Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Risk Analysis ((AIRA,volume 4))

Abstract

Benefit-cost analyses are required for proposed flood alleviation and sea defense schemes in the United Kingdom. However, generally flood impacts such as stress, worry and evacuation have been left as ‘intangibles’. Economic theory predicts that the avoidance of such impacts is a real benefit of flood alleviation. But only those impacts for which there exist a value concensus as to the bases of their measurement can be included within the framework of economic efficiency benefit-cost analyses.

In recent benefit-cost analyses we have, therefore, employed exploratory procedures to measure worry, health damage and other traditionally ‘intangible’ flood losses. A method of deriving the monetary equivalents of these impacts has also proved both feasible and to have face validity. The magnitude of these losses generally exceeds the physical damage caused by flooding.

Since worry has been shown to correlate with perceived risk, such evaluations include willingness-to-pay to reduce risk to health and safety. Estimating the risk to life in a particular location is problematic since the risk is almost wholly a function of the behavioural choices made by those at risk. Results of several studies of behavioural response to warnings and to discovering water are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antle, G., 1977. “Analysis of property value to determine the impact of flooding” in Proceedings of the Social Scientists Conference, Memphis, US Army Engineer Institute for Water Resources: Fort Belvoir, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, G., 1978. “Bristol Floods 1968, Controlled survey of effects on health of local community disaster”, British Medical Journal, 3, 454–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayrisches, Landesamt fur Wasserwirtschaft, 1983. Nutzen-Kusten- Untersuchung zur Teilruckleitung der Oberen isar Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D., Breaux, J. and Sime, J., 1980. “Domestic, Multiple Occupancy and Hospital Fires” in Canter, D. (ed.), Fires and Human Behaviour, John Wiley“ Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterton, J.B., Pirt, J. and Wood, T.R., 1979. “The benefits of flood forecasting”, Journal of Institute of Water Engineers and Scientists, 33 (3), 237–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalderfield, E.R., 1976. The Lynmouth Flood Disaster, ERD: Exmouth. Dreze, J., 1962. “L’utilite sociale d’une vie humane”, Rev. Fr. Rech. Oper., 6 (23), 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, P.J., 1984. “Health affects of flooding” in Handmer, J. (ed.) Proceedings of an Invitational Workshop, International Flood Research: Lessons for the UK, Geo Brooks: Norwich (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I., 1975. Belief, Attitude and Behavior, Addison-Wesley: Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C.H., 1980. “Revealed preference theory: assumptions and presumptions” in Conrad, J. (ed.), Society Technology and Risk Assessment, Academic Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C.h., 1984. “Not looking under lampposts: benefit-cost analysis and social values” in Handmer, J. (ed.), Proceedings of an Invitational Workshop, International Flood Research: Lessons for the UK, Geo books: Norwich (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C.H., Brown, R.A., and Goodsman, R.W., 1983. The Perception and Acceptability of Risks, Building Research Establishment Note N7/83, Fire Research Station: Borehamwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C.H., Emery, P.J., Penning-Rowsell, E.Ç. and Parker, D.J., 1984. The health effects of flooding: a survey at Uphill, Avon, Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C.H., Parker, D.J. and Emery, P.J., 1983. The Real Cost of Flooding to Households: Intangible Costs, Geography and Planning Paper No. 12, Middlesex Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C.H., Parker, D.J., Thompson, P.M. and Penning-Rowsell, E.C., 1982. Indirect losses from urban flooding: an analytical framework,Geography and Planning Working Paper No. 6, Middlesex Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C.H. and Penning-Rowsell, E.C., 1983. Western Enfield Flood Relief Scheme: An extended assessment of selected benefits, Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grist, D.E., 1978. Individual risk - a compilation of recent British data, SRD, R125, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruntfest, E.C., Downing, T. and White, G.E., 1978. “Big Thompson flood exposes need for better flood reaction system to save lives”, Civil Engineering, February, 72–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, D.M. and Parker, D.J., 1974. “Flood hazard in Shrewsburg, UK” in White, G.E. (ed.) Natural hazards local, national and global, Oxford: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, T.H. and Rahe, P.H., 1968. “The Social Readjustment Rating Scale”, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee, M., 1969. “Valuation of reductions in probability of death by road accident”, Journal of Trans. Eco. Policy, 3, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, S.P., Hunt, S.M. and McEwen, J., 1981. “Weighting the seriousness of perceived health problems using Thurston’s method of paired comparisons”, International Journal of Epidemiology, 10 (1), 93–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E.J., 1971. “Evaluation of Life and Limb: a Theoretical approach”, Journal of Political Economy, 79, (4), 687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D.J., Green, C.H. and Penning-Rowsell, E.C., 1983. Swalecliffe Coast Protection Proposals: Evaluation of Potential Benefits, Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D.J., Penning-Rowsell, E.C. and Green, C.H., 1984. Whitstable Central Area Sea Defense Scheme: evaluation of potential benefits, Flood Hazard Research Centre: Middlesex Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D.W., 1978. “Noise Nuisance” in Pearce, D.W. (ed.) The Valuation of Social Cost, Allen and Unwin: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penning-Rowsell, E.C., Parker, D.J. and Green, C.H., 1984. Loughton Brook Improvement Scheme: Assessment of potential benefits, Flood Hazard Research Centre: Middlesex Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penning-Rowsell, E.C. and Chatterton, J.B., 1977. The benefits of flood alleviation: a manual of assessment techniques, Saxon House: Farnborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penning-Rowsell, E.C., Chatterton, J.B., and Witts, R.C., 1983. An “intermediate” updating of the Middlesex Polytechnic standard potential flood damage data, Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D.N., 1971. The Book of Louth, Barracuda: Buckingham. Royal Society, 1983. Risk Assessment - A Study Group Report, Royal Society: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtke, R., 1984. “Project Appraisal, Resource Allocation and Public Involvement” in Handmer, J. (ed.) Proceedings of an invitational Workshop, International Flood Research: Lessons for the UK, Geo Books: Norwich (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterland, F.K., 1973. “An evaluation of personal annoyance caused by flooding” in Penning-Rowsell, E.C. and Parker, D.J. (eds.) Proceedings of a Symposium on the Economic Aspects of Floods, Middlesex Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. and Williams, A., 1978. The Principles of Practical Cost-Benefit Analysis, University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.M. Treasury, 1982. Investment Appraisal in the Public Sector, HM Treasury: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D.G., 1972. The Behaviour of People in Fires, Fire Research Note No. 953, Fire Research Station: Borehamwood.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Green, C.H., Penning-Rowsell, E.C., Parker, D.J. (1987). Estimating the Risk from Flooding and Evaluating Worry. In: Covello, V.T., Lave, L.B., Moghissi, A., Uppuluri, V.R.R. (eds) Uncertainty in Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Decision Making. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5317-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5317-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5319-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5317-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics