Abstract
In this chapter the new physical modeling method, the FTM, is compared with the classical physical modeling methods explained in chapter 4 with respect to their
-
■ approaches to solve initial-boundary-value problems,
-
■ implementation structures,
-
■ simulation accuracies,
-
■ computational complexities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trautmann, L., Rabenstein, R. (2003). Comparison of the FTM with the Classical Physical Modeling Methods. In: Digital Sound Synthesis by Physical Modeling Using the Functional Transformation Method. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0049-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0049-0_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4900-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0049-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive