Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Risk Analysis ((AIRA,volume 4))

  • 532 Accesses

Abstract

Risks associated with the production, use and disposal of 4,4′methylenedianiline (4,4′-MDA) have been under study by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 4,4′-MDA was the first chemical to trigger section 4(f) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), and EPA and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) have been working to find the most effective way to control the chemical’s risks. Limited information on dermal penetration rates and exposure levels have introduced uncertainty into the dose side of the dose-response equation. A cancer bioassay, on the other hand, has provided good data for estimating response, at least within the tested dose range.

A technique for estimating lifetime average daily doses to workers based on the limited dermal exposure data and inhalational exposure levels has been employed. This technique has been used to estimate the degree of risk reduction that protective clothing and equipment and improved industrial hygiene practices can produce.

The risk assessment information, complete with its uncertainties, is being made available to risk managers in EPA and OSHA, while additional work is planned to reduce uncertainty in the assessment. This work includes additional monitoring of workplaces and surface waters (the latter to assess possible contamination of drinking water supplies) and measurement of the chemical’s skin penetration rate. Since skin penetration rates can vary over several orders of magnitute, and since the limited data available indicate that dermal exposures in the workplace may be significant, reduction of uncertainty in this area is crucial for cost-effective risk management decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • CMA, 1983. Response of the Chemical Manufacturers Association Methylenedianiline Panel to EPA’s Section 4(f) Designation for MDA. June 27, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J.V., 1982. Letter of Steven D. Newburg-Rinn, Chief, Test Rules Development Branch, Office of Toxic Substances, U.S. EPA. Re: 4,4′-Methylenedianiline. November 4, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump, 1980. An Improved Procedure for Low-Dose Carcinogenic Risk Assessment for Animal Data. J. Environ. Path. and Toxicol. 5, 675 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE, 1983, Department of Energy. Response of the Albuquerque Operations, Office (AL) and Contractors to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Request for Information for the Review of 4,4′-Methylenedianiline (MDA). Draft. Received by EPA. August 31, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA, 1983a. Exposure to and Control of 4,4′–Methylenedianiline. Draft report prepared under contract #68–02–3935. Work assignment 1–5. PEDCo Environmental, Inc. October, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA, 1983b. 4,4′–Methylenedianiline (MDA) Use and Substitutes Analysis. Draft Report prepared under contract #69–02–3935. Task order #6. ICF, Inc. September, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA, 1984, Docket No. OPTS 64000 A.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCGill, D.B. and Motto, J.D., 1974. An Industrial Outbreak of Toxic Hepatitis Due to Methylenedianiline. N.Engl. J. Med. 291, 278 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH, 1976. Current Intelligence Bulletin 8. 4,4′-Diaminodiphenylmethane (DDM). January 30, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH, 1984a. Industrial Hygiene Survey Report of Olin Corporation, Moundsville, WV. Dr. Mark Boeniger, Industrial Hygiene Section, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH. March 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH, 1984b. Industrial Hygiene Survey Report of A.O. Smith/Inland Corporation, Little Rock, AR. Dr. Mark Boeniger, Industrial Hygiene Section, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH. February 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • NTP, 1983. Xarcinogenesis Studies of 4,4′-Methylenedianiline Dihydrochloride in F344/N Rats and B6C3F Mice. National Toxicology Program Technical Report, Series No. 248. NTP-81–143. NIH Publication No. 83–2504. June 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaudaine, M., Lery, N., Diter, J.N., Droin, M. and Charnaillard, C., 1982. Diamino-Diphenyl Methane: An Example of Toxic Agent Monitoring in the Workplace at Rhone-Poulenc Industrie. J. Toxicol. Medicale 2, 207 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hirzy, J.W. (1987). 4,4’-Methylenedianiline: Risk Assessment and Risk Management. In: Covello, V.T., Lave, L.B., Moghissi, A., Uppuluri, V.R.R. (eds) Uncertainty in Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Decision Making. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5317-1_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5317-1_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5319-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5317-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics