Abstract
In working on the mind-brain problem over the last few years, I have become disheartened on occasion and come to the conclusion that western man is uniquely equipped and situated so as to make that problem unsolvable, even though it may be a rather simple problem indeed. As a scientist, I would like to hold philosophers responsible for this state of affairs! However, the roots appear to lie deeper than mere verbal obfuscation. As Freud pointed out, the Copernican revolution, the Darwinian revolution, and finally the psychoanalytic revolution—the latter being more of a quelled insurrection—all comprised narcissistic injuries to man, who had seen himself variously as the center of the universe, distinct from other forms of life, and consciously determining his own behavior. Perhaps to understand the mind-brain problem, we have to give up further narcissistic notions—that we are the only conscious form of life, that the world actually 2 is as we perceive it to be, indeed that we are in any nontrivial way distinct from the rest of the natural world. Those of you who have read the brilliant and extraordinary books of Carlos Castaneda (1969, 1971, 1973, 1974) which describe his apprenticeship to a Yaqui Indian sorcerer, don Juan, will appreciate the tenacity with which we, reared in a western philosophical and scientific paradigm, hold onto these narcissistic notions. In this regard, I find that the mystical paradigm has much to offer, when considering the mind-brain puzzle.
The opposite of a trivial truth is a falsehood. The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth. —attributed’ to Niels Bohr
All around him were what other people called mirrors, which he called leaks. The entire wall which separated the lobby from the cocktail lounge was a leak ten feet high and thirty feet long. There was another leak on the cigarette machine and yet another on the candy machine. And when Trout looked through them to see what was going on in the other universe, he saw a red-eyed, filthy old creature who was barefoot, who had his pants rolled up to his knees. —Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. (1973, p. 229)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Broad, C. D. (1925): The Mind and Its Place in Nature. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Capek, M. (1969): The main difficulties of the identity theory. Scientia CIV, 1–17.
Capra, F. (1975): The Tao of Physics. Berkeley: Shambhala.
Castaneda, C. (1969): The Teachings of Don Juan. New York: Balantine.
Castaneda, C. (1971): Separate Reality. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Castaneda, C. (1973): Journey to Ixtlan. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Castaneda, C. (1974): Tales of Power. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Feigl, H. (1967): The “Mental” and the “Physical.” Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Globus, G. (1973a): Unexpected symmetries in the ‘World Knot,’ Science 180, 1129–1136.
Globus, G. (1973b): Consciousness and brain: I. The identity thesis. Arch. Gen. Psychiatr. 29, 153–160.
Globus, G. (1973c): Consciousness and brain. II. Introspection, the qualia of experience, and the unconsciousness. Arch. Gen. Psychiatr. 29, 167–176.
Globus, G. (1974): The problem of consciousness. In: Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Science, Vol. III. New York: International Universities Press.
Globus, G., Franklin, S., and Savodnik, I. (1975a): Gödel’s Theorem and the mind-brain problem. I. An undecidable awareness. ( Unpublished manuscript )
Globus, G., Franklin, S., and Savodnik, I. (1975b): Gödel’s Theorem and the mind-brain problem. II. A psychoneural structural identity solution. ( Unpublished manuscript )
Godei, K. (1931): On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems. London: Oliver and Boyd.
Hayek, F. A. (1963): The Sensory Order. London: Routledge, 1952. Reprinted by University of Chicago Press.
Holton, G. (1975): On the role of themata in scientific thought. Science 188, 328–334.
Krishnamurti, J. (1972): Freedom From the Known. London: Victor Gollancz, Ltd.
Kaas, J. H., Guillery, R. W., and Allman, J. M. (1973): Discontinuities in the dorsal lateral lateral geniculate nucleus corresponding to the optic disc: A comparative study. J. Comp. Neurol. 147, 163–180.
Margenau, H. (1963): Philos. of Sci. 30, 1 and 138.
Maxwell, G. (1972): Russell on perception: a study in philosophical method. In: Bertrand Russell: A Collection of Critical Essays. Ed. by D. Pears, New York: Doubleday.
Meehl, P. (1966): The compleat autocerebroscopist: a thought experiment on Professor Feigl’s mind/body identity thesis. In: Mind, Matter and Method. Ed. by P. K. Feyerabend and G. Maxwell, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Nagel, E., and Newman, J. F. (1958): Godel’s Proof. New York: New York University Press.
Parks, J. L., and Margenau, H. (1968): Int. J. Theor. Phys. I, 211–283.
Puccetti, R. (1973): Brain bisection and personal identity. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 24, 339–355.
Ryle, G. (1949): The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.
Sellars, W. (1963): Science, Perception and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Skinner, B. F. (1971): Beyond Freedom and Dignity. New York: Knopf.
Spencer-Brown, G. (1972): Laws of Form. New York: The Julian Press.
Vonnegut, K. (1973): Breakfast of Champions. New York: Delta.
Weimer, W. (1973): Psycholinguistics and Plato’s paradoxes of the Meno. Amer. Psychol 28, 15–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Globus, G.G. (1976). Mind, Structure, and Contradiction. In: Globus, G.G., Maxwell, G., Savodnik, I. (eds) Consciousness and the Brain. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2196-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2196-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2198-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2196-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive