Abstract
Auditory signals represent complex patterns of information in the frequency and intensity domain over time. How do neurons encode the complex frequency-time varying features of a natural vocalization? Where and how are the complex acoustic signals transferred and coded in the animal’s brain? Are there specialized areas for the extraction of communicatively meaningful sound parts? For the neurophysiological experimentalist the situation seems at first sight frustrating. The answers obtained with single unit recordings are only simple yes/no codes (i.e, action potentials). First, the interpretation of the action-potential frequencies with respect to different complex stimuli seemed to be impossible at the single neuron level. Therefore, when the first monkey studies started, the only promising concept seemed the search for highly specialized cortical neurons which may act as “vocalization detectors”. Such neurons should answer only to a very small set of vocalizations but not — or not in the same way — to noise or tone bursts. Neurons with such feature specificity have never been clearly identified. Even complex vocalizations appeared to evoke neural responses only by producing spike trains following the time structure of the transient elements in the stimulus (Newman, 1988). Consequently, it is not surprising that previous electrophysiological research with species-specific sounds gave rise to more questions than answers. Moreover, the theoretical background for these experiments was poorly described. Highly specialized “vocalization detector” neurons are only to be expected if one assumes one of the following mechanisms: an innate neural network specialized for filtering the species’ own vocalizations, or, alternatively, a sensory serial information processor leading to the extraction of information-bearing sounds. Both mechanisms could produce higher-order neurons exclusively restricted in their activity to vocalizations as adequate stimuli. An argument against a simple innate neural network comes from behavioral studies. The meaning of an animal’s vocalization can vary with context, even though the acoustic morphology of the sound remains unchanged (Symmes, 1981; Cheney and Seyfarth, 1990). An argument against the second alternative is the anatomically established centrifugal pathways which parallel the centripetal auditory pathways (Pickles, 1982). On the other hand, electrophysiologists have documented several neurons that are, for example, specialized to small intensity or frequency ranges. This can be interpreted as support for the view that neurons are able to extract features, which may be information-bearing parameters in a complex stimulus. Such feature encoding seems an essential framework for the brain in complex sound recognition. To offer an example, it is an every day experience that in speech perception the meaning of a word is often known despite an unclear pronunciation or against a noisy environment. We complete a familiar word if we detect some features or meaningful parts of the word. Therefore, many studies regarding the auditory perception of sounds focus on experiments with relatively simple artificial sounds, which may act as information-bearing elements in a complex sound.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bieser. A. and Müller-Preuss, P., 1989. Temporal processing through auditory neurones:Periodicity decoding and spike rate, Euro. J. Neurosci. Suppl. 2: 260.
Bieser, A. and Müller-Preuss, P, 1992, Organization of the auditory cortex in the squirrel monkey, in: “Rhythmogenesis in Neurons and Networks”, N. Elsner and D.W. Richter, eds., Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart. New York, pp. 228–220.
Bregman, A.S., Abramson. J., Doehring, P., and Darwin, C.J., 1985, Spectral integration based on common amplitude modulation, Percept. Psychophys. 37: 483–493.
Cheney, D.L. and Seyfarth, R.M., 1990, “How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species”, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Clarey, C.C., Barone, P., and Imig, T., 1992, Physiology of thalamus and cortex, in: “The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neurophysiology”, A.N. Popper and R.R. Fay, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 233–334.
Edeline, J.M. and Weinberger, N.M., 1993, Receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex during frequency discrimination training–selective retuning independent of task difficulty, Behay. Neurosci. 107: 82–103.
Eggermont, J. J., 1990. “The Correlative Brain - Theory and Experiment in Neural Interaction”, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Evans, E.F., 1992, Auditory processing of complex sounds–an overview, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. Series B, Biol. 336: 295–300.
Fasti, H., 1977, Roughness and temporal masking patterns of sinusoidally amplitude modulated broadband noise, in: “Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing”, E.F., Evans and J.P.Wilson, eds., Academic Press, London, pp. 403–414.
Fasti, H., Widmann, U., and Müller-Preuss, P., 1991, Correlations between hearing and vocal activity in man and the squirrel monkey, Acustica 73: 35–36.
Heffner, H.E. and Heffner, R.S., 1990, Role of primate auditory cortex in hearing, in: “Comparative Perception-Vol.II: Complex Signals”. W.C. Stebbins and M.A. Beckley, eds., Wiley, New York, pp. 279–310.
Imig, T.J. and Reale, R.A., 1980. Patterns of cortico-cortical connections related to tonotopic maps in cat auditory cortex, J. Comp. Neural. 192: 293–332.
Imig, T.J., Ruggero, M.A., Kitzes, L.M., Javel, E., and Brugge, J.F., 1977, Organization of auditory cortex in the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus), J. Comp. Neurol. 171: 111–128.
Javel, E. and Mott, J.B., 1988, Physiological and psychophysical correlates of temporal processes in hearing, Hear. Res. 34: 275–294.
Langner, G., 1992, Periodicity coding in the auditory system, Hear. Res. 60: 115–142.
Luethke, L.E., Krubitzer, L.A., and Kaas, J.H., 1988, Cortical connections of electrophysiological and architectonically defined subdivisions of auditory cortex in squirrels, J. Comp. Neurol. 268: 181.
Maurus, M., Streit, K.-M., Geissler, B., Barclay, D., Wiesner, E., and Kuehlmorgen, B., 1984, Categorical differentiation in amplitude changes of squirrel monkey calls, Lang. Commun. 4: 195–208.
Miller, J.M., Sutton, D., Pfingst, B., and Beaton, R., 1972, Single cell activity in the auditory cortex of rhesus monkeys: Behavioral dependency, Science 177: 449–451.
Moore, B.C.J. and Sek, A., 1992, Detection of combined frequency and amplitude modulation, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 92: 3119–3131.
Morel, A. and Kaas J.H., 1992, Subdivisions and connections of auditory cortex in owl monkeys, J. Comp. Neurol. 318: 27–63.
Morel, A., Garraghty, P. E., and Kaas, J.H.,1993, Tonotopic organization, architectonic fields, and connections of auditory cortex in macaque monkeys, J. Comp. Neurol. 335: 437–459.
Müller-Preuss, P., Bieser, A., Preuss, A., and Fastl, H., 1988, Neural processing of AM-sounds within central parts of the auditory pathway, in: “Auditory Pathway: Structure and Function”, J. Syka and B. Masterton, eds., Plenum, New York, pp. 327–33.
Newman, J.D., 1988, Primate hearing mechanisms, in: “Comparative Primate Biology, Vol.4: Neurosciences”, H.D. Steklis and J. Erwin, eds., Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 469–499.
Pfingst, B.E. and O’Connor, T.A., 1981, Characteristics of neurons in auditory cortex of monkeys performing a simple auditory task, J. Neurophysiol. 45: 16–34.
Pfingst, B.E., O’Connor, T.A., and Miller, J.M., 1977, Response plasticity of neurons in auditory cortex of the rhesus monkey, Exp. Brain. Res. 29: 393–404.
Phillips, D.P. and Irvine, D.R.F., 1981, Responses of single neurons in physiologically defined primary auditory cortex (AI) of the cat: frequency tuning and responses to intensity, J. Neurophysiol. 45: 48–58.
Phillips, D.P. and Irvine, D.R.F., 1982, Properties of single neurons in the anterior auditory field (AAF) of cat cerebral cortex, Brain Res. 248: 237–244.
Preuss, A. and Muller-Preuss, P., 1990, Processing of amplitude-modulated sounds in the medial geniculate body of squirrel monkeys, Exp. Brain Res. 79: 207–211.
Pickles, J.O., 1982, “An Introduction to the Physiology of Hearing”, Academic Press, London.
Schott, D., 1975, Quantitative analysis of the vocal repertoire of squirrel monkeys (Sainriri sciureus), Zeitschr. Tierpsvchol. 38: 225–250.
Schreiner, C.E. and Urbas, J.V., 1986, Representation of amplitude modulation in the auditory cortex of the cat. I. The anterior auditory field (AAF), Hear. Res. 21: 227–241.
Schreiner, C.E. and Urbas, J.V., 1988, Representation of amplitude modulation in the auditory cortex of the cat. II. Comparison between cortical fields, Hear. Res. 32: 49–64.
Sudakov,K., MacLean, P.D., Reeves, A., and Marino,R., 1971, Unit study of exteroceptive inputs to claustrocortex in awake, sitting squirrel monkey, Brain Res. 28: 19–34.
Suga, N., 1990, Cortical computational maps for auditory imaging, Neural Networks 3: 3–21.
Symmes, D., 1981, On the use of natural stimuli in neurophysiological studies of audition, Hear. Res. 4: 203–214.
Symmes, D., Newman, J.D., Talmage-Riggs, G.. and Katz-Lieblich, A.. 1979, Individuality and stability of isolation peeps in squirrel monkeys. Anim. Behan. 27: 1142–1152.
Terhardt, E.. 1974, On the perception of periodic sound fluctuations (roughness), Acustica 30: 201–213.
Pfingst, B.E. and O’Connor, T.A., 1981. Characteristics of neurons in auditory cortex of monkeys performing a simple auditory task, J. Neurophysiol. 45: 16–34.
Weinberger, N.M. and Diamond, D.M., 1987, Physiological plasticity in auditory cortex: Rapid induction by learning, Progr. Neurohiol. 29: 1–55.
Weinberger, N.M., Ashe, J.H., Metherate, R., McKenna, T.M., Diamond, D.M., and Bakin, J., 1990, Retuning auditory cortex by learning:A preliminary model of receptive field plasticity, Concepts Neurosci. 1: 91–132.
Zwicker, E. and Fastl, H.. 1990, “Psychoacoustics-Facts and Models”, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bieser, A. (1995). Amplitude Envelope Encoding as a Feature for Temporal Information Processing in the Auditory Cortex of Squirrel Monkeys. In: Zimmermann, E., Newman, J.D., Jürgens, U. (eds) Current Topics in Primate Vocal Communication. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9930-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9930-9_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9932-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9930-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive