Skip to main content

The Role of Females in Extrapair Copulations in Socially Monogamous Territorial Animals

  • Chapter
Feminism and Evolutionary Biology

Abstract

This chapter considers the role of females in the sexual and agonistic life of socially monogamous territorial species. Because of the obvious superficial similarities between such species and humans, this is a topic that has always attracted attention from evolutionary and behavioral biologists. However, despite longstanding interest in animal monogamy, most empirical and theoretical studies have relied on a relatively small set of seminal ideas and hypotheses, some of which are summarized here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahnesjo, I., A. Vincent, R. Alatalo, T. Halliday, W. Sutherland. 1993. The role of females in influencing mating patterns. Behavioral Ecology 4:187–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. D. and K. M. Noonan. 1979. Concealment of ovulation, parental care, and human social evolution. In N.A. Chagnon and W. Irons (Eds.), Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior, pp. 436–453. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beecher, M. D. and I. M. Beecher. 1979. Sociobiology of bank swallows: Reproductive strategy of the male. Science 205:1282–1285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, A., C. Magnhagen, A. Bisazza, B. König, F. Huntingford. 1993. Female-female competition over reproduction. Behavioral Ecology 4:184–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. M. 1991. The Magpies: The Ecology and Behaviour of Black-Billed and Yellow-Billed Magpies. London: Poyser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. M. and A. P. Møller. 1992. Sperm competition in birds: evolutionary causes and consequences. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. M. and A. P. Møller. 1993. Female control of paternity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8:100–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. M., L. Atkin, and A. P. Møller. 1987. Copulation behaviour in birds. Behaviour 101:101–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, J. W. and M. B. Andersson, eds. 1987. Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, O. E., J. J. Kennelly, and J. L. Guarino. 1975. Fertility of eggs produced on territories of vasectomized red-winged blackbirds. Wilson Bulletin 87:187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. L. 1964. The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems. Wilson Bulletin 76:160–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. L. and G. H. Orians. 1970. Spacing patterns in mobile animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1:239–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, C. M. 1994. Population dynamics and pair fidelity in sleepy lizards. In L. J. Vitt and E. R. Pianka (Eds.), Lizard Ecology: Historical and Experimental Perspectives, pp. 159–174. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley, N. 1988. The differential-allocation hypothesis: An experimental test. American Naturalist 132:611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. S., A. C. DeVries, and L. L. Getz. 1995. Physiological substrates of mammalian monogamy: The prairie vole model. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 19:303–314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. S. and L. L. Getz. 1993. Monogamy and the prairie vole. Scientific American 1993 (June): 100-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. S., J. R. Williams, and D. M. Witt. 1990. The biology of social bonding in a monogamous mammal. In J. Balthazart (Ed.), Hormones, Brain and Behavior in Vertebrates, 2nd ed., pp. 154–164. New York: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. S., D. M. Witt, S. R. Manock, K. A. Adams, J. M. Bahr, and K. Carlstead. 1989. Hormonal correlates of sexual behavior and ovulation in prairie voles. Physiology and Behavior 46:941–948.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1989. Mammalian mating systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 236:339–372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, M. A. and L. W. Oring. 1989. Extra-pair mating in the spotted sandpiper: A female mate acquisition tactic. Animal Behaviour 38:675–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1877. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. 2nd ed., rev. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. B. 1985. Cooperation and conflict among dunnocks, Prunella modularis, in a variable mating system. Animal Behaviour 33:628–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. B. 1991. Mating systems. In J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 3rd ed., pp. 263–299. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. B. 1992. Dunnock Behavior and Social Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P. O. 1992. Do male birds adjust territory size to the risk of cuckoldry? Animal Behaviour 43:857–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P. O. and J. T. Lifjeld. 1994. Can extra-pair copulations be used to predict extra-pair paternity in birds? Animal Behaviour 47:983–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P. O. and R. J. Robertson. 1993. Extra-pair paternity in polygynous tree swallows. Animal Behaviour 45:231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P. O., L. A. Whittingham, J. T. Lifjeld, R. J. Robertson, and P. T. Boag. 1994. Effects of breeding density, synchrony, and experience on extra-pair paternity in tree swallows. Behavioral Ecology 5:123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eens, M. and R. Pinxten. 1990. Extra-pair courtship in the Starling, Sturnus vulgaris. Ibis 132:618–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S. T. and L. W. Oring. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ens, B. J. 1992. The social prisoner: Causes of natural variation in reproductive success in the oystercatcher. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ens, B. J., U. N. Safriel, and M. P. Harris. 1993. Divorce in the long-lived and monogamous oystercatcher, Haematopus ostralegus: Incompatibility or choosing the better option? Animal Behaviour 45:1199–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, M. A. and G. W. Shugart. 1984. Requirements for a mixed reproductive strategy in avian species. American Naturalist 124:116–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, P. C. 1987. Extra-pair copulations in the mating system of white ibis (Eudocimus albus). Behaviour 100:170–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P. A. 1985. Multiple paternity and apparent monogamy in birds. In P. A. Gowaty and D. W. Mock (Eds.), Avian Monogamy, pp. 11–21. Ornithological Monographs 37. Washington, DC: American Ornithologists’ Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P. A. 1994. Architects of sperm competition. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:160–161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P. A. 1996. Battles of the sexes and the origins of monogamy. In J. Black (Ed.), Partnerships in Birds, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P. A. and W. C. Bridges. 1991. Behavioral, demographic and environmental correlates of extra-pair fertilizations in eastern bluebirds, Sialia sialis. Behavioral Ecology 2:339–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P. A. and A. A. Karlin. 1984. Multiple maternity and paternity in single broods of apparently monogamous eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 15:91–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P. A., J. H. Plissner, and T. G. Williams. 1989. Behavioral correlates of uncertain parentage: Mate guarding and nest guarding by eastern bluebirds, Sialia sialis. Animal Behaviour 38:272–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P. A. and S. J. Wagner. 1988. Breeding season aggression of female and male eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis) to models of potential conspecific and interspecific egg dumping. Ethology 78:238–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, P. J. 1980. Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Animal Behaviour 28:1140–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubernick, D. J. and R. L. Addington. 1994. The stability of female social and mating preferences in the monogamous California mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Animal Behaviour 47:559–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubernick, D. J. and J. C. Nordby. 1993. Mechanisms of sexual fidelity in the monogamous California mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32:211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, T. and S. J. Arnold. 1988. Multiple mating by females: A perspective from quantitative genetics. Animal Behaviour 35:939–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. and A. Laurila. 1993. Male chaffinches do not enlarge their territories to prevent cuckoldry. Animal Behaviour 46:1036–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. 1986. Primatology is politics by other means. In R. Bleier (Ed.), Feminist Approaches to Science, pp. 77–118. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, S. A. 1987. Copulation and mate-guarding in the northern fulmar. Auk 104:450–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heg, D., B. J. Ens, T. Burke, L. Jenkins, and J. P. Kruijt. 1993. Why does the typically monogamous oystercatcher, Haematopus ostralegus, engage in extra-pair copulations? Behaviour 126:247–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R. A. 1956. The biological significance of the territories of birds. Ibis 98:340–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horrigan, T. F. 1987. The behavioral ecology of three species of butterflyflshes (family Chaetodontidae). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, E. 1920. Territory in Bird Life. London: Collins Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. 1981. The Woman That Never Evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. 1986. Empathy, polyandry and the myth of the coy female. In R. Bleier (Ed.), Feminist Approaches to Science, pp. 119–145. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, F., M. Petrie, M. Otronen, T. Birkhead, and A. P. Møller. 1993. Why do females copulate repeatedly with one male? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8:21–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers, B. 1994. Polygyny in the blue tit: Unbalanced sex ratio and female aggression restrict mate choice. Animal Behaviour 47:943–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers, B. and A. A. Dhondt. 1993. Why do females engage in extra-pair copulations: A review of hypotheses and their predictions. Belgian Journal of Zoology 123:93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers, B., G. R. Verheyen, M. Van den Broeck, T. Burke, C. Van Broeckhoven, and A. A. Dhondt. 1992. Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high-quality males in the blue tit. Nature 357:494–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leighton, D. R. 1986. Gibbons: territoriality and monogamy. In B. Smuts, D. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T T. Shruhsaker (Eds.), Primate Societies, pp. 135–145. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifjeld, J. T., P. O. Dunn, and D. F. Westneat. 1994. Sexual selection by sperm competition in birds: Male-male competition or female choice? Journal of Avian Biology 25:244–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lifjeld, J. T. and R. J. Robertson. 1992. Female control of extra-pair fertilization in tree swallows. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 31:86–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, S. 1983. Female manipulation of male avoidance of cuckoldry behavior in the ring dove. In S. K. Waser (Ed.), Social Behavior of Female Vertebrates, pp. 91–112. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, F., K. M. Cheng, and D. J. Bruggers. 1984. Sperm competition in apparently monogamous birds. In R. L. Smith (Ed.), Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, pp. 523–545. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, S. B. and R. J. Robertson. 1994. Interspecific competition for nestboxes affects mate guarding in eastern bluebirds, Sialia sialis. Animal Behaviour 47:295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A. P. 1990. Changes in the size of avian territories in relation to the nesting cycle. Animal Behaviour 43:860–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, E. S., L. Forman, and M. Braun. 1990. Extra-pair fertilizations and the evolution of colonial breeding in purple martins. Auk 107:275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, R. A. 1992. Evolutionary ecology of the mating system of superb fairy-wrens. Ph.D. dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians, G. H. 1969. On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. American Naturalist 103:589–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, M. 1992. Copulation frequency in birds: Why do females copulate more than once with the same male? Animal Behaviour 44:790–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, M. and F. M. Hunter. 1993. Intraspecific variation in courtship and copulation frequency: An effect of mismatch in partner attractiveness? Behaviour 127:265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, M. and A. Williams. 1993. Peahens lay more eggs for peacocks with larger trains. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 251:127–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinxten, R., L. van Elsacker, and R. F. Verheyen. 1987. Duration and temporal pattern of mate guarding in the starling. Ardea 75:263–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Promislow, D. E., R. Montgomerie, and T. E. Martin. 1992. Mortality costs of sexual dimorphism in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 250:143–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reese, E. S. 1991. How behavior influences community structure of butterflyfishes (family Chaetodontidae) on Pacific coral reefs. Ecology International Bulletin 19:29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskaft, T. 1983. Male promiscuity and female adultery in the rook, Corvus fuglegus. Ornis Scandinavica 14:175–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, I. 1983. Remating in birds. In P. Bateson (Ed.), Mate Choice, pp. 331–360. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russett, C. E. 1989. Sexual Science: The Victorian Construction of Womanhood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, B. C. 1994. Sperm competition in the chaffinch: The role of the female. Animal Behaviour 47:163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, B. C. and T. Burke. 1994. Copulation behavior and paternity in the chaffinch. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 34:149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold, T. and J. T. Lifjeld. 1994. Polygyny in birds: The role of competition between females for male parental care. American Naturalist 143:59–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. M. 1988. Extra-pair copulations in black-capped chickadees: The role of the female. Behaviour 107:15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. B. 1985. Sex and Friendship in Baboons. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamps, J. A. 1994. Territorial behavior: Testing the assumptions. Advances in the Study of Behavior 23:173–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. 1984. Alternative hypotheses for traits believed to have evolved by sperm competition. In R. L. Smith (Ed.), Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, pp. 151–178. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N. 1939. The behavior of the snow bunting in spring. Transactions of the Linnaean Society of New York 5:1–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N. 1959. Comparative studies of the behaviour of gulls (Laridae): A progress report. Behaviour 15:1–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man: 1871–1971, pp. 136–179. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. H. 1991a. The use of extra-pair copulations for mate appraisal by razorbills, Alca torda. Behavioral Ecology 2:198–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. H. 1991b. Pair bond formation in the razorbill. Wilson Bulletin 103:682–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. H. 1992. The pursuit of extra-pair copulations by monogamous female razorbills: How do females benefit? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29:455–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhardt, M. J., J. W. Bradbury, N. B. Davies, P. H. Gouyon, P. Hammerstein, B. König, G. A. Parker, N. Sachser, T. Slagsvold, F. Trillmich, C. Vogel. 1987. Conflicts between and within the sexes in sexual selection. In J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson (Eds.), Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives, pp. 180–195. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat, D. F. 1987a. Extra-pair copulations in a predominantly monogamous bird: Observations of behaviour. Animal Behaviour 35:865–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat, D. F. 1987b. Extra-pair fertilizations in a predominantly monogamous bird: Genetic evidence. Animal Behaviour 35:877–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat, D. F., P. W. Sherman, and M. L. Morton. 1990. The ecology and evolution of extra-pair copulations in birds. Current Ornithology 7:331–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittingham, L. A., P. O. Dunn, and R. J. Robertson. 1994. Do female tree swallows guard their mates by copulating frequently? Animal Behaviour 47:994–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. R., K. C. Catania, and S. C. Carter. 1992. Development of partner preferences in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): The role of social and sexual experience. Hormones and Behavior 26:339–349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. R., T. R. Insel, C. R. Harbaugh, and S. C. Carter. 1994. Oxytocin administered centrally facilitates formation of a partner preference in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Journal of Neurobiology 6:247–250.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winslow, J. T., N. Hastings, C. S. Carter, C. R. Harbaugh, and T. R. Insel. 1993. A role for central vasopressin in pair bonding in monogamous prairie voles. Nature 356:545–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stamps, J. (1997). The Role of Females in Extrapair Copulations in Socially Monogamous Territorial Animals. In: Gowaty, P.A. (eds) Feminism and Evolutionary Biology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5985-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5985-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-07361-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5985-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics