Abstract
Plant proteins can be used for the production of a variety of bioproducts, including films and coatings, adhesives, fibres and pharmaceuticals. Proteins derived from plant production systems have many advantages: they are safe, low-cost and rapidly deployable, allow for simple product storage and result in proteins that are properly folded, assembled and post-translationally modified. While plant-derived protein-based products are natural, renewable, biodegradable and environmentally friendly, they tend to be lower in strength and elasticity than their corresponding synthetic products. Current research in this area is focused on overcoming challenges in plant production platforms related to yield, purification, regulatory approval and customer acceptance.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
-
Plant proteins can be used for the production of a variety of bioproducts, including films and coatings, adhesives, fibres and pharmaceuticals.
-
Proteins derived from plant production systems have many advantages: they are safe, low-cost and rapidly deployable, allow for simple product storage and result in proteins that are properly folded, assembled and post-translationally modified.
-
While plant-derived protein-based products are natural, renewable, biodegradable and environmentally friendly, they tend to be lower in strength and elasticity than their corresponding synthetic products.
-
Current research in this area is focused on overcoming challenges in plant production platforms related to yield, purification, regulatory approval and customer acceptance.
9.1 Introduction
The production of protein-based textile fibres, foams for fire extinguishers and plastics started 60–70 years ago (Wormell 1954). Ulrich and Ursula Kölsch, in Essen Germany, assembled a collection of thousands of plastic articles, including items produced from bio-based plastics and composites. The collection includes items that date back to the 1840s, evidence that the manufacture of bio-based materials is not a new phenomenon. In 1855, Francois Charles Lepage patented, in France and England, an extruded plastic composite material manufactured from ebony or rosewood (Dalbergia latifolia) sawdust and diluted egg albumin (Lepage, UK patent No. 2232). This material was compressed in steel moulds under pressure with steam heat to produce a composite material known as bois durci or ‘ hardened wood ’. Different products were made from bois durci, including portrait plaques, plaques for attaching to furniture and pianos, picture and mirror frames, inkstands, pen trays, blotters and letter racks, barometers, belt buckles and brooches, album and book covers, boxes, clocks, dishes, paper weights, statuettes, purses, caskets and other articles.
The first protein bioproduct patent was based on a mammalian source. It was granted to a German chemist, Adolf Spitteler, and his business partner, Ernst Wilhelm Krische, in 1899, for making plastic from milk casein (protein) and formaldehyde. The process for producing the casein semisynthetic plastic was accidently discovered when Spitteler’s cat knocked over a small bottle of formaldehyde one night from the chemist’s counter into the cat’s milk on the floor. The next morning, the chemist found that the cat’s milk had turned into a hard, celluloid-like substance. Spitteler experimented with casein and formaldehyde mixtures and found that casein could be transformed into water-insoluble plastic by letting it sit in formaldehyde for extended periods of time.
His businessman partner, Krische, was the owner of a small book binding and school supplies manufacturing company. He was trying to manufacture washable white writing boards for export to Turkey and was experimenting by coating cardboard with milk curdle, since casein was commonly used as a binding material. In fact, casein has had a long history of nonfood applications. The industrial use of casein goes back to at least 2 centuries BCE in Egypt, where casein was used as an adhesive material for colour pigments in paint manufacturing. Spitteler and Krische found each other and worked together on developing the milk protein plastic. They named it Galalith, a Greek word from gala (milk) and lithos (stone) or milk stone. The other trade names that were used for casein plastic were Aladdinite (in the USA) and Lactoid. In Britain, the trade name Erinoid, derived from the Gaelic word for Ireland, which was the source of most British cheese curds, was used for the milk protein plastics.
When lactic acid is added to skimmed milk, it separates into curds and whey. The curds, after being dried and powdered, can be formed into dough by soaking in water and extruded into rods. When these rods are treated with formaldehyde, they harden into a thermoset plastic . This is a lengthy process, sometimes taking months. One advantage of the casein thermoplastic material is that it is easy to colour.
Casein-based plastics were not utilized in the USA until 1919, and the material had some problems, including moisture absorption, shrinkage after drying, a lengthy and costly manufacturing process and difficulties in disposal of manufacturing waste. In 1929, P.C. Christensen added aluminium stearate to hornlike casein plastic and converted it to a soft plastic for the automotive industry. Worldwide casein production increased from 10,000 tons in 1930 to 30,000 in 1932. In 1937, William S. Murray patented a method for converting the milk sugar in skimmed milk to an aldehyde, thus eliminating the use of formaldehyde in the plastic hardening process and reducing manufacturing waste (Murray and Utica 1937). The main products made from casein in this era were imitation pearl, tortoiseshell and ivory for buttons, belt buckles, knitting needles and jewellery. World War II resulted in a large reduction in the production and use of casein. Today, casein is still used to manufacture buttons and knitting needles.
Soybean was early plant source for protein-based plastics. This crop was domesticated in China between 1500 and 1027 BCE (Hymowitz and Singh 1987). With the development of sea and land routes, the cultivation of soybean spread to the rest of Asia but remained a minor crop between the first and eleventh century AD (Hymowitz 1990). Samuel Brown, an East India Company employee, introduced soybean from India-Pakistan to North America in 1765, where Henry Young planted it in Savannah, Georgia (Hymowitz and Harlan 1983). However, soybean crops were not developed in North America until World War I, when a shortage of vegetable oil made it an alternative source for this purpose (Ralston and Osswald 2008). Today, soybean is one of the most important sources of oil and protein in the modern world. The dry soybean seed contains approximately 40% protein by weight (Liu et al. 2007). The first patent on soybean protein plastic was granted in Europe (France and UK) in 1913 and in the USA in 1916 to a Japanese researcher named Sadakichi Satow. Unfortunately, soy protein plastics had similar drawbacks to casein, including shrinkage, porosity and moisture absorption after drying in formaldehyde.
Manufacturing products from agricultural production was a major interest of Henry Ford, who was the owner of the Ford Company, and the inventor Thomas Edison also became involved in the development of these products. Ford prepared moulded plastics from soybean meal and hardened them with formaldehyde. By 1936, one million Ford vehicles were on the road containing 15 pounds of soymeal plastic parts. However, the auto parts made from this extruded soymeal were moisture-sensitive. Prior to World War II, some progress was made to produce slightly hydrophobic soy-based materials, but the war impaired the opportunity. In any case, these developments in the production of bio-based materials in the 1800s and early 1900s played significant roles in shaping the modern materials industry.
The idea of utilizing renewable, biodegradable and/or edible materials to manufacture industrial goods received significant attention in the 1980s, when the cost of fossil fuel -derived raw materials rose dramatically and people became newly interested in preserving the global environment. New interest evolved in the scientific community to use bio-based technologies in the context of the knowledge and resources available today. Customer willingness, health and environmental concerns and the efficient utilization of agricultural production have been the key driving factors for the re-emergence of protein-based products. Plant proteins from soybean, bean, wheat and corn are now being widely tested for their utility in producing bioproducts. In addition, plant systems, especially tobacco, are being used as platforms for producing proteins from a wide range of species for novel applications, including pharmaceuticals.
9.2 Protein-Based Products
In addition to their importance in human nutrition, proteins are increasingly utilized to produce bioproducts of various sorts, including fibres, films and coatings, adhesives and glues and pharmaceuticals. These protein-based products have a large number of applications in food packaging, pharmaceutical encapsulation, agricultural mulching, novel textile production, medical suturing, protective coating , bonding materials and medicine. In the following sections, the major protein-based bioproducts will be discussed. The major focus, however, will be on the use of proteins from plants.
9.2.1 Films and Coatings
The production of films and coatings is the most studied use of proteins for bioproduct manufacturing. A protein film is an independently produced sheet or membrane formed from a protein isolate and a plasticizer by solvent casting or extrusion methods, which have known physicochemical properties that are suitable for a particular use. Coatings are films formed from proteins directly on the surfaces of objects and provide some separation from the environment. In some cases, these coatings may be edible, especially if they are deposited on food products. For example, edible coatings are applied commercially to citrus fruit, apples and pears to improve gloss and control weight loss.
Protein-based films and coatings are generally manufactured from native proteins dissolved in different solvents, depending on their solubilities (Table 9.1). For example, corn zein, wheat gluten and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) kafirin are soluble only in aqueous ethanol. Soy, peanut, common bean, cottonseed and rice bran proteins are soluble in water and alkaline water. Like all other physical and chemical properties, the solubilities of native proteins also depend on their constituent amino acid residues.
Plant proteins, such as soybean protein and corn zein, need a small quantity of plasticizer to weaken the intra- and inter-peptide cross-linking and attractive forces and to reduce the brittleness and stiffness in the films and coatings. Plasticizers are low molecular weight and low volatility substances that work as spacers to reduce the strength of intermolecular attractive forces and lower the glass transition temperature of amorphous or partially crystalline protein films. Generally, plasticizers increase the molecular flexibility and extensibility but decrease elasticity, mechanical resistance and barrier properties of protein films and coatings (Gounga et al. 2007). Water is the most effective plasticizer in biopolymer materials, enabling them to undergo glass transition at a lower temperature as well as facilitating deformation and processability of the biopolymer matrix (Hernandez-Izquirdo and Krochta 2008). Besides water, common plasticizers for films include monosaccharides, oligosaccharides (sucrose), polyols (glycerol, sorbitol, propylene glycol and polyethylene glycol or polyethylene oxide), lipids (stearic acid) and their derivatives (Table 9.2) (Sothornvit and Krochta 2005). Plasticizer composition, size, shape and ability to attract water are important for the mechanical and barrier properties of protein films (Sothornvit and Krochta 2000).
Glycerol is the most widely used plasticizer in protein films (Cuq et al. 1997; Sothornvit and Krochta 2001; Cho and Rhee 2002). Its high plasticizing effects are attributed to the ease with which the glycerol molecule inserts and positions itself within the three-dimensional protein network (di Gioia and Guilbert 1999). The critical factors for a good protein plasticizer are that it has a low melting point, low volatility and compatibility (Pommet et al. 2005). In addition to these characteristics, the retention of the plasticizer by the film and amount needed should be taken into account when choosing a plasticizer (di Gioia and Guilbert 1999; Sothornvit and Krochta 2001). The relative effects on the mechanical and barrier properties of films can vary a great deal among different plasticizers, tested in different testing conditions (temperature and relative humidity ).
9.2.1.1 Film Preparation Methods
The main ingredients of protein-based films and coatings are proteins, solvents, plasticizers and additives. Native proteins exist as folded structures that need to be unfolded for film and coating formation. Generally, higher temperatures, high pH and water are used to unfold native protein structures. Other ingredients such as plasticizers and additives such as antioxidants, antimicrobials, nutraceuticals, flavours and colourants are also added to film formulations (Han 2003; Suppakul et al. 2003).
9.2.1.2 Physicochemical Properties of Protein-Based Films and Coatings
Protein films have great potential to be used for producing environmentally friendly food and drug packaging (Janjarasskul and Krochta 2010). Films and coatings made from renewable resources, such as plant proteins, could create new uses for agricultural products and byproducts that could protect, extend the shelf life and add value to food and drug products. To provide physical protection, the films require strength and elasticity, and to extend shelf life, they must act as barriers to water, oxygen, oil, aromas and microbes. If they are used as food coatings, they could add value by incorporating antioxidants, antimicrobial agents, nutrients, colours and flavours. In general, protein films have acceptable strength and elasticity and they are good barriers to oxygen, oil and aromas, but they are poor barriers to moisture at high humidity. However, at low to medium humidity, protein films are acceptable water vapour barriers. Generally, the mechanical and barrier properties are evaluated in a laboratory before industrial production .
9.2.1.2.1 Mechanical Properties of the Protein Films
The mechanical properties that are commonly measured for films include their strength, elasticity and plasticity. These measurements are made by clamping the film between the jaws of a tensometer and applying a strain at a fixed linear rate to the sample and measuring the stress. The resulting stress-strain curves can be used to calculate the tensile strength (TS) , elastic modulus (EM) , yield point and break point of the film (Fig. 9.1). Tensile strength and EM are usually expressed in pascals (Pa); one pascal is equal to one newton (1 N) of force applied over one metre squared (1 m2). Strain , which is the geometrical measure of deformation, is expressed in percent elongation (E) and represents the relative displacement between particles in the material body (Jacob 2008). The EM measures the stiffness of the film (Banker 1966). It is calculated by drawing a tangent to the initial linear portion of the stress-strain curve (Fig. 9.1), selecting any point on the tangent curve and dividing the tensile stress by the corresponding strain. Yield strength is the amount of stress at which the film starts to plastically deform. Prior to the yield point, the film deforms elastically and will return to its original shape and size when the stress is released (Dieter et al. 2003). Tensile strength at break point is the amount of force per unit of the original cross-sectional area to pull the film to point where it breaks (Banker 1966). The distance between the yield point and the tensile strength point along the stress-strain curve indicates the degree of plasticity of the film.
To produce films, proteins are initially denatured (Gennadios et al. 1994), which exposes their functional groups and allows them to interact with each other to form three-dimensional intermolecular networks when the temperature returns to ambient (Wang and Damodaran 1991; Subirade et al. 1998). The tensile properties of films are affected by protein composition (Table 9.3), protein concentration, amount of plasticizer , pH, ionic strength and heating temperature (Sze et al. 2007). Attractive forces between proteins in the protein film matrix, including hydrogen bonds between backbone amino and carbonyl groups to stabilize α-helix and β-sheet secondary structures within the proteins and to form links between protein molecules, or with the plasticizer (Choi et al. 2003), van der Waals forces or electrostatic forces among polymer chains (Takashi et al. 2007), ionic interactions or salt linkages or bridges between oppositely charged functional groups of amino acids in protein side chains and disulphide (S – S) bonds within and between different protein chains (Subirade et al. 1998; Sang et al. 2000), allow the development of a film matrix from denatured protein. During the film drying period, water is progressively eliminated, and protein conformations change, including the degree of protein unfolding, which determines the types and numbers of bonds that establish interactions between proteins (Denavi et al. 2009; Mauri and Anon 2006). The cohesion of the film network is a function of all these interactive forces, which determine the properties of the film .
Proteins with different physical properties result in films with different properties (Table 9.4; Wang and Damodaran 1991). For example, higher β-sheet content in the film matrix increases the tensile properties of protein films, and strong protein cross-linking increases film stiffness and strength but decreases the ability of the film to elongate.
9.2.1.2.2 Barrier Properties
Films and coatings can be used to protect the objects they surround from various organic and inorganic materials including moisture, oil and microbes. Sometimes the barrier properties of the protein films and coatings have to meet certain standards in order to be used for particular applications, such as packaging foods or drugs. Generally, protein films are permeable to polar substances, such as water, but less permeable to nonpolar substances such as oxygen, oil, aroma and microorganisms compared to low-density polyethylene films (Lim et al. 1999; Krochta 2002; Table 9.5). The high permeability to polar substances reflects the fact that its two major ingredients, namely, proteins and plasticizers, are generally polar in nature. Nevertheless, protein films manufactured from different proteins have different moisture and oxygen permeabilities (Table 9.5).
Similarly, plasticizer type and concentration also affect film properties. High levels of plasticizer weaken the attractive forces in film networks and dramatically reduce film stiffness but elevate elongation properties (Tables 9.6 and 9.7). Different types and amounts of plasticizers interact differently even within a single polypeptide chain. For example, studies of soy protein films plasticized with glycerol revealed that there were two glass transition temperatures, indicating that the films contained two microdomains that interacted differently with glycerol (Chen and Zhang 2005). The presence of these domains suggests that protein and glycerol are not uniformly compatible across the polymer chains, but there is a preferential linking between protein polymer regions and glycerol molecules. Usually, higher quantities of plasticizers reduce mechanical and barrier properties (Cuq et al. 1997). Extensive research efforts have been focused on modifying the properties of protein-based films to improve their mechanical and barrier properties for industrial applications (Rhim 2004; Rhim and Weller 2000; Rhim et al. 1999, 1998, 2000; Micard et al. 2000; Gennadios et al. 1993, 1998; Ghorpade et al. 1995; Park et al. 1993).
Film age also affects its properties. Over a period of time, protein films can change chemically and/or physically. Chemical changes such as oxidation degrade the protein chains, while glycerol plasticizer has the tendency to migrate to the film surface (Anker et al. 2001) with the passage of time and water in the film also evaporates. These changes reduce the intermolecular spaces between proteins, which facilitate attractive forces to increase cross-linking and make the film harder and also more brittle (Kim et al. 2002).
For commercial applications, it is desirable that protein films meet industry standards set for petroleum-based plastics, particularly polypropylene and low-density polyethylene films. However, generally, protein-based films have lower mechanical and water barrier properties than synthetic plastics. For example, protein-based films have tensile strengths of 2–24 MPa, elongation at break points of 3–210% and water vapour permeabilities of 6–300 g.mm/m2.d.kPa, compared to tensile strengths of 8–38 MPa, elongation at break points of 300–500% and water vapour permeabilities of 0–0.02 g.mm/m2.d.kPa measured for polypropylene and low-density polyethylene (Tables 9.6, 9.8, and 9.9). Protein films, however, have better oxygen barrier properties than synthetic films. For example, protein-based films have oxygen permeabilities of 2–45 cc3.μm/m2.d.kPa, compared to 427–1870 cc3.μm/m2.d.kPa for polyethylene (Tables 9.5 and 9.6).
Although the mechanical properties of protein films are sufficient for a number of industrial applications including food wraps, pouches, medical capsules and bandages (Krochta 2002), research efforts have been focused on modifying protein properties to enable the manufacture of films that have properties that are closer to standard industry mechanical and barrier properties (Rhim 2004; Rhim and Weller 2000; Rhim et al. 1998, 1999, 2000; Micard et al. 2000; Gennadios et al. 1993, 1998; Ghorpade et al. 1995; Park et al. 1993). In order to improve emulsification, gelation, water-holding capacity, foaming and solubility properties of films produced from proteins, various treatments have been used, including acylation, alkylation, phosphorylation, enzymatic modifications and conjugation with polysaccharides (starch) and lipids (Achouri et al. 2005). In addition, various film additives and production modifications have been tested to improve the mechanical and barrier properties of the protein films . These include (1) various plasticizer types and protein/plasticizer concentrations and ratios; (2) various additives such as cysteine, propylene glycol alginate, methylcellulose, bee wax, gossypol, fatty acids, mineral oil and different casting solvents; (3) adjustments in pH and drying conditions; and (4) post-casting film treatments with mild acid and alkali or exposure to UV radiation (Krochta 2002).
9.2.1.3 Protein Film and Coating Applications
Protein films have a wide range of potential applications, including incorporation into food covers, wraps, separation layers, casings, pouches, bags, capsules, microcapsules, labels, trash bags, water-soluble fertilizer and pesticide bags and agricultural mulches. They can be used as coatings for drugs, paper and paper products (such as disposable plates) and disposable laboratory items (such as gloves, gowns and disposable diapers) (Krochta 2002). Soy proteins are very useful for papermaking and paper coatings. Their film-forming characteristics improve the strength and heat resistance of paper, allowing it to be used at higher production speeds in print applications. Their amphoteric nature (possessing both positive and negative charges) and high water-holding capabilities also improve ink receptivity and printability (Brentin 2014).
For some applications, edibility and biodegradability are two important properties. For example, most of the food and drug coatings manufactured from biomaterials are edible, and this property is determined by its formulation, method of manufacture and modification treatments that were used (Krochta 2002). The biodegradability of films by microorganisms in composting environments at the end of their life cycle, by naturally occurring microorganisms into water, carbon dioxide , methane, biomass and mineral residues, is an important attribute of many protein-based bioproducts, as it helps to reduce environmental pollution due to packaging. ASTM International (American Section of the International Association for Testing Materials) standard methods for aerobic compositing (D6400–12) and aerobic biodegradation (D5338) have been developed to measure the biodegradability of materials. In order for a plastic product to be labelled compostable, it must meet the US Standard ASTM D6400 and/or the European Norm EN 13432. Both specifications require that materials be completely biodegraded during composting at a rate similar to other known compostable materials (90% of organic carbon to CO2 within 180 days) and should not leave visual or toxic residue .
Opportunities for utilizing protein films are increasing because of the application of new technologies to improve their mechanical and barrier properties while retaining their biodegradability and edibility. In addition, the food, pharmaceutical and biofuel industries are producing large amounts of protein meals, concentrates and isolates as byproducts, which are available for industrial-scale protein-based product manufacturing. Therefore, this bioindustry is moving from a pilot project stage to a commercial stage. For example, industrial-scale corn zein protein-coated confectionaries, nuts and drug tablets are already on the market ( http://www.zeinproducts.com/zeinapplications.html ), and these films provide a relatively effective water vapour barrier compared to other edible films. Other potential uses of plant proteins include coatings for fresh vegetables, fruits and fried foods (Trezza and Krochta 2002; Shukla and Cheryan 2001). The use of protein coatings decreases water loss, reduces pigment degradation, prevents undesirable pigment development, delays ripening, improves gloss, intensifies peel colouration and reduces oxygen, aroma and oil transfer .
In addition, an interesting property of edible coatings is their ability to incorporate active ingredients that can enhance their functionality, including antimicrobials (such as organic acids, fatty acid esters, polypeptides and plant essential oils, nitrites and sulphites), texture enhancers (such as calcium salts) and nutraceuticals (such as certain fatty acids and vitamins). All of these effects can improve quality, shelf life and safety and reduce postharvest losses and additional packaging costs. Some of the problems and limitations that are associated with these coatings include anaerobic respiration in fruits and vegetables when the coating is too thick and restricts exchange of CO2 and O2, undesirable tastes associated with particular compounds like essential oils and food safety issues such as allergic reactions (Dhall 2013).
9.2.2 Protein Adhesives
Adhesives are nonmetallic liquids or gels that bind the surfaces of materials together and resist separation (https://www.britannica.com/technology/adhesive). Adhesives (or glues) hold objects together through adhesive forces between adhesive materials and the surfaces of materials (called adherents ) and cohesive forces within the glue (Fig. 9.2). The physical and chemical properties of the adhesive, the type of adherents and the nature of the surface pretreatments are important factors in glue performance, in the short and long terms. To make initial molecular contact, adhesives have the ability to wet and spread evenly on the surfaces of the materials one wishes to joint. Once that is achieved, intrinsic attractive forces are generated across interfaces through a number of mechanisms including adsorption (occurs when adhesive molecules are attracted to a specific site on a solid surface through weak van der Waals forces or chemisorption through covalent bonding), mechanical interlocking (occurs when the adhesive flows into pores or solidifies around the projections), interdiffusion (occurs when the adhesive dissolves and diffuses into the substrate material) and electrostatic attractions (occur when electrons are transferred across the interface, thus creating positive and negative charges that attract one another). Generally, several mechanisms contribute to the performance of adhesives with various types of adherents .
In the formation of an adhesive joint, a transitional region arises in the interface between the joint surface and adhesive. In this transitional region, the chemical and physical properties of the adhesive may be considerably different from those in the noncontact portions or cohesive region (Fig. 9.2). It is generally believed that the interphase composition controls the durability and strength of an adhesive joint and is primarily responsible for the transference of stress from one surface to the other. This transitional region is frequently the site of environmental attack, leading to joint failure (Encyclopaedia Britannica).
Adhesives are used in every sphere of human life, including aerospace, automotive, electronics, construction, furniture construction, carpet manufacturing, musical instrument building, packaging, plywood manufacturing and agriculture. In 1998, the share of natural adhesives was 0.03% of the total North American wood industry (Seller 2001). In Canada, about 80% of adhesives and sealants are used in industrial applications including packaging, automotive, construction and the furniture industry and the remainder by individual consumers for home maintenance and renovation.
Adhesives are formulated by mixing base materials such as proteins, starch and lignin with fillers, pigments, stabilizers, plasticizers and other additives to yield products with desirable characteristics. Adhesives may be synthetic or natural, depending on their base materials. Many synthetic adhesives are formaldehyde-based resins derived from petrochemicals including phenol formaldehyde and urea formaldehyde resins. Although synthetic adhesives have high-performing characteristics, including excellent bond strength, environmental resistance and durability, their base chemical, formaldehyde, is a human carcinogen (International Agency for Research on Cancer, https://www.iarc.fr), and they are derived from nonrenewable resources. Alternatively, natural adhesives are thus being developed to replace these formaldehyde-based adhesives currently on the market because of these concerns.
Natural adhesives and sealants are derived from natural biopolymers obtained from plants, animals and microbes (Lambuth 2003; Imam et al. 2013). Proteins have been used to formulate commercial adhesives, and sealants, for many years, but initially, animal proteins were used for glues. Protein adhesives are used in antique furniture and old religious texts. These adhesives have excellent flexibility and non-warp characteristics, as well as permanent and tenacious adhesion. They are water-soluble, easy to clean up, nontoxic, eco-friendly, biodegradable, recyclable and repulpable. Protein adhesives have some limitations, however, such as a lack of specific adhesion on coatings and nonporous surfaces and sensitivity to temperature and humidity changes. The use of plant proteins as adhesives is more recent with soy protein-based adhesives widely used between 1930 and 1960. However, they were completely replaced thereafter by cheaper and stronger synthetic adhesives.
Today, soy protein alone, or in combination with animal proteins such as casein, gelatin and blood proteins, is used to produce adhesives that are widely used as glues in paper, book binding, packaging, furniture and wood industries (Frihart 2009; Lambuth 2003). Generally, protein adhesives have sufficient strength in dry conditions but are susceptible to moisture and mould (Lambuth 2003). The nature of the protein determines the formulation, mixing and application of the adhesive. The manufacturing steps, however, are common and include grinding dry protein extracts to glue particle sizes (typically with surface areas between 3000 and 6000 cm2 per gram), sufficiently dispersing the ground proteins in alkaline water for maximum binding efficiency and addition of fungicide (such as sodium orthophenylphenate, sodium pentachlorophenate, copper-8-quinolinate or copper naphthenate) to prevent mould.
Adhesive durability has been a problem for protein glues. Several protein modifications including physical, chemical and enzymatic treatment are used to enhance the functional properties of protein adhesives such as bonding strengths and environmental and moisture resistance. Treatment of proteins with organic or inorganic alkali, such as sodium hydroxide or trisodium phosphate, breaks the internal hydrogen bonds of protein molecules, unfolds the protein structure and exposes the polar functional groups of the amino acid residues for adhesion to binding surfaces such as wood (Brother et al. 1940; Lambuth 2003). The combination of alkali treatment and mild heating of the protein in deionized water breaks the inter- and intramolecular protein hydrogen and disulphide bonds and unfolds the protein structure to improve the adhesive and viscosity and hydrophobic properties of the glues (Graham and Krinski 1983). For example, soy protein heated at 50 °C and a pH of 10.0 improved adhesive strength by 118% and the hydrophobic properties of soy protein glues by 92% (Hettiarachchy et al. 1995). The amount of alkali in the protein adhesives depends on the usage in the final product. For example, high-alkali (Table 9.10) soy protein adhesives prevent glue swelling, maintain glue viscosity and improve moisture resistance by forming insoluble proteinates (Laucks and Davidson 1928). However, it also burns wood cellulose and causes reddish-brown stains on wood surfaces (Truax 1929). On the other hand, low-alkali soy protein adhesives are less dispersive and have lower bonding strengths. This makes them good for paper and softboard lamination, but not for structural usage such as sheathing plywood (Sheeran 1957; Lambuth 2003). Furthermore, salt treatment of disulphide bond-containing proteins, such as soy protein, results in cleavage of the disulphide bonds and unfolded protein structures, which improves the viscosity of glues without reducing adhesive strengths and water resistance at certain concentrations. High concentrations of salts, however, reduce viscosity, adhesive strengths and water resistance (Kalapathy et al. 1996).
The addition of chemicals such as urea, guanidine hydrochloride, sodium dodecyl sulphate, maleic anhydride, polyethylenimine and polyamidoamine-epichlorohydrin, which react with the carboxylic acid and amino groups in proteins, results in cross-linking of protein molecules and the formation of three-dimensional networks. These networks improve the adhesive and moisture resistance properties of protein-based glues. For example, soy protein modified with urea and guanidine hydrochloride increases the average shear strengths in walnut (Juglans spp.), cherry (Prunus spp.) and pine plywoods by 34 and 37%, respectively. In addition, both urea and guanidine hydrochloride-modified soy protein exhibited 100% moisture resistance. These chemicals are known to increase the production of secondary structures in globular proteins, which may be responsible for enhancing adhesive strength and also expose hydrophobic amino acids, which might enhance water resistance (Huang and Sun 2000). Furthermore, the addition of polyamidoamine-epichlorohydrin to maleic anhydride-grafted soy protein isolates improves the adhesive properties of glues to such an extent that they exceed those of commercial phenol formaldehyde glues (Liu and Li 2007).
Enzymatic hydrolysis of soy protein with proteases such as trypsin is another method for improving its adhesive properties. Glue strength increases of 58–119% have been observed with these treatments (Kalapathy et al. 1995; Hettiarachchy et al. 1995). Other soy protein modifying enzymes, including urease, pepsin and transglutaminase, also improve the adhesive and water resistance properties of soy protein glues (Thames et al. 2010; Imam et al. 2013).
Marine mussel adhesive proteins allow the adhesion of objects in seawater (Waite 1987) and contain a substantial quantity of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA). DOPA incorporated into synthetic polypeptides mimics marine adhesives and plays an important role in moisture-resistant adhesion (Liu and Li 2002; Yu and Deming 1998). Above and beyond its effectiveness on wet surfaces, this adhesive protein has several other advantages, such as strong adhesive strengths and resistance to biological degradation. However, marine adhesive proteins are difficult to produce at reasonable costs. For example, DOPA content in soy proteins can be increased through genetic engineering, and dopamine-grafted (Fig. 9.3) soy protein showed significant increases in adhesive strengths and water resistance in wood glues (Liu and Li 2002).
Blending together different proteins is another way to enhance the functional properties of glues. For example, soybean proteins have good adhesive properties but weak water resistance, while casein proteins have good water resistance but poor adhesion. A blend of these proteins results in an adhesive with better properties than those derived from the either single protein. However, for this approach to be successful, the proteins in the mixture must be compatible and have similar processing requirements to convert them into glues. Soy-blood and soy-casein blends have successfully been used in interior plywood and softwood manufacturing during the 1930s to 1960s and again during the oil embargo in 1973. Generally, a soy-casein mixture provides an excellent adhesive for softwood and millwork assembly (Lambuth 2003).
9.2.3 Protein Fibre
Fibres have extensive uses in textile and clothing manufacture; they are used for protection and have medicinal and aesthetic applications. A fibre is a continuous filament or discrete, elongated, piece of material. The word ‘fibre’ comes from the Latin word fibra or fillum, meaning thread. Fibres can have micro (10−6 m) or 10−9 nano- (10−9 m) diameters and almost limitless lengths (Castano et al. 2012).
Synthetic fibres are made from petroleum-derived plastics, such as polyester, nylon and rayon. Plants produce natural fibres such as cotton and bast fibres (e.g. derived from flax, hemp, jute [Corchorus spp.], ramie [Boehmeria nivea], kenaf [Hibiscus cannabinus] and abaca [Musa textilis]), and fibres can also be synthesized from natural sources such as alginate (a natural polymer that exists widely in many species of brown seaweed.), cellulose (to produce lyocell fibres from cellulose), polylactic acid (from sugars extracted from crops like corn and sugar beet), polyhydroxyalkanoate (from bacterial sources) and protein. Natural fibres are generally biodegradable; they are mostly hydrophilic and made up of short, flexible chains with low levels of crystallization. They often have chain backbones with oxygen or nitrogen links and/or pendant groups containing oxygen or nitrogen atoms. Biodegradable fibres are suitable for all applications, including knitwear, intimate apparel, shirts, trousers, dress material, bath linen, floor coverings, bed linens, furnishing and industrial yarns. Biodegradable fibres impart colour brilliance to fabrics and garments, which remain bright and true even after repeated washes. The fibres often give fabrics a soft and bouncy feel.
Wool and silk are two natural protein fibres that have been used for centuries in textile manufacturing. These natural protein fibres are made from filamentous animal proteins. Generally, they have good physical properties, but they also have some limitations, such as variable fibre diameters, propensity to shrink and high cost. Fibres produced from plant globular proteins, especially seed storage proteins, are alternatives to wool and silk (Wormell 1954). Kajita and Inoue in Japan and Boyer in the USA first patented fibre development from soybean protein in 1940. Fibres from soybean protein and corn zein called prolons were investigated extensively in the 1930s and 1940s, but they were not commercialized because of their high cost and poor/inconsistent physical properties. The cheaper and excellent physical properties of synthetic fibres called synthons , manufactured from petroleum, at that time led to a rapid commercialization of synthetic textiles (Huang et al. 1995). Renewed interest in eco-friendly and renewable protein fibre materials has led to the commercialization of soy protein fibres and garments manufactured from these textiles by Chinese companies around the globe (Zhang et al. 2003). Plant protein fibres have excellent properties, including natural lustre and smooth surfaces, as well as good physical and dyeing properties. Garments manufactured from soybean fibre textiles have good breathability and comfort, and they also have a fine appearance with excellent drape (Fig. 9.4).
9.2.3.1 Properties of Protein Fibres
The morphological and mechanical properties of protein-based synthetic fibres are important determinants of their commercial utility. The morphological properties of importance include surface texture, fibre diameter, length and circularity. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is a useful tool to examine and measure the morphological properties of fibres, including surface properties, cross-sectional area and circularity. SEM and atomic force microscopy can also be used to measure some mechanical properties such as the strength of the electrospun nanofibre. Mechanical properties of fibres, including intra- and intermolecular alignments and crystallinity, can also be determined by X-ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry, respectively. Tensile tests determine the strength, elongation at break point and flexibility of the fibre (Table 9.8).
Several prior- and post-spin factors can affect the physical properties of protein-based fibres (Table 9.9). The prior-spinning factors include source, type and concentration of protein, additives and solvents, blends with other polymers, pH, temperature and viscosity of the protein solution and extrusion/spinning instrument set-up. Post-spinning factors include washing, drying, drawing, chemical treatments, thermal and conditioning treatments, as well as annealing and testing conditions. The variations among proteins from different sources described above necessitate that specific formulations, with different additives, blends and electrospinning conditions need to be investigated and optimized to produce fibres with specific properties.
9.2.3.2 Protein Fibre Applications
Plant protein fibres have been on the market for decades with different trade names, including Vicara, Zycon and Wavecrape for corn zein fibres (Lawton 2002), Prolon and Alysol for soy protein fibres and Ardil for peanut protein fibres. Today, Azlon is the common generic name for all fibres regenerated from plant proteins ( http://info.fabrics.net/meet-the-azlons-from-a-to-z-regenerated-rejuvenated/ ). Azlon blended textile fabrics are commercially available (Fig. 9.4), and a considerable amount of research is currently being carried out to improve the technology and properties of the plant protein-based fibres in public and private sectors. Some proteins such as soybean protein, corn zein, wheat gluten and peanut protein have greater potential for use in producing fibres than others because they are readily available for industrial availability (Xu et al. 2012). Some of the ongoing limitations of protein fibres involve performance characteristics, such as moisture sensitivity and mechanical properties. However, like any field of material research, improvements in protein-based fibres are being explored. In particular, blends with other polymers, including polyethylene oxide, polylactic acid , polyvinyl alcohol, polycaprolactone, polyacrylonitrile, hydroxyapatite and polysaccharides, are the wave of the future and considered as the next generation of materials.
In addition to the general usage of protein-based fibres for textiles and clothing, they have other speciality uses in (1) medicine as medical sutures and for drug delivery, bandaging and enzyme mobilization; (2) cosmetics and skin care; (3) tissue engineering of blood vessels, bone tissues, heart tissues and cartilage tissues; (4) electronics including nano-sensors; and (5) military protective clothing and body armour (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/379338.stm). Historically, silk and animal gut were widely used as surgical sutures because they are eventually degraded by human proteolytic enzymes, but recently they have been replaced by synthetic sutures (made of polyglycolic, polylactic acid , polydioxanone and caprolactone) because of concerns about possible contamination of gut sutures with prions. Plant protein fibres are an ideal alternative to synthetic sutures because they are renewable and absorbable.
The ideal wound dressing is one that is sterile, breathable and supports a moist healing environment. Such a dressing will reduce the risk of infection, help the wound heal more quickly and reduce scarring. Conventional dressings do not efficiently induce haemostasis (the mechanism that stops bleeding) or adhere in moist environments around wounds. With the advances in nanotechnology seen in the last two decades, it is now possible to design and produce nanofibre-based wound dressings that contain an electrospun nanofibrous layer applied to a basic support fabric material. These wound dressings have very high surface area to volume ratios. They are able to control the release of drugs such as antibiotics and analgesics co-spun with protein nanofibre; prevent haemostasis, high filtration and liquid absorption efficiencies; and stimulate the growth of live cells. Thus, the combination of nanotechnology with electrospinning and the development of new wound dressing materials from plant proteins with highly desirable properties may lead to bioproducts that can could enhance the healing of wounds significantly compared to the conventional fibrous dressing materials.
Nanofibres have also been used for drug delivery because their very small sizes and extraordinarily large surface areas make them highly efficient delivery and carrier systems. Some nanofibres can also control the release of active ingredients and protect the chemical integrity of drugs. For example, protein (gelatin)-polyvinyl alcohol nanofibres containing a model drug have been produced, and their encapsulation and delivery efficiencies have been demonstrated (Yang et al. 2007). The development of nanofibres into efficient drug delivery systems is attracting much attention, and in particular, the use of electrospun nanofibers manufactured from biodegradable polymers, such as proteins, for drug delivery systems is being actively studied. Variables that affect their efficiencies and drug release rates include the physical properties of the drug and the protein microfibre.
9.3 Plant Crops as Platforms for Speciality Protein Products
Proteins play crucial roles in living organisms, including humans, to enable a large number of fundamental processes, such as cell signalling, immune responses, cell adhesion, cell division and cell growth and differentiation. The continuous progress in biotechnology, including genetic and protein engineering, in the last few decades has made it possible to manipulate different platforms for the commercial-scale production of proteins in transgenic bacteria, yeast, filamentous fungi, insects, mammalian and plant cell cultures and transgenic animals and plants. These biotechnological advances have significantly affected many industries, including food, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical , enzyme , hormone, textile, leather, paper, pulp, polymer , plastics and agriculture industries. For example, there are more than 200 approved peptide and protein pharmaceuticals in the US Food and Drug Administration list, including human insulin, serum albumin, human growth hormone, various antibodies, edible vaccines, collagen, human epidermal growth factor and blood coagulating protein (Factor VIII), among many others.
Of the different recombinant proteins that are produced on a commercial scale, 39% are made in Escherichia coli , 35% in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, 15% in yeasts, 10% by other mammalian systems and 1% by other bacteria and systems (Rader 2008). Microorganisms and cell cultures are robust recombinant protein synthesis production systems. They possess certain challenges, however, such as high culture development costs, high cell culture maintenance costs, cell culture variability and limitations concerning the production of large molecular weight proteins.
In principle, DNA from any source can be manipulated in any living system. Genetically engineered animals have been created that produce recombinant proteins in their tissues, milk, blood or urine ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0WCjX8jUE4 ). By the late 1980s, it was shown that transgenic plants could be used as alternative, commercial-scale, recombinant protein production platforms, after immunoglobulins and the assembly of functional antibodies were successfully achieved at 1.3% of the total leaf protein in tobacco leaves (Hiatt et al. 1989). This opened many new windows of opportunity to use genetically engineered plants for the production of recombinant proteins in whole plants or in their tissues, seeds and cell culture. Some transgenic plants carrying human protein genes are given in Table 9.11. Further progress made in biotechnological fields in the 1990s and early 2000s prompted interest in the production of pharmaceuticals in plants, known colloquially as ‘pharming’ (Hunter 2011).
Plant crop protein production platforms have certain advantages over animal and microbial systems. Mammalian cell culture systems are complicated and expensive processes; they require large bioreactors and high energy inputs for commercial-scale production. In contrast, plant systems are cost-effective, quicker to scale up, easy to propagate and simple to distribute. In addition, there is no risk of contamination by human pathogens (such as viruses and prions), and relatively cheap systems exist for purification and concentration of the therapeutic proteins. Plant platforms can synthesize and accumulate valuable proteins to high levels. These proteins are properly assembled and folded and can be post-transcriptionally modified to yield complex protein molecules. In addition, if the plants are engineered to accumulate the proteins in storage tissues and cellular compartments, they may be stably stored without refrigeration.
Plants are capable of assembling two or more subunits of proteins into complex three-dimensional structures. For example, spider dragline silk genes were successfully expressed in tobacco (Nicotiana spp.) and potato (Solanum tuberosum) plants, and spider silk proteins accumulated in transgenic tobacco leaves and potato tubers up to at least 2% of total soluble proteins with >90% homology to Nephila clavipes native proteins (Scheller et al. 2001; Menassa et al. 2004). Even more dramatic was the production of spider silk protein in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana , which accumulated to 18% of total soluble proteins (Yang et al. 2005).
Plant platforms, including major crops such as alfalfa (Medicago sativa), potato, wheat, rice, tobacco, soybean, carrot ( Daucus carota subsp. sativus) and turnip ( Brassica rapa subsp. rapa), have been extensively tested for their ability to produce human and animal antibodies and vaccines (Table 9.12). For example, the hepatitis B surface antigen has been produced in transgenic tobacco plants, and human insulin has been produced in transgenic A. thaliana seeds at levels of 0.13% of the total soluble seed protein (Nykiforuk et al. 2006). The quality of these antibodies and vaccines was equivalent to the present commercially produced proteins in microorganism -based systems. For example, a 44 kDa fragment of human collagen Iα1 (CIα1) expressed in corn grains was molecularly equivalent to that produced in recombinant yeast (Pichia pastoris).
Commercial enzyme production is another area where transgenic plants can play an important role. The global industrial enzyme market will be as high as $7 billion by 2015 ( http://www.prweb.com/releases/industrial_enzymes/proteases_carbohydrases/prweb8121185.htm ), according to Global Industry Analysts (Hood and Requesens 2012). These commercial enzymes, including proteases, amylases, cellulases, xylanases, lipases and reduction/oxidation enzymes are utilized by many industries, such as the manufactures of detergent, pulp and paper, textile, chemical, feed, food, biofuels and bio-based products (Hood and Requesens 2012). Currently, the largest markets for technical enzymes are the pulp and paper, food and beverage and animal feed industries ( https://www.freedoniagroup.com/World-Enzymes.html ). These may be replaced, however, by the lignocellulosic-supported biofuel and bio-based product industry market in the near future since large quantities of enzymes, including cellulases, hemicellulases and ligninases, will be required to deconstruct feedstock materials (Hood and Requesens 2012).
In 2011, the US Department of Agriculture approved the first commercial-scale production of Enogen , a transgenic corn plant developed by Syngenta US to express α-amylase . Enogen eliminates the need to use liquid α -amylase in dry-grind ethanol production (Table 9.13). Another industrial enzyme, bovine trypsin (a protease ) is widely used for commercial purposes to digest other pharmaceutical proteins. This enzyme can be expressed in the corn grain (Woodard et al. 2003) and has been marketed by Sigma Chemicals, USA, with the trade name TrypZean. TrypZean produced in plant-based systems could replace other production systems such as animal cell cultures to eliminate the chances of human pathogen contamination of the enzyme preparation. Several plant crops (Table 9.13) including tobacco, Arabidopsis , potato, rice, alfalfa, canola, pea, barley, soybean, wheat and corn are being investigated to produce commercial enzymes such as amylase , glucanase, xylanase , phyrase and chymosin (Hood and Requesens 2012; Biesgen et al. 2002). Besides enzyme purity, the commercial viability of these products depends on several factors including the cost and demand for the product.
Like any other system, plant platforms also display certain challenges, such as low accumulation of some proteins, difficult purification, biological equivalence, regulatory status and consumer acceptance. Other possible challenges are the potential for horizontal dissemination of transgene(s) to other plants through pollen grains, especially for open-pollinated crops, such as corn, and the contamination of plant tissues and protein products with pesticides, herbicides and toxic plant metabolites (Fitzgerald 2003).
Plant-based systems require methods of purification that are different from other systems, such as mammalian cells. Protein fusion technology is being tested to overcome two significant challenges of plant-based systems, namely, low accumulation of the protein and difficulty in terms of purification. In this approach, the DNA encoding the target protein is fused with DNA sequences encoding targeting peptides, stabilizing sequences, elastin-like proteins, hydrophobins and prolamine seed storage proteins (γ-zein), amino acid affinity tags or oil bodies (Conley et al. 2011). Both SemBioSys (no longer trading) and Plant Farm Corp. have developed technologies that combine the high-capacity, low-cost production of therapeutic proteins in seeds with a novel technology that simplifies downstream purification. In this instance, the genes encoding the target proteins are fused with a sequence encoding a small protein called oleosin. The resulting fusion protein accumulates on oil bodies within the seed. These oil bodies and the oleosin/protein fusion are then simply purified from other components in ground seeds by centrifugation because they float. The protein is released from the oil bodies into an aqueous extraction solution by enzymatic digestion of the oleosin/protein linker, and initial purification is accomplished without expensive chromatography.
Research in the last decade has overcome many of the technical challenges that have delayed the application of molecular pharming. Good manufacturing practices for plant-derived proteins are in place, with an emphasis on the containment of therapeutic protein in a particular tissue/organ of the plant such as seed, sustainability in production and similarity to mammalian cell-derived therapeutic protein. Indeed, some plant-derived therapeutic proteins are already on their way to commercialization as described in the Table 9.14.
9.4 Closing Comments
Environmental concerns and consumer awareness have been driving forces for the reintroduction of protein-based bioproducts to the market. Advances in genetics, protein chemistry and the availability of superior tools and technologies have accelerated the utilization of proteins for manufacturing consumers’ goods. Continuous efforts are ongoing to make these new products economical, durable and sustainable, and the commercialization of such products is gaining momentum. A few, such as protein-coated nuts and fruit, soybean cotton spandex shirts, fabricated nano-spun dressings and plant platform-multiplied vaccines and enzymes, are already on the market, and many more are close to commercialization.
References
Achouri A, Boye JI, Yaylayan VA, Yeboah K (2005) Functional properties of glycated soy 11S glycinin. J Food Sci 70:C269–C274
Anker M, Stading M, Hermansson A-M (2001) Relationship between the microstructure and the mechanical and barrier properties of whey protein films. J Agric Food Chem 49:989–995
Arakawa T, Chong DKX, Langridge WHR (1998) Efficacy of a food plant-based oral cholera toxin B subunit vaccine. Nat Biotechnol 16:292–297
ASTM (2012) Standard test method for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting. Method D882–12. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia
Aydt TP, Weller CL, Testin RF (1991) Mechanical and barrier properties of edible corn and wheat protein films. Trans ASAE 34:207–211
Bae HJ, Kim HJ, Kim YS (2008) Production of a recombinant xylanase in plants and its potential for pulp biobleaching applications. Bioresour Technol 99:3513–3519
Banker SG (1966) Film coating theory and practice. J Pharm Sci 55:81–89
Biesgen C, Hillebrand H, Herbers K (2002) Technical enzymes produced in transgenic plants. Phytochem Rev 1:79–85
Brandenburg AH, Weller CL, Testin RF (1993) Edible films and coatings from soy protein. J Food Sci 58:1086–1089
Brentin RP (2014) Soy-based chemicals and materials: growing the value chain. In: Brentin RP (ed) Soy-based chemicals and materials. ACS Publications. eISBN: 9780841230071
Brother GH, Smith AK, Circle SJ (1940) Soybean protein. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Agricultural Chemistry, Washington DC
Castano O, Eltohamy M, Kim HW (2012) Electrospinning technology in tissue regeneration. In: Navarro M, Planell JA (eds) Nanotechnology in regenerative medicine: methods and protocols, (methods in molecular biology). Springer Protocol, Barcelona
Chen P, Zhang L (2005) New evidences of glass transitions and microstructures of soy protein plasticized with glycerol. Macromol Biosci 5:237–245
Cho SY, Rhee C (2002) Sorption characteristics of soy protein films and their relation to mechanical properties. LWT- Food Sci Technol 35:151–157
Choi SG, Kim KM, Hanna MA, Weller CL, Kerr WL (2003) Molecular dynamics of soy-protein isolate films plasticized by water and glycerol. J Food Sci 68:2516–2522
Chong DKX, Langridge WHR (2000) Expression of full-length bioactive antimicrobial human lactoferrin in potato plants. Transgenic Res 9:71–78
Conley AJ, Joensuu JJ, Richman A, Menassa R (2011) Protein body-inducing fusions for high-level production and purification of recombinant proteins in plants. Plant Biotechnol J 9:419–433
Cramer CL, Boothe JG, Oishi KK (1999) Transgenic plants for therapeutic proteins: linking upstream and downstream technologies. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 240:95–118
Cuq B, Gontard N, Guilbert S (1997) Thermoplastic properties of fish myofibrillar proteins: application to biopackaging fabrication. Polymer 38:4071–4078
Denavi G, Tapia-Blacido DR, Anon MC, Sobral PJA, Mauri AN, Menegalli FC (2009) Effects of drying conditions on some physical properties of soy protein films. J Food Eng 90:341–349
Denbow DM, Grabau EA, Lacy GH, Kornegay ET, Russell DR, Umbeck PF (1998) Soybeans transformed with a fungal phytase 85 gene improve phosphorus availability for broilers. Poult Sci 77:878–881
Dhall RK (2013) Advances in edible coatings for fresh fruits and vegetables: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 53:435–450
di Gioia L, Guilbert S (1999) Corn protein-based thermoplastic resins: effect of some polar and amphiphilic plasticizers. J Agric Food Chem 47:1254–1261
Dieter GE, Kuhn HA, Semiatin SL (2003) Bulk workability in metals. In: Handbook or workability and process design. ASM International, Materials Park
Fitzgerald DA (2003) Revving up the green express. Scientist 17:45
Frihart CR (2009) Adhesive groups and how they relate to the durability of bonded wood. J Adhes Sci Technol 23:601–617
Gennadios A, Brandenburg AH, Weller CL, Testin RF (1993) Effects of pH on properties of wheat gluten and soy protein isolate films. J Agric Food Chem 41:1935–1939
Gennadios A, McHugh TH, Weller CL, Krochta JM (1994) Edible coatings and films based on proteins. In: Krochta JM, Baldwin EA, Nisperos-Carriedo MO (eds) Edible coatings and films to improve food quality. Technomic Publishing Company, Lancaster
Gennadios A, Rhim JW, Handa A, Weller CL, Hanna MA (1998) Ultraviolet radiation affects physical and molecular properties of soy protein films. J Food Sci 63:225–228
Gennadios A, Weller CL, Hanna MA, Froning GW (1996) Mechanical and barrier properties of egg albume films. J Food Sci 61:585–589
Ghorpade VM, Li H, Gennadios A, Hanna MA (1995) Chemically modified soy protein films. Trans ASAE 38:1805–1808
Giddings G, Allison G, Brooks D, Carter A (2000) Transgenic plants as factories for biopharmaceuticals. Nat Biotechnol 18:1151–1155
Gómez N, Carrillo C, Salinas J, Parra F, Borca MV, Escribano JM (1998) Expression of immunogenic glycoprotein S polypeptides from transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus in transgenic plants. Virology 249:352–358
Gounga ME, Xu S, Wang Z (2007) Whey protein isolate-based edible films as affected by protein concentration, glycerol ratio and pullulan addition in film formation. J Food Eng 83:521–530
Graham PM, Krinski TL (1983) Heat coagulable paper coating composition with a soy protein adhesive binder. US Patent No 4,421,564
Han JH (2003) Antimicrobial food packaging. In: Ahvenainen R (ed) Novel food packaging techniques. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge
Haq TA, Mason HS, Clements JD, Arntzen CJ (1995) Oral immunization with a recombinant bacterial antigen produced in transgenic plants. Science 268:714–716
Herbers K, Wilke I, Sonnewald U (1995) A thermostable xylanase from Clostridium thermocellum expressed at high levels in the apoplast of transgenic tobacco has no detrimental effects and is easily purified. Biotechnology 13:63–66
Hernandez-Izquierdo VM, Krochta JM (2008) Thermoplastic processing of protein for film formation. J Food Sci 73:30–39
Hettiarachchy NS, Kalapathy U, Myers DJ (1995) Alkali-modified soy protein with improved adhesive and hydrophobic properties. J Am Oil Chem Soc 72:1461–1464
Hiatt A, Cafferkey R, Bowdish K (1989) Production of antibodies in transgenic plants. Nature 342:76–78
Hood EA, Requesens DV (2012) Production of industrial proteins in plants. In: Wang A, Ma S (eds) Molecular farming in plants: recent advances and prospects. Springer, New York
Huang HC, Hammond EG, Reitmeier CA, Myers DJ (1995) Properties of fibers produced from soy protein isolate by extrusion and wet-spinning. J Am Oil Chem Soc 72:1453–1460
Huang W, Sun X (2000) Adhesive properties of soy proteins modified by urea and guanidine hydrochloride. J Am Oil Chem Soc 77:101–104
Hunter P (2011) A new era for plant biotechnology. Nature 12:504–507
Hymowitz T (1990) Soybeans: the success story. In: Janick J, Simon J (eds) Soybeans: the success story advances in new crops. Timber Press, Portland
Hymowitz T, Harlan JR (1983) Introduction of soybeans to North America by Samuel Bowen in 1765. Econ Bot 37:371–379
Hymowitz T, Singh RJ (1987) Taxonomy and speciation. In: Wilcox JR (ed) Soybeans: improvement, production, and uses, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison
Imam SH, Bilbao-Sainz C, Chiou B, Glenn GM, Orts WJ (2013) Biobased adhesives, gums, emulsions, and binders: current trends and future prospects. J Adhes Sci Technol 27:1972–1997
Jacob L (2008) Introduction to continuum thermomechanics. In: Jacob L (ed) Plasticity theory. Dover Publications Inc., Mineola, New York
Jangchud A, Chinnan MS (1999) Properties of peanut protein film: sorption isotherm and plasticizer effect. LWT- Food Sci Technol 32:89–94
Janjarasskul T, Krochta JM (2010) Edible packaging materials. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 1:415–448
Jensen LG, Olsen O, Kops O, Wolf N, Thomsen KK, von Wettstein D (1996) Transgenic barley expressing a protein engineered, thermostable (1,3-1,4)-β-glucanase during germination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:3487–3491
Kalapathy U, Hettiarachchy NS, Myers DJ, Hanna MA (1995) Modification of soy proteins and their adhesive properties on woods. J Am Oil Chem Soc 72:507–510
Kalapathy U, Hettiarachchy NS, Myers DJ, Rhee KC (1996) Alkali-modified soy proteins: effects of salts and disulfide bond cleavage on adhesion and viscosity. J Am Oil Chem Soc 73:1063–1066
Kapusta J, Modelska A, Figlerowicz M, Pniewski T, Letellier M, Lisowa O, Yusibov V, Koprowski H, Plucienniczak A, Legocki AB (1999) A plant-derived edible vaccine against hepatitis B virus. FASEB J 13:1796–1799
Kim KM, Weller CL, Hanna MA, Gennadios A (2002) Heat curing of soy protein films at atmospheric and sub-atmospheric conditions. J Food Sci 67:708–813
Krochta JM (2002) Proteins as raw materials for films and coatings: definitions, current status, and opportunities. In: Gennadios A (ed) Protein-based films and coatings. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Kumagai MH, Donson J, della-Cioppa G, Grill LK (2000) Rapid, high-level expression of glycosylated rice alpha-amylase in transfected plants by an RNA viral vector. Gene 245:169–174
Kusnadi AR, Nikolov ZL, Howard JA (1997) Production of recombinant proteins in transgenic plants: practical considerations. Biotechnol Bioeng 56:473–484
Lambuth AL (2003) Protein adhesives for wood. In: Pizzi A, Mittal KL (eds) Handbook of adhesive technology, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York
Laucks IF, Davidson G (1928) Vegetable glue and method of making same. U.S. patent No. 1,689,732 and US Patent No. 1,691,661
Lawton JW (2002) Zein: a history of processing and use. Cereal Chem 79:1–18
Lebel E, Heifetz P, Ward E, Uknes S (1998) Transgenic plants expressing cellulolytic enzymes Patent application WO98/11235
Lim LT, Mine Y, Tung MA (1999) Barrier and tensile properties of transglutaminase cross-linked gelatin films as affected by relative humidity, temperature, and glycerol content. J Food Sci 64:616–622
Liu S, Zhou R, Tian S, Gai J (2007) A study on subunit groups of soybean protein extracts under SDS-PAGE. J Am Oil Chem Soc 84:793–801
Liu Y, Li K (2002) Chemical modification of soy protein for wood adhesives. Macromol Rapid Commun 23:739–742
Liu Y, Li K (2007) Development and characterization of adhesives from soy protein for bonding wood. Int J Adhes Adhes 27:9–67
Liu JH, Selinger LB, Cheng J, Beauchemin KA, Moloney MM (1997) Plant seed oil-bodies as an immobilization matrix for a recombinant xylanase from the rumen fungus Neocallimastix patriciarum. Mol Breed 3:463–470
Loo C, Sudesh K (2007) Polyhydroxyalkanoates: bio-based microbial plastics and their properties. MPJ 2:31–57
Ma JK, Hiatt A, Hein M, Vine ND, Wang F, Stabila P, Dolleweerd C, Mostov K, Lehner T (1995) Generation and assembly of secretory antibodies in plants. Science 268:716–719
Ma JK, Hikmat BY, Wycoff K, Vine ND, Chargelegue D, Yu L, Hein MB, Lehner T (1998) Characterization of a recombinant plant monoclonal secretory antibody and preventive immunotherapy in humans. Nat Med 4:601–606
Mason HS, Ball JM, Shi JJ, Jiang X, Estes MK, Arntzen CJ (1996) Expression of Norwalk virus capsid protein in transgenic tobacco and potato and its oral immunogenicity in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:5335–5340
Mason HS, Haq TA, Clements JD, Arntze CJ (1998) Edible vaccine protects mice against Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin (LT): potatoes expressing a synthetic LT-B gene. Vaccine 16:1336–1343
Mauri AN, Anon MC (2006) Effect of solution pH on solubility and some structural properties of soybean protein isolate films. J Sci Food Agric 86:1064–1072
McGarvey PB, Hammond J, Dienelt MM, Hooper DC, Fu ZF, Dietzschold B, Koprowski H, Michaels FH (1995) Expression of the rabies virus glycoprotein in transgenic tomatoes. Biotechnology 13:1484–1487
McHugh TA, Krochta JM (1994) Sorbitol vs glycerol-plasticized whey protein edible films: integrated oxygen permeability and tensile property evaluation. J Agric Food Chem 42:841–846
Menassa R, Zhu H, Karatzas CN, Lazaris A, Richman A, Brandle JE (2004) Spider dragline silk proteins in transgenic tobacco leaves: accumulation and field production. Plant Biotechnol J 2:431–438
Micard V, Belamri R, Morel MH, Guilbert S (2000) Properties of chemically and physically treated wheat gluten films. J Agric Food Chem 48:2948–2953
Murray SW, Utica NM (1937) Molding casein composition. US Patent No 2,115,316
Nykiforuk CL, Boothe JG, Murray EW, Keon RG, Goren HJ, Markley NA, Moloney MM (2006) Transgenic expression and recovery of biologically active recombinant human insulin from Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. Plant Biotechnol J 4:77–85
Park HJ, Bunn JM, Weller CL, Vergano PJ, Test RF (1994) Water vapor permeability and mechanical properties of grain protein-based films as affected by mixtures of polyethylene glycol and glycerin plasticizers. ASAE 94:1281–1285
Park HJ, Chinnan MS (1995) Gas and water vapor barrier properties of edible films from protein and cellulose materials. J Food Eng 25:497–507
Park HJ, Weller CL, Vergano PJ, Testin RF (1993) Permeability and mechanical properties of cellulose-based edible films. J Food Sci 59:1361–1370
Parris N, Coffin DR (1997) Composition factors affecting the water vapor permeability and tensile properties of hydrophilic zein films. J Agric Food Chem 45:1596–1599
Pen J, Molendijk L, Quax WJ, Sijmons PC, van Ooyen AJJ, van den Elzen PJM, Rietveld K, Hoekema A (1992) Production of active Bacillus licheniformis alpha-amylase in tobacco and its application in starch liquefaction. Biotechnology 10:292–296
Pen J, Verwoerd TC, van Paridon PA, Beudeker RF, van den Elzen PJM, Geerse K, van der Klis JD, Versteegh HAJ, van Ooyen AJJ, Hoekema A (1993) Phytase-containing transgenic seeds as a novel feed additive for improved phosphorous utilization. Nat Biotechnol 11:811–814
Pommet M, Redl A, Guilbert S, Morel MH (2005) Intrinsic influence of various plasticizers on functional properties and reactivity of wheat gluten thermoplastic materials. J Cereal Sci 42:81–91
Puchta H (2000) Removing selectable marker genes: taking the shortcut. Trends Plant Sci 5:273–274
Qiu X, Wong G, Audet J, Bello A, Fernando L, Alimonti JB, Fausther-Bovendo H, Wei H, Aviles J, Hiatt E, Johnson A, Morton J, Swope K, Bohorov O, Bohorova N, Goodman C, Kim D, Pauly MH, Velasco J, Pettitt J, Olinger GG, Whaley K, Xu B, Strong JE, Zeitlin L, Kobinger GP (2014) Reversion of advanced Ebola virus disease in nonhuman primates with ZMapp. Nature 514:47–53
Rader RA (2008) Expression systems for process and product improvement. Bioprocess Int 6:4–9
Ralston EB, Osswald AT (2008) The history of tomorrow’s materials: protein-based biopolymers. Plast Eng 64:36–40
Reddy N, Yang Y (2007) Novel protein fibres from wheat gluten. Biomacromolecules 8:638–643
Rhim JW (2004) Physical and mechanical properties of water resistant sodium alginate films. LWT- Food Sci Technol 37:323–330
Rhim JW, Gennadios A, Fu D, Weller CL, Hanna MA (1999) Properties of ultraviolet irradiated protein films. LWT- Food Sci Technol 32:129–133
Rhim JW, Gennadios A, Handa A, Weller CL, Hanna MA (2000) Solubility, tensile, and color properties of modified soy protein isolate films. J Agric Food Chem 48:4937–4941
Rhim JW, Gennadios A, Weller CL, Cezeirat C, Hanna MA (1998) Soy protein isolate-dialdehyde starch films. Ind Crop Prod 8:195–203
Rhim JW, Weller CL (2000) Properties of formaldehyde adsorbed soy protein isolate films. Food Sci Biotechnol 9:228–233
Richter LJ, Thanavala Y, Arntzen CJ, Mason HS (2000) Production of hepatitis B surface antigen in transgenic plants for oral immunization. Nat Biotechnol 18:1167–1171
Ruggiero F, Exposio JY, Bournat P, Gruber V, Perret S, Comte J, Olagnier B, Garrone R, Theisen M (2000) Triple helix assembly and processing of human collagen produced in transgenic tobacco plants. FEBS Lett 469:132–136
Salame M (1986) Barrier polymer. In: Bakkar M (ed) The Wiley encyclopedia of packaging technology. Wiley, New York
Sánchez AC, Popineau Y, Mangavel C, Larré C, Guéguen J (1998) Effect of different plasticizers on the mechanical and surface properties of wheat gliadin films. J Agric Food Chem 46:4539–4544
Sang KP, Hettiarachchy NS, JU ZY, Gennadios A (2000) Formation and properties of soy protein films and coatings. In: Gennadios A (ed) Protein based films and coatings. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Scheller J, Guhrs KH, Grosse F, Conrad U (2001) Production of spider silk proteins in tobacco and potato. Nat Biotechnol 19:573–577
Seller T Jr (2001) Wood adhesive innovations and applications in North America. For Prod J 51:12–22
Sheeran NJ (1957) Method of forming an adhesive for insulation boards and the product thereof. U.S. patent No. 2,788,305
Sherman A, Su J, Lin S, Wang X, Herzog RW, Daniell H (2014) Suppression of inhibitor formation against factor VIII in hemophilia a mice by oral delivery of antigens bioencapsulated in plant cells. Blood 124:1659–1669
Shoji Y, Farrance CE, Bautista J, Bi H, Musiychuk K, Horsey A, Park HW, Jaje J, Green BJ, Shamloul M, Sharma S, Chichester JA, Mett V, Yusibov V (2011) A plant-based system for rapid production of influenza vaccine antigens. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 6:204–210
Shukla R, Cheryan M (2001) Zein: the industrial protein from corn. Ind Crop Prod 13:171–192
Smith MA (1986) Polyethylene, high density. In: Bakker M (ed) The Wiley encyclopedia of packaging technology. Wiley, New York
Sothornvit R, Krochta JM (2000) Plasticizer effect on oxygen permeability of ß-lactoglobulin films. J Agric Food Chem 48:6298–6302
Sothornvit R, Krochta JM (2001) Plasticizer effect on mechanical properties of ß-lactoglobulin films. J Food Eng 50:149–155
Sothornvit R, Krochta JM (2005) Plasticizers in edible films and coatings. In: Han JH (ed) Innovations in food packaging. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego
Staub JM, Garcia B, Graves J, Hajdukiewicz PTJ, Hunter P, Nehra N, Paradkar V, Schlittler M, Carrol JA, Spatola L, Ward D, Ye G, Russell DA (2000) High-yield production of a human therapeutic protein in tobacco chloroplasts. Nat Biotechnol 18:333–338
Stoger E, Vaquero C, Torres E, Sack M, Nicholson L, Drossard J, Williams S, Keen D, Perrin Y, Christou P, Fischer R (2000) Cereal crops as viable production and storage systems for pharmaceutical ScFv antibodies. Plant Mol Biol 42:583–590
Streatfield SJ, Jilka JM, Hood EE, Turner DD, Bailey MR, Mayor JM, Woodard SL, Beifuss JK, Horn ME, Delaney DE, Tizard IR, Howard JA (2000) Plant-based vaccines: unique advantages. Vaccine 19:2742–2748
Subirade M, Kelly I, Gueguen J, Pezolet M (1998) Molecular basis of film formation from soybean protein: comparison between the conformation of glycerine in aqueous solution and in films. Int J Biol Macromol 23:241–249
Suppakul P, Miltz J, Sonneveld K, Bigger SW (2003) Active packaging technologies with an emphasis on antimicrobial packaging and its applications. J Food Sci 68:408–420
Sze CKW, Kshirsagar HH, Venkatachalam M, Sathe KS (2007) A circular dichroism and fluorescence spectrometric assessment of effects of selected chemical denaturants of soybean (Glycine max L.) storage proteins glycinin (11S) and β-Conglycinin (7S). J Agric Food Chem 55:8745–8753
Tacket CO, Mason HS, Losonsky G, Clements JD, Levine MM, Arntzen CJ (1998) Immunogenicity in humans of a recombinant bacterial antigen delivered in a transgenic potato. Nat Med 4:607–609
Tacket CO, Mason HS, Losonsky G, Estes MK, Levine MM, Arntzen CJ (2000) Human immune responses to a novel Norwalk virus vaccine delivered in transgenic potatoes. J Infect Dis 182:302–305
Takashi K, Kevin U, Joshua UO, Robert YL, Shelby FT (2007) Effect of uniaxial drawing of soy protein isolate biopolymer film on structure and mechanical properties. Polym Eng Sci 47:374–380
Thames SF, Rawlins JW, Ferguson RC, Mendon SK (2010) Soy protein adhesive and their uses thereof. US Patent No 2010 2010/0089287 A1
Torres E, Vaquero C, Nicholson L, Sack M, Stoger E, Drossard J, Christou P, Fischer R, Perrin Y (1999) Rice cell culture as an alternative production system for functional diagnostic and therapeutic antibodies. Transgenic Res 8:441–449
Trezza TA, Krochta JM (2002) Application of edible protein coatings to nuts and nut-containing food products. In: Gennadios A (ed) Protein-based films and coatings. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Truax TR (1929) The gluing of wood, bulletin 1500. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
Tuboly T, Yu WJ, Bailey A, DeGrandis S, Du S, Erickson LR, Nagy E (2000) Immunogenicity of porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus spike protein expressed in plants. Vaccine 18:2023–2028
Urbanchuk JM, Kowalski DJ, Dale BKS (2009) Corn amylase: improving the efficiency and environmental footprint of corn to ethanol through plant biotechnology. AgBioforum 12:149–154
van Rooije G, Glenn KR, Shen Y, Boothe J (2008) Commercial production of chymosin in plants. US patent No 2008/0184394 A1
Vaquero C, Sack M, Chandler J, Drossard J, Schuster F, Monecke M, Schillberg S, Fischer R (1999) Transient expression of a tumor-specific single-chain fragment and a chimeric antibody in tobacco leaves. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:11128–11133
Verwoerd TC, van Paridon PA, van Ooyen AJJ, van Lent JWM, Hoekema A, Pen J (1995) Stable accumulation of Aspergillus niger phytase in transgenic tobacco leaves. Plant Physiol 109:1199–1205
Waite JH (1987) Nature's underwater adhesive specialist. Int J Adhes Adhes 7:9–14
Wang C, Damodaran S (1991) Thermal gelation of globular proteins: influence of protein conformation on gel strength. J Agric Food Chem 39:433–438
Woodard SL, Mayor JM, Bailey MR, Barker DK, Love RT, Lane JR, Delaney DE, McComas-Wagner JM, Mallubhotla HD, Hood EE, Dangott LJ, Tichy SE, Howard JA (2003) Maize (Zea mays)-derived bovine trypsin: characterization of the first large-scale, commercial protein product from transgenic plants. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 38:123–130
Wormell RL (1954) New fibres from proteins. Butterworths Scientific Pubs, London
Xu X, Jiang L, Zhou Z, Wu X, Wang Y (2012) Preparation and properties of electrospun soy protein isolate/polyethylene oxide nanofiber membranes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:4331–4337
Yang DZ, Li Y, Nie J (2007) Preparation of gelatin/PVA nanofibers and their potential application in controlled release of drugs. Carbohydr Polym 69:538–543
Yang J, Barr LA, Fahnestock SR, Liu ZB (2005) High yield recombinant silk-like protein production in transgenic plants through protein targeting. Transgenic Res 14:313–324
Yang Y, Wang L, Li S (1996) Formaldehyde-free zein fibre – preparation and investigation. J Appl Polym Sci 59:433–441
Yu M, Deming TJ (1998) Synthetic polypeptide mimics of marine adhesives. Macromolecules 31:4739–4745
Zeitlin L, Olmsted SS, Moench TR, Co MS, Martinell BJ, Paradkar VM, Russell DR, Queen C, Cone RA, Whaley KJ (1998) A humanized monoclonal antibody produced in transgenic plants for immunoprotection of the vagina against genital herpes. Nat Biotechnol 16:1361–1364
Zhang X, Min BG, Kumar S (2003) Solution spinning and characterization of poly(vinyl alcohol)/soybean protein blend fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 90:716–721
Ziegler MT, Thomas SR, Danna KJ (2000) Accumulation of a thermostable endo-1,4-β-D-glucanase in the apoplast of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Breed 6:37–46
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arif, M., Chia, LS., Pauls, K.P. (2018). Protein-Based Bioproducts. In: Chen, G., Weselake, R., Singer, S. (eds) Plant Bioproducts. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8616-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8616-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-8614-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-8616-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)