (2018). The internet of things. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Chaudron, S., Di Gioia, R., Gemo, M., Holloway, D., Marsh, J., Mascheroni, G., … Yamada-Rice, D. (2017). Kaleidoscope on the internet of toys—Safety, security, privacy and societal insights. Ispra: Joint Research Centre. Retrieved from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC105061/jrc105061_final_online.pdf.
Connected Toys. (n.d.). Trends. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/tools/future/trends/connectedtoys.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge: Polity.
Coulton, P. (2015). Playful and gameful design for the internet of things. In A. Niholt (Ed.), More playful user interfaces (pp. 151–173). Singapore: Springer.
Crawford, K., & Schultz, J. (2014). Big data and due process: Toward a framework to redress predictive privacy harms. Boston College Law Review,55(1), 93–128.
Cukier, K. N., & Mayer-Schoenberger, V. (2013). The rise of big data how it’s changing the way we think about the world. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2013–04-03/rise-big-data.
Daily, S. B., James, M. T., Cherry, D., Porter, J. J., Darnell, S. S., Isaac, J., & Roy, T. (2017). Affective computing: Historical foundations, current applications, and future trends. In M. Jeon (Ed.), Emotions and affect in human factors and human–computer interaction (pp. 213–231). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Demir, K. A., Caymaz, E., & Elci, M. (2017). Issues in integrating robots into organizations. Paper presented at the The 12th International Scientific Conference “Defence Resources Management in the 21st Century”, Brazov.
Duffy, B. (2004). Robots social embodiment in autonomous mobile robotics. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems,1(3), 17.
Ford, M. (2015). Rise of the robots: Technology and the threat of a jobless future. New York: Basic Books.
Franceschi-Bicchierai, L. (2017, February 27). Internet of things teddy bear leaked 2 million parent and kids message recordings. Motherboard. Retrieved December 22, 2017, from https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/pgwean/internet-of-things-teddy-bear-leaked-2-million-parent-and-kids-message-recordings.
Haddon, L., & Silverstone, R. (2000). Information and communication technologies and everyday life: Individual and social dimensions. In K. Ducatel, J. Webster, & W. Herrman (Eds.), The information society in Europe: Work and life in an age of globalization (pp. 233–258). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Hartmann, M. (2006). The triple articulation of ICTs. Media as technological objects, symbolic environments and individual texts. In T. Berker, M. Hartmann, Y. Punie, & K. Ward (Eds.), Domestication of media and technology (pp. 80–102). Berkshire: Open University Press.
Hinske, S., Langheinrich, M., & Lampe, M. (2008, February 25–27). Towards guidelines for designing augmented toy environments. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. Cape Town, South Africa.
Holloway, D. (in press a). Children’s digital lives: The parent factor. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
Holloway, D. (in press b). The Internet of Toys and Things (IoTTs) for children: Surveillance capitalism and children’s data. Media International Australia.
Holloway, D., & Green, L. (2016). The internet of toys. Communication Research and Practice,2(4), 506–519.
Ihamäki, P., Pori, S., & Heljakka, K. (2018, January 10–12). Smart, skilled and connected in the 21st century: Educational promises of the Internet of Toys (IoToys). Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on Arts and Humanities, Honolulu.
Kahn, P. H., Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., Gill, B. T., … Shen, S. (2012). “Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology,48(2), 303–314.
Leaver, T. (2017). Intimate surveillance: Normalizing parental monitoring and mediation of infants online. Social Media + Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707192.
Lievrouw, L. A., & Livingstone, S. (2006). Introduction to the first edition (2002): The social shaping and consequences of ICTs. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media (pp. 15–32). London: Sage.
Livingstone, S. (2007). On the material and the symbolic: Silverstone’s double articulation of research traditions in new media studies. New Media & Society,9(1), 16–24.
Lyon, D. (2017). Surveillance culture: Engagement, exposure, and ethics in digital modernity. International Journal of Communication,11, 824–842.
Marsh, J. (2017). The internet of toys: A posthuman and multimodal analysis of connected play. Teachers College Record, 119(15). Retrieved December 20, 2017, from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/113557/.
Marsh, J., Mascheroni, G., Carrington, V., Árnadóttir, H., Brito, R., Dias, P., … Trueltzsch-Wijnen, C. (2018). The online and offline digital literacy practices of young children: A review of the literature. Sheffield: COST Action IS1410 DigiLitEY. Retrieved July 17, 2018, from http://digilitey.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WG4-LR-jan-2017.pdf.
McReynolds, E., Hubbard, S., Lau, T., Saraf, A., Cakmak, M., & Roesner, F. (2017, May 6–11). Toys that listen: A study of parents, children, and internet-connected toys. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 5197–5207). Denver, Colorado. Retrieved from https://www.franziroesner.com/pdf/ToysThatListen-CHI2017.pdf.
Paradeda, R., Ferreira, M. J., Martinho, C., Dias, J., & Paiva, A. (2016). A persuasive storyteller robot: Pilot study. Retrieved July 17, 2018, from https://r4l.epfl.ch/files/content/sites/r4l/files/proceedings_hri2017/R4L_HRI_2017_paper_6.pdf.
Payne, M. T., & Steirer, G. (2014). Redesigning game industries studies. Creative Industries Journal,7(1), 67–71.
Rogoff, B. (2008). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In K. Hall, P. Murphy, & J. Solet (Eds.), Pedagogy and practice: Culture and identities (pp. 58–74). London: Sage.
Ruis, E. (2016). The New Ludic City: From hybrid play towards embedded play within urban spaces. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305367984_The_New_Ludic_City_From_hybrid_play_towards_embedded_play_within_urban_spaces.
Serholt, S. (2017). Child-robot interaction in education. Ph.D., University of Gothenburg, Gottenburg.
Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. London: Routledge.
Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E., & Morley, D. (1992). Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In R. Silverstone & E. Hirsch (Eds.), Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic space (pp. 13–28). London: Routledge.
Soltano, E. (2008). How to evaluate what students have learned about cognition. AP® Psychology, 25.
Van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance and Society,12(2), 197–208.
Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology,30(1), 75–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mascheroni, G., Holloway, D. (2019). Introducing the Internet of Toys. In: Mascheroni, G., Holloway, D. (eds) The Internet of Toys. Studies in Childhood and Youth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10898-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10898-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10897-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10898-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)