Abstract
Biological research attempts to answer the question: How do organisms function? Once we can answer this question, we can explain our natural surroundings and begin to change them in a targeted fashion that offers us benefit, may it be in medicine, agriculture, biotechnology, or a responsible exploitation of the environment. The challenge is that we were not provided with a blueprint of the inner workings of organisms. We have very many observational data, but they are almost always mere snapshots of some parts of some organisms under some more or less controlled conditions. Often these snapshots are clustered in some interesting corner of the biological universe, but more often they are separated by gaping holes in our knowledge. Our task is then to interpolate between rather scarce data in order to construct a picture that matches the observations and, more interestingly, explains what lies between and beyond.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Mostafa YS. The Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension: information versus complexity in learning. Neural Computat 1: 312–317 (1989).
Akutsu T, Miyano S, Kuhara S. Inferring qualitative relations in genetic networks and metabolic pathways. Bioinformatics 16: 727–734 (2000).
Almeida JS. Predictive non-linear modeling of complex data by artificial neural networks. Curr Opin Biotechnol in pressspi (2002).
Almeida JS, Reis MAM, Carrondo MJT. Competition between nitrate and nitrite reduction in denitrification by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Biotechnol Bioeng 46: 476–484 (1995).
Alves R, Savageau M. Extending the method of mathematically controlled comparison to include numerical comparisons. Bioinformatics 16: 786–798 (2000).
Burden RL, Faires JD. Numerical Analysis. 5th Edn. pp. 156–167, PWS Publishing Co, Boston (1993).
DiStefano III J J. The modeling methodology forum: an expanded department. Am J Physiol 248: C187–C188 (1985).
Garfinkel D. The role of computer simulation in biochemistry. Comp Biomed Res 2: 31–44 (1968).
Garfinkel D. Computer modeling, complex biological systems, and their simplifications. Am J Phys 239: R1–R6 (1980).
Garfinkel D. Computer-based modeling of biological systems which are inherently complex: problems, strategies, and methods. Biomed Biochim Acta 44: 823–829 (1985).
Goodenowe DB. Metabolic network analysis: integrating comprehensive genomic and metabolomic data to understand development and disease (abstract). Cambridge Healthtech Institute Conference on Metabolic Profiling: Pathways in Discovery, Chapel Hill (2001).
Hatzimanikatis V, Floudas CA, Bailey JE. Optimization of regulatory architectures in metabolic reaction networks. Biotechnol Bioeng 52: 485–500 (1996).
Heinrich R, Rapoport SM, Rapoport TA. Metabolic regulation and mathematical models. Prog Biophys Mol Bio 32: 1–82 (1977).
Hernández-Bermejo B, Fairén V. Lotka-Volterra representation of general nonlinear systems. Math Biosci 140: 1–32 (1997).
Irvine DH, Savageau MA. Network regulation of the immune response. J Immunol 134: 2100–2130(1985).
Irvine DH, Savageau MA. Efficient solution of nonlinear ordinary differential equations expressed in S-system canonical form. SI AM J N timer Anal 27: 704–735 (1990).
Jacquez, J A. Compartmental Analysis in Biology and Medicine. 3rd Edn. Thomson-Shore, Inc, Dexter, MI (1996).
Kantz H, Schreiber T. Nonlinear Time Series Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).
Kikuchi S, Tominaga D, Masanori A, Tomita M. Pathway finding from given time-courses using genetic algorithm. Genome Informat 12: 304–305 (2001).
Maki Y, Tominaga D, Okamoto M et al. Development of a system for the inference of large scale genetic networks. ProcPacific Symposium on Biocomputing. pp. 446–458, World Scientific, Singapore (2001).
Michel, M. An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998).
Neves AR, Ramos A, Nunes MC et al. In vivo nuclear magnetic resonance studies of glycolytic kinetics in Lactococcus lactis. Biotechnol Bioeng 64: 200–212 (1999).
Neves AR, Ramos A, Shearman C et al. In vivo nuclear magnetic resonance studies of glycolytic kinetics in Lactococcus lactis. Eur J Biochem 267: 3859–3868 (2000).
Okamoto M, Morita Y, Tominaga D et al. Design of virtual-labo-system for metabolic engineering: development of biochemical engineering system analyzing tool-kit (BEST KIT). Comp Chem Engng 21: S745–S750 (1997).
Oliveira JS, Bailey CG, Jones-Oliveira JB, Dixon DA. An algebraic-combinatorial model for the identification and mapping of biochemical pathways. Bull Mathem Biol 63: 1163–1196 (2001).
Sakamoto E, Iba H. Inferring a system of differential equations for a gene regulatory network by using genetic programming. Proc 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computing, CEC200L pp. 720–726, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, (2001).
Samoilov M, Arkin A, Ross J. On the deduction of chemical reaction pathways from measurements of time series of concentrations. Chaos 11: 108–114 (2001).
Sands PJ, Voit EO. Flux-based estimation of parameters in S-systems. Ecol Model 93: 75–88 (1996).
Santos MM, Lemos PC, Reis MA, Santos H. Glucose metabolism and kinetics of phosphorus removal by the fermentative bacterium Microlunatus phosphovorus. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 3920–3928 (1999).
Savageau MA. Biochemical Systems Analysis, I. Some mathematical properties of the rate law for the component enzymatic reactions. J Theor Biol 25: 365–369 (1969a).
Savageau MA. Biochemical Systems Analysis, II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. J Theor Biol 25: 370–379 (1969b).
Savageau MA. Biochemical Systems Analysis. A Study of Function and Design in Molecular Biology. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1976).
Savageau MA. Growth equations: a general equation and a survey of special cases. Math Biosci 48: 267–278 (1980).
Savageau MA. A theory of alternative designs for biochemical control systems. Biomed Biochim Acta 44: 875–880 (1985).
Savageau MA, Voit EO. Recasting nonlinear differential equations as S-systems: a canonical nonlinear form. Math Biosci 87: 83–115 (1987).
Sibjesma WFH, Almeida JS, Reis MAM, Santos H. Evidence for uncoupling effect of nitrite during of denitrification by Pseudomonas fluorescens: in vivo P-NMR study. Biotechnol Bioeng 52: 176–182 (1996).
Sorribas A, Cascante M. Structure identifiability in metabolic pathways: parameter estimation in models based on the power-law formalism. Biochem J 298: 303–311 (1994).
Torres NV, Voit, EO. Pathway Analysis and Optimization in Metabolic Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in press (2003).
Voit EO (Ed). Canonical Nonlinear Modeling. S-System Approach to Understanding Complexity. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1991).
Voit EO. Symmetries of S-systems. Math Biosci 109: 19–37 (1992).
Voit EO. Computational Analysis of Biochemical Systems. A Practical Guide for Biochemists and Molecular Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).
Voit EO. Models-of-data and models-of-processes in the post-genomic era. Mathem. Biosci in pressspi (2002).
Voit EO, Sands PJ. Modeling forest growth. I. Canonical approach. Ecol Model 86: 51–71 (1996).
Voit, EO, Savageau MA. Power-law approach to modeling biological systems; II. Application to ethanol production. J Ferment Technol 60: 229–232 (1982a).
Voit EO, Savageau MA. Power-law approach to modeling biological systems; III. Methods of analysis. J Ferment Technol 60: 233–241 (1982b).
V’Yugin, VV. Algorithmic complexity and stochastic properties of finite binary sequences. Comp J 42: 294–317 (1999).
Zhang Z, Voit EO, Schwacke LH. Parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis of S-systems using a genetic algorithm. In Methodologies for the Conception, Design, and Application of Intelligent Systems. YamakawaT, Matsumoto G (Ed) World Scientific, Singapore, (1996).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Voit, E.O., Almeida, J. (2003). Dynamic Profiling and Canonical Modeling. In: Harrigan, G.G., Goodacre, R. (eds) Metabolic Profiling: Its Role in Biomarker Discovery and Gene Function Analysis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0333-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0333-0_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5025-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0333-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive