Skip to main content

Abstract

The objective of this study is to obtain better understanding of the flow over two tandemly positioned bluff bodies in close enough proximity to strongly interact with each other. This interaction is often beneficial in that the drag of the overall system is reduced. Prototypes for this problem come from tractor-trailer and cab-van combinations, and from various add-on devices designed to reduce their drag.

The primary object of the present investigation is an axisymmetric configuration which seems to have first been studied by Saunders (1966). A disc of diameter d1 is coaxially placed in front of a flat-faced cylinder of diameter d2. For a given ratio d1/d2, there is a value of gap ratio, g*/d2, for which the drag of the forebody system is a minimum. In the most optimum configuration, d1/d2 = 0.75, g*/d2 = 0.375, and the corresponding forebody drag coefficient is 0.02, a remarkable reduction from the value of 0.75 for the cylinder alone. For each value of d1/d2, the minimum drag configuration, g*/d2, appears to correspond to a minimum dissipation condition in which the separation stream surface just matches (joins tangentially onto) the rearbody. Support for this idea is furnished by comparison with some results derived from free-streamline theory and from flow visualization experiments. However, when g*/d2 exceeds a critical value of about 0.5, the value of CDmin is almost an order of magnitude higher than for subcritical optimum gap ratios. The increase seems to be connected with the onset of cavity oscillations.

For non-axisymmetric geometry (square cross-sections) the separation surface cannot exactly match the rearbody and the subcritical minimum values of drag are higher than for circular cross-sections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A1, A2:

frontal area of frontbody and rear body, respectively

CD :

drag coefficient of forebody system based on A2 and freestream dynamic pressure

CDmin :

minimum drag coefficient for fixed Al/A2

\({{C}_{{{p}_{1}}}}\) :

drag coefficient of frontbody based on Al

\({{C}_{{{D}_{{{1}_{f}}}}}}\) :

drag coefficient of frontbody face based on Al

\({{C}_{{{p}_{2}}}}\) :

drag coefficient of rearbody face based on A2

Cp :

local rearbody face pressure coefficient

\({{C}_{{{p}_{s}}}}\) :

constant pressure surface or free-streamline pressure coefficient

Cp*:

average cavity pressure coefficient at optimum gap

dl, d2 :

diameter of frontbody and rearbody, respectively

(dl/d2)cr :

frontbody to rearbody diameter ratio at critical g*/D2

g:

gap between frontbody and face of rearbody

g*:

optimum gap for a given d1/d2

(g*/d2)cr :

optimum gap ratio of critical geometry

q :

freestream dynamic pressure

r:

radius of corner on rearbody face

rs(x):

radial position of the separation surface

Re:

Reynolds number based on q and d2

τS :

shear stress on separation surface

Us :

flow velocity outside separation surface

U :

freestream velocity

x:

coordinate parallel to freestream velocity

y:

radial location on rearbody face

References

  • Hoerner, S. F. (1965), Fluid-Dynamic Drag, published by the author, Brick Town, N.J. Liepmann, H. W. & Laufer, J. (1947), Investigations of Free Turbulent Mixing, NACA TN 1257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plessel, M. S. & Perry, B. (1954), On the Application of Free Streamline Theory to Cavity Flows, California Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshko, A. (1954), A New Hodograph for Free Streamline Theory, NACA TN 3168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshko, A. ( 1955 ), Some Measurements of Flow in a Rectangular Cutout, NACA TN 3488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, W. S. (1966). Apparatus for Reducing Linear and Lateral Wind Resistance in a Tractor-Trailer Combination Vehicle., U. S. Patent Office 3, 241, 876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struck, H. G. (1970), Discontinuous Flows and Free Streamline Solutions for Axisymmetric Bodies at Zero and Small Angles of Attack, NASA TN D-5634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T.M. (1976), The Hydrodynamics Laboratory at the California Institute of Technology, Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories, California Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roshko, A., Koenig, K. (1978). Interaction Effects on the Drag of Bluff Bodies in Tandem. In: Sovran, G., Morel, T., Mason, W.T. (eds) Aerodynamic Drag Mechanisms of Bluff Bodies and Road Vehicles. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8434-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8434-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-8436-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-8434-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics