Skip to main content

Mind, Structure, and Contradiction

  • Chapter
Consciousness and the Brain

Abstract

In working on the mind-brain problem over the last few years, I have become disheartened on occasion and come to the conclusion that western man is uniquely equipped and situated so as to make that problem unsolvable, even though it may be a rather simple problem indeed. As a scientist, I would like to hold philosophers responsible for this state of affairs! However, the roots appear to lie deeper than mere verbal obfuscation. As Freud pointed out, the Copernican revolution, the Darwinian revolution, and finally the psychoanalytic revolution—the latter being more of a quelled insurrection—all comprised narcissistic injuries to man, who had seen himself variously as the center of the universe, distinct from other forms of life, and consciously determining his own behavior. Perhaps to understand the mind-brain problem, we have to give up further narcissistic notions—that we are the only conscious form of life, that the world actually 2 is as we perceive it to be, indeed that we are in any nontrivial way distinct from the rest of the natural world. Those of you who have read the brilliant and extraordinary books of Carlos Castaneda (1969, 1971, 1973, 1974) which describe his apprenticeship to a Yaqui Indian sorcerer, don Juan, will appreciate the tenacity with which we, reared in a western philosophical and scientific paradigm, hold onto these narcissistic notions. In this regard, I find that the mystical paradigm has much to offer, when considering the mind-brain puzzle.

The opposite of a trivial truth is a falsehood. The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth. —attributed’ to Niels Bohr

All around him were what other people called mirrors, which he called leaks. The entire wall which separated the lobby from the cocktail lounge was a leak ten feet high and thirty feet long. There was another leak on the cigarette machine and yet another on the candy machine. And when Trout looked through them to see what was going on in the other universe, he saw a red-eyed, filthy old creature who was barefoot, who had his pants rolled up to his knees. —Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. (1973, p. 229)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Broad, C. D. (1925): The Mind and Its Place in Nature. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capek, M. (1969): The main difficulties of the identity theory. Scientia CIV, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1975): The Tao of Physics. Berkeley: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castaneda, C. (1969): The Teachings of Don Juan. New York: Balantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castaneda, C. (1971): Separate Reality. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castaneda, C. (1973): Journey to Ixtlan. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castaneda, C. (1974): Tales of Power. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigl, H. (1967): The “Mental” and the “Physical.” Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globus, G. (1973a): Unexpected symmetries in the ‘World Knot,’ Science 180, 1129–1136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Globus, G. (1973b): Consciousness and brain: I. The identity thesis. Arch. Gen. Psychiatr. 29, 153–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Globus, G. (1973c): Consciousness and brain. II. Introspection, the qualia of experience, and the unconsciousness. Arch. Gen. Psychiatr. 29, 167–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Globus, G. (1974): The problem of consciousness. In: Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Science, Vol. III. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globus, G., Franklin, S., and Savodnik, I. (1975a): Gödel’s Theorem and the mind-brain problem. I. An undecidable awareness. ( Unpublished manuscript )

    Google Scholar 

  • Globus, G., Franklin, S., and Savodnik, I. (1975b): Gödel’s Theorem and the mind-brain problem. II. A psychoneural structural identity solution. ( Unpublished manuscript )

    Google Scholar 

  • Godei, K. (1931): On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems. London: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1963): The Sensory Order. London: Routledge, 1952. Reprinted by University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. (1975): On the role of themata in scientific thought. Science 188, 328–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurti, J. (1972): Freedom From the Known. London: Victor Gollancz, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaas, J. H., Guillery, R. W., and Allman, J. M. (1973): Discontinuities in the dorsal lateral lateral geniculate nucleus corresponding to the optic disc: A comparative study. J. Comp. Neurol. 147, 163–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margenau, H. (1963): Philos. of Sci. 30, 1 and 138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, G. (1972): Russell on perception: a study in philosophical method. In: Bertrand Russell: A Collection of Critical Essays. Ed. by D. Pears, New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. (1966): The compleat autocerebroscopist: a thought experiment on Professor Feigl’s mind/body identity thesis. In: Mind, Matter and Method. Ed. by P. K. Feyerabend and G. Maxwell, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E., and Newman, J. F. (1958): Godel’s Proof. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, J. L., and Margenau, H. (1968): Int. J. Theor. Phys. I, 211–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puccetti, R. (1973): Brain bisection and personal identity. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 24, 339–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949): The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1963): Science, Perception and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1971): Beyond Freedom and Dignity. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Brown, G. (1972): Laws of Form. New York: The Julian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonnegut, K. (1973): Breakfast of Champions. New York: Delta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, W. (1973): Psycholinguistics and Plato’s paradoxes of the Meno. Amer. Psychol 28, 15–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Globus, G.G. (1976). Mind, Structure, and Contradiction. In: Globus, G.G., Maxwell, G., Savodnik, I. (eds) Consciousness and the Brain. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2196-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2196-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2198-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2196-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics