Abstract
In this paper we shall critically examine the two main arguments that W. V. Quine has presented in various forms to support his thesis of the indeterminacy of translation. If somebody objects that we have, from the very beginning, misrepresented the thesis by calling it “indeterminacy of meaning” whereas Quine names it “indeterminacy of translation”, here is our answer. Since translation as normally understood is a way of explaining meaning and there is considerable evidence that Quine intends that the word “translation” should be understood in its normal sense, his thesis could also be interpreted as a thesis of the indeterminacy of meaning. Here we shall discuss the thesis only in this sense.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chomsky, N., 1976, “Reflections on Language,” Temple Smith, London.
Friedman, M., 1975, Physicalism and the Indeterminacy of Translation, Noûs, 9:353–374.
Føllesdal, D., 1973, Indeterminacy of Translation and Under-Determination of the Theory of Nature, Dialectica, 27:289–301.
Føllesdal, D., 1975, Meaning and Experience, in: “Mind and Language,” S. Guttenplan, ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Gardner, M. R., 1973, Apparent Conflicts between Quine’s Indeterminacy Thesis and his Philosophy of Science, BJPS, 24:381–393.
Hockney, D., 1975, The Bifurcation of Scientific Theories and Indeterminacy of Translation, PS, 42:411–427.
Quine, W. V., 1960, “Word and Object,” MIT Press, Cambridge.
Quine, W. V., 1966, “The Ways of Paradox,” Random House, New York.
Quine, W. V., 1969a, Reply to Chomsky, in: “Words and Objections,” D. Davidson and J. Hintikka, eds., Reidel, Dordrecht.
Quine, W. V., 1969b, “Ontological Relativity and Other Essays,” Columbia University Press, New York and London.
Quine, W. V., 1970, On the Reasons for Indeterminacy of Translation, JP, 67:178–183.
Quine, W. V., 1974, “The Roots of Reference,” Open Court, La Salle.
Quine, W. V., 1975a, The Nature of Natural Knowledge, in: “Mind and Language,” S. Guttenplan, ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Quine, W. V., 1975b, Mind and Verbal Dispositions, in: “Mind and Language,” S. Guttenplan, ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Quine, W. V., 1975c, On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World, Erkenntnis, 9:313–328.
Quine, W. V., and Ullian, J. S., 1978, “The Web of Belief,” Random House, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Qvarnström, BO. (1985). Indeterminacy of Meaning. In: Dorn, G., Weingartner, P. (eds) Foundations of Logic and Linguistics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0548-2_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0548-2_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0550-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0548-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive