Abstract
Fermented foods and beverages have been an important part of our lives in all over the world. Their production is one of the oldest manufacturing and preservation methods, dating back to ancient times. Yeasts, mainly Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and lactic acid bacteria have long been used for the production of many fermented products.
In food industry, yeasts have an important role in the production of alcoholic beverages, bioethanol, baker’s yeast and yeast-derived products. Lactic acid bacteria also have a fundamental effect on the production of some food products such as yoghurt, fermented vegetables, sour-dough bread and others.
This chapter gives some information on the beneficial aspects of yeasts and lactic acid bacteria in foods and beverages.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Lactic Acid Bacterium
- Lactobacillus Plantarum
- Wine Yeast
- Leuconostoc Mesenteroides
- Kluyveromyces Marxianus
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Introduction
Yeasts are non-photosynthetic, relatively sophisticated, living, unicellular fungi. They are substantially beneficial to human culture, in particular for the production of alcoholic beverages and foods. Yeasts also play detrimental role in the spoilage of foods and beverages and some can be pathogenic. Of the yeasts, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and related species are widely used in the food and beverage industries. Many species of Saccharomyces are safe (GRAS) and the term “yeast” is generally employed as synonymous with Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Stewart and Russell 1998). In industry, yeasts are commercially used in the production of alcoholic beverages, industrial alcohols, baker’s yeast, enzymes and yeast-derived flavour products (Walker 1999).
Lactic acid bacteria are unicellular prokaryotes of Gram-positive, non-sporing, non-respiring cocci or rods which form lactic acid as the major end-product during the fermentation of sugars. Lactic acid bacteria include the species of Lactobacillus, Carnobacterium, Leuconostoc, Oenococcus, Streptococcus, Lactococcus, Enterococcus, Vagococcus, Pediococcus, Aerococcus and Tetragenococcus (Bourdichon et al. 2012). Many lactic acid bacteria are safe and they are used extensively in the production and maturation of fermented foods and beverages such as yoghurt, pickles, table olives, sour dough bread (Axelsson 1998; Caplice and Fitzgerald 1999).
This chapter will briefly discuss the beneficial aspects of yeasts and lactic acid bacteria in food processing.
2 Yeasts in Food Processing
2.1 Baker’s Yeast and Single-Cell Production
Baker’s yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is used for bakery and confectionary processes throughout the world (Akbaria et al. 2012; Romano and Capece 2013).
Baker’s yeast can be found in different forms like compressed, granular, cream, dried pellet, instant, encapsulated or frozen (Young and Cauvain 2007).
Some of the basic desired properties of baker’s yeast are rapidly utilization of maltose, tolerance to high levels of sucrose, enduring freeze-thawing stress and production of high levels of CO2. Another desired feature of baker’s yeast is using disaccharide melibiose. One of the most desirable characteristic of baker’s yeast strains is high fermentation rate. Development of the freeze-tolerance and freeze-thawing survival of yeasts is a property that could be useful for the quality and generation of bakery products. Baker’s yeast should be osmotolerant, able to tolerate chemicals (salt, propionates), maintain a high growth capacity, should not aggregate and must have a good storage capability. In addition, during the drying process and after the addition of dry yeast to flour for dough making, the yeast must have a high rate of vitality (Randez-Gil et al. 1999).
High fermentation rate is priority desired for baker’s yeast strains since it is completely connected to dough-leavening. Yeasts at the same time encourage gluten network and generate aromatic compounds (Romano and Capece 2013). During the fermentation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolises fermentable sugars (glucose, sucrose, maltose and fructose) and results in releasing CO2 therefore rising dough volume. CO2 is soluble in water and saturates the aqueous phase. After reaching saturation, all CO2 produced passes through unsaturated gas phase and permit rising of the volume of bread. Solubilization of CO2 in water results in decreasing the pH and elevates the acidity of the dough (Boekhout and Robert 2003). In addition, CO2 affects rheological characteristics of fermented dough (Romano and Capece 2013). The most important two factors for volume of the bread are fermentation activity of yeast (producing CO2) and ability of the dough to keep gas. The second one is carried out by gluten network. Accordingly these two components have to be in balance to acquire a quality end-product (Boekhout and Robert 2003).
Yeast contributes to the bakery products not only for increasing volume of the dough, but also producing aroma compounds (Birch et al. 2013). Due to the activity of yeasts, aroma compounds are formed widely in the crumb of bread and the most abundant compounds are alcohols, aldehydes as well as 2,3-butanedione (diacetyl), 3-hydroxy-2-butanone (acetoin) and esters (Hazelwood et al. 2008).
Volatile compounds which are responsible for aroma properties of dough and aroma precursors are produced by the thermal reactions during baking. In the course of the dough fermentation performed by yeasts, the chemical phenomena that dominates the fermentation is alcohol fermentation (Pozo et al. 2006).
Single-cell proteins are normally mentioned as source of mixed proteins. They are obtained from microorganisms like algae, fungi, yeasts and bacteria. If microbial cells are composed of significant amount of proteins, these microorganisms are referred as single-cell protein and native protein source. Due to increasing human population and the worldwide shortage of protein microbial biomass as food and feed, single-cell protein has gained importance (Nasseri et al. 2011).
Yeasts are the most suitable microorganisms for the production of single-cell proteins due to their high nutritional value. Some of the yeasts for production of single-cell proteins are Candida lipolytica, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Amoco torula, Candida utilis, Candida intermedia and Candida tropicalis (Chandrani and Jayathilake 2000).
2.2 Production of Alcoholic Beverages
Yeasts play an important role in the production of fermented alcoholic beverages, especially beer, wine and distilled spirits. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most important species involved in wine making and brewing (McKay et al. 2011). Fermentation is the core microbial reaction in the production of alcoholic beverages and the microorganisms, which contaminate the raw materials before and after fermentation, can affect the final quality of fermented products. For the quality assurance of alcoholic beverages, controlling of such influences has become an important issue (Fleet 1998).
2.2.1 Beer
Beer is made from starch containing malted cereals, notably barley, hops, water and yeasts. Beer processing is a multistage process and fermentation is one of these stages (Deak 2008). In the brewery fermentation yeasts convert the fermentable sugars (mainly maltose) in the wort to ethanol and carbon dioxide as the major products of metabolism. Also a series of minor metabolites such as esters, higher alcohols, organic acids, aldehydes, ketones, sulphur compounds those contribute to flavour and aroma of beer are produced by yeasts (Briggs et al. 2004; Gibson et al. 2008). Depending on these minor metabolites, yeasts have a fundamental impact on the quality since these compounds play a key role on the organoleptic profile of beer (Pinho et al. 2006; Ferreira et al. 2010).
Brewer’s yeast belongs to the group of Saccharomyces sensu stricto formed around the species Saccharomyces cerevisiae and is mainly divided into two groups, ale brewing yeasts and lager brewing yeasts, according to their use for the production of ales and lagers, respectively (Deak 2008; Lodolo et al. 2008; Nakao et al. 2009). These brewer’s yeasts are classified based on flocculation behaviour; top fermenting and bottom fermenting which are called as Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ale type) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (lager type) in the literature, respectively (Stewart and Russell 1998; Jentsch 2007). However, in beverage industry, ale yeast is referred as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and lager yeast is referred as Saccharomyces uvarum (carlsbergensis). Currently, yeast taxonomists have assigned all strains used in brewing to the species Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Stewart and Russell 1998). Top-fermenting yeasts produce ale beers at fermentation temperatures above 15 °C. At the end of fermentation they are carried to the surface of the wort. The other type is lager beer which is the most widespread beer type throughout the world. Lager beers are produced by bottom fermenting yeasts at fermentation temperatures below 15 °C. Lager yeasts have a good flocculation ability. They form flocculates at the bottom of the vessel by clumping together (Bamforth 2003; Ferreira et al. 2010). Top yeasts and bottom yeasts are collected to be used again from the surface and the fermenter bottom, respectively (Stewart and Russell 1998; Campbell 2003). Moreover, ale and lager yeasts are also different from each other depending on the ability to ferment the disaccharide melibiose (glucose-galactose). Since lager yeasts have the MEL gene, they can produce the extracellular enzyme α-galactosidase (melibiase) and are able to utilise melibiose. On the other hand, ale yeasts do not have the MEL gene, consequently do not produce α-galactosidase, therefore unable to utilise melibiose (Stewart and Russell 1998; Lodolo et al. 2008).
Brewing yeast should produce desirable flavour and aroma metabolites for the final product and fast growth, rapid and efficient fermentation are other essential properties (Campbell 2003). The brewing yeast should tolerate the environmental stresses, such as high ethanol and low oxygen levels (Ferreira et al. 2010). Ethanol is a desirable product of the fermentation process, but accumulation of it can cause significant chemical stress on the yeast cell (Lentini et al. 2003; Hutkins 2006). Suitable flocculation and sedimentation or head formation at the end of the fermentation are other essential requirements depending on the beer type. High final viability for pitching for the next fermentation and high genetic stability are other important properties of suitable brewing yeast (Campbell 2003).
2.2.2 Wine
Yeasts are important microorganisms in wine microbiology. Biotransformation of grape sugars into ethanol, carbon dioxide and several secondary products is a complex process and yeasts are responsible for this conversion (Ciani et al. 2010). Besides the conversion of sugars to ethanol, yeasts also make positive contributions to wine flavour by the synthesis of other minor metabolites that define the flavour and other sensorial properties (Cortes and Blanco 2011; De Benedictis et al. 2011; Navarrete-Bolanos 2012). The main activities of wine yeasts are rapid, complete and efficient conversion of the grape sugars into ethanol and carbondioxide; influencing the quality of the grapes before the harvest by biocontrol of molds; biocatalysis of neutral grape components into flavour active compounds; producing secondary metabolites such as esters, acids, alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, polyols, volatile sulphur compounds which directly impact the wine flavour without development of off-flavours (Lambrechts and Pretorius 2000; Fleet 2003a). Spontaneous fermentation of “must” is initiated by indigenous yeasts and final stages are dominated by the alcohol-tolerant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The non-Saccharomyces yeasts, commonly Kloeckera spp. and Candida spp., dominate at the beginning of the fermentation and affect the sensorial characteristics of wine (Ganga and Martinez 2004). The other isolated yeasts are Metschnikowia, Dekkera, Pichia, Kluyveromyces, Issatchenkia, Saccharomycodes, Zygosaccharomyces, Torulaspora, Debaryomyces, and Schizosaccharomyces (Fleet 2003a). It was reported that Kloeckera apiculata (its telemorph Hanseniaspora uvarum) is the predominant non-Saccharomyces yeast present in grape must (Fleet and Heard 1993). When the ethanol content starts to increase during the fermentation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the main wine yeast, degrades the sugar and can tolerate high ethyl alcohol. It takes over the fermentation and completes the process (Fleet and Heard 1993; Blanco et al. 2012).
Fast fermentation of grape juice sugars to high ethanol concentrations is essential for wine yeasts. Wine yeasts should exhibit uniform dispersion and produce minimal foam. At the end of the fermentation, sediment should be quickly taken from the wine. It is also important that the yeast should not give slow, sluggish or stuck fermentations (Bisson 1999). Desirable characteristics of wine yeasts include some properties such as rapid initiation of fermentation, high fermentation efficiency, high ethanol tolerance, high osmotolerance, moderate biomass, high genetic stability, high sulphite tolerance, low sulphite binding activity, low foam formation, compacts sediment, resistance to desiccation, killer activity, genetic marking, proteolytic activity and low nitrogen demand. Other properties which are related to the flavour characteristics are also reported as low volatile acidity production, less higher alcohol production, liberation of glycosylated flavour precursors, high glycerol production, hydrolytic activity, enhanced autolysis and modified esterase activity. Moreover, the yeast must give a good flavour, free of sensory faults, and allow the grape character to be perceived by the consumer (Lambrechts and Pretorius 2000; Swiegers et al. 2005; Ciani et al. 2010). Low sulphite and biogenic amine formation and low ethyl carbamate (urea) potential are metabolic properties related to health implications (Pretorius 2000; Curtin et al. 2011).
2.3 Yeasts in Table Olives
Table olive is an important fermented product in the food industry. Depending on some of its unique characteristics such as the bitter component called oleuropein, low sugar concentration and high oil content, it cannot be consumed directly and needs to be processed (Arroyo-López et al. 2008). During the processing of table olives, microorganisms, both lactic acid bacteria and yeasts, play important roles. Yeasts act as both desirable and spoilage microorganisms in table olives (Garrido-Fernández et al. 1997; Arroyo-López et al. 2012). It was reported that the species of yeast mainly present in the table olive fermentation are in the genera of Saccharomyces, Pichia, Debaryomyces, Candida and Kluyveromyces (Arroyo-López et al. 2008; Tofalo et al. 2013). Yeasts produce compounds such as alcohols, ethyl acetate, acetaldehyde and organic acids which enhance the organoleptic characteristics (Garrido-Fernandez et al. 1995; Arroyo-López et al. 2008; Alves et al. 2012). Moreover, yeasts in olive fermentation could improve the aromatic profile of fermented olives by increasing their free fatty acid content, which could be the precursors to the formation of diverse volatile compounds, such as propanol or 2-butanol (Hernández et al. 2007; Rodriguez-Gómez et al. 2010; Rodríguez-Gómez et al. 2012). Another positive effect of yeasts on the olive fermentation is acting as biocontrol agents which are achieved by the toxic proteins also called as killer toxins those enable the inhibition of the growth of fungi (Viljoen 2006; Arroyo-López et al. 2012). It was reported that a considerable number of killer strains of Debaryomyces, Pichia and Candida species were isolated from table olives (Marquina et al. 1997). Especially, inhibitory activities of species Wickerhamomyces anomalus and Pichia membranaefaciens were proven against the fungi (Santos et al. 2000; Arroyo-López et al. 2012). Moreover, yeasts can improve growth of lactic acid bacteria which are the essential organisms of fermentation by the synthesis of nutritive compounds (Viljoen 2006; Alves et al. 2012; Tofalo et al. 2013).
Nevertheless, yeasts sometimes may be associated with different kinds of olive spoilage such as gas pocket formation depending on the production of CO2, softening of the fruits due to pectinolitic activity, clouding of brines, biofilm production and sometimes production of off-flavours (Arroyo-López et al. 2008; Alves et al. 2012).
2.4 Yeasts in Meat-Based Fermented Foods
Yeasts are found on meat and processed meat products since meat is a suitable media for growth of them. They have also positive effects on fermented meat products and many yeast species such as Candida, Debaryomyces, Pichia, Trichosporon, Cryptococcus, Rhodotorula and Yarrowia have been isolated from fermented meat products, especially sausages (Dillon and Board 1991; Deak 2008). Lipolytic and proteolytic activities, which contribute to flavour due to the production of volatiles, of those yeasts were described (Olesen and Stahnke 2000; Selgas and Garcia 2007). Most frequently isolated yeasts are Yarrowia lipolytica and Debaryomyces hansenii (its anamorph Candida famata) (Gardini et al. 2001; Deak 2004). Debaryomyces hansenii is also used as commercial starter culture in fermented meat products due to its positive contributions on final product (Hammes and Hertel 1998; Toldrá 2002; Selgas and Garcia 2007).
2.5 Yeasts in Dairy-Based Fermented Foods
Various types of yeasts are naturally found in milk and fermented dairy products such as kefir, koumis, viili, longfil, yoghurt and all types of cheese (Wouters et al. 2002; Frölich-Wyder 2003; Cantor et al. 2004). Yeasts play essential role due to their important functions in dairy based products such as contributing to the ripening of cheese, speeding up the maturation, improving texture and aroma characteristics of certain milk products, increasing pH of cheese, manufacturing of some metabolites like ethanol, acetaldehyde, CO2, amino acids and vitamins, removing toxic end-products of metabolism, taking part in some interactions and contributing to the fermentation by supporting the starter cultures, preventing some undesired microorganisms those cause product quality default, inducing the growing of starter cultures by means of the utilization of organic acids, contributing to the flavour characteristic of dairy products due to the strong proteolytic and lipolytic activity, fermenting lactose and utilizing citric acid (Fleet 1990; Spinnler et al. 2001; Jakobsen et al. 2002; Ferreira and Viljoen 2003).
Most common yeast species found in dairy products are as follows: Candida lusitaniae, Candida krusei, Kluveromyces lactis, Debaryomyces hansenii, Yarrowia lipolytica, Kluyveromyces marxianus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Galactomyces geotrichum, Candida zeylanoides and various Pichia species. These yeast species play a key role in the processing of dairy-based fermented products by the contribution to flavour and colour (Jakobsen and Narwnjs 1996; Viljoen 2001; Samelis and Sofos 2003; Jacques and Caserogola 2008).
There are numerous studies to identify yeast species in various cheese types. Debaryomyces hansenii, Candida lipolytica, Candida kefyr, Candida intermedia, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cryptococcus albidus and Kluyveromyces marxianus are the most prevelant species in Camembert and Blue-veined cheese (Roostita and Fleet 1996), Debaryomyces hansenii, Galactomyces candidum, Issatchenkia orientalis, Kluyveromyces lactis, Kluyveromyces marxianus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Yarrowia lipolytica and Candida catenulata were identified as predominant yeast species in various cheeses from Austria, Denmark, France, Germany and Italy (Prillinger et al. 1999). Additionally, Saccharomyces unisporus and Kluyveromyces marxianus are utilised for the manufacture of kefir (Abdelgadir et al. 2001; Gadaga et al. 2001; Strehaiano et al. 2006).
Especially, Debaryomyces hansenii and Yarrowia lipolytica are suitable for generation of starter cultures because of their proteolytic and lipolytic activity and also make favorable contributions on cheese ripening (Van den Tempel and Jacobsen 2000; Guerzoni et al. 2001; Ferreira and Viljoen 2003). In a study on feta cheeses, various aroma compounds were investigated and it was shown that yeast species are effective in the formation of aromatic substances such as 2,3-bütandiol (McSweeney and Sousa 2000), 1-bütanol, 1-heptanol, hexanal and nonanal (Bintsis and Robinson 2004; Kesenkaş and Akbulut 2006).
2.6 Yeasts in Cereal-Based Fermented Foods
Cereal and cereal crops are accepted as significant nutrients all over the world. Cereal grains and legumes are utilised as raw material for many foods and beverages in different countries and cultures (Blandino et al. 2003; Heredia et al. 2009). The basic cereals utilised for nourishment are corn (maize), wheat, barley, rice, oats, rye, millet, sorghum and soybeans. Cereals are substrates for some fermentation products such as; beer, sake, spirits, boza, fura, malt vinegar, tarhana, idli and baked goods made from doughs leavened by yeasts or sourdough. Cereal based foods are usually performed by natural fermentations including mixed cultures of yeasts, bacteria and fungi (Gotcheva et al. 2000; Hammes et al. 2005; Settani et al. 2011).
Sourdough is a significant product for bakeries and it is characterized as combined activity of yeasts and lactic acid bacteria (Giannou et al. 2003; Chavan and Jana 2008). The most important function of yeasts in sourdough fermentation is metabolizing fermentable sugars for generating CO2, increasing gas formation capacity, improving flavour and aroma, contributing to the texture of the crumb and the nutritional value (De Vuyst and Vancanneyt 2007; Vogelmann et al. 2009; Vrancken et al. 2010; Chavan and Chavan 2011). The generated CO2 plays an important role in the formation of dough volume and is used for leavening agent and affects bread texture, density and volume (Decock and Cappelle 2005).
2.7 Bioethanol Production (Industrial Ethyl Alcohol)
The importance of biofuels continues to increase worldwide. Alternative energy sources are necessary for all over the world because of political instability of oil producer countries, global environmental concerns, volatile oil price and negative effects of fosil fuels (Wyman 2007; Bai et al. 2008; Mussatto et al. 2010). Bioethanol is commonly thought as the most promising biofuels among renewable sources (Sanchez and Cardona 2008; Moona et al. 2012).
Bioethanol can be produced from various raw materials. Wide variety of renewable feedstock can be classified in three main groups: (1) simple sugars those containing significant amounts of easily fermentable sugar (sugar cane, sugar beets, sweet sorghum), (2) starches and fructosans (corn, potatoes, rice, wheat, agave, inulin) and (3) cellulosics (stover, grasses, corn cobs, wood, sugar cane bagasse) (Demirbas 2007; Sanchez and Cardona 2008; Amorim et al. 2009; Chi et al. 2011).
Yeasts for bioethanol fermentation can be defined in terms of their performance parameters such as temperature range, pH range, alcohol tolerance, growth rate, productivity, osmotic tolerance, specificity, yield, genetic stability and inhibitor tolerance (Dien et al. 2003). Conventially, Saccharomyces cerevisiae is used for bioethanol fermentation. Saccharomyces cerevisiae can ferment glucose into bioethanol, but unable to ferment xylose (Keshwani and Cheng 2009). Xylose-fermenting yeasts, such as Pichia stipitis, Candida shehatae and Candida parapsilosis, can metabolise xylose via the action of xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase. Hereby, using recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae, carrying heterologous xylitol reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase from Pichia stipitis and xylulokinase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, bioethanol production from xylose can be successfully done (Katahira et al. 2006).
2.8 Yeast-Derived Products
A reliable source of ingredients and additives for food processing is obtained from yeasts (Demain et al. 1998). Preparations of baker’s and brewer’s yeasts have been available for many years as dieatary supplements due to their high content of proteins, peptides, amino acids, B vitamins and trace minerals. At the present time, numerous products are derived from yeasts which are antioxidants, autolysates, enzymes, minerals, vitamins, colour and flavour compounds (Stam et al. 1998).
Yeasts and yeast extracts are known as source of antioxidant compounds for years (Abbas 2006). It is believed that yeast peroxisomes play nearly the same role to plant peroxisomes. Consequently, the response in yeasts to oxygen-derived radicals would include various enzymes, involving catalases, superoxide dismutases and glutathione, besides several NADP-dependent dehydrogenases (Del Rio et al. 2003).
Interest to the biotechnological generation of natural aroma compounds is rapidly increasing. Yeasts contribute significantly to the aroma of fermented foods. During fermentation yeasts synthesize a vast number of aroma compounds (Suomalainen and Lehtonen 1979; Berry 1995). The numerically and quantitatively largest groups of aroma compounds synthesized by yeasts consist of fusel alcohols, fatty acids, acids, esters, carbonyl compounds, acetals, phenols, hydrocarbons, nitrogen compounds, sulphur compounds, lactones, sugars, and a diversity of other unclassified compounds (Suomalainen and Lehtonen 1978, 1979; Berry 1989, 1995; Garafolo 1992; Dickinson 2003).
Yeast-formed flavours can be generally classified into three categories as yeast metabolic products which include products synthesized or derived through yeast biocatalysis, yeast cell mass-derived products which include products prepared through yeast autolysis and complex products resulting from the interaction of yeast-derived products with other food matrix ingredients (Kollar et al. 1992; Stam et al. 1998).
Yeast extracts can be produced using autolysis, plasmolysis and hydrolysis but the most frequently production practise is autolysis (Tanguler and Erten 2008). They are concentrates of the soluble fraction of yeast cells and mainly produced from baker’s or spent brewer’s yeasts, both Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In Europe, the main raw material for yeast extract is baker’s yeast which is primary grown high protein yeast. In the UK and the USA, debittered brewer’s yeast is used. Other yeasts, in particular, Candida utilis and Kluyveromyces marxianus are also sometimes used (Sommer 1998). Recently, temperature-sensitive autolysing strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae which showed increased autolysis at 37 °C has been used for yeast extract by Asahi Breweries in Japan (Stam et al. 1998).
To produce a product by autolysis, viable yeast slurry containing 15–20 % yeast solids is maintained at an elevated temperature in the range of 45–60 °C for up to 36 h or more at about pH 5.5 (Nagodawithana 1992; Joseph 1999). At elevated temperatures, the yeast cells die but their native enzymes are still remain active (Sommer 1998). During autolysis, intracellular yeast enzymes located in the general matrix of the cell cause breakdown of mainly proteins, peptides, carbohydrates, nucleic acids (mainly RNA) and cell wall materials into free amino acids (mainly glutamate), peptides, sugars and nucleotides (Stam et al. 1998). The most important flavour enhancing components are glutamate and 5′-nucleotides, especially 5′-guanylate (5′-GMP). Glutamate has 100–300 mg/l of taste threshold, for 5′-inosinate (5′-IMP) and 5′-guanylate 120 and 35 mg/l, respectively. Glutamate and 5′-nucleotides are chemically stable substances but enzimatically active foods such as raw meats, raw fish and vegetable tissues can degrade these compounds (Sommer 1998).
Plasmolysis is generally used for rapid initiation of the cell degradation process for the production of yeast extract especially in Europe but less popular in the USA. During plasmolysis, yeast cells start to lose water to equilibrate their osmotic pressure with the surrounding medium in the presence of high amounts of promoters (Nagodawithana 1992, 1994).
Commonly used plasmolysing agents are common salt (sodium chloride), sucrose, ethanol, ethyl acetate, amyl acetate, chloroform, toluene and combinations of salts such as potassium chloride (Peppler 1982). The most frequently utilised agent is common salt (Reed and Nagodawithana 1991) at the ratio of 1–3 %. However, using salt as a plasmolysing agent leads to an extract with high salt concentration (Reed and Nagodawithana 1991; Nagodawithana 1994).
Yeast cells are also rich source of vitamins such as thiamine, pantothenic acid, riboflavin, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 (Harrison 1970; Peppler 1970; Reed 1981; Halasz and Laszity 1991). Yeast cells are also good sources of biotin, folic acid and ergosterol.
Intracellular yeast enzymes can be prepared from whole yeast cell mass by mechanical disruption and other means. These enzymes have found several food uses (Peppler 1979; Reed 1981; Halasz and Laszity 1991). Invertase obtained from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other sucrolytic food yeasts are used in the confectionary industry to break down sucrose for manufacturing liquid-centre candies (Reed 1981; Halasz and Laszity 1991). Lactase from Kluyveromyces spp. is also important for several food uses, especially to hydrolyse lactose. Ribonuclease obtained from baker’s yeast is used for RNA denaturation during the manufacture of yeast nucleotides (Sanchez et al. 2003).
A number of yeasts can produce carotenoids which are used as food colorants including species of Rhodotorula (Rhodotorula glutinis, Rhodotorula lactis, Rhodotorula gracilis, and Rhodotorula rubra), Rhodosporidium, Phaffia rhodozyma and Sporobolomyces pararoseus (Cang et al. 2002; Squina et al. 2002; Simova et al. 2003; Frengova et al. 2003, 2004; Cheng et al. 2004).
2.9 Yeasts as Biocontrol Agents
There is a good relationship between the terms of sustainable agriculture and biocontrol, because biological control concept benefits from natural biological cycles with the minimal environmental effect in the field of crop production (Spadaro and Gullino 2004). All foods and beverages have a wide variety of microbial species and interactive responses which affect the product quality. The major underlying response in biocontrol concept is antagonistic interactions (Fleet 2006). Antogonism effect is the inhibition of undesired or pathogenic microorganisms by competition for space or nutrients via the manufacture of toxic materials and by providing environmental exchange and by production of antimicrobial metabolites thus survival of desirable species (Huber 1997; Fleet 2006; Pometto et al. 2006; Satyanarayana and Kunze 2009).
Biocontrol activity of antagonism could be increased using many applications such as combining organic and inorganic additives with antogonistic yeasts (Mecteau et al. 2002). The most interesting microorganisms in biological control programmes are yeasts. Because they have some important properties which make them reasonable to be used as biocontrol agents (Satyanarayana and Kunze 2009).
In the last 20 years, some yeasts which can be utilised as potential biocontrol agent were identified. Some fungi such as Botrytis, Penicillium, Aspergillus, Rhizopus spp. give rise to pre and postharvest spoilage of fruits and vegetables. Certain yeasts can be used as biocontrol agents to these spoilage microorganisms and therefore chemicals can be less frequently used (Punja and Utkhede 2003; Fleet 2003b; Spadaro and Gullino 2004). Some of prominent potential biocontrol yeasts have been commercialised; e.g. Candida oleophila and Pseudozyma flocculosa. Some of the other species which are used as potential biocontrol agents are determined as Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Pichia guilliermondii, Candida sake, Sporobolomyces roseus, Aureobasidium pullulans and various Cryptococcus species (Fleet 2003b).
2.10 Probiotic Yeasts
Although lactic acid bacteria are well-known probiotic organisms, some yeast species also recognised as probiotics due to their health benefits. Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, have been reported as the major probiotic yeasts. Moreover, there is an interest to some other non-Saccharomyces species such as Debaryomyces hansenii, Yarrowia lipolytica, Issatchenkia orientalis, Kluyveromyces marxianus and Kluyveromyces lactis to be used as probiotics (Fleet 2006; Fleet and Balia 2006).
3 Lactic Acid Bacteria in Food Processing
3.1 Plant-Based Fermented Products
Plant-based fermented foods are popular all over the world and consumer demand for these fermented products is increasing. Olives, cucumber and sauerkraut are commercially important plant-based fermented vegetables eventhough most vegetables are fermented at small-scale level.
3.1.1 Table Olives
Table olives are one of the most important fermented foods obtained by mainly the action of lactic acid bacteria. The main processing types are lye-treated green olives in brine, untreated black olives in brine and ripe olives. First two methods include the lactic acid fermentation (Harris 1998; Hurtado et al. 2012).
Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus pentosus are the predominant species in most of the fermentations. However, the other lactobacilli or genera can take partial responsibility for this essential role or even can be the major actor of the fermentations depending on the olive cultivar, processing method and the geographical origin (Hurtado et al. 2012). Both of them are suitable for fermenting various table olive cultivars (Sánchez et al. 2001; Panagou et al. 2008) but cultivar and processing method are the major actors of a successful inoculation (Panagou and Tassou 2006; Hurtado et al. 2010).
In order to achieve an enhanced and more predictable fermentation process, brine inoculation with an appropriate starter culture of lactic acid bacteria can be used. Lactic acid bacteria convert carbohydrates into lactic acid, CO2 and other organic acids without the need for oxygen in the medium. However, higher concentrations of phenolic compounds in olive fruit, mainly oleuropein, could inhibit lactic acid bacteria (Amiot et al. 1990; Sánchez-Gómez et al. 2006; Landete et al. 2008; Hurtado et al. 2009; Rodriguez et al. 2009; Ghabbour et al. 2011). Moreover these phenolic compounds, especially oleuropein, give bitterness, therefore they are removed from fruit to become edible by the treatment with sodium hydroxide for lye-treated Spanish style green olives production. Unlike alkali treatment, to hydrolyse the bitter-tasting oleuropein, Lactobacillus pentosus can be used as starter due to its glycosidases and esterase activities (Servili et al. 2006).
Starters can be chosen based on a large variety of criteria like homo- and hetero-fermentation, acid production, salt tolerance, flavour development, temperature range, oleuropein-splitting ability and bacteriocin-production (Ruiz-Barba and Jimenez-Diaz 1995; Durán Quintana et al. 1999; Delgado et al. 2005).
Olives’ fermentation is done by the natural biota of olives consisting of a variety of bacteria, yeasts, and molds. The lactic acid bacteria become prominent during the intermediate stage of fermentation. Initially Leuconostoc mesenteroides and Pediococcus cerevisiae (now called Pediococcus pentosaceus) become prominent, and then lactobacilli, with Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus brevis become the most important.
Growth of Lactobacillus plantarum in the fermentation provides the necessary lactic acid formation for preservation and also for its characteristic flavour (Rodriguez De Le Borbolla et al. 1979, 1981). Also using suitable Lactobacillus plantarum starter cultures potentially improve the microbiological control of the process, increase the lactic acid yield and highly qualified fermented green olives are produced (Fernandez Diez 1983; Roig and Hernandez 1991; Ruiz-Barba et al. 1991; Garrido-Fernandez et al. 1995; Ruiz-Barba and Jimenez-Diaz 1995). Lactic acid bacteria can form the flavour during the fermentation. Numerous volatile compounds make a significant contribution to the final flavour of table olives (Sabatini et al. 2008).
3.1.2 Pickled Vegetables
3.1.2.1 Cucumber
Cucumbers are typically fermented in brine solutions in large tanks. Lactic acid bacteria may be involved during the primary fermentation of cucumbers. Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus pentosaceus have been chosen as the desired species of lactic acid bacteria for commercial cucumber fermentations. These homofermantative species are preferred for the fermentation to minimize purging requirements to remove CO2. Cucumber sugars are converted into lactic acid by the fermentation which is carried out by primarily Lactobacillus plantarum and pH is decreased (Ic and Ozcelik 1995, 1999).
During brine fermentation, keeping the structure integrity of whole cucumbers is very important. As a result of respiration and malolactic fermentation by Lactobacillus plantarum, CO2 may be formed. In order to prevent the serious economic losses due to gaseous spoilage (bloater damage), cucumbers may be purged with air. It should be taken into consideration that such kind of practice may increase the risk of growth of molds and yeasts (Tamang et al. 2005).
The potential involvement of Lactobacillus buchneri is indicated in the study of spoilage of fermented cucumber (Fleming et al. 1989, 2002; Kim and Breidt 2007). Lactobacillus buchneri has been isolated from fermented cucumbers those had undergone spoilage, characterized by decreased concentrations of lactic acid, increased pH, and increased concentrations of acetic and propionic acids (Franco and Pérez-Díaz 2012; Johanningsmeier et al. 2012). Only Lactobacillus buchneri was found to initiate lactic acid utilization in fermented cucumber media after several lactic acid bacteria have been isolated from spoiled fermented cucumber (Johanningsmeier et al. 2012). Therefore, Lactobacillus buchneri plays the major role in the initiation of secondary fermentations which lead to spoilage of fermented cucumber.
3.1.2.2 Sauerkraut
Sauerkraut is a commonly consumed vegetable in some European countries. It is a fermentation product of fresh cabbage. The starter for sauerkraut production is generally the normal flora of cabbage. Leuconostoc mesenteroides and Lactobacillus plantarum are the two most preferred lactic acid bacteria in sauerkraut fermentation. As well as Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus brevis also affects the final stages of sauerkraut production (Kalac et al. 1999).
Sauerkraut production is generally based on a sequential microbial process that involves heterofermentative and homofermentative lactic acid bacteria. In this process Leuconostoc species and Lactobacillus, Pediococcus species involve as the first and second group, respectively (Font De Valdez et al. 1990). Leuconostoc primarily uses glucose and fructose for its growth and produce lactic and acetic acids, ethanol, mannitol and CO2 (Aukrust et al. 1994). These bacteria slow down and begin to die off, when the acidity reaches to 0.25–0.3 % as lactic acid. The activity started by Leuconostoc mesenteroides is continued by Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus cucumeris until an acidity level of 1.5–2 % as lactic acid is reached. Finally, Lactobacillus pentoaceticus continues the fermentation and the acidity reaches to 2–2.5 %, so completes the fermentation.
The end-products of a normal sauerkraut fermentation are mainly lactic acid, smaller amounts of acetic and propionic acids, a mixture of gases of principally carbon dioxide, small amounts of alcohol and a mixture of aromatic esters. However the acidity helps to control the growth of spoilage and undesired microorganisms.
3.2 Sour-Dough Breads
The dough properties (Collar 1996), organoleptic characteristics (Hammes et al. 1996), nutritional value (Lopez et al. 2001) and the shelf life of bread (Lavermicocca et al. 2000) are improved by lactic acid bacteria in bread making.
Sourdough is prepared with flour and water, containing a wide variety of lactic acid bacteria (Gobbetti 1998; Hammes and Gaenzle 1998). High numbers of lactic acid bacteria found in cereal sourdoughs, including mainly Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc and Lactococcus species (Hounhouigan et al. 1993; Johansson et al. 1995). It is reported that the dominant Lactobacillus species in wheat sourdoughs are Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis (which is reported as identical to Lactobacillus brevis var. lindneri) (Hutkins 2006), Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus fructivorans (Gobbetti et al. 1994; Corsetti et al. 2001, 2003). Some described species such as Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus alimentarius, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. delbrueckii (Gobbetti et al. 1994; Corsetti et al. 2001, 2003), Lactobacillus spicheri (Meroth et al. 2003), Lactobacillus mindensis (Ehrmann et al. 2003), Lactobacillus frumenti (Müller et al. 2000) and Lactobacillus paralimentarius (Cai et al. 1999) were also isolated from sourdough. In this complex system, the synthesis of bacteriocins and other antimicrobial compounds could regulate the interactions between the starter and the contaminant microflora of the sourdough (Corsetti et al. 2004).
The performance of lactic acid bacteria strains in the food matrix has been studied by characterization of the acidification parameters and lactic and acetic acid production during sourdough fermentation (Hammes and Gaenzle 1998). The organic acids would also contribute to the production of aroma compounds (Meignen et al. 2001).
In sourdoughs, the sugar usage by lactic acid bacteria strains is related to the microorganism, the type of sugar, the presence of yeasts, and the manufacturing conditions (Hammes and Gaenzle 1998; Martinez-Anaya 2003). On the whole, Lactobacillus reuteri strains, which were isolated from homemade doughs, ferment different sugars, e.g., sucrose, melibiose, rafinose, fructose, while most Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis strains only ferment maltose (Corsetti et al. 2001).
3.3 Lactic Acid Bacteria and Wine
Lactic acid bacteria are responsible for malolactic fermentation (MLF) in wines which can be beneficial in some cases and undesirable in the others (Krieger 1993).
Primary importance of lactic acid bacteria in wine making is malolactic fermentation. The main malolactic fermentation reaction is the decarboxylation of l-malic acid to l-lactic acid. In this reaction the acidity decreases and pH raises by 0.3–0.5 units. The malolactic fermentation is done both by Lactobacilli and Leuconostoc.
Malolactic bacteria growing in wine must be capable of tolerate low nutrient concentration, low pH and high concentrations of ethanol and SO2. When wines involve residual glucose and fructose, there is undesirable acidification.
Malolactic fermentation could be conducted by the species of Lactobacillus or Pediococcus, but this reaction usually results in non-acceptable wines when pH is higher than 3.5. These genera usually can not tolerate low pH and produce undesirable flavours along with high levels of acetic acid (Murphy et al. 1985; Krieger et al. 1990).
To conduct malolactic fermentation, Oenococcus oeni (formerly Leuconostoc oenos) is primarily preferred bacterial species, rather than yeast or other lactic acid bacteria. Oenococcus oeni is especially adapted to the harsh environment of wine and is capable of converting malic acid to lactic acid quickly. Hence different strains of Oenococcus oeni can have particularly different effects on the final product, and some strains are more beneficial to the properties of wine than others (Henick-Kling 2002).
3.4 Lactic Acid Bacteria in Fermented Dairy Products
Especially mesophilic Lactococcus lactis and thermophilic Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus are important lactic acid bacteria in the process of dairy products; for example, yogurt, cheese and buttermilk. By lactic acid fermentation, acetaldehyde and diacetyl production increase and this causes flavour formation in yogurt and buttermilk. Lactic acid bacteria also produce exopolysaccharides which help to increase structural properties of fermented dairy products. In addition, one of the health benefits of dairy products is the conversion of lactose and galactose to the sweetener such as l-alanine (Hugenholtz et al. 2000).
Lactococcus lactis, especially sub-species of lactis and cremoris are the commonly used starter bacteria for some cheese types (Gouda and Cheddar cheese), butter and buttermilk. This bacterium can grow in milk easily and converts lactose to lactic acid. With a nitrogen source in medium, it hydrolyses casein. This biochemical process occurs during ripening of cheese and it helps to form flavour by the result of amino acid release. Other important characteristic of Lactococcus lactis in some strains is that they can convert citric acid to diacetyl (flavour of butter) and CO2 (Hugenholtz 1993).
Streptococcus thermophilus is another lactic acid bacteria used in dairy fermentation as starter culture especially in yogurt. It is also used for some cheeses such as Swiss (Emmenthaler) and Italian (Parmesan) types. Its growing temperature is 40–45 °C. Special characteristic of this bacterium is that, it metabolises only the glucose-moiety from lactose and residual galactose is exerted from cell. Streptococcus thermophilus forms only L (+) lactate. During milk fermentation of Streptococcus thermophilus, a flavour compound, acetaldehyde is also produced (Caplice and Fitzgerald 1999; Hugenholtz et al. 2000).
Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus is used together with Streptococcus thermophilus for the production of yoghurt. It is homofermantative yoghurt bacterium with growing temperature of 40–45 °C. Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus produce D (-) lactic acid. Although lactic acid is the main end-product of yoghurt fermentation, flavour compounds such as acetaldehyde, acetone, diacetyl (2,3-bütanedione) and acetoin can also be formed in very low amounts (Caplice and Fitzgerald 1999; Chaves et al. 1999).
Lactobacillus acidophilus as obligate homofermantative, is a probiotic lactic acid bacterium. Hexose sugars are metabolised primarily to lactic acid. It is used for the production of acidophilus in milk mixed culture with Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus.
Lactic acid bacteria contribute to the structural characteristic of the fermented dairy products by the production of exopolysaccharides. Especially in yoghurt and in some Scandinavian dairy products, for example viili and longfil, both Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus produce these sugar polymers (Van Kranenburg et al. 1999).
3.5 Lactic Acid Bacteria in Meat Products
Lactic acid bacteria help meat products to protect them from pathogenic microorganism and improve their sensory quality during fermentation. Increasing acidification leads to prevent development of spoilage and pathogenic activities. It also contributes to stabilization of colour and texture. Lactic acid bacteria can produce bacteriocins which help to preserve fresh and processed meat (Kröckel 2013). The predominant lactic acid bacteria during lactic acid fermentation of sausages are Lactobacillus sakei and Lactobacillus curvatusare. However, some species of Lactobacillus spp. and Pediococcus spp. are used as starter cultures for most European fermented sausages formulated with nitrite (Caplice and Fitzgerald 1999).
3.6 Lactic Acid Bacteria in Traditional Turkish Fermented Foods and Beverages
3.6.1 Tarhana
Tarhana, a traditional cereal-based lactic acid fermented food product, is widely consumed in Turkey and Middle East. Tarhana is obtained primarily by mixing yoghurt, wheat flour, yeast, salt, depending on the region raw or cooked vegetables (tomato, onion, pepper, etc.) and spices (mint, basil, dill, tarhana herb, etc.). Fermentation is usually carried out by yoghurt bacteria and fermentation lasts for 1–7 days (Ibanoglu and Ibanoglu 1998). Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus fermentum, Pediococcus acidilactici, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus brevis, Enterococcus faecium, Pediococcus pentosaceus, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides and Weissella cibaria are identified in tarhana fermentations (Sengun et al. 2009; Settani et al. 2011).
The resulting product is listed among the acidic fermented foods characterised by sour taste and strong yeast flavour (Ibanoglu and Ibanoglu 1999; Sagdic et al. 2002; Dağlioğlu et al. 2002; Sengun et al. 2009).
The dominant microbiota of tarhana is mainly lactic acid bacteria and yeasts. Lactic acid bacteria are the most important microbial group for tarhana fermentation. They play the main role in the production of aromatic compounds those are typical for the final product (Settani et al. 2011). Also, they increase acidity and control the mechanism to enhance the safety (Settanni and Corsetti 2008).
3.6.2 Boza
Boza is a mildly alcoholic beverage produced from the fermentation of barley, oats, millet, maize, wheat or rice. It is a traditional Turkish-fermented beverage. Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus coprophilus, Lactobacillus coryniformis, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus pentosus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus sanfrancisco, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum, Leuconostoc raffinolactis, Pediococcus pentosaceus, Oenococcus oeni, Weissella confusa and Weissella paramesenteriodes were found in boza samples (Arici and Daglioglu 2002; Todorov and Dicks 2006). Only a few papers reported the isolation of yeasts and moulds from boza. It was reported that boza is a good source of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria (Todorov and Dicks 2006).
3.6.3 Kefir
Kefir is an acidic and low-alcoholic fermented dairy product with its functional properties (Farnworth 1999, 2006; Farnworth and Mainville 2003). Traditionally, the people of the Caucasus prepared the kefir by fermenting milk in tulum made from fur of animals (Yaygin 1995).
Kefir differs from other fermented dairy products, because “kefir grains” have a complex microflora include heterofermentative and homofermentative lactic acid bacteria, acetic acid bacteria and yeasts (Marshall et al. 1984; Toba et al. 1987; Piodux et al. 1990). Manufacturing a quality kefir beverage with stable starter culture is difficult because type of microorganisms and their ratio differ from the origin of “kefir grains” and there are different opinions for the type of microorganisms in “kefir grains” (Yaygin 1995).
The main producer of kefiran polymer in kefir grains is Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens and other species of lactobacilli (Frengova et al. 2002; Irigoyen et al. 2005). Lactic acid bacteria present in kefir grains or kefir products were isolated and identified, including Lactobacillus acidophilus (Angulo et al. 1993), Lactobacillus brevis (Simova et al. 2002), Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei (Simova et al. 2002), Lactobacillus delbrueckii (Simova et al. 2002; Witthuhn et al. 2004), Lactobacillus helveticus (Angulo et al. 1993; Lin et al. 1999; Simova et al. 2002), Lactobacillus kefiri (Angulo et al. 1993; Takizawa et al. 1998; Garrote et al. 2001), Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens (Takizawa et al. 1998), Lactobacillus plantarum (Garrote et al. 2001), Leuconostoc mesenteroides (Lin et al. 1999; Garrote et al. 2001; Witthuhn et al. 2004), Lactococcus lactis (Garrote et al. 2001; Simova et al. 2002; Witthuhn et al. 2004), Streptococcus thermophilus (Simova et al. 2002).
3.6.4 Shalgam
Shalgam, a traditional Turkish lactic acid fermented beverage, is mainly produced in some provinces of Southern Turkey (Tangüler and Erten 2012a). The raw materials used for shalgam production are black carrot, turnip, rock-salt, sourdough, bulgur flour and drinkable water. It is a red coloured, cloudy and sour non-alcoholic drink (Erten et al. 2008).
Lactic acid bacteria are the main fermentation agents of shalgam and they are responsible for the acidification process by converting sugars into mainly lactic acid and other end compounds which give the typical taste and flavour to the shalgam (Erten et al. 2008).
There is limited information about the microflora of shalgam and its microbiology is complex. Lactobacillus plantarum, the predominant lactic acid bacteria, Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. delbrueckii and Lactobacillus fermentum were found in shalgam samples (Erginkaya and Hammes 1992; Arici 2004; Tangüler and Erten 2012a, b).
References
Abbas CA (2006) Production of antioxidants, aromas, colours, flavours, and vitamins by yeast. In: Querol A, Fleet GH (eds) Yeasts in food and beverages, vol 2, The yeast handbook. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 285–334
Abdelgadir WS, Hamad SH, Møller PL, Jakobsen M (2001) Characterisation of the dominant microbiota of Sudanese fermented milk Rob. Int Dairy J 11:63–70
Akbaria H, Karimia K, Lundin M, Taherzadeh M (2012) Optimization of baker’s yeast drying in industrial continuous fluidized bed dryer. Food Bioprod Process 90:52–57
Alves M, Gonçalves T, Quintas C (2012) Microbial quality and yeast population dynamics in cracked green table olives’ fermentations. Food Control 23:363–368
Amiot MJ, Tacchini M, Fleuriet A, Macheix JJ (1990) Le processus technologique de désamérisation des olives: caractérisation des fruits avant et pendant le traitement alcalin. Sci Aliment 10:619–631
Amorim HV, Basso LC, Lopes ML (2009) Sugar cane juice and molasses, beet molasses and sweet sorghum: composition and usage. In: Ingledew WM, Kelsall DR, Austin GD, Kluhspies C (eds) The alcohol text book, 5th edn. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp 39–46
Angulo L, Lopez E, Lema C (1993) Microflora present in kefir grains of the Galician region (North-West of Spain). J Dairy Res 60:263–267
Arici M (2004) Microbiological and chemical properties of a drink called shalgam. Ernahrungs-Umschau 51(1):10–11
Arici M, Daglioglu O (2002) Boza: a lactic acid fermented cereal beverage as a traditional Turkish food. Food Res Int 18:39–48
Arroyo-López FN, Querol A, Bautista-Gallego J, Garrido-Fernández A (2008) Role of yeasts in table olive production. Int J Food Microbiol 128:189–196
Arroyo-López FN, Romero-Gil V, Bautista-Gallego J, Rodríguez-Gómez F, Jiménez-Díaz R, García-García P, Querol A, Garrido-Fernández A (2012) Yeasts in table olive processing: desirable or spoilage microorganisms. Int J Food Microbiol 160:42–49
Aukrust TW, Blom A, Sandtorv BF, Slinde E (1994) Interactions between starter culture and raw material in lactic acid fermentation of sliced carrot. LWT Food Sci Technol 27:337–341
Axelsson L (1998) Lactic acid bacteria: Classification and physiology. In: Salminen S, Von Wright A, (eds) lactic acid bacteria- Microbiology and functional aspects. Markel Dekker, New York, pp 1–72
Bai FW, Anderson WA, Moo-Yong M (2008) Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks. Biotechnol Adv 26:89–105
Bamforth C (2003) Yeast and fermentation. In: Bamforth C (ed) Beer tap into the art and science of brewing. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 144–159
Berry DR (1989) Manipulation of flavor production by yeast: physiological and genetic approaches. In: Piggott JR, Paterson A (eds) Distilled beverage flavour. Harwood, Chichester, UK, pp 299–307
Berry DR (1995) Alcoholic beverage fermentations. In: Lea AGH, Piggott JR (eds) Fermented beverage production. Blackie, Glasgow, UK, pp 32–44
Bintsis T, Robinson RK (2004) A study of the adjunct cultures on the aroma compounds of feta-type cheese. Food Chem 88(3):435–441
Birch AN, Petersen MA, Hansen AS (2013) The aroma profile of wheat bread crumb influenced by yeast concentration and fermentation temperature. LWT Food Sci Technol 50:480–488
Bisson LF (1999) Stuck and sluggish fermentations. Am J Enol Viticult 50:107–119
Blanco P, Mirás-Avalos JM, Orriols I (2012) Effect of must characteristics on the diversity of Saccharomyces strains and their prevalence in spontaneous fermentations. J Appl Microbiol 112(5):936–944
Blandino A, Al-Aseeri ΜE, Pandiella SS, Cantero D, Webb C (2003) Cereal-based fermented foods and beverages. Food Res Int 36:527–543
Boekhout T, Robert V (2003) Yeasts in foods. Beneficial and detrimental aspects. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 488
Bourdichon F, Casaregola S, Farrokh C, Frisvad JC, Gerds ML, Hammes WP, Harnett J, Huys G, Laulund S, Ouwehand A, Powell IB, Prajapati JB, Seto Y, Ter Schure E, Van Boven A, Vankerckhoven V, Zgoda A, Tuijtelaars S, Hansen EB (2012) Food fermentations: microorganisms with technological beneficial use. Int J Food Microbiol 154:87–97
Briggs DE, Boulton CA, Brookes PA, Stevens R (2004) Fermentation technologies. In: Briggs DE, Boulton CA, Brookes PA, Stevens R (eds) Brewing science and practice. Woodhead; CRC Press, England, pp 509–542
Cai Y, Okada H, Mori H, Benno Y, Nakase T (1999) Lactobacillus paralimentarius sp. nov., isolated from sourdough. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49:1451–1455
Campbell I (2003) Microbiological aspects of brewing. In: Priest FG, Campbell I (eds) Brewing microbiology. Springer, New York, pp 1–17
Cang Y, Lu L, Wang G (2002) Antioxidant role of carotenoids in Rhodotorula sp. and screening of carotenoid hyperproducing yeasts. Junwu Xitong 21(2):84–91
Cantor MD, Van Den Temple T, Hansen TK, Ardö Y (2004) Blue cheese. In: Fox PF, McSweeney P, Cogan T, Guinee T (eds) Cheese: chemistry, physics and microbiology, major cheese groups, vol 2, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 175–198
Caplice E, Fitzgerald GF (1999) Food fermentations: role of microorganisms in food production and preservation. Int J Food Microbiol 50:131–149
Chandrani W, Jayathilake AN (2000) Characteristics of two yeast strain (Candida tropicalis) isolated from Caryora urens (Khitul) toddy for single cell protein production. Natl J Sci Found (Sri Lanka) 28:79–86
Chavan RS, Chavan SR (2011) Sourdough technology: a traditional way for wholesome foods: a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 10:169–182
Chavan RS, Jana A (2008) Frozen dough for bread making: a review. Int J Food Sci Technol Nutr 2:9–27
Chaves ACSD, Kleerebezem M, Lerayer ALS, Hugenholtz J (1999) Improved yoghurt flavour by metabolic engineering of Streptococcus thermophilus. Sixth symposium on lactic acid bacteria, book of abstracts, G2
Cheng Q, Rouviere PE, Tao L (2004) Mutant carotenoid-producing microorganisms and their use in carotenoid fermentation. PCT Int Appl WO 2004056974
Chi ZM, Zhang T, Cao TS, Liu XY, Cui W, Zhao CH (2011) Biotechnological potential of inulin for bioprocesses. Bioresour Technol 102:4295–4303
Ciani M, Comitini F, Mannazzu I, Domizio P (2010) Controlled mixed culture fermentation: a new perspective on the use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in winemaking. FEMS Yeast Res 10:123–133
Collar C (1996) Biochemical and technological assessment of the metabolism of pure and mixed cultures of yeast and lactic acid bacteria in breadmaking applications. Food Sci Technol Int 2:349–367
Corsetti A, Lavermicocca P, Morea M, Baruzzi F, Tosti N, Gobbetti M (2001) Phenotypic and molecular identification and clustering of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts from wheat (species Triticum durum and Triticum aestivum) sourdoughs of Southern Italy. Int J Food Microbiol 64:95–104
Corsetti A, De Angelis M, Dellaglio F, Paparella A, Fox PF, Settanni L, Gobbetti M (2003) Characterization of sourdough lactic acid bacteria based on genotypic and cell-wall protein analysis. J Appl Microbiol 94:641–654
Corsetti A, Settanni L, Van Sinderen D (2004) Characterization of bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS) from sourdough lactic acid bacteria and evaluation of their in vitro and in situ activity. J Appl Microbiol 96:521–534
Cortes S, Blanco P (2011) Yeast strain effect on the concentration of major volatile compounds and sensory profile of wines from Vitis vinifera var. treixadura. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:925–932
Curtin C, Chambers P, Pretorius S (2011) Wine fermentation. In: Wheeler MB, Hoover DG, Heldman DR (eds) Encyclopedia of biotechnology in agriculture and food. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 689–694
Dağlioğlu O, Arici M, Konyali M, Gumus T (2002) Effects of tarhana fermentation and drying methods on the fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Staphylacoccus aureus. Eur Food Res Technol 215:515–519
De Benedictis M, Bleve G, Grieco F, Tristezza M, Tufariello M, Grieco F (2011) An optimized procedure for the enological selection of non-Saccharomyces starter cultures. A Van Leeuw J Microb 99(2):189–200
De Vuyst L, Vancanneyt M (2007) Biodiversity and identification of sourdough lactic acid bacteria. Food Microbiol 24:120–127
Deak T (2004) Spoilage yeasts. In: Steele R (ed) Understanding and measuring the shelf-life of food. Woodhead, Boca Raton, pp 91–110
Deak T (2008) Handbook of food spoilage yeasts. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 325 pp
Decock P, Cappelle S (2005) Bread technology and sourdough technology. Trends Food Sci Technol 16:113–120
Del Rio L, Corpas J, Sandalio L, Palma J, Barroso J (2003) Plant peroxisomes, reactive oxygen metabolism and nitric oxide. IUBMB Life 55(2):71–81
Delgado A, Brito D, Peres C, Noé-Arroyo F, Garrido-Fernández A (2005) Bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus pentosus B96 can be expressed as a function of temperature and NaCl concentration. Food Microbiol 22:521–528
Demain AL, Phaff HJ, Kurtzman CP (1998) The industrial and agricultural significance of yeasts. In: Kurtzman CP, Fell JW (eds) The yeasts – a taxonomic study, 4th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 13–19
Demirbas A (2007) Producing and using bioethanol as an automotive fuel. Energ Sour B 2:391–401
Dickinson JR (2003) The formation of higher alcohols. In: Smart KA (ed) Brewing yeast fermentation performance, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 196–205
Dien BS, Cotta MA, Jeffries TW (2003) Bacteria engineered for fuel ethanol production: current status. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63:258–266
Dillon VM, Board RG (1991) Yeast associated with red meats. J Appl Microbiol 71:93–108
Durán Quintana MC, García García P, Garrido-Fernández A (1999) Establishment of conditions for green olive fermentation at low temperature. Int J Food Microbiol 51:133–143
Ehrmann MA, Muller MR, Vogel RF (2003) Molecular analysis of sourdough reveals Lactobacillus mindensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:7–13
Erginkaya Z, Hammes WP (1992) Şalgam suyu fermantasyonu sırasında mikroorganizmalarin gelişimi ve izole edilen laktik asit bakterilerinin tanımlanmaları üzerine bir araştırma. Gida 17(5):311–314
Erten H, Tangüler H, Canbaş A (2008) A traditional turkish lactic acid fermented beverage: Shalgam (Salgam). Food Rev Int 24:352–359
Farnworth ER (1999) Kefir: from folklore to regulatory approval. J Nutraceut Funct Med Foods 57–68
Farnworth ER (2006) Kefir a complex probiotic. Food Sci Technol Bull Funct Foods 2:1–17. http://www.foodsciencecentral.com/fsc/bulletin-ff-freeS
Farnworth ER, Mainville I (2003) Kefir: a fermented milk product. In: Farnworth ER (ed) Handbook of fermented functional foods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 77–112
Fernandez Diez MJ (1983) Olives. In: Rehm HJ, Reed G (eds) Biotechnology: food and feed production with microorganisms. Verlag Chemie, Florida, pp 379–397
Ferreira AS, Viljoen BC (2003) Yeasts as adjunct starters in maturated Chedar cheese. Int J Food Microbiol 86:131–140
Ferreira IMPLVO, Pinho O, Vieira E, Tavarela JG (2010) Brewer’s Saccharomyces yeast biomass: characteristics and potential applications. Trends Food Sci Technol 21:77–84
Fleet GH (1990) Yeasts in dairy products. J Appl Bacteriol 68:199–211
Fleet GH (1998) The microbiology of alcoholic beverages. In: Fleet GH, Wood BJB (eds) Microbiology of fermented foods. Thomson Science, London, pp 217–255
Fleet GH (2003a) Yeast interactions and wine flavour. Int J Food Microbiol 86:11–22
Fleet GH (2003b) Yeasts in fruit and fruit products. In: Boekhout T, Robert V (eds) Yeasts in foods: beneficial and detrimental aspects. Behr’s Verlag, Hamburg, pp 267–287
Fleet GH (2006) The commercial and community significance of yeasts in food and beverage production. In: Queol A, Fleet GH (eds) Yeasts in food and beverages. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–13
Fleet GH, Balia R (2006) The public health and probiotic significance of yeasts in foods and beverages. In: Queol A, Fleet GH (eds) Yeasts in food and beverages. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 381–397
Fleet GH, Heard GM (1993) Yeasts – growth during fermentation. In: Fleet GM (ed) Wine microbiology and biotechnology. Harwood Academic, London, pp 27–54
Fleming HP, Da Eschel MA, Mcfeeters RF, Pierson MD (1989) Butyric acid spoilage of fermented cucumbers. J Food Sci 54(3):636–639
Fleming HP, Humpries EG, Fasina OO, McFeeters RF, Thompson RL, Breidt J (2002) Bag in box technology: pilot system for process-ready, fermented cucumbers. Pickle Pak Sci 8:1–8
Font De Valdez G, De Giori GS, Garro M, Mozzi F, Oliver G (1990) Lactic acid bacteria from naturally fermented vegetables. Microbiol Alim Nutr 8:175–179
Franco W, Pérez-Díaz IM (2012) Development of a model system for the study of spoilage associated secondary cucumber fermentation during long term storage. J Food Sci 78(2):264–269
Frengova GI, Simova ED, Beshkova DM, Simov ZI (2002) Exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria of kefir grains. Z Naturforsch 57(9–10):805
Frengova G, Simova E, Beshkova D (2003) Carotenoid production by lactoso-negative yeasts co-cultivated with lactic acid bacteria in whey ultrafiltrate. J Biosci 58(7/8):562–567
Frengova G, Simova E, Beshkova D (2004) Use of whey ultrafiltrate as a substrate for production of carotenoids by the yeast Rhodotorula rubra. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 112(3):133–141
Frölich-Wyder M-T (2003) Yeasts in dairy products. In: Boekhout T, Robert V (eds) Yeasts in food beneficial and detrimental aspects. Behr’s Verlag, Hamburg, pp 209–237
Gadaga TH, Mutukumira AN, Narvhus JA (2001) Int J Food Microbiol 70:11–19
Ganga MA, Martinez C (2004) Effect of wine yeast monoculture practice of biodiversity of non-Saccharomyces yeasts. J Appl Microbiol 96:76–83
Garafolo A (1992) The ester synthesizing activity of yeast under different nutrient conditions. Riv Vitic Enol 45(3):41–58
Gardini F, Suzzi G, Lombardi A, Galgano F, Crudeleb MA, Andrighetto C, Schirone M, Tofalo R (2001) A survey of yeasts in traditional sausages of Southern Italy. FEMS Yeast Res 1:161–167
Garrido-Fernandez A, Garcia PG, Brenes MB (1995) Olive fermentations. In: Rehm HJ, Reed G, Puhler A, Stadler P (eds) Biotechnology: enzymes, biomass, food and feed. VCH Verlag, Weinheim, pp 593–627
Garrido-Fernández A, Fernández Díaz MJ, Adams RM (1997) Table olives: production and processing. Chapman & Hall, London
Garrote GL, Abraham AG, De Antoni GL (2001) Chemical and microbiological characterization of kefir grains. J Dairy Res 68:639–652
Ghabbour N, Lamzira Z, Thonart P, Cidalia P, Markaouid M, Asehraou A (2011) Selection of oleuropein-degrading lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from fermenting Moroccan green olives. Grasas Aceites 62:84–89
Giannou V, Kessoglou V, Tzia C (2003) Quality and safety characteristics of bread made from frozen dough. Trends Food Sci Technol 14:99–108
Gibson BR, Boulton CA, Box WG, Graham NS, Lawrence SJ, Linforth RST, Smart KA (2008) Carbohydrate utilization and the lager yeast transcriptome during brewery fermentation. Yeast 25:549–562
Gobbetti M (1998) Interactions between lactic acid bacteria and yeasts in sourdoughs. Trends Food Sci Technol 9:267–274
Gobbetti M, Corsetti A, Rossi J, La Rosa F, De Vincenzi S (1994) Identification and clustering of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts from wheat sourdoughs of central Italy. Ital J Food Sci 1:85–94
Gotcheva V, Pandiella SS, Angelov A, Roshkova Z, Webb C (2000) Microflora identification of the Bulgarian cereal-based fermented beverage boza. Process Biochem 36:127–130
Guerzoni ME, Lanciotti R, Vannini L, Galgano F, Favati F, Gardini F, Suzzi G (2001) Variability of the lipolytic activity in Yarrowia lipolytica and its dependence on environmental conditions. Int J Food Microbiol 69:79–89
Halasz A, Laszity R (1991) Use of yeast biomass in food production. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 319
Hammes WP, Gaenzle MG (1998) Sourdough breads and related products. In: Wood BJB (ed) Microbiology of fermented foods, 2nd edn. Blackie Academic and Professional, London, pp 199–216
Hammes WP, Hertel C (1998) New developments in meat starter cultures. Meat Sci 49(1): 125–138
Hammes WP, Stolz P, Gaenzle M (1996) Metabolism of lactobacilli in traditional sourdoughs. Adv Food Sci 18(5/6):176–184
Hammes WP, Brandt MJ, Francis KL, Rosenheim J, Seitter MFH, Vogelmann SA (2005) Microbial ecology of cereal fermentations. Trends Food Sci Technol 16:4–11
Harris LJ (1998) The microbiology of vegetable fermentations. In: Wood BJB (ed) Microbiology of ferment food. Academic Professional, London, pp 45–72
Harrison JS (1970) Miscellaneous products from yeast. In: Rose AH, Harrison JS (eds) The yeasts, vol III. Academic, London, pp 529–545
Hazelwood LA, Daran JM, van Maris AJ, Pronk JT, Dickinson JR (2008) The Ehrlich pathway for fusel alcohol production: a century of research on Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2259–2266
Henick-Kling T (2002) Malolactic fermantation. In: Fleet GH (ed) Wine microbiology and biotechnology. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 289–326
Heredia N, Wesley I, Garcia S (2009) Microbiologically safe foods. Wiley, Canada, p 667
Hernández A, Martín A, Aranda E, Pérez-Nevado F, Córdoba MG (2007) Identification and characterization of yeast isolated from the elaboration of seasoned green table olives. Food Microbiol 24(4):346–351
Hounhouigan DJ, Nout MJR, Nago CM, Houben JH, Rombouts FM (1993) Composition and microbiological and physical attributes of mawè, a fermented maize dough from Benin. Int J Food Sci Tech 28:513–517
Huber JT (1997) Probiotics in cattle. In: Fuller R (ed) Probiotics 2: applications and practical aspects. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 162–186
Hugenholtz J (1993) Citrate metabolism in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 12:165–178
Hugenholtz J, Starrenburg M, Boels I, Sybesma W, Chaves AC, Mertens A, Kleerebezem M (2000) Metabolic engineering of lactic acid bacteria for the improvement of fermented dairy products. In: Proceedings of the international meeting of biothermokinetics. Stellenbosch University Press, pp 285–290
Hurtado A, Reguan TC, Bordons A, Rozès N (2009) Influence of fruit ripeness and salt concentration on the microbial processing of Arbequina table olives. Food Microbiol 26:827–833
Hurtado A, Reguant C, Bordons A, Rozès N (2010) Evaluation of a single and combined inoculation of a Lactobacillus pentosus starter for processing cv. Arbequina natural green olives. Food Microbiol 27:731–740
Hurtado A, Reguant C, Bordons A, Rozes N (2012) Lactic acid bacteria from fermented table olives. Food Microbiol 31:1–8
Hutkins RW (2006) Microbiology and technology of fermented foods. Blackwell, Ames, p 473
Ibanoglu S, Ibanoglu E (1998) Rheological characterization of some traditional Turkish soups. J Food Eng 35(2):251–256
Ibanoglu S, Ibanoglu E (1999) Rheological properties of cooked Tarhana, a cereal based soup. Food Res Int 32:29–33
Ic E, Ozcelik F (1995) Hiyar turşusu fermentasyonunda görülen mikroorganizmalar. Gida (Food) 20(3):173–178
Ic E, Ozcelik F (1999) Hiyar turşularinin düşük tuzlu salamurada fermentasyonu üzerine bir araştirma. Gida (Food) 24(2):77–87
Irigoyen A, Arana I, Castiella M, Torre P, Ibanez FC (2005) Microbiological, physicochemical and sensory characteristics of Kefir during storage. Food Chem 90:613–620
Jacques N, Caserogola S (2008) Safety assessment of dairy microorganisms: the hemiascomycetous yeasts. Int J Food Microbiol 126:321–326
Jakobsen M, Narwnjs J (1996) Yeasts and their possible beneficial and negative effects on the quality of dairy products. Int Dairy J 6:755–768
Jakobsen M, Larsen MD, Jespersen L (2002) Production of bread, cheese and meat. In: Osiewacz HD (ed) A comprehensive freatise on fungi as experimental systems and applied research, The Mycota, industrial applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–22
Jentsch M (2007) Top-fermented beer specialities in focus. Brauwelt Int 5:332–334
Johanningsmeier SD, Franco W, Pérez-díaz IM, Mcfeeters RF (2012) Influence of sodium chloride, pH and lactic acid bacteria on anaerobic lactic acid utilization during fermented cucumber spoilage. J Food Sci 77(7):397–404
Johansson ML, Quednau M, Molin G, Ahrné S (1995) Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for rapid typing of Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Lett Appl Microbiol 21:155–159
Joseph R (1999) Yeasts: production and commercial uses. In: Robinson RK, Patel P, Batt CA (eds) Enc food microbiol. Academic, London, pp 2335–2341
Kalac P, Špička J, Křížek M, Steidlová S, Pelikánová T (1999) Concentration of seven biogenic amines in sauerkraut. Food Chem 67:275–280
Katahira S, Mizuike A, Fukuda H, Kondo A (2006) Ethanol fermentation from lignocellulosic hydrolysate by a recombinant xylose- and cellooligosaccharide-assimilating yeast strain. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72:1136–1143
Kesenkaş H, Akbulut N (2006) Destek Kültür Olarak Kullanılan Bazı Mayaların Beyaz Peynir Aroması Üzerine Etkileri. Ege Üniv Ziraat Fak Derg 43(2):73–84
Keshwani DR, Cheng JJ (2009) Switchgrass for bioethanol and other value-added applications: a review. Bioresour Technol 100:1515–1523
Kim JH, Breidt F (2007) Development of preservation prediction chart for long term storage of fermented cucumber. J Life Sci 17(2):1616–1621
Kollar RE, Sturdik E, Sajbidor J (1992) Complete fractionation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae biomass. Food Biotechnol 6:225–237
Krieger S (1993). The use of active dry malolactic starter cultures. In: Proceedings of ASVO seminar, 30 Jul 1992, McLaren Vale, pp 56–62
Krieger SA, Hammes WP, Henick-Kling T (1990) Management of malolactic fermentation using starter cultures. Vineyard Winery Manage (Nov/Dec):45–50
Kröckel L (2013) The role of lactic acid bacteria in safety and flavour development of meat and meat products. In: Kongo M (ed) Lactic acid bacteria- R&D for food, health and livestock purposes. InTech, Croatia, p 658
Lambrechts MG, Pretorius IS (2000) Yeast and its importance to wine aroma—a review. S Afr J Enol Vitic 21:97–129
Landete JM, Curiel JA, Rodríguez H, De Las RB, Muñoz R (2008) Study of the inhibitory activity of phenolic compounds found in olive products and their degradation by Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Food Chem 107:320–326
Lavermicocca P, Valerio F, Evidente A, Lazzaroni S, Corsetti A, Gobbetti M (2000) Purification and characterization of novel antifungal compounds from the sourdough Lactobacillus plantarum strain 21B. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4084–4090
Lentini A, Rogers P, Higgins V, Chandler DI, Stanley M, Chambers P (2003) The impact of ethanol stress on yeast physiology. In: Smart K (ed) Brewing yeast fermentation performance. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 25–38
Lin CW, Chen HL, Liu JR (1999) Identification and characterisation of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts isolated from kefir grains in Taiwan. Aust J Dairy Technol 54:14–18
Lodolo EJ, Kock JLK, Axcell BC, Brooks M (2008) The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae- the main character in beer brewing. FEMS Yeast Res 8:1018–1036
Lopez HW, Krespine V, Guy C, Messager A, Demigne C, Remesy C (2001) Prolonged fermentation of whole wheat sourdough reduces phytate level and increases soluble magnesium. J Agric Food Chem 49:2657–2662
Marquina D, Toufani S, Llorente P, Santos A, Peinado JM (1997) Killer activity in yeast isolated from olive brines. Adv Food Sci 19:41–46
Marshall VM, Cole WN, Brooker BE (1984) Observations on the structure of kefir grains and the distribution of the microflora. J Appl Bacteriol 57(3):491–497
Martinez-Anaya MA (2003) Associations and interactions of microorganisms in dough fermentations: effects on dough and bread characteristics. In: Lorenz K, Kulp K (eds) Handbook of dough fermentations. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 63–95
McKay M, Buglass AJ, Lee CG (2011) Alcoholic fermentation. In: Buglass AJ (ed) Handbook of alcoholic beverages: technical, analytical and nutritional aspects. Wiley, Chichester, pp 72–95
McSweeney PLH, Sousa MJ (2000) Biochemical pathways for the production of flavour compounds in cheeses during ripening: a review. Lait 80:293–324
Mecteau MR, Arul J, Tweddell RJ (2002) Effect of organic and inorganic salts on the growth and development of Fusarium sambucinum, a causal agent of potato dry rot. Mycol Res 106:688–696
Meignen B, Onno B, Gelinas P, Infantes M, Guilois S, Cahagnier B (2001) Optimization of sourdough fermentation with Lactobacillus brevis and baker’s yeast. Food Microbiol 18:239–245
Meroth CB, Walter J, Hertel C, Brandt MJ, Hammes WP (2003) Monitoring the bacterial population dynamics in sourdough fermentation processes by using PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:475–482
Moona SK, Kimb SW, Choi GW (2012) Simultaneous saccharification and continuous fermentation of sludge-containing mash for bioethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae CHFY0321. J Biotechnol 157:584–589
Müller MRA, Ehrmann MA, Vogel RF (2000) Lactobacillus frumenti sp. nov., a new lactic acid bacterium isolated from rye-bran fermentations with a long fermentation period. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:2127–2133
Murphy MG, O’Connor L, Walsh D, Condon S (1985) Oxygen dependent lactate utilization by Lactobacillus plantarum. Arch Microbiol 121:75–79
Mussatto SI, Dragone G, Guimaraes PMR, Silva JPA, Carneiro LM, Roberto IC, Vicente A, Domingues L, Teixeira JA (2010) Technological trends, global market, and challenges of bio-ethanol production. Biotechnol Adv 28:817–830
Nagodawithana T (1992) Yeast derived flavors and flavor enhancers and their probable mode of action. Food Technol 46:138–144
Nagodawithana T (1994) Savory flavours. In: Gabelman A (ed) Bioprocess production of flavour fragrance and color ingredients. Wiley, New York, pp 135–168
Nakao Y, Kanamori T, Itoh T, Kodama Y, Rainieri S, Nakamura N, Shimonaga T, Hattori M, Ashikari T (2009) Genome sequence of the lager brewing yeast, an interspecies hybrid. DNA Res 16:115–129
Nasseri AT, Rasaul S, Morowvat MH, Ghasemi Y (2011) Single cell protein: production and process. Am J Food Technol 6(2):103–116
Navarrete-Bolanos JL (2012) Improving traditional fermented beverages: how to evolve from spontaneous to directed fermentation. Eng Life Sci 12(4):410–418
Olesen PT, Stahnke LH (2000) The influence of Debaryomyces hansenii and Candida utilis on the aroma formation in garlic spiced fermented sausages and model minces. Meat Sci 56:357–368
Panagou EZ, Tassou CC (2006) Changes in volatile compounds and related biochemical profile during controlled fermentation of cv. Conservolea green olives. Food Microbiol 23:738–746
Panagou EZ, Schillinger U, Franz C, Nychas GJE (2008) Microbiological and biochemical profile of cv. Conservolea naturally black olives during controlled fermentation with selected strains of lactic acid bacteria. Food Microbiol 25:348–358
Peppler HJ (1970) Food yeasts. In: Rose AH, Harrison JS (eds) The yeasts, vol 3, Yeast technology. Academic, London, pp 421–462
Peppler HJ (1979) Production of yeasts and yeast products. In: Peppler HJ, Perlman D (eds) Microbial technology, vol I, 2nd edn. Academic, New York, pp 157–185
Peppler HJ (1982) Yeast extracts. Econ Microbiol 7:293–312
Pinho O, Ferreira IMPLVO, Santos LHMLM (2006) Method optimization by solid-phase microextraction in combination with gas chromatography with mass spectrometry for analysis of beer volatile fraction. J Chromatogr A 1121:145–153
Piodux M, Marshall VM, Zanoni P, Brooker B (1990) Lactobacilli isolated from sugary kefir grains capable of polysaccharide production and minicell formation. J Appl Bacteriol 69:311–320
Pometto A, Shetty K, Paliyath G, Robert E (2006) Food biotechnology, 2nd edn, Food science and technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 1903
Pozo MA, Guichard E, Cayot N (2006) Flavor control in baked cereal products. Food Rev Int 22(4):335–379
Pretorius IS (2000) Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast 16:675–729
Prillinger H, Molnar O, Eliskases-Lechner F, Lopandic K (1999) Phenotypic and genotypic identification of yeasts from cheese. A Van Leeuw J Microb 75:267–283
Punja ZK, Utkhede RS (2003) Using fungi and yeasts to manage vegetable crop diseases. Trends Biotechnol 21:400–407
Randez-Gil F, Sanz P, Prieto JA (1999) Engineering baker’s yeast: room for improvement. Trends Biotechnol 17:237–244
Reed G (1981) Use of microbial cultures: yeast products. Food Technol 35(1):89–94
Reed G, Nagodawithana TW (1991) Yeast technology, 2nd edn. Avi Publishing, New York, p 765
Rodriguez De Le Borbolla Y, Alcala JM, Rejano Navarro L (1979) Sobre la preparacion de las aceitunas estilo sevillano la fermentacion I. Grasas Aceites 30:175–185
Rodriguez De Le Borbolla Y, Alcala JM, Rejano Navarro L (1981) Sobre la preparacion de las aceitunas estilo sevillano la fermentacion II. Grasas Aceites 32:103–113
Rodriguez H, Curiel JA, Landet EJM, Rivas DLB, López DF, Gómez- Cordovés C, Mancheño JM, Muñoz R (2009) Food phenolics and lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 132:79–90
Rodriguez-Gómez F, Arroyo-López FN, López-López A, Bautista-Gallego J, Garrido-Fernández A (2010) Lipolytic activity of the yeast species associated with the fermentation/storage phase of ripe olive processing. Food Microbiol 27:604–612
Rodríguez-Gómez F, Romero-Gil V, Bautista-Gallego J, Garrido-Fernández A, Arroyo-López FN (2012) Multivariate analysis to discriminate yeast strains with technological applications in table olive processing. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:1761–1770
Roig JM, Hernandez JM (1991) El uso de microorganismos iniciadores (starters) en la fermentacion de aceitunas. Olivae 37:20–28
Romano P, Capece A (2013) Saccharomyces cerevisiae as bakers’ yeast. In: Heldman DR, Wheeler MB, Hoover DG (eds) Encyclopedia of biotechnology in agriculture and food. Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 1–4
Roostita R, Fleet GH (1996) The occurrence and growth of yeast in camembert and blueveined cheeses. Int J Food Microbiol 28:393–404
Ruiz-Barba JL, Jimenez-Diaz R (1995) Availability of essential B group vitamins to Lactobacillus plantarum in green olive fermentation brines. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1294–1297
Ruiz-Barba JL, Jimenez-Diaz R, Piard JC (1991) Plasmid profiles and curing of plasmids in Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from green olive fermentations. J Appl Bacteriol 71(5):417–421
Sabatini N, Mucciarella MR, Marsilio V (2008) Volatile compounds in uninoculated and inoculated table olives with Lactobacillus plantarum (Olea europaea L., cv. Moresca and Kalamata). LWT- Food Sci Tech 41:2017–2022
Sagdic O, Kuscu A, Ozcan M, Ozcelik S (2002) Effects of Turkish spice extracts at variousconcentrations on the growth of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Food Microbiol 19:473–480
Samelis J, Sofos JN (2003) Yeasts in meat and meat products. In: Boekhout T, Robert V (eds) Yeasts in food: beneficial and detrimental aspects. Behr V, Hamburg, pp 239–266
Sanchez OJ, Cardona CA (2008) Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks. Bioresour Technol 99:5270–5295
Sánchez AH, Rejano L, Montaño A, De Castro A (2001) Utilization at high pH of starter cultures of lactobacilli for Spanish-style green olive fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol 67:115–122
Sanchez B, Reverol L, Galindo-Castro I, Bravo A, Rangel-Aldao R, Ramirez JL (2003) Brewer’s yeast oxidoreductase with activity on Maillard reaction intermediates of beer. Tech Quart MBAA 40(3):204–212
Sánchez-Gómez AH, García P, Rejano L (2006) Trends in table olives production, elaboration of table olives. Grasas Aceites 57:86–94
Santos A, Marquina D, Leal JA, Peinado JM (2000) (1➔6)-β-D-Glucan as cell wall receptor for Pichia membranifaciens killer toxin. Appl Environ Microb 66:1809–1813
Satyanarayana T, Kunze G (2009) Yeast biotechnology: diversity and applications. Springer, New Delhi, p 766
Selgas MD, Garcia ML (2007) Starter cultures: yeasts. In: Toldrá F (ed) Handbook of fermented meat and poultry. Blackwell, Ames, pp 159–170
Sengun IY, Nielsen DS, Karapinar M, Jakobsen M (2009) Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Tarhana, a traditional Turkish fermented food. Int J Food Microbiol 135:105–111
Servili M, Settani L, Veneziani G, Esposto S, Massitti O, Taticchi A, Urbani S, Montedoro GF, Corsetti A (2006) The use of Lactobacillus pentosus 1MO to shorten the debittering process time of black table olives (Cv.Itrana and Leccino): a pilot-scale application. J Agri Food Chem 54:3869–3875
Settani L, Tangüler H, Moschetti G, Reale S, Gargano V, Erten H (2011) Evolution of fermenting microbiata in tarhana produced under controlled technological conditions. Food Microbiol 28:1367–1373
Settanni L, Corsetti A (2008) Application of bacteriocins in vegetable food biopreservation. Int J Food Microbiol 121:123–138
Simova E, Beshkova D, Angelov A, Hristozova TS, Frengova G, Spasov Z (2002) Lactic acid bacteria and yeast in kefir grains and kefir made from them. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 28:1–6
Simova ED, Frengova G, Beshkova DM (2003) Effect of aeration on the production of carotenoid pigments by Rhodotorula rubra-Lactobacillus casei subsp. Casei co-cultures in whey ultrafiltrate. J Biosci 58(3/4):225–229
Sommer R (1998) Yeast extract: production, properties and components. Food Aust 50:181–183
Spadaro D, Gullino ML (2004) State of the art and future prospects of the biological control of postharvest fruit diseases. Int J Food Microbiol 91:185–194
Spinnler HE, Berger C, Lapadatescu C, Bonnarme P (2001) Production of sulphur compounds by several yeasts of technological interest for cheese ripening. Int Dairy J 11:245–252
Squina FM, Yamashita F, Pereira JL, Mercadante AZ (2002) Production of carotenoids by Rhodotorula rubra and R. glutinis in culture medium supplemented with sugar cane juice. Food Biotechnol 16(3):227–235
Stam H, Hoogland M, Laane C (1998) Food flavours from yeast. In: Wood BJ (ed) Microbiology of fermented foods, vol 2, 2nd edn. Blackie, London, pp 505–542
Stewart GG, Russell I (1998) An introduction to brewing science and technology series III Brewer’s yeast. Institute of Brewing, London, p 108
Strehaiano P, Ramon-Portugal F, Taillandier P (2006) Yeasts as biocatalysts. In: Queol A, Fleet GH (eds) Yeasts in food and beverages. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 243–285
Suomalainen H, Lehtonen M (1978) Yeast as a producer of aroma compounds. Dechema Monogr 82:207–220
Suomalainen H, Lehtonen M (1979) The production of aroma compounds by yeast. J Inst Brew 85(3):149–156
Swiegers JH, Bartowsky EJ, Henschke PA, Pretorius IS (2005) Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour. Aust J Grape Wine R 11:139–173
Takizawa S, Kojima S, Tamura S, Fujinaga S, Benno Y, Nakase T (1998) The composition of the Lactobacillus flora in kefir grains. Syst Appl Microbiol 21:121–127
Tamang JP, Tamang B, Schillinger U, Franz CMAP, Gores M, Holzapfel WH (2005) Identification of predominant lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditionally fermented vegetable products of the Eastern Himalayas. Int J Food Microbiol 105:347–356
Tanguler H, Erten H (2008) Utilisation of spent brewer’s yeast for yeast extract production by autolysis: the effect of temperature. Food Bioprod Process 86:317–321
Tangüler H, Erten H (2012a) Occurence and growth of lactic acid bacteria species during the fermentation of Shalgam (Şalgam), a traditional Turkish fermented beverage. LWT Food Sci Technol 46:36–41
Tangüler H, Erten H (2012b) Chemical and microbiological characteristics of Shalgam (Şalgam); a traditional Turkish fermented beverage. J Food Qual 35:298–306
Toba T, Arihara K, Adachi S (1987) Comparative study of polysaccharides from kefir grains, an encaosuied homofermentative Lactobacillus species and Lactobacillus kefir. Milchwissenschaft 42(9):565–568
Todorov SD, Dicks LMT (2006) Screening for bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria from boza, a traditional cereal beverage from Bulgaria. Process Biochem 41:11–19
Tofalo R, Perpetuini G, Schirone M, Suzzi G, Corsetti A (2013) Yeast biota associated to naturally fermented table olives from different Italian cultivars. Int J Food Microbiol 161:203–208
Toldrá F (2002) Fermentation and starter cultures. In: Toldrá F (ed) Dry-cured meat products. Food & Nutrition Press, Trumbull, pp 89–112
Van den Tempel T, Jacobsen M (2000) Debaryomyces hansenii and Yarrowia lipolytica as potential starter cultures for production of blue cheese. Int Dairy J 10:263–270
Van Kranenburg R, Van Swam II, Marugg JD, Kleerebezem M, de Vos WM (1999) Exopolysaccharide biosynthesis in Lactococcus lactis NIZO B40: functional analysis of the glycosyltransferase genes involved in synthesis of the polysaccharide backbone. J Bacteriol 181:338–340
Viljoen BC (2001) The interaction between yeasts and bacteria in dairy environments. Int J Food Microbiol 69:37–44
Viljoen BC (2006) Yeast ecological interactions: yeast–yeast, yeast–bacteria, yeast fungi interactions and yeasts as biocontrol agents. In: Querol A, Fleet GH (eds) Yeasts in food and beverages. Springer, Berlin, pp 83–110
Vogelmann SA, Seitter M, Singer U, Brandt MJ, Hertel C (2009) Adaptability of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts to sourdough prepared from cereals, pseudocereals and cassava and use of competitive strains as starters. Int J Food Microbiol 130:205–212
Vrancken G, Vuyst LD, Van der Meulen R, Huys G, Vandamme P, Daniel HM (2010) Yeast species composition differs between artisan bakery and spontaneous laboratory sourdoughs. FEMS Yeast Res 10:471–481
Walker GM (1999) Yeast physiology and biotechnology. Wiley, London, p 350
Witthuhn RC, Schoeman T, Britz TJ (2004) Isolation and characterization of the microbial population of different South African kefir grains. Int J Dairy Technol 57:33–37
Wouters JTM, Ayad EH, Hugenholtz J, Smit G (2002) Microbes from raw milk for fermented dairy products. Int Dairy J 12:91–109
Wyman CE (2007) What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol. Trends Biotechnol 25(4):153–157
Yaygin H (1995) Yoğurt, III. Süt ve Süt Ürünleri Sempozyumu 2-3 Haziran 1994 Istanbul, Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi Yayınları, No:548
Young LS, Cauvain SP (2007) Technology of breadmaking, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, p 398
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Erten, H. et al. (2014). Importance of Yeasts and Lactic Acid Bacteria in Food Processing. In: Malik, A., Erginkaya, Z., Ahmad, S., Erten, H. (eds) Food Processing: Strategies for Quality Assessment. Food Engineering Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1378-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1378-7_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1377-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1378-7
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)