Skip to main content

Mechanisms, Then and Now: From Metaphysics to Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mechanistic Explanations in Physics and Beyond

Part of the book series: European Studies in Philosophy of Science ((ESPS,volume 11))

Abstract

For many old and new mechanists, Mechanism is both a metaphysical position and a thesis about scientific methodology. In this paper we discuss the relation between the metaphysics of mechanisms and the role of mechanical explanation in the practice of science, by presenting and comparing the key tenets of Old and New Mechanism. First, by focusing on the case of gravity, we show how the metaphysics of Old Mechanism constrained scientific explanation, and discuss Newton’s critique of Old Mechanism. Second, we examine the current mechanistic metaphysics, arguing that it is not warranted by the use of the concept of mechanism in scientific practice, and motivate a thin conception of mechanism (the truly minimal view), according to which mechanisms are causal pathways for a certain effect or phenomenon. Finally, we draw analogies between Newton’s critique of Old Mechanism and our thesis that the metaphysical commitments of New Mechanism are not necessary in order to illuminate scientific practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the purposes of this paper, we ignore issues of mind-body causation and we focus on body-body causation. We also ignore divisions among mechanists concerning the nature of corpuscles, the existence of vacuum etc.

  2. 2.

    In (IV, 204; 1982, 286) Descartes accepts that scientific explanation does not require the truth of the claims about the microconstituents of things. In the next paragraph, however, he argues that his explanations have ‘moral certainty’ (IV, 205; 1982, 286–7).

  3. 3.

    For more on the development of Old Mechanism, see Psillos (2011).

  4. 4.

    These questions concern, for example, the components and boundaries of mechanisms (cf. Kaiser 2018), the metaphysics of causation (cf. Matthews and Tabery 2018), and the mechanistic levels (cf. Povich and Craver 2018).

  5. 5.

    There are various other questions that can be raised concerning TMM: for example, do we take pathways to be types or tokens? Here again, we defer to practice. Causal pathways, qua things in the world that produce an effect, are concrete particulars. But what is described theoretically in the language of theory is a type of causal pathway.

References

  • Bechtel, W., and A. Abrahamsen. 2005. Explanation: A Mechanistic Alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 421–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, R. 1991. Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle, ed. M.A. Stewart. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R.N. 1984. Grene on Mechanism and Reductionism: More Than Just a Side Issue. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984 (2): 345–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Adaptation and Environment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craver, C.F. 2013. Functions and Mechanisms: A Perspectivalist View. In Functions: Selection and Mechanisms, ed. P. Huneman, 133–158. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. 1982. Principles of Philosophy. Trans. V.R. Miller, and R.P. Miller. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. René Descartes: The World and Other Writings, ed. S. Gaukroger. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowe, P. 2000. Physical Causation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garson, J. 2018. Mechanisms, Phenomena, and Functions. In The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy, ed. S. Glennan and P.M. Illari, 104–115. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, D. 2017. Mechanisms in Medicine. Axiomathes 27: 621–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glennan, S. 1996. Mechanisms and The Nature of Causation. Erkenntnis 44: 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation. Philosophy of Science 69: S342–S353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. The New Mechanical Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. 1970. The Principles of Scientific Thinking. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huygens, C. 1997 [1690]. Discourse on the Cause of Gravity. Trans. Karen Bailey. Mimeographed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illari, P.M., and J. Williamson. 2012. What is a Mechanism? Thinking about Mechanisms Across the Sciences. European Journal of Philosophy of Science 2: 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis, S., and S. Psillos. 2017. In Defense of Methodological Mechanism: The Case of Apoptosis. Axiomathes 27: 601–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Mechanisms, Counterfactuals and Laws. In The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy, ed. S. Glennan and P.M. Illari, 144–156. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, M.I. 2018. The Components and Boundaries of Mechanisms. In The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy, ed. S. Glennan and P.M. Illari, 116–130. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhani, S., S. Dilly, and C. Finlayson. 2009. Basic Pathology: An Introduction to the Mechanisms of Disease. 4th ed. London: Hodder Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G.W. 1989. G. W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays, ed. R. Ariew and D. Garber. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machamer, P., L. Darden, and C.F. Craver. 2000. Thinking About Mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 67: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J.L. 1974. The Cement of the Universe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, L.J., and J. Tabery. 2018. Mechanisms and the metaphysics of causation. In The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy, ed. S. Glennan and P.M. Illari, 131–143. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, I. 2004. Philosophical Writings, ed. A. Janiak. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povich, M., and C.F. Craver. 2018. Mechanistic Levels, Reduction and Emergence. In The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy, ed. S. Glennan and P.M. Illari, 185–197. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psillos, S. 2002. Causation and Explanation. Montreal: Acumen & McGill-Queens University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. The Idea of Mechanism. In Causality in the Sciences, ed. P.M. Illari, F. Russo, and J. Williamson, 771–788. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. 1997. Causality and Explanation: A Reply to Two Critiques. Philosophy of Science 64: 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M.D. 1999. Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woodger, J.H. 1929. Biological Principles: A Critical Study. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the AIPS Conference on Mechanistic Explanations, in Dortmund, 27–30 October 2016. We would like to thank the audience for comments and suggestions. Special thanks are due to Brigitte Falkenburg and Gregor Schiemann for their invitation, encouragement and comments. Many thanks to Stuart Glennan for useful comments on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stathis Psillos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Psillos, S., Ioannidis, S. (2019). Mechanisms, Then and Now: From Metaphysics to Practice. In: Falkenburg, B., Schiemann, G. (eds) Mechanistic Explanations in Physics and Beyond. European Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10707-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics