Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Psychological Assessment ((AIPA,volume 8))

  • 285 Accesses

Abstract

The field of couple assessment, like so many other areas of clinical assessment, is in the midst of substantial theoretical and practical self-analysis and revision. Different theoretical orientations in this field have co-existed mostly in isolation from one another, and advocates of each orientation have maintained their own more-or-less standard approach to assessment. These standard approaches generally have involved following a rather detailed recipe of procedures. Thus, each theoretical approach to couple assessment has been quite specific in terms of goals and methods, albeit of a different flavor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur, J., Hops, H., and Biglan, A. (1982). Living in Family Environments (LIFE) coding system. Eugene, OR: Oregon Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H. (1981a). A role for clinicians in the research process. Behavioral Assessment, 3, 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H. (1981b). On the relation of clinical research to clinical practice: Current issues, new directions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 147–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H., Hayes, S. C., and Nelson, R. (1984). The scientist-practitioner. Elmsford, New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucom, D. H. (1982). A comparison of behavioral contracting and problemsolving/communication training in behavioral marital therapy. Behavior Therapy, 13, 162–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baucom, D. H. (1983). Conceptual and psychometric issues in evaluating the effectiveness of behavioral marital therapy. Advances in family intervention, assessment and theory (Vol. 3, pp. 91–117). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucom, D. H., Burnett, C. K., Rankin, L., andSher, T. G. (1990). Cognitive/behavioral marital therapy outcome research: What is success? In R. L. Weiss (Chair), Why 9 out of 10 marital therapists should not prefer satisfaction. Symposium presented at the 24th Annual Convention of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., Sayers, S., and Sher, T. G. (1989). The role of cognitions in marital relationships: Definitional, mehtodological, and conceptual issues. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 31–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., and Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New YOrk: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, P., and Snyder, D. K. (1981). Differential diagnosis of marital and sexual distress: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 7, 290–295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A., and Thorsen, C. (1986). Ther interactive behavior of women with chronic pain. Unpublished manuscript, Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birchler, G. R., and Webb, L. J. (1977). Discriminating Interaction in behavior in happy and unhappy marriages. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 494–495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broderick, J. E., and O’Leary, K. D. (1986). Contributions of affect, attitudes, and behavior to marital satisfaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 514–517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A. (1988). Dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples. In P. Noller and M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on mairtal interaction (pp. 31–52 ). Clevedon, Avon, England: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A., and Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 73–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A. C., and Mendoza, J. (1986). A method for assessing change in single subject designs: An alteraction of the RC index. Behavior Therapy, 17, 305. 308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A., and Nies, D. C. (1980). The Spouse Observation Checklist: Empirical analysis and critique. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 8, 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. H., Sargent, M. M., and Sechrest, L. B. (1986). Use of psychotherapy research by professional psychologists. American Psychologist, 41, 198–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, J. M., Heyman, R. E., andWeiss, R. L (1990). Satisfaction by the numbers: Is the DAS a cause for concern? In R. L. Weiss (Chair), Why 9 out of 10 marital therapists should not prefer satisfaction. Symposium presented at the 24th Annual Convention of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filsinger, E. E. (1981). The Dyadic Interaction Scoring Code. In E. E. Filslinger and R. A. Lewis (Eds), Assessing marriage: New behavioral approaches. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotalling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (1983). The dark side of families: Current family violence research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1988). A typological approach to marital interaction. In P. Noller and M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 98–120 ). Clevedon, Avon, England: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, F. J., and Markman, H. J. (1984). An economical observational measure of couples’ communication skill. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 97–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fruzzetti, A. E., andJacobson, N. S. (1990). Toward a behavioral conceptualization of adult intimacy: Implications for marital therapy. In E. A. Blechman (Ed.), Emotions and the family: For better or for worse (pp. 117–135 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruzzetti, A. E., and Jacobson, N. S. (1991). Depressive response to relationship dissolution: A comparison of cognitive and contextual factors. Manuscript submitted for publication. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruzzetti, A. E., King, M. R., Whisman, M. A., andJacobson, N. S. ( 1989, November). Homework compliance and generalization in behavioral marital therapy.: Therapist-client interactions and outcome. Paper presented at the 23rd annual meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruzzetti, A. E., Whisman, M. A., and Jacobson, N. S. (1990). MMPI Scale 4 false positives: Beware the effects of marital discord. Unpublished manuscript. Seattle, WA: Univeristy of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganley, A. (1981). Counseling program for men who batter: Elements of effective programs. Response, 4, 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. J., andStraus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence. New York: Simon andSchuster. Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1982). Temporal form: Toward a new language for describing relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 943–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1985). Observational measures of behavior therapy outcome: A reply to Jacobson. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 317–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1988). Specific Affect Coding System (SPAFF): Observing emotional communication in marital and family interaction. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., and Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., and Levenson, R. W. (1985). A valid procedure for obtaining selfreport of affect in marital interaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 151–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., and Levenson, R. W. (1986). Assessing the role of emotion in marriage. Behavioral Assessment, 8, 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L.A., andJohnson, S. (1988). Emotion focused couples therapy. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahlweg, K., Reisner, L., Kohli, G., Vollmer, M., Schindler, L., and Revenstorf, D. (1984). Development and validity of a new system to analyze interpersonal communication (KPI). In K. HahlwegandN. S. Jacobson (Eds.), Marital interaction: Analysis and modification. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, and McKinley, (1983). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, R. E, Weiss, R. L., and Eddy, J. M. (1990). Marital interaction coding system-IV (MICS-IV). Eugene, OR: Oregon Marital Studies Program, University of Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hops, H., Wills, T. A., Patterson, G. R., and Weiss, R. L. (1972). Marital interaction codingsystem. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon and Oregon Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S. (1985a). The role of observational measures in behavior therapy outcome research. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S. (1985b). The uses versus abuses of observational measures. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 323–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S. (1989). The politics of intimacy. Behavior Therapist, 12, 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., Berley, R., Elwood, R., Melman, K., and Phelps, C. (1985). Failure in behavioral marital therapy. In S. Coleman (Ed.), Failure in family therapy (pp. 91–134 ). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., Dobson, K., Fruzzetti, A. E., Schmaling, K. B., and Salusky, S. (in press). Marital therapy as a treatment for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., and Elwood, R. W. (1984). Outcome research on behavioral marital therapy: A methodological and conceptual reappraisal. In K. Hahlweg andN. S. Jacobson (Eds.), Marital interaction: Analysis and modification (pp. 113–132 ). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., andRevenstorf, D. (1984). Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behavior Therapy, 15, 336–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N.S., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., andSchmaling, K.B. (1989). Marital therapy and spouse involvement in the treatment of depression, agoraphobia, and alcoholism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 5–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., and Margolin, G. (1979). Marital therapy: Strategies based on social learning and behavior exchange principles. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazak, A. E., Jarmas, A., andSnitzer, L. (1988). Athe assessment of marital satisfaction: An evaluation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 2, 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, R W., and Gottman, J. M. (1983). Marital interaction: Physiological linkage and affective exchange. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 45, 587–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, R. W, andGottman, J. M. (1985). Physiological and affective predictors of change in relationship satisfaction. Journal ofPersonal ity and Social Psychology, 49, 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, G. (1981a). Behavior exchange in distressed and nondistressed marriages: A family cycle perspective. Behavior Therapy, 12, 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, G. (1981b). The reciprocal relationship between marital and child problems. In J. P. Vincent (Ed.), Advances in family intervention assessment and theory. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, G. (1983). An interactional model for the behavioral assessment of marital relationships. Behavioral Assessment, 5, 103–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, G., Michelli, J., andJacobson, N. (1988). Assessment of marital dysfunction. In A. S. BellackandM. Hersen (Eds.), Behavioral assessment: A practical handbook ( 3rd edition ) (pp. 441–489 ). Elsmford, New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, G., Talovic, S., andWeinstein, C. D. (1983). Areas of Change questionnaire: A practical approach to marital assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 920–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, G., andWampold, B. E. (1981). A sequential analysis of conflict and accord in distressed and nondistressed marital pairs. Journal of Consultingand Clinical Psychology, 49, 554–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, G., and Weinstein, C. D. (1983). The role of affect in behavioral marital therapy. In M. L. Aronson andL. R. Wolberg (Eds.), Group and family therapy 1982: An overview (pp. 334–355 ). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, G., and Weiss, R. L. (1978). A comparative evaluation of therapeutic components associated with behavioral marital treatment.Joumal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 1476–1486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, H. J., and Notarius, C. I. (1987). Coding marital and family interaction: Current status. In T. Jacob (Ed.), Family interaction and psychopathology (pp. 329–390 ). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow-Bradley, C., and Elliott, R. (1986). Utilization of psychotherapy research by practicing psychotherapists. American Psychologist, 41, 188–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Napier, A. Y. (1978). The rejection-intrusion pattern: A central family dynamic. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 4, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notarius, C. I., and Markman, H. J. (1981). The Couples Interaction Scoring System. In E. E. Filsinger and R. A. Lewis (Eds.), Assessing Marriage (pp. 112–127 ). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notarius, C. I., andVanzetti, N.A. (1983). The marital agendas protocol.In E. Filsinger (Ed.), Marriage and family assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, K. D., and Beach, S. R. H. (1990). Marital therapy: A viable treatment for depression and marital discord. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 183–186.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, K. D., and Murphy, C. (in press). Clinical issues in the assessment of spouse abuse. In R. T. Ammerman and M. Hersen (Eds.), Assessment of family violence: A clinical and legal sourcebook. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, K. D., and Vivian, D. (1990). Physical aggression in marriage. In F. D. Fincham and T. N. Bradbury (Eds), The psychology of marriage: Basic issues and applications (pp. 232–348 ). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R. (1976). Some procedures for assessing changes in marital interaction patterns. Oregon Research Institute Bulletin, 16 (7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley, C. F., and Cross, D. G. (1982). A psychometric evaluation of the Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 739–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, D. K. (1979). Multidimensional assessment of marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, D. K., Wills, R. M., andKeiser, T. W. (1981). Empirical validation of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory: An actuarial approach. Journal of ConsultingandClinical Psychology, 49, 262–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the qulity of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 1528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, M. D., and Todd, T. C. (1982). The family therapy of drug abuse and addiction. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J., andSteinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Garden City, New York: Doubleday / Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullaway, M., and Christensen, A. (1983). Assessment of dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 653–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touliatos, J., Perlmutter, B. F., and Straus, M. A. (1990). Handbook of family measurement techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, J. P., Cook, N. I., and Messerly, L. (1980). A social learning analysis of couples during the second postnatal month. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 8, 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. L., and Aved, B. M. (1978). Marital satisfaction and depression as predictors of physical health status. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 1379–1384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. L., andFrohman, P. E. (1985). Behavioral observation as outcome measures: Not through a glass darkly. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 309–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. L., Hops, H., and Patterson, G. R. (1973). A framework for conceptualizing marital conflict, a technology for altering it, some data for evaluating it. In L. A. Hamerlynck, L. C. Hardy, and E. J. Mash (Eds.), Behavior change: Methodology, concepts, and practice. Champaign, IL: Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. L., andPerry, B. A. (1983). The Spouse Observation Checklist: Development and clinical applications. In E. E. Filsinger (Ed.), Marriage and fam ilyassessment (pp. 65–84 ). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. L., and Margolin, G. (1986). Assessment of conflict and accord: A second look. In A. Ciminero (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral assessment (2nd edition) (pp. 561–600 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whisman, M. A., andJacobson, N. S. (1991). Changes in marital adjustment following marital therapy: Comparisons between outcome measures. Unpublished manuscript. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whisman, M. A., Jacobson, N. S., Fruzzetti, A. E., andWaltz, J. A. (1989). Methodological issues in marital therapy. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 11, 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wile, D. (1981). Couples therapy: A non-traditional approach. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yllo, K., and Bograd, M. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fruzzetti, A.E., Jacobson, N.S. (1992). Assessment of Couples. In: Rosen, J.C., McReynolds, P. (eds) Advances in Psychological Assessment. Advances in Psychological Assessment, vol 8. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9101-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9101-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9103-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9101-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics