Abstract
A new approach for optimization or hedging of a portfolio of finance instruments to reduce the risks of high losses is suggested and tested with several applications. As a measure of risk, Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) is used. For several important cases, CVaR coincides with the expected shortfall (expected loss exceeding Values-at-Risk). However, generally, CVaR and the expected shortfall are different risk measures. CVaR is a coh erent risk measure both for continuous and discrete distributions. CVaR is a more consistent measure of risk than VaR. Portfolios with low CVaR also have low VaR because CVaR is greater than VaR. The approach is based on a new representation of the performance function, which allows simultaneous calculation of VaR and minimization of CVaR. It can be used in conjunction with analytical or scenario based optimization algorithms If the number of scenarios is fixed, the problem is reduced to a Linear Programming or Nonsmooth Optimization Problem. These techniques allow optimizing portfolios with large numbers of instruments. The approach is tested with two examples: (1) portfolio optimization and comparison with the Minimum Variance approach; (2) hedging of a portfolio of options. The suggested methodology can be used for optimizing of portfolios by investment companies, brokerage firms, mutual funds, and any businesses that evaluate risks. Although the approach is used for portfolio analysis, it is very general and can be applied to any financial or non-financial problems involving optimization of percentiles.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson, F., Mausser, H., Rosen, D., and S. Uryasev (2000), “Credit Risk Optimization with Conditional ValueAt-Risk Criterion”, Mathematical Programming,Series B, December, (relevant Report 99–9 of the Center for Applied Optimization, University of Florida, can be downloaded: www.ise.ufl.edu/uryasev/pubs.html#t)
Artzner, P., Delbaen F., Eber, J. M., and D. Heath (1997), “Thinking Coherently”, Risk, 10, 68–71.
Artzner, P., Delbaen F., Eber, J. M., and D. Heath (1999), “Coherent Measures of Risk”, Mathematical Finance, June.
Birge, J. R. (1995), “Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods Approaches to Option Pricing”, Technical report 94–19, Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, The University of Michigan, 15 p.
Boyle, P. P., Broadie, M., and P. Glasserman (1997), “Monte Carlo Methods for Security Pricing”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,21(8–9), 1267 — 1321.
Bucay, N. and D. Rosen (1999), “Credit Risk of an International Bond Portfolio: a Case Study”, ALGO Research Quarterly, 2 (1), 9–29.
Dembo, R. S. (1995), “Optimal Portfolio Replication” Algorithmics Technical paper series, 95–01.
Dembo, R. S. and A. J. King (1992), “Tracking Models and the Optimal Regret Distribution in Asset Allocation”, Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, 8, 151–157.
Harlow, W. V. (1991), “Asset Allocation in Downside-Risk Framework”, Financial Analysts Journal, September-October, 28–40.
Ermoliev, Yu. (1983), “Stochastic Quasi-Gradient Methods and Their Applications to System Optimization”, Stochastics, 4, 1–36.
Embrechts, P. (1999), “Extreme Value Theory as a Risk Management Tool”, North American Actuarial Journal, 3 (2).
Embrechts, P., Kluppelberg, S., and T. Mikosch (1997), Extremal Events in Finance and Insurance,Springer Verlag.
Kast, R., Luciano, E., and L. Peccati (1998), “VaR and Optimization”, 2nd International Workshop on Preferences and Decisions, Trento.
Konno, H. and H. Yamazaki (1991), “Mean Absolute Deviation Portfolio Optimization Model and Its Application to Tokyo Stock Market”, Management Science, 37, 519–531.
Kreinin, A., Merkoulovitch, L., Rosen, D., and Z. Michael (1998), “Measuring Portfolio Risk Using Quasi Monte Carlo Methods”, ALGO Research Quarterly, 1 (1), 17–25.
Litterman, R. (1997), “Hot Spots and Hedges (I)”, Risk,10(3), 42–45.
Litterman, R. (1997), “Hot Spots and Hedges (II)”, Risk, 10 (5), 38–42.
Markowitz, H. M. (1952), “Portfolio Selection” Journal of Finance, 7 (1), 77–91.
Mauser, H. and D. Rosen (1991), “Beyond VaR: From Measuring Risk to Managing Risk”, ALGO Research Quarterly, 1(2), 5–20.
Ermoliev, Yu. and R. J.-B. Wets (Eds.) (1988), Numerical Techniques for Stochastic Optimization,Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, 10.
Palmquist, J., Uryasev, S., and P. Krokhmal (1999), “Portfolio Optimization with Conditional Value-At-Risk Objective and Constraints”, Research Report 99–1.4, Center for Applied Optimization, University of Florida. (accepted for publication, “The Journal of Risk,” can be downloaded.
Pflug, G. Ch. (2000), “Some Remarks on the Value-at-Risk and the Conditional Value-at-Risk”, in: Probabilistic Constrained Optimization: Methodology and Applications, Ed. S. Uryasev, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A, Vetterling, W. T., and B. P. Flannery (1992), Numerical Recipes in C. Cambridge University Press.
Prekopa, A. (1995), Stochastic Programming. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston.
RiskMetri T (1996), Technical Document, 4-th Edition, J. P. Morgan.
Rockafellar, R. T. (1970), Convex Analysis, Princeton Mathematics, 28, Princeton Univ. Press.
Rockafellar R. T. and S. Uryasev (2000), Optimization of Conditional Value-at-Risk. The Journal of Risk, 2 (3).
Shor, N. Z. (1985), Minimization Methods for Non-Differentiable Functions. Springer-Verlag.
Testuri, C. E. and S. Uryasev (2000), “On Relation between Expected Regret and Conditional Value-At-Risk”, Research Report 2000–9. ISE Dept., University of Florida.
Uryasev, S. (2000), “Conditional Value-at-Risk: Opti mization Algorithms and Applications”, Financial Engineering News,14, February, (can be downloaded: www.ise.ufl.edu/uryasev/pubs.html#t)
Uryasev, S. (1995), “Derivatives of Probability Functions and Some Applications”, Annals of Operations Research, 56, 287–311.
Uryasev, S. (1980), “Stepsize Control for Direct Stochastic Programming Methods”, Kibernetika (Kiev), 6, 85–87 (in Russian). Cybernetics, 16 (6), 886–890 (in English).
Uryasev, S. (1991), “New Variable-Metric Algorithms for Nondifferential Optimization Problems”, J. of Optim. Theory and Applic., 71 (2), 359–388.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uryasev, S., Rockafellar, R.T. (2001). Conditional Value-at-Risk: Optimization Approach. In: Uryasev, S., Pardalos, P.M. (eds) Stochastic Optimization: Algorithms and Applications. Applied Optimization, vol 54. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6594-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6594-6_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4855-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-6594-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive