Abstract
This chapter examines the questions that PSM face about their continued role and relevance against the backdrop of a fast-changing and increasingly commercialised media landscape. It examines the evidence about news produced by PSM and considers the implications for democracy in two ways. First, it draws on the latest academic scholarship to examine the evidence about whether PSM produce news that is distinctive from their market-driven rivals. Second, it considers how informative PSM coverage is compared to their commercial competitors. The chapter assesses the latest research to establish whether public or commercial media systems offer the most effective way of raising public knowledge about politics and public affairs.
The chapter has previously been published by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) and appears here with their kind permission.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boehlert, E. (2016, November 3). The Media Isn’t for Hilary Clinton: Her Emails Have Been Covered More Than All Policy Proposals. Salon, Salon Media Group. https://www.salon.com/2016/11/03/the-media-isnt-for-hillary-clinton-her-emails-have-been-covered-more-than-all-policy-proposals/.
Bos, L., Kruikemeier, S., & de Vreese, C. (2016). Nation Binding: How Public Service Broadcasting Mitigates Political Selective Exposure. PLoS One,11(5), 1–11.
Curran, J., Iyengar, S., Lund, A. B., & Salovaara-Moring, I. (2009). Media Reporting, Public Knowledge and Democracy: A Comparative Study. European Journal of Communication,24(1), 5–26.
Curran, J. et al. (2012). Media System, Public Knowledge and Political Engagement: An 11-Nation Study. Unpublished material.
Cushion, S. (2012). The Democratic Value of News: Why Public Service Media Matter. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cushion, S. (2015). News and Politics: The Rise of Live and Interpretive News. London: Routledge.
Cushion, S. (2018). Using Public Opinion to Serve Journalistic Narratives: Rethinking Vox Pops and Live Two-way Reporting in Five UK Election Campaigns (2009–2017). European Journal of Communication. Online First.
Cushion, S., & Lewis, J. (2009). ‘Towards a ‘Foxification’ of 24-Hour News Channels in Britain? An Analysis of Market-Driven and Publicly Funded News Coverage. Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism,10(2), 131–153.
Cushion, S., Lewis, J., & Ramsay, G. N. (2012). The Impact of Interventionist Regulation in Reshaping News Agendas: A Comparative Analysis of Public and Commercially Funded Television Journalism. Journalism,13(7), 831–849.
Cushion, S., & Thomas, R. (2018). Reporting Elections: Rethinking the Logic of Campaign Coverage. London: Polity.
Cushion, S., Thomas, R., Kilby, A., Morani, M., & Sambrook, R. (2016). Interpreting the Media Logic Behind Editorial Decisions: Television News Coverage of the 2015 U.K. General Election Campaign. International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(4), 472–489.
de Vreese, C., & Boomgaarden, H. (2006). News, Political Knowledge and Participation: The Differential Effects of News Media Exposure on Political Knowledge and Participation. Acta Politica,41(4), 317–341.
Freedman, D. (2018). “Public Service” and the Journalism Crisis: Is the BBC the Answer? Television and New Media. Online First.
Goidel, K., Gaddie, K., & Ehrl, M. (2017). Watching the News and Support for Democracy: Why Media Systems Matter. Social Science Quarterly,98(3), 836–855.
Humprecht, E., & Esser, F. (2018). Mapping Digital Journalism: Comparing 48 News Websites from Six Countries. Journalism, 19(4), 500–518.
Iyengar, S., Hahn, K. S., Bonfadelli, H., & Marr, M. (2009). “Dark Areas of Ignorance” Revisited: Comparing International Affairs Knowledge in Switzerland and the United States. Communication Research,36(3), 341–358.
Media Coalition Reform. (2018). Draft Proposals for the Future of the BBC. http://www.mediareform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/MRC_flyer_20180312_WEB-1.pdf.
Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J., & Scherr, S. (2016). Hard and Soft News. In C. de Vreese, F. Esser, & D. Hopmann (Eds.), Comparing Political Journalism. London: Routledge.
Strömbäck, J. (2017). Does Public Service TV and the Intensity of the Political Information Environment Matter? Journalism Studies,18(11), 1415–1432.
Sehl, A., Cornia, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2016). Public Service News and Digital Media. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.
Soroka, S., Andrew, B., Aalberg, T., Iyengar, S., Curran, J., Coen, S., et al. (2013). Auntie Knows Best? Public Broadcasters and Current Affairs Knowledge. British Journal of Political Science,43(4), 719–739.
Tyndall, A. (2016). Year in Review. Tyndall Report. http://tyndallreport.com/yearinreview2016/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cushion, S. (2019). PSM Contribution to Democracy: News, Editorial Standards and Informed Citizenship. In: Połońska, E., Beckett, C. (eds) Public Service Broadcasting and Media Systems in Troubled European Democracies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02710-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02710-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02709-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02710-0
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)