Abstract
“Teleology,” a word invented in 1728 by Christian Wolff, has become a magic formula among those who are interested in Plato, Aristotle, and even the Stoics. Among our contemporaries, “teleology” in fact enables modern physical theories based on mechanical necessity to be opposed to ancient explanations that try to master chance by means of a good and benevolent intellect. The question in this paper will be to determine whether this explanation, which refers above all to Aristotle’s doctrine of causes and more precisely to the final cause, can be found in Plato’s Timaeus.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
On this subject, see Woodfield (1976).
- 3.
For ancient Greek, we have used the following system of transliteration. Greek letters are written in Roman letters according to this system: eta = e; omega = o; zeta = z; theta = th; xi = x; phi = ph; khi = kh; and psi = ps. Iota subscript is written after the letter (e.g., ei and ai if it is an alpha, because in this case a is a long vowel); rough breathings are written as h, and smooth breathings are not noted. All accents are noted.
- 4.
- 5.
Philonenko (1978); reprinted in his Études kantiennes.
- 6.
On this notion, see Brisson (1999b).
- 7.
Brisson (1997).
- 8.
“Fiction” should not be understood in a derogatory sense. The social contract, which Rousseau made the foundation of democracy, is a fiction, but it was at the origin of the French Revolution, and allows the foundations of this political organization to be pointed out.
- 9.
On this important notion in Plato, see Brisson (1996). In a society in which competition reigns, such as ancient Greece, for instance, phthónos is the feeling that urges an individual to maintain a potential competitor, by all available means, in a state of inferiority with regard to him.
- 10.
See Chap. 1 of Brisson (1974).
- 11.
Brisson (2011).
- 12.
Frede (1980).
- 13.
See Timaeus 33a6, as well as 30b4 and 34a8.
- 14.
See Timaeus 30c1, 44c7, and 45b1.
- 15.
An overall grammatical and semantic study confirms these conclusions. Whether we have to do with final circumstantial prepositions introduced by hína (31a8, 38b6, c4, 39d8, 41c3, 61d4, 88b7) or by hópos (30b5, 37b1, 40a3, 73a4, 77e3, 90a1) with the preposition héneka (39d7, 47c5, d1,74a7, 75d6, 76d1, d7) or with formulations such as kharín (33c1, 49b2, 72b7, c2, 75e2) or dià tèn aitían (33a6, 38d7, 40b4), we are in the domain of the intentions of the demiurge. This is supported by the fact that, as Lennox points out, these expressions are lacking in 49–69, which deals with necessity.
- 16.
See Timaeus 53 a7-b7.
- 17.
See Timaeus 68e4-5.
- 18.
See Timaeus 79a6-8.
- 19.
See Brisson (2003) + figures.
- 20.
See Brisson (1999a).
- 21.
- 22.
Betegh (2009).
- 23.
Graham (1991).
- 24.
Brumbaugh (1976).
- 25.
Brisson (2013).
- 26.
Proclus, Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus (29d6-e1) II 355.29 sq. Diehl.
- 27.
As Cooper (1982).
- 28.
As Lennox (1985).
- 29.
- 30.
- 31.
Broadie (2012).
- 32.
At Timaeus 40d5, 90e3, and 92c4, it designates the end of an exposition; at 55a8, the end of the construction of an octahedron; and at 81d4 and e4, the end of life, that is, death. The only “philosophical” usage occurs at 90d5, where the term evokes the goal after which mankind must strive: assimilation to the divinity. Moreover, the formulation dià télous has its usual meaning: “from one end to another” (38c2), “right to the end” (85e4).
- 33.
Broadie (2012, Chap. 1).
- 34.
Broadie (2012, p. 62).
- 35.
Ferrari (2003).
- 36.
Baltes (1996, p. 88).
- 37.
Broadie (2012, Chap. 1).
- 38.
- 39.
- 40.
Cherniss (1994).
- 41.
Cornford (1937).
- 42.
Carone (1994–1995).
- 43.
- 44.
I reacted against this by writing with Meyerstein & Brisson (1991).
References
Baltes, M. (1996). Gégonen (Platon, Tim. 28b7). Ist die Welt real entstanden oder nicht? In K. Algra, P. W. Van der Horst, & D. Runia (Eds.), Polyhistor. Studies in the history of ancient philosophy, presentend to Jaap Mansfeld. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
Betegh, G. (2009). Tale, theology and teleology in the Phaedo. In C. Partenie (Ed.), Plato’s myths (pp. 77–100). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Brisson, L. (1974) Le Même et l’Autre dans la structure ontologique du Timée de Platon. Un commentaire systématique du Timée de Platon. Reprinted Sankt Augustin: Academia, 1998.
Brisson, L. (1996). La notion philosophique de phthónos chez Platon. Reprinted in Lectures de Platon (pp. 219–234). Paris, France: Vrin, 2000.
Brisson, L. (1997). Aristote, Physique IV 2. Reprinted in Lectures de Platon (pp. 99–110). Paris, France: Vrin, 2000.
Brisson, L. (1999a). Plato’s theory of sense perception in the Timaeus. How it works and what it means [1997]. In J. Cleary & G. Gurtler (Eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 13 (pp. 147–176). New York, NY: University Press of America.
Brisson, L. (1999b). Un si long anonymat. In J.-M. Narbonne, & L. Langlois (Eds.), La métaphysique. Son histoire, sa critique, sesenjeux (pp. 37–60) [Actes du Congrès de l’Association des Sociétés de Philosophie de Langue Française, Université Laval-Québec, 18–24 août 1998]. Paris, France: Vrin/Québec, Presses de l’Université Laval.
Brisson, L. (2003). How and why do the building blocks of the universe change constantly in Plato’s Timaeus (51a-61c)? In Plato Physicus. Cosmologia e antropologia nel Timeo, a cura di Carlo Natali e Stefano Maso (pp. 189–204). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Hakkert.
Brisson, L. (2011). La “matière” chez Platon et dans la tradition platonicienne. In Materia. XIII Colloquio Internazionale [Roma, 7-8-9 gennaio 2010], Atti a cura di Delfina Giovannozzi e Marco Veneziani, Firenze, Leo S. Olschki editore (pp. 1–40) [Lessico Intellettuale Europeo].
Brisson, L. (2012). Why is the Timaeus called an eikôs muthos and an eikôs logos? In C. Collobert, P. Destrée, & F. J. Gonzalez (Eds.), Plato and Myth. Studies in the use and status of Platonic myths (pp. 369–391). Boston, MA: Brill.
Brisson, L. (2013). Clement and Cyril of Alexandria: Confronting Platonism with Christianism. In M. Vinzent (Eds.), Studia Patristica. Papers presented at the sixtieth international Conference on Patristic Studies held in Oxford 2011 (Vol. 6, pp. 19–44), Studia patristica 58. Neoplatonism and Patristics. Leuven, Belgium: Peeters.
Broadie, S. (2012). Nature and divinity in Plato’s Timaeus. Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press.
Brumbaugh, R. S. (1976). Plato’s relation to the arts and crafts. In W. H. Werkmeister (Ed.), Facets of Plato’s philosophy (pp. 40–52). Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum [Phronesis, Suppl. II].
Burnyeat, M. F. (2005). Eikos muthos. Rhizai, 2, 143–165.
Carone, G. R. (1994–1995). Teleology and evil in Laws 10. Review of Metaphysics, 48, 275–298.
Chen, C. H. (1961). Plato’s theistic teleology. Anglican Theological. Review, 43, 71–87.
Cherniss, H. F. (1994). Aristotle’s criticism of Plato and the Academy. New York, NY: Russell & Russell Appendix XI.
Cooper, J. M. (1982). Aristotle on natural teleology. In M. Schofield & M. C. Nussbaum (Eds.), Language and logos Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy presented to G.E. L Owen (pp. 197–222). Cambridge, England: Owen.
Cornford, F. M. (1937). Plato’s cosmology. London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Cresswell, M. J. (1971). Plato’s theory of causality. Phaedo 95-106. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 19, 244–249.
Ferrari, F. (2003). Causa paradigmatica e causa efficiente. Il ruolo delle idee nel Timeo. In Plato Physicus. Cosmologia e antropologia nel Timeo, a cura di Carlo Natali e Stefano Maso (pp. 83–96). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Hakkert.
Franklin, L. (2005). ‘Techne’ and teleology in Plato’s Gorgias. Apeiron, 38, 229–255.
Frede, M. (1980). The original notion of cause. In M. Schofield, M. Burnyeat, & J. Barnes (Eds.), Doubt and dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic epistemology (pp. 217–249, esp. 222–223). Oxford, England: Clarendon.
Graham, D. W. (1991). Socrates, the craft analogy, and science. Apeiron, 24, 1–24.
Hackforth, R. (1965). Plato’s theism. In R. E. Allen (Ed.), Studies in Plato’s metaphysics (pp. 439–447). London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Johansen, T. K. (2003). The place of the demiurge in Plato’s teleology. In C. Natali & S. Maso (Eds.), Plato physicus. Cosmologia e antropologia nel Timeo (pp. 83–96). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Hakkert.
Johansen, T. K. (2004). Plato’s natural philosophy. A study of the Timaeus-Critias. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lennox, J. (1985). Plato’s unnatural teleology. In D. J. O’Meara (Ed.), Platonic investigations (pp. 195–218). Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America.
Mackenzie, M. M. (1988). Impasse and explanation: from the Lysis to the Phaedo. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 70, 15–45.
Menn, S. (1995). Plato on God as Nous. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press [The Journal of the History of Philosophy Monograph Series].
Meyerstein, F. W., & Brisson, L. (1991). Inventer l’univers. Le problème de la connaissance et les modèles cosmologiques, Collection “L’âne d’or” 1. Paris, France: Les Belles Lettres. English translation under the title Inventing the Universe, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1995.
Natali, C., & Maso, S. (1999). Antiaristotelismo. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Hakkert.
Natali, C., & Maso, S. (2003). Plato physicus. Cosmologia e Antropologia nel Timeo. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Hakkert.
Natali, C., & Maso, S. (2005). La catena delle cause. Determinismo e antideterminismo nel pensiero antico e in quello contemporaneo. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Hakkert.
Natali, C., & Maso, S. (2010). La scienza e le cause a partire dalla Metafisica di Aristotele, a cura di Francesco Fronterotta. Napoli, Italy: Bibliopolis. [Elenchos: collana di testi e studi sul pensiero antico 54].
Payne, A. (2008). The teleology of the ascent in Plato’s Symposium (210a-212b). Apeiron, 41, 123–146.
Philonenko, A. (1978). L’antinomie du jugement téléologique. In Revue de métaphysique et de morale (p. 82).
Sedley, D. (1989). Teleology and myth in the Phaedo. Boston Area Colloquium, 5, 359–383.
Sedley, D. (2007). Creationism, and its critics in antiquity. London, England: University of California Press.
Sedley, D. N. (2008). Socrates’ place in the history of teleology. Elenchos, 29, 317–334.
Strange, S. K. (1985). The double explanation in the Timaeus. Ancient Philosophy, 5, 25–39.
Wiggins, D. (1986). Teleology and the good in Plato’s Phaedo. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 4, 1–18.
Woodfield, A. (1976). Teleology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brisson, L. (2019). Can One Speak of Teleology In Plato?. In: Pitteloud, L., Keeling, E. (eds) Psychology and Ontology in Plato. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 139. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04654-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04654-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04653-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04654-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)