Abstract
Currently, every public or private institution generates digital information that by legal mandate, social responsibility, cultural and historical value must be preserved in the long term by means of techniques, methods or appropriate models that allow a technical way to have digital information accessible and informationally useful in a near and far future. In the world and in Ecuador there is a legal basis that motivates and demands that this responsibility is fulfilled, as well as several models of digital preservation that could be applicable. This research intends to know the current state of preservation of digital information of public and private institutions of Ecuador, specifically Chimborazo, valued by means of a validated survey of 68 items, applied to 63 public and private institutions, which measures 4 aspects globally accepted and of fundamental compliance, these are: (A) Organizational infrastructure, (B) Administration of digital objects, (C) Infrastructure management and security risks, and (D) Management of aspects of integrity in institutions, aspects that allow a guarantee of an acceptable level of integrity and security of digital information and its correct preservation. After a statistical analysis it is determined that there is a very low percentage of companies that apply some formal method and in the same way a very low compliance with the minimum aspects necessary for an adequate digital preservation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
“Preserving Our Digital Heritage: Plan for the National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program” 2002, p.19.
References
Allinson J (2006) OAIS as a reference model for repositories. An evaluation. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/3464/. Accessed 29 Apr 2018
Ashoire AB (2013) An overview of the use of digital evidence in international criminal courts. In: Salzburg workshop on cyber investigations, Berkeley
CCSD (2012) Reference model for an open archival information system (OAIS) 650.0-M-2. Washington, DC, USA
CCSDS (2012) Reference model for an open archival information system (OAIS) 650.0-M-2. Washington, DC, USA: CCSDS. Obtenido de http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0m2.pdf
Plaza LAC, Guadalupe JMP (2015) Diseño experimental en el desarrollo del conocimiento científico, vol 1. Riobamba, La Caracola Editores, Ecuador
Corral Y (2009) Validez y confiabilidad de los instrumentos de investigación para la recolección de datos. Revista Ciencias De La Educación 19(33):228–247
Ferreira M (2006) Introdução à Preservação Digital: Conceitos, estratégias e actuais consensos. https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/5820/1/livro.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2018
Gladney HM (2009) Critique of Architectures for Long-Term Digital Preservation. HMG Consulting, United Kingdom
Gomez LS (2013) Delitos, prueba y evidencia digital. http://listas.hackcoop.com.ar/archivos/bla/attachments/20131026/b708d60b/attachment.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2018
ISO (2012) Space data and information transfer systems – Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories. ISO 16363:2012
Kotler P (2010) Fundamentos de Marketing. Prentice Hall, Mexico
LeFurgy W (2009) NDIIPP partner perspectives on economic sustainability. Libr Trends, 413–426
Molina F, Rodriguez G (2015) Digital preservation and criminal investigation: a pending subject. In: Molina Granja F, Rodriguez G New contributions in information systems and technologies. Springer, US, pp 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16486-1_30
Molina F, Rodriguez G (2017) Model for digital evidence preservation in criminal research institutions – predeci. Int J Electron Secur Digit Forensics 9(2):150–166
Molina F, Rodriguez G (2017) The preservation of digital evidence and its admissibility in the court. Int J Electron Secur Digit Forensics 9(1):1–18
Morales P (2010) Investigación e innovación educativa. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación 8(2):47–73. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/551/55114080004.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2018
National digital stewardship alliance (2015) National agenda for digital stewardship. The Library of Congress, Washington
Nestor working Group (2009) Catalogue of criteria for trusted digital repositories Version 2. Nestor working Group Trusted Repositories – Certification, Frankfurt
Martinez R (2012) La importancia de la evidencia y el análisis forense digital. Obtenido de http://www.bsecure.com.mx/opinion
Serra Serra J (2001) Gestión de los documentos digitales: estrategias. El profesional de la información, 4(18)
Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Hougthon Mifflin Company, Boston, New York
Térmens M (2009) Investigación y desarrollo en preservación digital: un balance internacional. El profesional de la información 4(8):4–18
Torres Freixinet L (2008) Preservacion Digital, el Reto del Futuro. Actas de las VIII Jornadas de Archivos Aragoneses. Gobierno de Aragón
Unesco (2004) Charter on the preservation of the heritage digital, Paris, France
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Molina-Granja, F. (2019). The Digital Preservation in Chimborazo: A Pending Responsibility. In: Botto-Tobar, M., Barba-Maggi, L., González-Huerta, J., Villacrés-Cevallos, P., S. Gómez, O., Uvidia-Fassler, M. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies of Ecuador (TIC.EC). TICEC 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 884. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02828-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02828-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02827-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02828-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)