Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Appareil fléchisseur : rupture sous-cutanée récente des poulies

  • Chapter
La traumatologie des parties molles de la main

Part of the book series: Approche pratique en orthopédie-traumatologie ((APPRPRAT))

  • 533 Accesses

Résumé

La première description avérée des poulies des tendons fléchisseurs des doigts semble revenir à Léonard De Vinci (1452–1529). Vésale, en 1543, en souligne l’importance biomécanique montrant qu’elles permettent de produire une mobilité articulaire par la traction sur les tendons sans création d’une corde d’arc. En 1751, dans l’Encyclopédie de Diderot et d’Alembert, les poulies sont désignées de façon imagée et fonctionnaliste, comme « les ligaments qui retiennent les fléchisseurs des doigts ». Les anatomistes du début du XIXe siècle apportent des descriptions plus fines qui précisent le rôle de ces poulies et s’accordent avec l’anatomie que nous reconnaissons aujourd’hui (1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Moutet F (2003) Les poulies de l’appareil fléchisseur. Anatomie Pathologies Traitement. Chir Main 22: 1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moutet F, Guinard D, Gerard P, Mugnier C (1993) Les ruptures sous-cutanées des poulies des fléchisseurs des doigts longs chez les grimpeurs de haut niveau. Ann Hand Surg 12: 182–188

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Doyle JR, Blythe (1975) The finger flexor tendon sheath and pulleys: anatomy and reconstruction. In: AAOS Symposium on Tendon Surgery in the Hand. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co, p 81–87

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyer MI (2005) Flexor tendon injury. In: Green’s Operative Hand Surgery, Green (ed). Elsevier Churchill Livingstone 5th edition, p. 219–276

    Google Scholar 

  5. Doyle JR (1989) Anatomy of the flexor tendon sheath and pulley system: A current review. J Hand Surg 14A: 349–351

    Google Scholar 

  6. Manske PR, Lesker PA (1983) Palmar aponeurosis pulley. J Hand Surg 8A: 259–263

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen MJ, Kaplan L (1987) Histology and ultrastructure of the human flexor tendon sheath. J Hand Surg 12A: 25–29

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sbernardori MC, Fenu G, Pirino A et al. (2000) Histogenesis and morphology of the flexor tendon pulley system in the human embryonic hand. J Hand Surg 25B: 175–179

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lin GT, Amadio PC, An KN, Cooney WP (1989) Functional anatomy of the human digital flexor pulley system. J Hand Surg 14A: 949–956

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schuind F, Garcia-Elias M, Cooney WP, An KN (1992) Flexor tendon forces: in vivo measurements. J Hand Surg 17A: 291–298

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mitsionis G, Fischer KJ, Bastidas JA et al. (2000) Feasibility of partial A2 and A4 pulley excision: residual pulley strength. J Hand Surg 25B: 90–94

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vigouroux L, Quaine F, Labarre-Vila A, Moutet F (2006) Estimation of finger muscle tendon tensions during specific sport-climbing grip techniques. J Biomechanics 2583–2592

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vigouroux L, Quaine F, Paclet F et al. (2008) Middle and ring fingers are more exposed to pulley rupture than index and little during sport-climbing: A biomechanical explanation. Clinical Biomechanics 23: 562–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bowers WH, Kumza GR, Bynum DK (1994) Closed rupture of finger flexor pulley. J Hand Surg 14A: 782–787

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rousselin B, Le Viet D, Roulot E, Godefroy D (1995) Intérêt du scanner dans les ruptures des poulies digitales chez le grimpeur. J Traumato Sport 12: 7–14

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gabl M, Lener M, Pechlaner S (1996) Rupture or stress injury of the flexor tendon pulley? Early diagnosis with MRI. Handchir Microchir Plast Chir 28: 317–321

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Klauser A, Bodner G, Frauscher F (1999) Finger injuries in extreme rock climbers. Assesment of High-resolution ultrasonography. Am J Sports Med 27: 733–737

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hauger O, Chung CB, Lektrakul N et al. (2000) Pulley system in the fingers: normal anatomy and simulated lesions in cadavers at MR imaging, CT, and US with and without contrast material distension of the tendon sheath. Radiology 217: 201–212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Friol JP (2001) Reconstructions secondaires après lésions traumatiques de l’appareil fléchisseur. In: Alnot JY (ed) Cahier d’Enseignement de la Société Française de Chirurgie de la Main No13. Elsevier Paris p. 71–103

    Google Scholar 

  20. Warme WJ, Brooks D (2000) The effect of circumferential taping on flexor tendon pulley failure in rock climbers. Am J Sports Med 28: 674–678

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Voulliaume D, Forli A, Parzy O, Moutet F (2004) Réparation des ruptures de poulies chez le grimpeur. Chir Main 23: 243–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nishida J, Amadio PC, Bettinger PC, An KN (1998) Flexor tendon pulley intercation after pulley reconstruction: A biomechanical study in a human model in vitro. J Hand Surg 23A: 665–672

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boyes JH (1970) In: Bunnell’s surgery of the hand. 5th ed. JB Lippincott Philadelphia p. 403–404

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kleinert HE, Bennett JB (1978) Digital pulley reconstruction employing always present rim of the previous pulley. J Hand Surg 3A: 297–298

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lister GD (1979) Reconstruction of pulleys employing extensor retinaculum. J Hand Surg 4A: 461–464

    Google Scholar 

  26. Karev A (1984) The «belt loop» technique for the reconstruction of pulleys in the first stage of flexor tendon grafting. J Hand Surg 9A: 923–924

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lin GT, Amadio PC, An KNet al. (1989) Biomechanical analysis of finger pulley reconstruction. J Hand Surg 14B: 278–282

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mugnier C, Moutet F (1992) La main du grimpeur. Ann Kinesither 19: 19–23

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinique de chirurgie réparatrice de la main et des brûlés SOS Main Grenoble, CHU de Grenoble Hôpital A. Michalon, BP 217, 38043, Grenoble Cedex 09

    F. Moutet, D. Corcella, A. Forli & T. Martin des Pallières

  2. Centre de rééducation de la Main, 1, boulevard Clémenceau, 38100, Grenoble

    D. Thomas

Authors
  1. F. Moutet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Corcella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Forli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. Martin des Pallières
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moutet, F., Corcella, D., Forli, A., Martin des Pallières, T., Thomas, D. (2011). Appareil fléchisseur : rupture sous-cutanée récente des poulies. In: La traumatologie des parties molles de la main. Approche pratique en orthopédie-traumatologie. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99068-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99068-7_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-99067-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-99068-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation