Skip to main content

Using MBSE in Satellite Architecture Trade Studies: A Practical Example

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Systems Engineering in Context

Abstract

This paper explores the practical usage of model-based systems engineering (MBSE) to compare the ability of both traditional and CubeSat remote sensing architectures to fulfill a set of mission requirements. Mission requirements originating from a hurricane disaster response scenario are developed to derive a set of system requirements. These system requirements are used to develop notional traditional and CubeSat architecture models. The technical performance of these architectures is analyzed using Systems Toolkit (STK); the results are compared against measures of effectiveness (MOEs) derived from the disaster response scenario. The performance comparison between the traditional and CubeSat architectures is intended to inform future discussions relating to the benefits and limitations of using CubeSats to conduct operational missions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Academy of Sciences. (2016). Achieving science with cubesats: Thinking inside the box. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boshuizen, C. R., Mason, J., Klupar, P., & Spanhake, S. (2014). Results from the planet labs flock constellation. In 28th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites. Reston, VA: AIAA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Konecny, G. (2004). Small satellites - A tool for earth observation? In XXth ISPRS Congress Technical Commission IV (pp. 580–582). Istanbul: International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS).

    Google Scholar 

  4. European Space Agency. (n.d.). CubeSat concept. Retrieved from eoPortal Directory: https://directory.eoportal.org/web/satellite-missions/c-missions/cubesat-concept

  5. Battersby, S. E., Hodgson, M. E., & Wang, J. (2012). Spatial resolution imagery requirements for identifying structure damage in a Hurricane disaster: A cognitive approach. In Photogrammetric engineering & remote sensing (pp. 625–635). Fairfax, VA: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Department of Homeland Security. (2013, February 22). Remote sensing and incident support. 32. Retrieved from www.napsgfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/NAPSG-Remote-Sensing-Webcast-022213.pdf

  7. Womble, J., Ghosh, S., Adams, B. J., & Friedland, C. J. (2006). Advanced damage detection for Hurricane Katrina: Integrating remote sensing and VIEWS field reconnaissance. Buffalo, NY: MCEER.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Delligatti, L. (2014). SysML distilled. London: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Friedenthal, S., Moore, A., & Steiner, R. (2015). A practical guide to SysML (3rd ed.). Waltham, MA: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson, R. E. (2015). A methodology for the optimization of disaggregated space system conceptual designs. PhD Dissertation, Air Force Institute of Technology, Department of Systems Engineering and Management, Wright-Patterson AFB.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaslow, D., Soremuken, G., Hongman, K., & Spangelo, S. (2014). Integrated Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) applied to the simulation of a CubeSat mission. In IEEE Aerospace Conference (pp. 1–14). Big Sky, MT: IEEE Service Center.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cipera, D. (2018). Comparison of traditional versus cubeSat remote sensing: A model-based systems engineering approach. Master’s Thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Department of Systems Engineering and Management, Wright-Patterson AFB.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Evans, H., Lange, J., & Schmitz, J. (2014). The phenomenology of intelligence-focused remote sensing. New York: Riverside Research.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Analytical Graphics Incorporated. (2017, March). Sensor resolution. Retrieved from STK Programming Help: help.agi.com/stk/11.1/#stk/sn-13.htm?Highlight=GSD.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards, D. J. (2016). Exploring the integration of COSYSMO with a model-based systems engineering methodology in early tradespace analytics and decisions. Masters Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Jacques .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cipera, D., Jacques, D., Ford, T. (2019). Using MBSE in Satellite Architecture Trade Studies: A Practical Example. In: Adams, S., Beling, P., Lambert, J., Scherer, W., Fleming, C. (eds) Systems Engineering in Context. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00114-8_43

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics