Abstract
To solve risk management problems using the expected utility (EU) framework, one must first represent different decision options by their risk profiles using QRA modeling methods such as those in chapters 2–4. Then, it is necessary to choose the option corresponding to the most-preferred risk profile. This chapter covers methods for choosing among risk profiles — or, equivalently, cumulative probability distribution functions (CDFs) — when the consequences of interest can be summarized and compared using a single numerical attribute. This is not necessarily a severe restriction, as the attribute may be a synthetic one such as “net benefit” or “value” that summarizes preferences for consequences. The results in this chapter can be used to construct explicit utility functions for single-attribute consequences so that the expected utilities of prospects can be calculated. They also allow some pairs of prospects to be compared even without defining an explicit utility function, using various dominance criteria.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cox, L.A. (2002). Choosing Among Risk Profiles. In: Risk Analysis Foundations, Models, and Methods. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 45. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0847-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0847-2_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5268-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0847-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive