Skip to main content

Design and Manufacturing Process Management in a Network of Distributed Suppliers

  • Chapter
Scalable Enterprise Systems

Part of the book series: Integrated Series in Information Systems ((ISIS,volume 3))

Abstract

In this paper, we presented the basic structure of an XML-based scalable enterprise system called Manufacturing Integration and Design Automation System (MIDAS) to support collaboration among a network of suppliers engaged in the design and manufacturing of prototype parts. MIDAS provides a new paradigm where design and manufacturing processes can be represented and integrated within each vendor and with other venders working together to build a prototype. The framework is developed based on Java and XML to provide the efficient and secure interchange of data among the vendors involved in designing and building a prototype. While the quantity of parts is one aspect of the problem, scalability also includes the ability of a system to adapt to a changing environment, including new products, processes, technology, markets, and business partners. The key issues are (1) how to achieve the appropriate representation of process model, (2) how to model various constraints in design and manufacturing and to use them in order to find the best-of-practice process, and (3) how to maintain interdependencies within the network of vendors.

In order to resolve these issues, the process logic, which deals with the problems such as “how to do each subtask in detail, and what methods should I use,” is separated from the structural information of process such as “what subtasks are there, and what are the necessary sequence of processes?” Otherwise, excessive information demises the effectiveness of the decision makers in business, design and manufacturing tasks. Consequently, MIDAS was implemented using a layered approach where process information is separated into syntactic layer and execution layer. Process grammar captures the syntactic layer of process information: the relationships between tasks and subtasks, the alternatives of process decompositions, data dependencies among tasks. The execution layer provides the detail on how each task can be executed in a particular situation by choosing appropriate alternatives and executing the enter and exit criteria for executing each subtask.

Finally, we will present a simple example for service processes in cooperation with the companies in the Jackson Smart Park as a part of our modeling efforts. While the model we create will focus on prototyping services, we expect that the basic concepts for process configuration and constraint management will be applicable to a broader range of manufacturing industries. Such an enterprise system will be scalable in terms of not only volume but also variations, and will evolve into a powerful tool to model, configure, and reconfigure a wide variety of processes in relation to e-commerce activities in a virtual community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aberdeen Group White Paper, (2000), The e-Business Supply Chain: Meeting Customer Requirements in the Internet Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artiba, A. and S.E. Elmaghraby, (1997), The planning and scheduling of production systems: methodologies and applications New York: Chapman & Hall, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoli, J.-M., Pacull, F., and Pareschi, R., (1998), “XPECT: A Framework for Electronic Commerce,” IEEE Internet Computing, 1, 4, pp. 40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, M. F., (1995), Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, Butterworth — Heinemann, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asimow, W., (1962), “An Overview of the Structure of the Design Process,” in Emerging Methods in Environment Design and Planning, Ed. G.T. Moore, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. and Chung, M.J., (1995a), Design Methodology Management: A Formal Approach, IEEE Computer, February 1995, pp. 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. and Chung, M.J., (1995b), “Managing Engineering Data for Complex Products,” Research in Engineering Design, 1995, Vol. 7, pp. 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berners-Lee, T., Cailliau, R., Luotonen, A., Frystyk Nielsen, H., and Secret, A., (1994), “The World-Wide Web,” Communicatiosn of the ACM, 37, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • BYUPLAN Generative process Planning System User manual, (1985), Computer-Aided Manufacturing Laboratory, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, F., Spiller, M., Newton, R., (1998), “WELD-An Environment for Web-Based Electronic Design”, ACM Design Automation Conference, 1998, pp. 146–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T-C, Wysk, R. A. and Wang, H-P, (1991), Computer-Aided Manufacturing, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles S., (1986), “The Impact of Applying Artificial Intellegence with Group technology and Computer Aided Process Planning System,” Autofact Conference, Detroit, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, M.J., and Kwon, P., (1998), A Web-based Framework for Design and Manufacturing a Mechanical System, 1998 DETC, Atlanta, Georgia, Sep. 1998, CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, M.J., Kwon, P. and Pentland, B. (2001), “Making Process Visible: A Grammatical Approach To Managing Design Processes,” ASME Transaction, Journal of Mechanical Design, accepted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, M.J., and Kim, S., (1991), The Configuration Management for Version Control in an Object-Oriented VHDL Environment, in Proc. 1991 International Conference on Computer Aided Design, pp. 258–261, Nov. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. F. and M. S. Spencer, (1998), The constraints management handbook. St. Lucie Press; Falls Church, Va.: APICS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couretas, J. M. and Ziegler, B. P., (2001), “DEVs Framework for M&S Based Scalable Integrated Enterprises,” http://www.eng.usf.edu/nsf/conference/scalable/scalable_enterprises/Ziegler_Uariz.ppt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutkosky, M. R., Tenenbaum, J. M. And Glicksman, J., (1996), “Madefast: Collaborative Engineering over the Internet,” Communication of the ACM, 39,9, pp.78–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DCLASS Technical Manual, (1985), CAM Software Research Laboratory, Bringham Young University, Grove, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellen, B. Maurer, F., Pews, G., “Knowledge-based techniques to increase the flexibility of workflow management”, Data and Knowledge Engineering, North-Holland, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dengler, D., (1994), “An Adaptive Deductive Planning System”, Technical Report “RR-94-06”, Deutsches Forschungszentrum fur Kunstliche Intelligenz GmbH Erwin-Schrodinger Strasse Postfach 2080 67608 Kaiserslautern Germany”, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G. and Nohria, N., (1992), Networks and Organizations, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrig, H., Introduction to the Algebraic Theory of Graph Grammars, 1st Workshop on Graph Grammars and Their Applications to Computer Science and Biology, (1979), pp. 1–69, Springer, LNCS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkes, J.W., Kenny, K.B., Lewis, J.W., Sarachan, B.D., Sobololewski, M.W., and Sum, R. N., 1996, “Implementing Shared Manufacturing Services on the World-wide Web,” Communication of the ACM, 39, 2, pp.34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, D. and Tanniru, M. (1997). Generating and evaluating process redesign options: A network modeling approach Annals of operations rèsearch. 72, 293–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel, A. K., Ali, K. S., Donnellan, M. W., de Silva Garza, A. G., and Callantine, T. J., (1994), “Multistrategy Adaptive Path Planning,” IEEE Expert, 9(6), December 1994.

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, J., Purdom, W., Franco, J., and Wah, B. (1996), Algorithms for the Satisfiability (SAT) Problem: A Survey — DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, K., and Bordello, G., “A Geographically Distributed Framework for Embedded System Design and Validation”, ACM. 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • IDEF, (1998), http://www.idef.com

  • Jacome, M. F. and Director, S. W., (1996),“A Formal Basis for Design Process Planning and Management,” IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 15, 10, pp. 1197–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagadish, H. V., (2001), “Coopetitive Design and Manufacturing Across Organizations,” http://www.eng.usf.edu/nsf/conference/scalable/scalable_enterprises/JagadishUmich.ppt

    Google Scholar 

  • Janusz, B., (1997), Model-based process redesign. Journal of intelligent manufacturing. 8, no. 5, 345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalpakjian, S., 1992, Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 2nd Edition, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamath, M., (2001), “ADVANCED MODELING PROJECT (OSU-CIM)”, http://www.okstate.edu/cocim/advmod/

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers, J., Pinte, J., Detand, J., and Kruth, J., “A Collaborative Process Planning and Scheduling System”, Computer in Engineering Vol. 1, ASME, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, D., Dillon, L. and Chung, M. J., (1999), “Analysis of a Scheduler for a CAD Framework,” International Conference of Software Engineering 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, D.W. and Parker, A.C, (1991), “The ADAM Design Planning Engine,” IEEE Transactions on Computer Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, pp. 263–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, P., Crimp, M., and Chung, M. J., Automating the Design Process and Powder Fabrication of Functionally Gradient Materials, ASME Int. Symposium Annual Winter Conference, Dallas, Dec. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander, S. E., Staley, S. M. and Corkill, D. D., (1995), “Designing Integrated Engineering Environments: Blackboard-Based Integration of Design and Analysis Tools,” IJCAI-95 Workshop Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, AAAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavana, H., Khetawat, A., Brglez, F., and Kozminski, K., (1997), “Executable Workflows: A Paradigm or Collaborative Design on the Internet,” Proceedings of the 34th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubell, J. (2000) “An XML Repository Architecture for Step Modules,” NIST Technical report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W., (1987), Modeling coordination in organizations and markets., 33, 1317–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. and Crowston, K., (1994), “The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination.” ACM Computing Surveys 26: pp. 87–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W., Crowston, K. G., Lee, J., Pentland, B., Dellarocas, C., Wyner, G., Quimby, J., Osborn, C. S., Bernstein, A., Herman, G., Klein, M., & O’Donnell, E., (1999), “Tools for inventing organizations: Toward a handbook of organizational processes,” Management Science, 45, 3, pp. 425–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, A., Minis, I., Proth, J., “Hierarchical Production Planning for Complex Manufacturing System”, Computer in Engineering Vol. 1, ASME, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  • Melis, E., and Meier, A., (2000), “Proof Planning with Multiple Strategies”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1861, pp. 644–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miura, J. and Shirai, Y., “Knowledge-Based Control of Decision Theoretic Planning — Adaptive Planning Model Selection”, 14th Workshop New Results in Planning, Scheduling and Design (PuK2000), pp. 107–114, Berlin, August 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nau, D.S., Gupta, S.K. et al. (1995) AI planning versus Manufacturing-Operation Planning, A Case Study. IJCAI-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A., (1972), Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, C, “Agent-Based Engineering, the Web, and Intelligence”, IEEE Expert, Dec, 1996. see http://cdr.stanford. edu/NextLink/Expert.html

  • Petrie, C, Jeon, H., and Cutkosky, M., “Combining Constraint Propagation and Backtracking for Distributed Engineering”, ECAI-96 Workshop on Non- Standard Constraint Processing, Budapest, August, 1996, revised for AAAI-97 Workshop on Constraints and Agents, Providence, RI, Jul, 1997. see also “http://www.cdr.stanford.edu/ProcessLink/papers/non-stan-const/non-stan-const.html ”.

  • Rea, H. J., Falconer, R. A., Murray, J. L., and Simmons, J. A.,(1988), “A Structured approach for assembly planning,” ASME International Congress and Exposition — 5, Symposium on Assembly Modeling and Assembly Systems; 1998, Anaheim, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemer, K., (2001), ebXML Business Process, http://www.gca.org/papers/xmleurope2001/papers/s18-1.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. J., (2001), Information-based manufacturing: technology, strategy and industrial applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schey, J. A., (1987), Introduction to Manufacturing Processes, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Schienoff, C, Knutilla, A. and Ray, S., (1996), Unified Process Specification Language: Requirements for Modeling Process, NISTIR 5910, NIST.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, L. C, and Cagan, J., (1997), “GGREADA: A Graph Grammar-Based Machine Design Algorithm,” Research in Engineering Design, 9, pp. 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schurmann, B. and Altmeyer, J., “Modeling Design Tasks and Tools - The Link between Product and Flow Model -,” Proceedings of 34th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, June 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1973) “The structure of ill-structured problems,” Artificial Intelligence, 4: 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sriram, R.D., (1997), Intelligent Systems for Engineering, Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhage, A., and Schoner, G., (1997), “The dynamic approach to autonomous robot navigation”, Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, ISIE′97, pp. SS7–SS12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton P. R., and Director, S. W., (1998), “Framework Encapsulations: A New Approach to CAD Tool Interoperability,” Proceedings of the 35th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, A., “Representing Plans as a Set of Constraints — the <I-N-OVA> Model”, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems, Edinburgh, UK, May, 1996. See also http://www.aiai.ed.ac.uk/pub/documents

  • Tulkoff, J., (1981), “Process Planning in the Computer Age,” Machine and Tool Blue Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeramani, D. and Garikapati, R., (2000), “XML based Markup Languages for Knowledge Management in Manufacturing Companies,” CD-ROM DETC 2000/CIE-14603.

    Google Scholar 

  • vom Ende, A., Helmke, M., Dobermann, M., and Naumann, T., (2000), “A Concept for an Adaptive Process Management in a Distributed Product Development Environment,” ProSTEP Science Days 2000, September 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, R.A., Pancerella, C. M., and Klevgard, P. A., (1997), “A CORBA-Based Manufacturing Environment”, Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, January 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O., (1975), Markets and Hierarchies, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, T.N. and Siu, S. L., (1995), “A Knowledge-based Approach to Automated Machining Process Selection and Sequencing,” International Journal of Production Research, 34 (1), 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • WFMC, Workflow Management Coalition, (1998), Workflow Security Considerations — White Paper, Document Number WFMC-TC-1019,. Feb 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B., (2000), Manufacturing and supply systems management: a unified framework of systems design and operation. London; New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, G. and Zhang, Q., (1996), Recent advances in control and optimization of manufacturing systems. London; New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yourdon, E., (1989), Modern Structured Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chung, M.J., Kwon, P., Pentland, B. (2003). Design and Manufacturing Process Management in a Network of Distributed Suppliers. In: Prabhu, V., Kumara, S., Kamath, M. (eds) Scalable Enterprise Systems. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 3. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0389-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0389-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5052-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0389-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics