Abstract
Two general approaches to knowledge have varied in their dominance throughout Western history. The first, associated with idealism, adopts a skepticism about matter and so locates the ground for whatever certainty of knowledge is possible within human reason and mental events. The second, associated with materialism, adopts a skepticism toward reason and emphasizes the difference between the objects of mentation and the objects of reality; it grounds certainty in the material reality from which mental processes are said to develop. The idealist position sees “the notion” to be first and reality second; the materialist position reverses this ordering, seeing reality to have dominance over the notion (see Colletti, 1979). Where idealism emphasizes the spontaneity of human thought, materialism emphasizes its receptivity to external determination.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sampson, E.E. (1983). Psychology and Subjectivity. In: Justice and the Critique of Pure Psychology. Critical Issues in Social Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8163-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8163-1_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-8165-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-8163-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive