Abstract
Personal identification is a field where pathology, anthropology, odontology, and even genetics must merge. Specific features and descriptors (such as scars, moles, gross anomalies) may be sufficient for identification. However, in more complex cases, four main disciplines are involved in the identification of human remains: DNA, fingerprint analysis, odontology, and anthropology (or better yet, osteology). Genetic and fingerprinting methods give a quantitative result, or at least statistics have been performed on the specific traits studied, which allow one to answer in a quantitative manner on the probability of two individuals having similar characteristics in the first case, for the distribution of different alleles within a population, and in the second, for the frequency of minutiae on the finger. Forensic anthropology and odontology methods, which compare the status and shape of teeth and bones, are valid alternative methods. Methods include comparison of dental work, bone, and tooth morphology, in particular frontal sinus patterns, and craniofacial superimposition. They are advantageous methods because faster and less costly; however, they may suffer, in the view of some judges, from the qualitative and nonquantitative responses they give.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kahana, Y., Grande, A., Tancredi, D. M., Penalver, J., Hiss, J. Fingerprinting the deceased: traditional and new techniques. J. Forensic Sci. 46:908–912, 2001.
Bernstein, M. L., Cottone, J. A. Forensic Odontology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2005.
Clarke, D. H. Practical Forensic Odontology. Butterworth-Heinemann, London, 1992.
Acharya, A. B, Taylor, J. A. Are a minimum number of concordant matches needed to establish identity in forensic odontology? J. Forensic Odontostomatol. 21:6–13, 2003.
Kirk, N. J., Wood, R. E., Goldstein M. Skeletal identification using the frontal sinus region: a retrospective study of 39 cases. J. Forensic Sci. 47:318–323, 2002.
Yoshino, M., Miyasaka, S., Sato, H., Seta, S. Classification system of frontal sinus patterns. Can. Soc. Forensic Sci. J. 22:135–146, 1998.
Adams, B. J., Maves, R. C. Radiographic identification using the clavicle of an individual missing from the Vietnam conflict. J. Forensic Sci. 47:369–373, 2002.
Angyal, M., Derczy, K. Personal identification on the basis of antemortem and postmortem radiographs. J. Forensic Sci. 43:1089–1093, 1998.
Brogdon, B. G. Radiological identification of individual remains. In: Brogdon, B. G., ed., Forensic Radiology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1998.
Goodman, N. R., Himmelberger, L. K. Identifying skeletal remains found in a sewer. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 133:1508–1513, 2002.
Kahana, T., Goldin, L., Hiss, J. Personal identification based on radiographic vertebral features. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 23:36–41, 2002.
Kahana, T., Ravioli, J. A., Urroz, C. L., Hiss, J. Radiographic identification of fragmentary human remains from a mass disaster. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 18:40–44, 1997.
Mann, R. W. Use of bone trabeculae to establish positive identification. Forensic Sci. Int. 98:91–99, 1998.
Owsley, D. W., Mann, R. W. Positive personal identity of skeletonized remains using abdominal and pelvic radiographs. J. Forensic Sci. 37:332–336, 1992.
Smith, D. R., Limbird, K. G., Hoffman, J. M. Identification of human skeletal remains by comparison of bony details of the cranium using computerized tomographic (CT) scans. J. Forensic Sci. 47:937–939, 2002.
Sudimack, J. R., Lewis, B. J., Rich, J., Dean, D. E., Fardal, P. M. Identification of decomposed human remains from radiographic comparisons of an unusual foot deformity. J. Forensic Sci. 47:218–220, 2002.
Valenzuela, A. Radiographic comparison of the lumbar spine for positive identification of human remains. A case report. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 18:215–217, 1997.
Dean, D. E., Tatarek, N. E., Rich, J., Brogdon, B. G., Powers, R. H. Human identification from the ankle with pre-and postsurgical radiographs. J. Clin. Forensic Med. 12:5–9, 2005.
Rogers, T. L., Allard, T. T. Expert testimony and positive identification of human remains through cranial suture patterns. J. Forensic Sci. 49:203–207, 2004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cattaneo, C., De Angelis, D., Porta, D., Grandi, M. (2006). Personal Identification of Cadavers and Human Remains. In: Schmitt, A., Cunha, E., Pinheiro, J. (eds) Forensic Anthropology and Medicine. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-099-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-099-7_15
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-824-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-099-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)