Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Risk Analysis ((AIRA,volume 4))

Abstract

To compare immediate regulatory options, the decision maker needs a current assessment of outcomes (e.g., health impact of a proposed standard), including, say, a mean and a range of uncertainty. To evaluate an option to delay the decision, he needs to appreciate how that current assessment might change, introducing a higher order uncertainty. This paper explores graphic and other devices for communicating this elusive distinction, with a view to clarity, action orientation and logical soundness. Other common interpretations of uncertainty are treated as secondary for regulatory purposes. A nuclear backfit decision is used as an example.

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation, under Grant No. PRA-8413114, and by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Division of Risk Analysis and Operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, R.V. and Ulvila, J.W. Communicating information and uncertainty in the regulatory process (Draft Report). Falls Church, VA: Decision Science Consortium, Inc., October 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R.P., Strip, D.R., Aldrich, D.C. Regulatory analysis for severe accident issues: An example (Draft Report). Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories, August 1984. (NUREG/CR-3976; SAND84–1727).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trial decision support summary (Draft working paper). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Divisions of Risk Analysis and Operations, November 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, R.V., Ulvila, J.W. (1987). Communicating Uncertainty for Regulatory Decisions. In: Covello, V.T., Lave, L.B., Moghissi, A., Uppuluri, V.R.R. (eds) Uncertainty in Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Decision Making. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5317-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5317-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5319-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5317-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics