Abstract
In democracies, citizens are supposed to be free to decide what laws and institutional practices they believe are right, and to enact those beliefs through political influence. In such a context, it makes sense for researchers to ask why people support the politicians, political parties, and policies that they do (e.g., Himmelweit, Humphreys, & Jaeger, 1985), how cultural context influences people’s political preferences (e.g., Schwartz & Bardi, 1997), and to identify the political consequences of political attitudes (e.g., Rokeach, 1973). As Skitka and Mullen’s (this volume) review shows, many basic psychological processes influence people’s political attitudes. Political psychology must also consider the political implications and cultural meaning of political attitudes because (1) Political psychology must address politics: power relations between people and (2) Cultural context influences individuals’ attitudes (e.g., Pettigrew, 1958; Schwartz & Bardi, 1997). By examining the political meaning of political attitudes both to individuals and for their society, we will show how individual-level and societal-level processes influence each other. We first describe approaches to why people hold political attitudes and consequences of such attitudes. This review illuminates methodological difficulties and important empirical patterns. We then explicate social dominance theory’s analysis of ideologies as legitimizing political attitudes and social policies, and discuss the political and cultural implications of this analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. NY: Norton.
Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Manitoba: University of Manitoba Press.
Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other authoritarian personality. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 48–92). NY: Academic.
Barnea, M. F. & Schwartz, S. H. (1998). Values and voting. Political Psychology, 19, 17–37.
Bilsky, W. & Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Values and personality. European Journal of Personality, 8, 163–181.
Braithwaite, V. A. & Law, H. G. (1985). The structure of human values: Testing the adequacy of the Rokeach value survey. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 250–263.
Braithwaite, V. A. (1994). Beyond Rokeach’s equality-freedom model: Two dimensional values in a one-dimensional world. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 67–94.
Christie, R. & Cook, P. (1958). A guide to published literature relating to the authoritarian personality through 1956. Journal of Psychology, 45, 1717–1799.
Cochrane, R., Billig, M., & Hogg, M. (1979). British politics and the two-value model. In M. Rokeach (Ed.), Understanding human values, (pp. 179–191). NY: Free Press.
Duckitt, J. (1993). Right-wing authoritarianism among White South African students: Its measurement and correlates. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 553–563.
Duckitt, J. (2000). Culture, personality, and prejudice. In S. Renshon & J. Duckitt (Eds.), Political psychology: Cultural and Cross-cultural foundations (pp. 89–107). London: Macmillan.
Eckhardt, W. (1991). Authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 12, 97–124.
Eysenck, H. J. (1955). The psychology of politics. NY: Praeger.
Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. NY: Holt.
Glick, P., Deibold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323–1334.
Haddock, G., Zanna, M. P., & Esses, V. M. (1993). Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1105–1118.
Heaven, P. C. L. (1991). Voting intention and the two-value model: A further investigation. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43, 15–11.
Himmelweit, H. T., Humphreys, P., & Jaeger, M. (1985). How voters decide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lenski, G. E. (1984). Power and privilege: A theory of social stratification. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Lentz, T. F. (1929). Character and human happiness. Association Forum, 10, 1–8.
Lentz, T. F. (1935). C-R Opinionaire and Manual. St. Louis: Character Research Association.
McClosky, H. (1958). Conservatism and personality. American Political Science Review, 53, 27–45.
McFarland, S. G. & Adelson, S. (1996). An omnibus study of personality, values and prejudices. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the International Society for Political Psychology, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Mitchell, M. & Sidanius, J. (1995). Social hierarchy and the death penalty: A social dominance perspective. Political Psychology, 16, 591–619.
Murdock, G. (1956). Social structure. NY: Macmillan.
Nelson, T. E. & Kinder, D. R. (1996). Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. Journal of Politics, 58, 1055–1078.
Peterson, B. E., Doty, R. M., & Winter, D. G. (1993). Authoritarianism and attitudes towards contemporary social issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 174–184.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1958). Personality and sociocultural factors in intergroup attitudes: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 29–42.
Pettigrew, T. (1999). Placing authoritarianism in social context. Politics, groups, and the individual, 8, 5–20.
Pratto, F. (1999). The puzzle of continuing group inequality: Piecing together psychological, social, and cultural forces in social dominance theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 31, (pp. 191–263). NY: Academic.
Pratto, F., Cathey, C., Loftus, J., & Stallworth, L. M. (2001). What does it all mean? Message framing and social dominance orientation in policy persuasion. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut.
Pratto, F., Liu, J. H., Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Shih, M., Bachrach, H., & Hegarty, P. (2000). Social dominance orientation and the legitimization of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 369–409.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., & Conway-Lanz, C. (1998). Social dominance orientation and the ideological legitimization of social policy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1853–1875.
Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., & Sidanius, J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49–68.
Pratto, E, Stallworth, L., Sidanius, J., & Siers, B. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 37–53.
Pratto, F., Tatar, D. G., & Conway-Lanz, S. (1999). Who gets what and why: Determinants of social allocations. Political Psychology, 20, 127–150.
Ray, J. J. (1973). Conservatism, authoritarianism, and related variables: A review and an empirical study. In G. D. Wilson (Ed.), The psychology of conservatism (pp. 17–35). London: Academic Press.
Reardon, D. C. (1996). Making abortion rare. Springfield, IL: Acorn Books.
Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. NY: Free Press.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. NY: Free Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. NY: Academic Press.
Schwartz, S. H. & Bardi, A. (1997). Influences of adaptation to communist rule on value priorities in Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 18, 385–410.
Searing, D. D. (1979). A study of values in the British House of Commons. In M. Rokeach (Ed.), Understanding human values (pp. 154–178). NY: Free Press.
Shils, E. A. (1954). Authoritarianism: “Right” and “left.” In R. Christie & M. Jahoda (Eds.), Studies in the scope and method of “The authoritarian personality.” Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Sidanius, J., Devereux, E., & Pratto, F. (1992). A comparison of symbolic racism theory and social dominance theory: Explanations for racial policy attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 377–395.
Sidanius, J. & Ekehammar, B. (1979). Political socialization: A multivariate analysis of Swedish political attitude and preference data. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 265–279.
Sidanius, J. & Ekehammar, B. (1980). Sex-related differences in socio-political ideology. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 17–26.
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Liu, J., & Pratto, F. (2000). Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41–67.
Sidanius, J., Liu, J., Pratto, R, & Shaw, J. (1994). Social dominance orientation, hierarchy-attenuators and hierarchy-enhancers: Social dominance theory and the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 338–366.
Sidanius, J. & Pratto, R (1993a). The dynamics of social dominance and the inevitability of oppression. In P. Sniderman, P. E. Tetlock, & E. G. Carmines (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and race in America today (pp. 173–211). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Sidanius, J. & Pratto, R (1993b). Racism and support for free-market analysis: A cross-cultural analysis. Political Psychology, 14, 383–403.
Sidanius, J. & Pratto, R. (1999). Social dominance. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, R., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998–1011.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, R., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476–490.
Skitka, L. H. & Tetlock, P. E. (1992). Allocating scarce resources: A contingency model of distributive justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 491–522.
Skitka, L. J. & Tetlock, P. E. (1993). Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1205–1223.
Stone, W. F. (1980). The myth of left-wing authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 2, 3–19.
Stone, W. F. & Smith, L. D. (1993). Authoritarianism: Left and right. In W. F. Stone, G. Lederer, & R. Christie (Eds.), Strengths and weaknesses: The authoritarian personality today (pp. 144–156). NY: Springer-Verlag.
Thannhauser, D. & Caird, D. (1990). Politics and values in Australia: Testing Rokeach’s two-value model of politics. Australian Journal of Psychology, 42, 57–61.
Tompkins, S. (1963). Left and right: A basic dimension of ideology and personality. In R. W. White (Ed.), The study of lives (pp. 388–411). NY: Atherton.
van Dijk, T. A. (1987). Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News analysis: Case studies of international and national news in the press. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wetherell, M. & Potter, J. (1993). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. NY: Columbia University Press.
Whiting, B. B. & Whiting, J. W. M. (1975). Children of six cultures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Whitley, B. E. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126–134.
Wilson, G. D. (1973). The psychology of conservatism. San Diego, CA: Academic.
Wilson, G. D. & Patterson, J. R. (1968). A new measure of conservatism. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7, 264–269.
Zick, A. (1999). Preface. Politics, Groups and the Individual, 8, 1–3.
Zick, A. & Petzel, T. (1999). Authoritarianism, racism, and ideologies about acculturation. Politics, Groups and the Individual, 8, 41–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pratto, F., Cathey, C. (2002). The Role of Social Ideologies in Legitimizing Political Attitudes and Public Policy. In: Ottati, V.C., et al. The Social Psychology of Politics. Social Psychological Applications to Social Issues. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0569-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0569-3_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5136-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0569-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive