Abstract
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) (previously called neurogenic sarcomas, malignant schwannomas, or neurofibrosarcomas) are soft tissue sarcomas, which arise from a peripheral nerve or show nerve sheath differentiation. MPNSTs are associated with a high risk of local recurrence and predominantly hematogenous metastasis. They account for 10 % of all soft tissue sarcomas, and approximately half of these malignancies arise in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). MPNSTs occur in about 2–5 % of patients with NF1 compared with an incidence of 0.001 % in the general population. In contrast, in a large population-based longitudinal study the lifetime risk of developing an MPNST in NF1 was 8–13 %. In patients with NF1, the majority of MPNSTs arise in a previous clinically detectable plexiform neurofibroma, but MPNST may also develop as a primary tumor.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors
- Peripheral nerve sheath tumors
- Nervous system tumor pathology
- Molecular pathology of nervous system tumors
- Neurogenic sarcomas
- Malignant schwannomas
- Neurofibrosarcomas
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) (previously called neurogenic sarcomas, malignant schwannomas, or neurofibrosarcomas) are soft tissue sarcomas, which arise from a peripheral nerve or show nerve sheath differentiation. MPNSTs are associated with a high risk of local recurrence and predominantly hematogenous metastasis [1, 2]. They account for 10 % of all soft tissue sarcomas, and approximately half of these malignancies arise in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) [3]. MPNSTs occur in about 2–5 % of patients with NF1 compared with an incidence of 0.001 % in the general population [1]. In contrast, in a large population-based longitudinal study the lifetime risk of developing an MPNST in NF1 was 8–13 % [4]. In patients with NF1, the majority of MPNSTs arise in a previously clinically detectable plexiform neurofibroma, but MPNST may also develop as a primary tumor [5, 6].
The most frequent sites of metastasis of MPNSTs are lung, liver, brain, soft tissue, bone, regional lymph nodes, and retroperitoneum [1]. Early diagnosis of MPNSTs is crucial, as only complete surgical resection has been shown to be curative. However, the clinical diagnosis of MPNST in patients with NF1 can be difficult to establish, because clinical indicators of malignancy (mass and pain) may also be features of benign plexiform neurofibromas commonly seen in this patient population. For unresectable or metastatic disease, adjuvant or neoadjuvant radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy have been used, but are generally not curative. Therefore, novel molecular targeted agents are being evaluated in this difficulty to treat patient population.
Histopathology
MPNST are malignant tumors of neuroectodermal origin arising from a peripheral nerve with or without a preexisting benign nerve sheath tumor [7]. The diagnosis of MPNST is often challenging, due to a lack of standardized morphological criteria, specific immunohistochemical marker expression, or characteristic karyotypic aberrations. Sarcomas with involvement of a nerve and lacking features indicating an alternative line of differentiation (such as synovial sarcoma or angiosarcoma), or those sarcomas definitively arising from a preexisting benign nerve sheath tumor, are designated MPNST [8]. Malignant spindled tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis (NF1) are also considered to be MPNST unless proven otherwise. Spindled tumors that are unrelated to a major nerve are more difficult to classify. In order to establish a diagnosis, a combined analysis of histological features, immunohistochemical phenotype, and/or ultrastructural features of Schwann cell (basal lamina) or differentiation (such as intracytoplasmic vesicles) in perineurial-like cells is necessary [7, 8].
As noted above, the main recognizable benign precursor to MPNST is the plexiform neurofibroma common in the setting of NF1 (Figs. 16.1 and 16.2). Figures 16.1 and 16.2 are photomicrographs representative of plexiform neurofibroma [9]. Prior irradiation is also a risk factor for NF1 patients to develop MPNST [9]. Figures 16.3 and 16.4 represent the gross pathology of an MPNST arising from a plexiform neurofibroma of the vagus nerve [10].
Notable histological variation may be observed in MPNSTs. Common histological findings include fascicles of alternating cellularity (Fig. 16.5), whorls, palisading or rosette-like patterns, subendothelial condensation of tumor cells, and geographic necrosis [8, 11]. Occasionally, the tumors resemble primitive or undifferentiated sarcoma (Fig. 16.6). Less commonly, rhabdomyosarcomatous elements (malignant Triton tumor), angiosarcoma, melanin, neuroendocrine, or glandular structures are observed. The cell(s) of origin of these divergent features remain uncertain [7, 11].
MPNST grading is separated pathologically into low and high grade categories; the majority of MPNSTs are high grade [8]. Morphological criteria for a low grade MPNST include hypercellularity and nuclear enlargement (approximately 3× the size of a neurofibroma nucleus) and hyperchromasia, features also seen in high grade MPNST; however, low grade MPNSTs exhibit little necrosis and show fewer than five mitoses per 10 high power fields [18, 12]. The isolated presence of one of these features in a neurofibroma is not adequate for a malignant diagnosis. Diagnostic difficulties arise due to the lack of objective criteria for hypercellularity, hyperchromasia, and the extent of changes required for a malignant diagnosis. Features concerning for malignant transformation include increased cellularity and a fascicular pattern of growth not usually seen in conventional neurofibromas (Fig. 16.7). Histological grading systems include the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) system [13], based on the tumor histological type, location, and degree of necrosis, as well as pleomorphism, cellularity, and mitotic activity. The Federation National des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) is a French grading system which uses a score generated by degree of tumor differentiation, mitotic activity, and extent of necrosis [14]. Neither of these grading systems has proven entirely useful in distinguishing low versus high grade MPNST and predicting clinical behavior. Information regarding the molecular biology of MPNST is anticipated to prove important for not only diagnosis but possible targeted therapy options.
Even more challenging is the separation of atypical neurofibroma (considered benign) from low grade MPNST (malignant), particularly in the setting of NF1. The term “atypical neurofibroma” has been applied to neurofibromas with degenerative nuclear changes [8]. This term, or alternatively, cellular neurofibroma, has also been used for nerve sheath tumors showing worrisome histological features, including high cellularity, few mitotic figures, monotonous cytomorphology, or fascicular growth, which do not fully meet criteria for malignancy. Atypical changes often develop in large, slowly growing neurofibromas [15]. Atypical neurofibromas have generally been regarded as benign. However, a study of NF1 patients suggests that atypical neurofibromas, defined as neurofibromas with increased cellularity and nuclear hyperchromasia and enlargement lacking mitotic figures (Figs. 16.8, 16.9, and 16.10), represent early malignant change in neurofibroma, with CDKN2A (p16) deletions (seen in MPNST) in the majority of studied cases [16, 17].
Histological examination of a soft tissue lesion in which the differential comprises MPNST should include routine-stained H&E sections and possibly reticulin, to clearly outline nerve fibers. In addition, immunohistochemical stains for S100β protein, the skeletal muscle markers desmin and myogenin, and a proliferation marker (MIB-1 or KI-67) may be useful [1]. Increased MIB-1 (Ki-67) and p53 nuclear labeling by immunohistochemistry are seen in high grade MPNST [6, 18]. Genetic loss of the CDKN2A locus, and therefore loss of p16 immunoreactivity, are not found in neurofibroma, but are common in MPNST [16, 17]. Both p16 and p27 expression are typically present in neurofibromas and low grade MPNSTs but absent in high grade MPNSTs [6]; loss of expression may highlight foci of malignant transformation in neurofibromas, as may molecular alterations, including EGFR amplification [19].
The differential diagnosis of MPNST includes sarcomas, including adult-type fibrosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, dedifferentiated liposarcoma, and clear cell sarcoma. One useful distinction from benign Schwann cell tumors is the partial or complete loss of S100β expression in MPNST (Fig. 16.11). Conversely, isolated expression of S100β should not necessarily be diagnostic of MPNST, as S100β expression has been reported in leiomyosarcomas, rhabdomyosarcomas, and synovial sarcomas [6, 8, 18].
Synovial sarcoma, a high grade sarcoma of undetermined cell lineage, may occur in soft tissues in either biphasic (which includes a spindle cell component with interspersed glandular structures) or monophasic (spindle cell component only) forms. The monophasic variant may closely resemble MPNST, and may involve nerves or exhibit a plexiform growth pattern. Both synovial sarcoma and MPNST may show glandular differentiation. The only definitive histological feature used in the distinction of MPNST from synovial sarcoma is the presence of pleomorphic cells, not seen in synovial sarcoma (Fig. 16.12). Demonstration of SS18-SSX1 or SS18-SSX2 gene fusions, usually resulting from a characteristic X;18 translocation, may be required for definitive diagnosis of intraneural synovial sarcoma, as these gene fusions are limited to synovial sarcoma [8]. No specific chromosomal rearrangements in MPNST have been revealed by conventional cytogenetics, although a complex karyotype is characteristic (see below for details) [20].
Epithelioid MPNST, a rare subtype of MPNST, is characterized by a predominance of large epithelioid cells. Epithelioid MPNSTs are more frequent in superficial sites and exhibit strong and usually diffuse expression of S100β protein [8]. The majority of MPNSTs arising within preexisting schwannomas, which occurs very rarely, are of epithelioid type [10]. The differential diagnosis of epithelioid MPNST includes epithelioid sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma, melanoma, and carcinoma. The absence of expression of melanocytic markers (MelanA, HMB45, MART-1) is useful in the differentiation of epithelioid MPNST from melanoma and clear cell sarcoma [8]. Absent cytokeratin expression distinguishes epithelioid MPNST from epithelioid sarcoma and carcinoma. Both epithelioid MPNST and epithelioid sarcoma may show loss of SMARCB1/INI1/BAF47 protein expression [21], a potential diagnostic pitfall in the consideration of rhabdoid tumor [6, 8, 13–15, 17, 18, 22].
Most MPNST are frankly high grade, aggressive tumors by histology and clinical behavior, and carry a dismal prognosis. Adverse prognosticators include truncal location, size >5 cm, incomplete resection, local recurrence, young age [7, 9], and high grade. According to some authors, histological grade is the most important prognostic factor for soft tissue sarcomas [13, 23] including MPNSTs. Past literature portended a worse prognosis for NF1-associated tumors as compared to sporadic MPNSTs [7, 24]. However, a large recent study indicates that while NF1 patients with MPNSTs demonstrate overall increased mortality compared to those patients with non-NF1-associated MPNSTs, decreased survival did not appear to be related to inherent tumor behavior [24].
Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics
Primary among MPNST initiating mutations are mutations in the NF1 gene. NF1 patients carry a constitutional mutation of the NF1 tumor suppressor gene located on the long arm of chromosome 17 (17q11.2) [25], and mutation, or loss of the second allele, was found in 40 % of NF1 MPNST [26]. MPNST are particularly prevalent in NF1 patients whose constitutional mutations involve whole gene deletion, which can include contiguous genes that may contribute to tumor formation [27]. NF1 mutations are also present in 41 % of sporadic MPNST [26], explaining why expression signatures and genomic changes overlap in NF1 and sporadic tumors [28–30]. Mutations in RAS or RAS pathway genes may also cause MPSNT tumor initiation in MPNST lacking NF1 mutations; activating mutations in N-RAS(1/11), K-RAS (1/11) [31], and B-RAF (1/13 MPNST) [26] were identified in sporadic MPNST.
As discussed above, atypical neurofibromas represent an early stage in MPNST transformation from neurofibroma. Atypical neurofibromas (15/16) showed homozygous loss of the CDKN2A locus on chromosome 9p21.3 [17], and deletions of the CDKN2A locus are present in about 50 % of MPNSTs [16, 32]. The CDKN2A locus encodes two proteins: p16INK4A, which inhibits the cyclin-dependent kinases 4 (CDK4) and 6 (CDK6), and p14ARF, which inhibits the MDM2 ubiquitin ligase resulting in stabilization of tp53 [16, 32]. Mouse models support the importance of this locus in MPNST, as Nf1+/−; Ink4a/Arf−/− mice develop GEM-PNSTs resembling human MPNST [33].
Another tumor suppressor commonly inactivated in MPNST is TP53. An “inactivated p53-associated proliferation” gene expression signature was identified in 18/20 MPNST, and p53 inactivation caused downregulation of miR-34a, preventing MPNST cell apoptosis in tissue culture [34]. Estimates of MPNST with TP53 alterations (mutations or stabilized TP53) vary between 24 and 75 % [35–37], which is likely due to the variable sensitivity and specificity of different assays for assessing p53 expression and mutations, as well as intra-tumor heterogeneity [38–41]. TP53 stability can also be regulated through p14ARF so that if p14ARF is retained, TP53 is stabilized without TP53 mutation. While biallelic inactivation of the TP53 locus is rare in MPNSTs [42] in mouse models, only complete loss of tp53 and Nf1 correlates with Genetically engineered mouse-Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor (GEM-MPNST) formation [43, 44].
The PTEN gene is an “off signal” for phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling, and PTEN inactivation generally leads to activation of PI3K. Frequent monosomy of the PTEN locus was identified in MPNST without PI3KCA or PTEN mutations [31, 45]; PTEN methylation is detected in 45 % of MPNSTs, though not neurofibromas, and associated with early metastasis [46]. Co-deletion of Nf1 and Pten or expression of RasG12D or EGFR in combination with Pten deletion also resulted in GEM-PNST [47, 48]. In addition, expression of the retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor, a molecule that impedes cell cycle progression, is lost in 25 % of MPNSTs [49, 50].
As in most sarcomas, chromosomal gains, losses, and rearrangements in MPNSTs are numerous and variable [51], and MPNSTs commonly have hypodiploid or near-triploid karyotypes. Combined genomic somatic copy number alteration (CNA) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis on sets of neurofibromas and MPNSTs verified that recurrent or overlapping copy number variations (CNVs) or CNAs are absent from neurofibromas, while MPNSTs showed 232 CNAs (encompassing >2,900 genes) and more than 500 genes showed consistent LOH [52]. The microRNA miR-10b can target NF1 messenger RNA [53]; in principal miRs that target NF1 might also contribute to NF1 tumorigenesis.
Amplification of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene EGFR is frequent in MPNST [45, 54]. Perrone et al. found that EGFR was amplified in all sporadic MPNST and half of NF1 MPNST [31]. EGFR overexpression was correlated with a worse prognosis in one study [55], but not in another [56]. No activating mutations in EGFR have been detected in MPNST. Ligands that activate the EGFR including transforming growth factor (TGF)α and heparin binding epidermal growth factor (HBEGF) are expressed in 90 % of MPNST, suggesting the presence of an autocrine loop in MPNST cells [45, 57]. In 15 % of a small series of MPNST, the amplicon including PDGFRA, KIT, and VEGFR-2/KDR was present. Among the three genes, PDGFRA is most frequently amplified [49, 58, 59] and rarely mutant [59]. Hepatocyte growth factor is expressed and its c-Met receptor is expressed in 82 % of MPNST, and the MET gene is amplified in MPSNT [49, 60]. Short hairpin RNAs targeting MET and XL184, a multi-kinase inhibitor targeting MET and VEGFR2, decreased MPNST tumor growth and metastasis in tumor xenografts [61]. While in vitro studies in cell lines support roles for these receptors in MPNST, several histology-specific clinical trials with agents targeting PDGFR, C-KIT, and EGFR were completed, all without achieving responses or meaningful disease stabilization as single agents [62–65]. Possibly blocking one or more of these receptors will be useful in combination with other therapeutic agents.
Gene Expression Profiling
Sporadic and NF1 MPNST are indistinguishable by transcriptome analysis [30]. Transcriptome analysis comparing Schwann cells to MPNST found that expression of markers of neural crest cells is a prominent theme in human MPNST cell lines and tumors [29, 66]. Neural crest markers include SOX9 and TWIST1, which are dramatically upregulated in MPNST [29, 66–68]. MPNST cells are dependent on expression of these genes, as downregulation of SOX9 caused cell death and downregulation of TWIST1 decreased cell migration [29, 66]. Increased expression of the neural crest markers FOXD3, PAX7, SOX5, and AP-2α in MPNST compared to neurofibroma was described in a series of 34 MPNSTs [68]. The placodal markers EYA/SIX are also upregulated in MPNST cells and tumors [69], and shRNA to diminish EYA4 expression prevented tumor formation and caused necrosis. EYAs are phophatases that could in principle be targeted therapeutically.
Whole genome microRNA analysis of MPNST tumors identified downregulation of 14 miRs, and upregulation of two (miR-210 and miR-339-5p) [70]. There was no overlap with serum microRNAs in MPNST patients [71]. Serum miR expression distinguished patients with MPNST from those without MPNST. The authors identified miR-24 as upregulated in NF1 and MPNST, and MiR-214 and miR-801 as upregulated in serum of individuals with sporadic or NF1-related MPNST. The sensitivity (0.820) and specificity (0.844) of a three miR panel to identify NF1 MPNST supports a potential role in helping to diagnose MPNST and/or as a possible indicator of response to therapy [71].
On two-dimensional gel analysis of proteins, MPNST most closely resembled synovial sarcoma and clear cell carcinoma [72]. For this reason, a goal remains to identify the markers that distinguish MPNST from these tumors, and from surrounding neurofibroma. Several markers, each analyzed in relatively few tumors, may distinguish neurofibromas from MPNST. These include Tenascin-C and NNAT [73]; Cathepsin K [74]; and markers of an angiogenic switch: SMA, vWF, VEGF, and VEGF receptors Flt1 and Flk1 [75]. Many growing or atypical neurofibromas and MPNST stained positive for CD10 [76]. Some neurofibromas and MPNST express hTERT [77].
Prognostic Stratification
Complete surgical resection is the only known curative MPNST therapy, and predicts favorable prognosis in all MPNST patients [23, 78, 79]. In addition, survival is significantly better in female versus male MPNST patients [80, 81]. Gain/amplification of the CDK4 gene on chromosome 12q14.1 and upregulation of the FOXM1 gene on chromosome 12p13.3 were significant independent predictors of poor survival in 87 MPNST patients [82]. Chromosomal losses of 10q and Xq and gain of 16p were also associated with reduced MPNST patient survival [28]. In a large series, 93 % of MPNST showed positive staining for phospho-MEK, while about half expressed phospho-S6K, phospho-mTOR and/or phospho-AKT, and immunoreactivity toward all three mTOR pathway markers predicted significantly worse outcomes than in patients with tumors negative for the three markers [83]. Intriguingly, a single nucleotide polymorphisms in the microRNA biogenesis pathway gene DROSHA (rs1991401) significantly increased MPNST risk in NF1 patients, while SNPs in AGO2 and GEMIN4 in this pathway decreased risk [71]. To date, none of these indicators have been used to stratify patients for clinical trials.
Treatment of MPNSTS
Only complete MPNST surgical resection has been shown to be curative, and remains the cornerstone of therapy, but is rarely feasible due to tumor location or nerve association [23, 78, 79, 84, 85]. Radiotherapy is commonly used for local control in inoperable or incompletely resected MPNSTs, but when used as primary treatment, high doses of radiation are needed (median 50 Gy) [3]. The role of chemotherapy for adult and pediatric soft tissue sarcomas, including MPNSTs, is controversial. Only doxorubicin, dacarbazine, and ifosfamide are agents consistently associated with response rates of 20 % or more in patients with soft tissue sarcomas [23, 86, 87], and the combination of ifosfamide and doxorubicin has produced response rates as high as 46 % in these tumors [87, 88]. The response rate of MPNSTs to chemotherapy is unknown. Some investigators have suggested that they have intermediate chemosensitivity, less responsive than synovial sarcoma, but more responsive than refractory diseases such as alveolar soft part sarcoma [86]. However, recently others have questioned whether MPNSTs are at all chemosensitive [84]. Carli et al. summarized the 25-year experience of pediatric MPNSTs in German and Italian Groups [3]. The patients described encompass a span of three decades and were treated on standard sarcoma protocols. First, response to ifosfamide was significantly better than to cyclophosphamide (65 % vs. 17 %). Second, while chemotherapy increased overall and event-free survival over no chemotherapy, the 5-year overall survival for patients with unresectable and metastatic MPNST remained approximately 30 %. It may be that the addition of targeted agents to chemotherapy will improve response rate, and potentially improve outcome without undue morbidity.
Molecular Signaling Pathways
NF1 is an off signal for Ras GTPases [89]. Therefore, NF1 loss activates signaling pathways downstream of Ras-GTP, and the Raf-MEK-ERK and mTOR-S6K-Akt pathways have been explored as potential therapeutic targets (Fig. 16.13). Targeting MEK with PD0325901 in a xenograft and in a genetically engineered mouse model transiently delayed MPNST growth, correlating with suppression of tumor vasculature and tumor cell proliferation [90, 91]. Using rapamycin or its analog RAD001 to target the mTOR/S6K pathway also transiently blocked MPNST growth in xenografts and a mouse model [92–94]. This effect of rapamycin was converted to cytotoxicity in combination with agents that promote proteotoxic/endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in a genetically engineered mouse model [95]. Based on these data, combinatorial clinical trials are being considered.
We have chosen to omit discussion of a host of studies focusing on effects in MPNST cell lines, pending confirmation of significant effects in in vivo model systems. In xenografts, hyaluronan oligomers suppressed drug transporter activity and inhibited growth of MPNST tumor growth, with synergy between oligomers and doxorubicin [96]. The effect of 4-hydroxytamoxifen on K-Ras degradation and MPNST cell autophagy correlated with decreased MPNST growth [57, 97]. Inhibition of Aurora kinases using MLN2036 caused prolonged MPNST growth arrest in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle [98]. The combination of histone deacetylase inhibitor PC-24791 (which promotes autophagy) and autophagy blockade with chloroquine abrogated MPNST xenograft growth and promoted cell apoptosis, although the durability of the response is not known [99]. Blocking STAT3 with FLLL32 or shSTAT3 prevented growth of MPNST xenografts but did not arrest growth of established tumors [100]. Whether these xenograft studies will translate to effects in immune-competent models or clinical trials remains to be tested.
An exciting recent development is a new link between MPNST and β-catenin signaling. Transposon-based mutagenesis screens identified many components of the β-catenin signaling pathway as potential driver mutations in MPNST [101, 102]. Strong evidence also supports the role for autocrine CXCL12 and CXCR4 signaling upstream of β-catenin [103]. Both blockade of CXCR4 with AMD3100 (which is already in clinical trials in other cancers) and treatment of MPNST cells with shβ-catenin decreased cell proliferation and MPNST tumor growth [102, 103].
Molecular Targeted Therapies
The outcome for patients with relapsed unresectable MPNST remains poor. Therapy options remain particularly limited in patients with NF-1 in the face of the increased risk of therapy-related monosomy 7 myelodysplastic syndrome and leukemia in NF-1 patients who had previously received alkylator-based chemotherapy or radiotherapy for solid tumors [104]. As elucidated above, several effector pathways have been interrogated in order to find a cure for resistant MPNST. Ohishi et al. analyzed the cytotoxic effects of imatinib mesylate blockade of PDGFRβ using six human MPNST cell lines [105]. They found that imatinib mesylate effectively suppressed cell growth in vitro at concentrations within the therapeutic range in three of the six human MPNST cell lines. In two of these three, imatinib mesylate-sensitive cell lines, imatinib mesylate also significantly suppressed tumor growth in a xenograft model. Others have seen similar results with the second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib [106].
Another group identified bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) expression as neurofibromin regulated but independent of NRAS and MEK1/2. BMP2 belongs to the TGF-β superfamily and functions as a morphogen required for the development of lung, heart, and central nervous system. Overexpression of BMP2 promotes malignancy-related attributes such as migration and invasion and is found in NF1-related malignant tumors [107]. Inhibition of BMP2 signaling by the small molecule LDN-193189 or by BMP2 short hairpin RNA (shRNA) decreased the motility and invasion of Nf1-deficient MPNST cells in vitro.
Pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) can induce differentiation and inhibit angiogenesis in several tumors, including MPNST. Demestre et al. determined that PEDF inhibited proliferation and augmented apoptosis in S462 MPNST cells in vitro, and suppressed MPNST tumor burden in a nude mouse model, mainly due to inhibition of angiogenesis [108]. These results demonstrate the inhibitory effects of PEDF on the growth of human MPNST via induction of anti-angiogenesis and apoptosis, and suggest a potential novel approach for future therapy against MPNST.
Chau et al. recently described a novel small chemical compound, Compound 21 (Cpd21) that inhibits tumor cell growth [109]. Cpd21 inhibits growth of all available in vitro models of MPNST and human MPNST cell lines, while remaining nontoxic to normally dividing Schwann cells or mouse embryonic fibroblasts by delaying the cell cycle, thereby leading to cellular apoptosis. While too early to determine if these findings will be replicable and transferable to treating human patients, Cpd21 certainly has potential as a novel chemotherapeutic agent.
Perhaps the most promising is the work done on the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway in MPNST. Jessen et al. showed that the MEK inhibitor, PD0325901, had a robust, yet transient, in vivo effect on survival in MPNST xenografts, possibly due to effects on tumor vasculature [91]. Others have reported dramatic response in a patient with resistant BRAF V600E mutated MPNST to the second-generation B-Raf enzyme inhibitor, Vemurafenib [110]. There are many new BRAF and MEK inhibitors still to be investigated in this tumor type. In addition, due to the multiplicity of Ras effectors and complexity of negative feedback regulation, therapeutic strategies against more aggressive Ras-related tumors are likely to include combinations of compounds that target multiple points in the Ras signaling network [91].
References
Ferner RE, Gutmann DH. International consensus statement on malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis. Cancer Res. 2002;62(5):1573–7.
Woodruff JM. Pathology of tumors of the peripheral nerve sheath in type 1 neurofibromatosis. Am J Med Genet. 1999;89(1):23–30.
Carli M, Ferrari A, Mattke A, et al. Pediatric malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: the Italian and German soft tissue sarcoma cooperative group. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(33):8422–30.
Evans DG, Baser ME, McGaughran J, Sharif S, Howard E, Moran A. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis 1. J Med Genet. 2002;39(5):311–4.
King AA, Debaun MR, Riccardi VM, Gutmann DH. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis 1. Am J Med Genet. 2000;93(5):388–92.
Zhou H, Coffin CM, Perkins SL, Tripp SR, Liew M, Viskochil DH. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: a comparison of grade, immunophenotype, and cell cycle/growth activation marker expression in sporadic and neurofibromatosis 1-related lesions. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(10):1337–45.
Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW, editors. WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013.
Rodriguez FJ, Folpe AL, Giannini C, Perry A. Pathology of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: diagnostic overview and update on selected diagnostic problems. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123(3):295–319.
Stein-Wexler R. Pediatric soft tissue sarcomas. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2011;32(5):470–88.
Evans DG, Birch JM, Ramsden RT, Sharif S, Baser ME. Malignant transformation and new primary tumours after therapeutic radiation for benign disease: substantial risks in certain tumour prone syndromes. J Med Genet. 2006;43(4):289–94.
Guo A, Liu A, Wei L, Song X. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: differentiation patterns and immunohistochemical features—a mini-review and our new findings. J Cancer. 2012;3:303–9.
Bernthal NM, Jones KB, Monument MJ, Liu T, Viskochil D, Randall RL. Lost in translation: ambiguity in nerve sheath tumor nomenclature and its resultant treatment effect. Cancer. 2013;5(2):519–28.
Costa J, Wesley RA, Glatstein E, Rosenberg SA. The grading of soft tissue sarcomas. Results of a clinicohistopathologic correlation in a series of 163 cases. Cancer. 1984;53(3):530–41.
Trojani M, Contesso G, Coindre JM, et al. Soft-tissue sarcomas of adults; study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histopathological grading system. Int J Cancer. 1984;33(1):37–42.
Ferner RE, Golding JF, Smith M, et al. [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) as a diagnostic tool for neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs): a long-term clinical study. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(2):390–4.
Nielsen GP, Stemmer-Rachamimov AO, Ino Y, Moller MB, Rosenberg AE, Louis DN. Malignant transformation of neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis 1 is associated with CDKN2A/p16 inactivation. Am J Pathol. 1999;155(6):1879–84.
Beert E, Brems H, Daniels B, et al. Atypical neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis type 1 are premalignant tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011;50(12):1021–32.
Brekke HR, Kolberg M, Skotheim RI, et al. Identification of p53 as a strong predictor of survival for patients with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Neuro Oncol. 2009;11(5):514–28.
Li H, Velasco-Miguel S, Vass WC, Parada LF, DeClue JE. Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways are associated with tumorigenesis in the Nf1:p53 mouse tumor model. Cancer Res. 2002;62(15):4507–13.
Mertens F, Dal Cin P, De Wever I, et al. Cytogenetic characterization of peripheral nerve sheath tumours: a report of the CHAMP study group. J Pathol. 2000;190(1):31–8.
Hollmann TJ, Hornick JL. INI1-deficient tumors: diagnostic features and molecular genetics. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(10):e47–63.
Rodriguez FJ, Stratakis CA, Evans DG. Genetic predisposition to peripheral nerve neoplasia: diagnostic criteria and pathogenesis of neurofibromatoses, Carney complex, and related syndromes. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123(3):349–67.
Cormier JN, Pollock RE. Soft tissue sarcomas. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54(2):94–109.
Kolberg M, Holand M, Agesen TH, et al. Survival meta-analyses for >1800 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor patients with and without neurofibromatosis type 1. Neuro Oncol. 2013;15(2):135–47.
Messiaen LM, Callens T, Mortier G, et al. Exhaustive mutation analysis of the NF1 gene allows identification of 95% of mutations and reveals a high frequency of unusual splicing defects. Hum Mutat. 2000;15(6):541–55.
Bottillo I, Ahlquist T, Brekke H, et al. Germline and somatic NF1 mutations in sporadic and NF1-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours. J Pathol. 2009;217(5):693–701.
Wimmer K, Yao S, Claes K, et al. Spectrum of single- and multiexon NF1 copy number changes in a cohort of 1,100 unselected NF1 patients. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2006;45(3):265–76.
Brekke HR, Ribeiro FR, Kolberg M, et al. Genomic changes in chromosomes 10, 16, and X in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors identify a high-risk patient group. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(9):1573–82.
Miller SJ, Rangwala F, Williams J, et al. Large-scale molecular comparison of human schwann cells to malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor cell lines and tissues. Cancer Res. 2006;66(5):2584–91.
Watson MA, Perry A, Tihan T, et al. Gene expression profiling reveals unique molecular subtypes of Neurofibromatosis Type I-associated and sporadic malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Brain Pathol. 2004;14(3):297–303.
Perrone F, Da Riva L, Orsenigo M, et al. PDGFRA, PDGFRB, EGFR, and downstream signaling activation in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Neuro Oncol. 2009;11(6):725–36.
Kourea HP, Orlow I, Scheithauer BW, Cordon-Cardo C, Woodruff JM. Deletions of the INK4A gene occur in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors but not in neurofibromas. Am J Pathol. 1999;155(6):1855–60.
Joseph NM, Mosher JT, Buchstaller J, et al. The loss of Nf1 transiently promotes self-renewal but not tumorigenesis by neural crest stem cells. Cancer Cell. 2008;13(2):129–40.
Subramanian S, Thayanithy V, West RB, et al. Genome-wide transcriptome analyses reveal p53 inactivation mediated loss of miR-34a expression in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours. J Pathol. 2010;220(1):58–70.
Holtkamp N, Atallah I, Okuducu AF, et al. MMP-13 and p53 in the progression of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Neoplasia. 2007;9(8):671–7.
Upadhyaya M, Kluwe L, Spurlock G, et al. Germline and somatic NF1 gene mutation spectrum in NF1-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs). Hum Mutat. 2008;29(1):74–82.
Verdijk RM, den Bakker MA, Dubbink HJ, Hop WC, Dinjens WN, Kros JM. TP53 mutation analysis of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2010;69(1):16–26.
Thomas L, Mautner VF, Cooper DN, Upadhyaya M. Molecular heterogeneity in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors associated with neurofibromatosis type 1. Hum Genomics. 2012;6:18.
Birindelli S, Perrone F, Oggionni M, et al. Rb and TP53 pathway alterations in sporadic and NF1-related malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Lab Invest. 2001;81(6):833–44.
Legius E, Dierick H, Wu R, et al. TP53 mutations are frequent in malignant NF1 tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1994;10(4):250–5.
Menon AG, Anderson KM, Riccardi VM, et al. Chromosome 17p deletions and p53 gene mutations associated with the formation of malignant neurofibrosarcomas in von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(14):5435–9.
Lothe RA, Smith-Sorensen B, Hektoen M, et al. Biallelic inactivation of TP53 rarely contributes to the development of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2001;30(2):202–6.
Cichowski K, Shih TS, Schmitt E, et al. Mouse models of tumor development in neurofibromatosis type 1. Science. 1999;286(5447):2172–6.
Vogel KS, Klesse LJ, Velasco-Miguel S, Meyers K, Rushing EJ, Parada LF. Mouse tumor model for neurofibromatosis type 1. Science. 1999;286(5447):2176–9.
Holtkamp N, Malzer E, Zietsch J, et al. EGFR and erbB2 in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors and implications for targeted therapy. Neuro Oncol. 2008;10(6):946–57.
Bradtmoller M, Hartmann C, Zietsch J, et al. Impaired Pten expression in human malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e47595.
Gregorian C, Nakashima J, Dry SM, et al. PTEN dosage is essential for neurofibroma development and malignant transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(46):19479–84.
Keng VW, Watson AL, Rahrmann EP, et al. Conditional inactivation of Pten with EGFR overexpression in Schwann cells models sporadic MPNST. Sarcoma. 2012;2012:620834.
Mantripragada KK, Spurlock G, Kluwe L, et al. High-resolution DNA copy number profiling of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors using targeted microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(4):1015–24.
Mawrin C, Kirches E, Boltze C, Dietzmann K, Roessner A, Schneider-Stock R. Immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of p53, RB, and PTEN in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Virchows Arch. 2002;440(6):610–5.
Wallace MR, Rasmussen SA, Lim IT, Gray BA, Zori RT, Muir D. Culture of cytogenetically abnormal schwann cells from benign and malignant NF1 tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2000;27(2):117–23.
Upadhyaya M, Spurlock G, Thomas L, et al. Microarray-based copy number analysis of neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF1)-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors reveals a role for Rho-GTPase pathway genes in NF1 tumorigenesis. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(4):763–76.
Chai G, Liu N, Ma J, et al. MicroRNA-10b regulates tumorigenesis in neurofibromatosis type 1. Cancer Sci. 2010;101(9):1997–2004.
Perry A, Kunz SN, Fuller CE, et al. Differential NF1, p16, and EGFR patterns by interphase cytogenetics (FISH) in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) and morphologically similar spindle cell neoplasms. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002;61(8):702–9.
Keizman D, Issakov J, Meller I, et al. Expression and significance of EGFR in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. J Neurooncol. 2009;94(3):383–8.
Tabone-Eglinger S, Bahleda R, Cote JF, et al. Frequent EGFR positivity and overexpression in high-grade areas of human MPNSTs. Sarcoma. 2008;2008:849156.
Byer SJ, Brossier NM, Peavler LT, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor invasion requires aberrantly expressed EGF receptors and is variably enhanced by multiple EGF family ligands. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2013;72(3):219–33.
Badache A, De Vries GH. Neurofibrosarcoma-derived Schwann cells overexpress platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors and are induced to proliferate by PDGF BB. J Cell Physiol. 1998;177(2):334–42.
Holtkamp N, Okuducu AF, Mucha J, et al. Mutation and expression of PDGFRA and KIT in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, and its implications for imatinib sensitivity. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27(3):664–71.
Fan Q, Yang J, Wang G. Clinical and molecular prognostic predictors of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Clin Transl Oncol. 2013;16:191–9.
Torres KE, Zhu QS, Bill K, et al. Activated MET is a molecular prognosticator and potential therapeutic target for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(12):3943–55.
Albritton K, Rankin C, Coffin C, et al. Phase II trial of erlotinib in metastatic or unresectable malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition). Vol 24, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 9518.
Chugh R, Wathen JK, Maki RG, et al. Phase II multicenter trial of imatinib in 10 histologic subtypes of sarcoma using a bayesian hierarchical statistical model. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(19):3148–53.
Maki RG, D’Adamo DR, Keohan ML, et al. Phase II study of sorafenib in patients with metastatic or recurrent sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(19):3133–40.
Schuetze S, Wathen S, Choy E, et al. Results of a Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration (SARC) phase II trial of dasatinib in previously treated, high-grade, advanced sarcoma. ASCO. 2010. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:15s (suppl; abstr 10009).
Miller SJ, Jessen WJ, Mehta T, et al. Integrative genomic analyses of neurofibromatosis tumours identify SOX9 as a biomarker and survival gene. EMBO Mol Med. 2009;1(4):236–48.
Carbonnelle-Puscian A, Vidal V, Laurendeau I, et al. SOX9 expression increases with malignant potential in tumors from patients with neurofibromatosis 1 and is not correlated to desert hedgehog. Hum Pathol. 2011;42(3):434–43.
Pytel P, Karrison T, Can G, Tonsgard JH, Krausz T, Montag AG. Neoplasms with schwannian differentiation express transcription factors known to regulate normal schwann cell development. Int J Surg Pathol. 2010;18(6):449–57.
Miller SJ, Lan ZD, Hardiman A, et al. Inhibition of Eyes Absent Homolog 4 expression induces malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor necrosis. Oncogene. 2010;29(3):368–79.
Presneau N, Eskandarpour M, Shemais T, et al. MicroRNA profiling of peripheral nerve sheath tumours identifies miR-29c as a tumour suppressor gene involved in tumour progression. Br J Cancer. 2013;108(4):964–72.
Weng Y, Chen Y, Chen J, Liu Y, Bao T. Identification of serum microRNAs in genome-wide serum microRNA expression profiles as novel noninvasive biomarkers for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor diagnosis. Med Oncol. 2013;30(2):531.
Kawai A, Kondo T, Suehara Y, Kikuta K, Hirohashi S. Global protein-expression analysis of bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(9):2099–106.
Dugu L, Hayashida S, Nakahara T, et al. Aberrant expression of tenascin-c and neuronatin in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Eur J Dermatol. 2010;20(5):580–4.
Yan X, Takahara M, Dugu L, et al. Expression of cathepsin K in neurofibromatosis 1-associated cutaneous malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors and neurofibromas. J Dermatol Sci. 2010;58(3):227–9.
Gesundheit B, Parkin P, Greenberg M, et al. The role of angiogenesis in the transformation of plexiform neurofibroma into malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2010;32(7):548–53.
Cabibi D, Zerilli M, Caradonna G, Schillaci L, Belmonte B, Rodolico V. Diagnostic and prognostic value of CD10 in peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(8):3149–55.
Patel RM, Folpe AL. Immunohistochemistry for human telomerase reverse transcriptase catalytic subunit (hTERT): a study of 143 benign and malignant soft tissue and bone tumours. Pathology. 2009;41(6):527–32.
Scaife CL, Pisters PW. Combined-modality treatment of localized soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2003;12(2):355–68.
Abbas JS, Holyoke ED, Moore R, Karakousis CP. The surgical treatment and outcome of soft-tissue sarcoma. Arch Surg. 1981;116(6):765–9.
Ingham S, Huson SM, Moran A, Wylie J, Leahy M, Evans DG. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in NF1: improved survival in women and in recent years. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(18):2723–8.
Ren X, Wang J, Hu M, Jiang H, Yang J, Jiang Z. Clinical, radiological, and pathological features of 26 intracranial and intraspinal malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. J Neurosurg. 2013;119(3):695–708.
Yu J, Deshmukh H, Payton JE, et al. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization identifies CDK4 and FOXM1 alterations as independent predictors of survival in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(7):1924–34.
Endo M, Yamamoto H, Setsu N, et al. Prognostic significance of AKT/mTOR and MAPK pathways and antitumor effect of mTOR inhibitor in NF1-related and sporadic malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(2):450–61.
Zehou O, Fabre E, Zelek L, et al. Chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis 1: a 10-year institutional review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:127.
Amirian ES, Goodman JC, New P, Scheurer ME. Pediatric and adult malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: an analysis of data from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program. J Neurooncol. 2014;116(3):609–16.
Santoro A, Tursz T, Mouridsen H, et al. Doxorubicin versus CYVADIC versus doxorubicin plus ifosfamide in first-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13(7):1537–45.
Verma S, Bramwell V. Dose-intensive chemotherapy in advanced adult soft tissue sarcoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2002;2(2):201–15.
Fernberg JO, Wiklund T, Monge O, et al. Chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma. The Scandinavian Sarcoma Group experience. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1999;285:62–8.
Donovan S, Shannon KM, Bollag G. GTPase activating proteins: critical regulators of intracellular signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1602(1):23–45.
Dodd RD, Mito JK, Eward WC, et al. NF1 deletion generates multiple subtypes of soft-tissue sarcoma that respond to MEK inhibition. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12:1906–17.
Jessen WJ, Miller SJ, Jousma E, et al. MEK inhibition exhibits efficacy in human and mouse neurofibromatosis tumors. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(1):340–7.
Bhola P, Banerjee S, Mukherjee J, et al. Preclinical in vivo evaluation of rapamycin in human malignant peripheral nerve sheath explant xenograft. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(2):563–71.
Johannessen CM, Johnson BW, Williams SMG, et al. TORC1 is essential for NF1-associated malignancies. Curr Biol. 2008;18(1):56–62.
Johannessen CM, Reczek EE, James MF, Brems H, Legius E, Cichowski K. The NF1 tumor suppressor critically regulates TSC2 and mTOR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(24):8573–8.
De Raedt T, Walton Z, Yecies JL, et al. Exploiting cancer cell vulnerabilities to develop a combination therapy for ras-driven tumors. Cancer Cell. 2011;20(3):400–13.
Slomiany MG, Dai L, Bomar PA, et al. Abrogating drug resistance in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors by disrupting hyaluronan-CD44 interactions with small hyaluronan oligosaccharides. Cancer Res. 2009;69(12):4992–8.
Kohli L, Kaza N, Coric T, et al. 4-Hydroxytamoxifen induces autophagic death through K-Ras degradation. Cancer Res. 2013;73(14):4395–405.
Patel AV, Eaves D, Jessen WJ, et al. Ras-driven transcriptome analysis identifies aurora kinase A as a potential malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor therapeutic target. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(18):5020–30.
Lopez G, Torres K, Liu J, et al. Autophagic survival in resistance to histone deacetylase inhibitors: novel strategies to treat malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Cancer Res. 2011;71(1):185–96.
Wu J, Patmore DM, Jousma E, et al. EGFR-STAT3 signaling promotes formation of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Oncogene. 2014;33(2):173–80.
Rahrmann EP, Watson AL, Keng VW, et al. Forward genetic screen for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor formation identifies new genes and pathways driving tumorigenesis. Nat Genet. 2013;45(7):756–66.
Watson AL, Rahrmann EP, Moriarity BS, et al. Canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling drives human schwann cell transformation, progression, and tumor maintenance. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(6):674–89.
Mo W, Chen J, Patel A, et al. CXCR4/CXCL12 mediate autocrine cell-cycle progression in NF1-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Cell. 2013;152(5):1077–90.
Maris JM, Wiersma SR, Mahgoub N, et al. Monosomy 7 myelodysplastic syndrome and other second malignant neoplasms in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Cancer. 1997;79:1438–46.
Ohishi J, Aoki M, Nabeshima K, et al. Imatinib mesylate inhibits cell growth of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in vitro and in vivo through suppression of PDGFR-beta. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:224.
Jiang W, Schnabel C, Spyra M, et al. Efficacy and selectivity of nilotinib on NF1-associated tumors in vitro. J Neurooncol. 2014;116(2):231–6.
Sun D, Haddad R, Kraniak JM, Horne SD, Tainsky MA. RAS/MEK-independent gene expression reveals BMP2-related malignant phenotypes in the Nf1-deficient MPNST. Mol Cancer Res. 2013;11(6):616–27.
Demestre M, Terzi MY, Mautner V, Vajkoczy P, Kurtz A, Pina AL. Effects of pigment epithelium derived factor (PEDF) on malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs). J Neurooncol. 2013;115(3):391–9.
Chau V, Lim SK, Mo W, et al. Preclinical therapeutic efficacy of a novel pharmacologic inducer of apoptosis in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Cancer Res. 2014;74(2):586–97.
Kaplan HG. Vemurafenib treatment of BRAF V600E-mutated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2013;11(12):1466–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weiss, B., Sheil, A., Ratner, N. (2015). Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors. In: Karajannis, M., Zagzag, D. (eds) Molecular Pathology of Nervous System Tumors. Molecular Pathology Library, vol 8. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1830-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1830-0_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1829-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1830-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)