Abstract
In this chapter we will review the sonographic morphology of hemangiomas and vascular malformations, the most common cutaneous vascular anomalies. Technical considerations, useful classifications, and percutaneous interventional procedures guided by ultrasound that are frequently performed in vascular lesions are discussed.
How to deal with the most common forms of vascular tumors and their ultrasound findings
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Magnetic Resonance Angiography
- Digital Subtraction Angiography
- Vascular Malformation
- Duplex Ultrasound
- Color Doppler Ultrasound
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Introduction
While a so-called “angel’s kiss” is a harmless finding–typically with spontaneous resolution within the first 2 years of life–one in one hundred newborns is affected by a vascular soft-tissue lesion, which warrants further investigation. Our main goal is to separate the “don’t touch” lesions, such as most hemangiomas–that can simply be observed for a period of time, awaiting spontaneous involution– from lesions that need to be observed more closely or those that should undergo early therapeutic intervention. Such a decision must be made by an interdisciplinary team of pediatricians, dermatologists, surgeons, and radiologists, however, “too many cooks may spoil the broth,” especially if they don’t speak the same language. A confusing historical nomenclature has been used for many years for the classification of a vascular anomaly: even specialists have applied the term “cavernous hemangioma” to a port wine stain, which gives the false impression of a possibility for spontaneous involution of the lesion. Various hybrid names such as “capillary hemangioma” further added to the confusion. The correct classification of a lesion by clinicians, and especially radiologists and sonographers, however, is of utmost importance to avoid misinterpretations in terms of prognosis and choice of optimal treatment.
2 Classification of Vascular Anomalies
The work of Mulliken and Glowacki has greatly improved our understanding of vascular anomalies [1]. In their work dating back to 1982, they classified vascular anomalies according to their endothelial characteristics into two main categories: hemangioma and vascular malformations. While a hemangioma is a benign vascular tumor, characterized by an initial rapid growth of endothelial cells, followed by later slow involution, vascular malformations by definition are not tumors; they are composed of dysplastic vascular channels without accompanying endothelial proliferation. The basic classification by Mullicken/Glowacki was later modified by Burrows et al. [2], who introduced the subclassification of vascular malformations into high-flow and low-flow varieties. Currently, a generally accepted classification is recommended by the Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies [3], which is based on the cellular origin of the lesion, its clinical behavior, and its flow characteristics. In that classification, proliferating neoplasms are distinguished from congenital vascular malformations (Table 7.1). In terms of treatment planning, additional differentiation of lesions into “high-flow,” “intermediate-flow,” and “low-flow,” as proposed by Kawanabe et al. and Inoue et al., is of practical value [4, 5]. While in high-flow lesions a combination of transarterial catheter embolization with or without venous embolization or sclerotherapy is feasible, percutaneous sclerotherapy alone may be the best choice for slow-flow lesions.
Teaching Point
Hemangiomas are true endothelial tumors and malformations are developmental anomalies. Correct classification is mandatory to institute optimal treatment!
3 General Considerations for Imaging of Vascular Anomalies
Ultrasound imaging–which will be covered in more detail later in the chapter–is definitely the first line evaluation of hemangiomas and vascular malformations, although at times additional imaging studies are needed. While conventional radiography and computed tomography (CT) have only little impact, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and venous angiography are important adjuncts for the study of vascular anomalies.
DSA is typically performed to define the arterial component of combined high-flow arteriovenous malformations and arteriovenous fistulae (Fig. 7.1). However, in hemangiomas and other types of malformations (low or intermediate flow), it is hardly indicated. The lesions that should undergo DSA can be judged through careful evaluation of the individual flow characteristics during examination with color Doppler and duplex ultrasound or MRI. Depending on the location of the lesion, DSA is performed with either retrograde or antegrade cannulation of the femoral artery and endovascular treatment is typically performed during the same session. In low-flow venous malformations, angiographic lesion visualization is performed through direct percutaneous phlebography for differential diagnosis or during sclerotherapy (Fig. 7.2). This topic is covered in more detail in the section on venous malformations.
A complete work up of a hemangioma is normally feasible with ultrasound alone, whereas an indication for MRI is in critical regions in deep lying hemangiomas, such as the pelvic area or in distinct locations of the craniofacial region (orbit, nasopharyngeal space, etc.). Typically, hemangiomas are hyperintense on T2-weighted images and isointense to muscle on T1-weighted sequences with marked enhancement after administration of a contrast agent (Fig. 7.3).
In cases with large or multiple vascular malformations we opt for a combination of ultrasound with MRI and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) which can provide the complete extent of the lesion and its relationship to surrounding soft tissues (muscles, nerves, bone, tendons, subcutaneous tissue, and skin).
Teaching Point
Combined ultrasound and MRI is ideal for imaging of large and multiple vascular malformations. It combines functional and morphological information.
Vascular malformations are best distinguished from adjacent fatty structures on fat-suppressed sequences (STIR [short tau inversion recovery] or frequency selective fat saturation) (Fig. 7.4). Low-flow venous malformations consist of blood-filled pouches of variable size that appear as homogeneous hyperintense areas without flow void signals on T2-weighted or STIR images (Fig. 7.4). In contrast, high-flow malformations are characterized by signal voids in serpiginous structures corresponding to high-flow feeders (Fig. 7.5). A pathognomonic feature of venous malformations is intralesional phleboliths caused by stagnation of blood flow with partial thrombosis and calcification of clot, and can be detected as low signal foci on T2-weighted or STIR images (Fig. 7.6). MRA has gained widespread acceptance in the pre-treatment evaluation of vascular malformations (Fig. 7.7), and in terms of technique, it can be performed as conventional MRA, typically with fast 3D gradient-echo sequences in coronal orientation after intravenous injection of 0.1 mmol/kg of a gadolinium contrast agent. A more timely approach is contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA, which combines high temporal resolution and the ability to visualize flow dynamics in a manner similar to that of DSA [6].
4 Ultrasound: General Considerations and Technical Requirements
A modern ultrasound equipment with high-resolution scanning software is well suited for the imaging of vascular anomalies. Companies combine special beam-forming software with broad-band transducers, which enhances the system’s ability for high-resolution imaging and powerful color Doppler and duplex ultrasound. New matrix transducers deliver an ultra-thin, targeted ultrasound beam, which results in extraordinary tissue uniformity, while decreasing noise surrounding the region of interest. This results in fewer artifacts and better image quality in terms of resolution and image sharpness.
All lesions are initially evaluated in B mode and documented and measured in two orthogonal planes. We carefully evaluate the echotexture of the lesion (hypo- or hyperechoic, homogeneous or heterogeneous) and its borders toward surrounding tissue (well delineated, infiltrative, etc.). We especially look for any solid component, which is an important finding for the differentiation of a “true” tumor (i.e., hemangioma) and a malformation (Fig. 7.8). Any presence of cystic or tubular vascular channels inside a lesion is also recorded.
Color Doppler ultrasound is used to define the vascular pattern of a lesion (optimized low-flow color Doppler settings must be used to permit detection of small vessels, low-velocity arteries, and veins); hypovascular lesions are differentiated from lesions with little or dense vascularization. Vessel location is categorized as predominantly central, peripheral, or combined (central and peripheral). Vessel density inside a tumor is documented in a modified semi-quantitative fashion according to Dubois et al. [7, 8] (Fig. 7.9): the area of greatest vascular density is identified and color flow signals can be counted within an area of 1 cm2. A vessel is defined as a linear or punctuate colored signal not associated with adjacent color noise (optimized setting of color gain is of utmost importance to reduce artifacts). Vessel density is defined as low (fewer than two vessels per square centimeter), moderate (2–4 vessels per square centimeter), or high (five or more vessels per square centimeter).
An important additional tool for the differentiation of lesions with color Doppler ultrasound is the “compression test”: with light compression of a lesion and subsequent release of transducer pressure a bidirectional venous flow can be induced inside the blood filled pouches of a venous malformation. A corresponding change of color encoding from red to blue is seen in the image, depending on transducer pressure (Fig. 7.10).
Teaching Point
A color Doppler ultrasound compression test shows bidirectional flow inside a lesion typical for venous malformations.
Duplex ultrasound and spectral wave analysis are used to characterize the types of vessels that exist inside the lesion: presence of venous/arterial vessels, arteriovenous shunts (high diastolic flow and resistive index (RI) below 0.5) (Fig. 7.11), and measurement of flow velocities to define a lesion as low, intermediate, or high flow. In the latter, flow volume or shunt volume across the lesion should also be evaluated (Fig. 7.12).
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with application of microbubble contrast agents is not essentially new, but the value of CEUS for the examination of vascular anomalies has not been studied in detail [9]. Microbubbles circulate freely inside the body and constitute a true intravascular contrast agent; therefore, they permit analysis of tumor perfusion and regional blood flow. It is known from CEUS of soft-tissue tumors that microbubble-enhanced ultrasound can improve the detection of perfusion compared with color Doppler ultrasound: in a substantial number of tumors that appear only sparsely vascularized with color Doppler ultrasound, CEUS gives a completely different impression by depicting more vessels and more intense perfusion. In particular, CEUS may offer improved detection of small arteriovenous shunts, which might have an impact on the grading of vascular anomalies into low-flow or intermediate/high-flow subtypes, and especially on evaluation of therapeutic success (extent of devascularization) after sclerotherapy (Fig. 7.13).
5 Hemangioma
5.1 Clinical Background
Hemangiomas of infancy are benign vascular tumors typically present at birth. In contrast to vascular malformations, hemangiomas show an initial proliferative phase, followed by slow involution during early childhood. A second proliferative phase may precede regression in some hemangiomas. The time at which regression occurs differs substantially: around 50 % of hemangiomas regress completely by the age of 5 years and almost 90 % by the age of 9–10 years. Despite involution, the prognosis of a hemangioma can be disappointing resulting from cosmetic impairment, and furthermore, hemangiomas may pose a clinical problem, depending on their location: perioral, perianal, or orbital hemangiomas may bleed, impair vision, or cause other problems [10]. In contrast to simple hemangiomas, an extensive imaging work-up is advocated in the latter type. Ultrasound may often suffice, but for particularly deep-lying hemangiomas (such as lesions inside the orbit), MRI may be a better choice. In contrast to vascular malformations, most hemangiomas do not need invasive treatment.
5.2 Ultrasound Characteristics
Hemangiomas differ in their appearance according to the phase; thus, lesions in the proliferative stage appear as hypoechoic hypervascular ill-defined structures on ultrasound that become heterogeneous (i.e., hypoechoic and hyperechoic areas) during partial involution. The intensity of the vascularity that can be detected within the lesions also varies during the different degrees of involution going from hypervascular to hypovascular. In the end stage of involution, hemangiomas tend to show hyperechogenicity and hypo- or lack of vascularity (Figs. 7.14, 7.15, 7.16, 7.17, 7.18, 7.19, 7.20, 7.21, 7.22, 7.23, 7.24, and 7.25).
Vascular channels, pouches, or pseudocystic structures large enough to be seen on B-mode are not a typical feature of hemangiomas [7]. Nevertheless, most hemangiomas show blood flow through many small vessels that may not be detectable with B-mode ultrasound. Therefore, on color Doppler ultrasound, hemangiomas are typically hypervascular with intense perfusion and high vessel density according to the criteria mentioned above (five or more vessel counts per square centimeter) (Fig. 7.24). With duplex ultrasound the arterial vessels inside a hemangioma have a Doppler shift of >2 KHz, or in other words show high systolic flow velocities (Fig. 7.26). Together with a high vessel count this is a highly specific feature for the diagnosis of hemangiomas and the combination of high vessel count and high-flow velocity results in a positive predictive value of 97 % [7]. Proliferative hemangiomas show prominent arterial blood flow, low-velocity venous vessels, and occasionally arteriovenous shunts. During the involution phase, the arteriovenous shunts start to disappear and the peak systolic velocity of the arterial vessels tends to decrease.
Teaching Point
A high vessel density throughout the entire lesion along with high velocity arterial and venous signals inside a solid lesion is highly specific for hemangioma.
As mentioned previously, hemangiomas (benign lesions) and soft-tissue sarcomas are not easily differentiated using B-mode ultrasound alone. What about color Doppler ultrasound and duplex ultrasound? The problem is that both types of lesions (hemangiomas and malignant tumors) are capable of stimulating the host into creating new vessels, usually from existing endothelial cells, by secreting angiogenesis factors. This is the reason why hemangiomas, in contrast to other benign soft-tissue tumors, show high vascularization. These newly produced vessels lack normal wall architecture (the muscularis layer is absent) and therefore have a high velocity with low resistance. In this regard, hemangiomas may resemble malignant soft-tissue tumors, however, in the latter, vessels are mostly found at the periphery of the tumor (active infiltrative tumor tissue) while in hemangioma the vessels are distributed more evenly throughout the lesion [11] (Fig. 7.27), which is why a high vessel density throughout the lesion is unlikely to be found in a malignant soft-tissue sarcoma.
6 Vascular Malformations
6.1 Arterial and ArterioVenous Malformations
6.1.1 Clinical Background
Arterial and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) have no relationship to endothelial proliferation, but represent abnormal differentiation of vessels during embryogenesis. They are congenital lesions that are typically present at birth but often initially not detected. Additional growth, vascular factors, trauma, or endocrine changes result in clinical manifestation of the evolutive lesions, resulting in detection that is sometimes delayed into adolescence. Unlike hemangiomas, vascular malformations typically increase in size during growth. The main locations are the head and neck (40 % of cases), extremities (40 %), and torso (20 %) [12]. They represent a superficial soft-tissue mass that is typically soft and patchy with bluish or red discoloration of the skin. They derive from aberrant vessels and consist of a nest of arterial vessels or direct connections between arterial, venous, capillary, and also lymphatic vessels. This collection of tortuous vessels is called a nidus where shunting between vessels occurs, without existence of a capillary bed. These high-flow vascular malformations can contain several such nidi.
Teaching Point
A nidus with arteriovenous shunting is the hallmark of an AVM and several such nidi may exist inside a single malformation.
The high recurrence rate of vascular malformations results from their cellular origin from early mesenchymal cells, and have the potential to enlarge and recur. Because of this feature, AVMs can progress into highly destructive lesions with gross deformity of a finger or limb and substantial cosmetic impairment.
6.1.2 Ultrasound Characteristics
The presentation of arterial and AVMs on B-Mode ultrasound is quite variable. Typically located superficially in the subcutaneous tissue and they may result in thickening of the skin and subcutis. A nest of anechoic ducts can usually be detected, even though in some cases a anechoic pseudocystic appearance can be encountered (Figs. 7.28, 7.29, 7.30, 7.31, and 7.32). Additionally, a mixed pattern composed by hyperechoic vascular stroma and anechoic vascular channels of different size and diameter may be found [8]. The overall appearance of AVMs can be quite inhomogeneous, especially because of the different amount of arterial and venous elements inside the lesion (Figs. 7.33 and 7.34). Typically arterial malformations and AVMs do not have a soft-tissue component [8]. If the latter is encountered, the physician should always be concerned about a different differential diagnosis, such as a highly vascularized soft-tissue tumor. A criterion which may help is the distribution of vessels inside the lesions: while vessels and shunts are mainly centered inside the lesion in AVMs, in soft-tissue sarcomas, these vessels are more often found in the periphery because of their infiltrative growth. A coexisting surrounding edema or infiltrative borders are also a hallmark of sarcomas. AVMs often have indistinct outer borders and sometimes the vessels inside an AVM are so small that they are hardly seen with B-Mode ultrasound, and only detected when color Doppler ultrasound is applied.
Teaching Point
AVMs do not have soft-tissue components. If high-flow vessels and shunting are present together with a soft-tissue mass−think sarcoma.
As mentioned previously, AVMs consist of arterial and venous connections forming a so-called vascular nidus. The arterial feeders and draining veins of the AVM may sometimes be detected in the periphery of the lesion, but this is not always possible. A characteristic of all AVMs however, which must be sought as it comprises a diagnostic feature, is the presence of arteriovenous shunt flow. With color Doppler ultrasound, this is represented by aliasing inside the lesion; in this regard the correct setting of the scanner is of utmost importance to not take artifacts for true aliasing! With duplex ultrasound arteriovenous shunts show high diastolic flow above the baseline and resistance indices below 0.5 (Figs. 7.33 and 7.34). The differentiation of high-flow and low-flow AVMs is important in terms of treatment planning and therefore direct measurement of shunt flow across the lesion with duplex ultrasound is mandatory.
6.2 Venous Malformations
6.2.1 Clinical Background
Venous malformations have certain similarities to arterial malformations and AVMs: both are congenital, both do not regress, but may most commonly enlarge during growth and both may go undetected for a period of time until they become clinically symptomatic. Venous malformations are bluish in color, they are compressible, and typically increase in size during a Valsalva maneuver [13]. While venous malformations are often asymptomatic, they may become painful when thrombophlebitis or thrombosis occurs, or in the case of involvement of muscles and joints. Histologically, they consist of venous channels with dilated, sponge-like caverns of different sizes. In terms of treatment planning, venous malformations may be further divided into four subtypes according to a classification system proposed by Puig et al. [14] (Table 7.2). The classification is based on lesion drainage and has important implications on sclerotherapy because types 3 and 4 lesions carry a higher risk of complications.
Teaching Point
The type of drainage has implications on the treatment of venous malformations as type 3 and type 4 lesions have a higher rate of complications during sclerotherapy.
A variety of syndromes can be associated with venous malformations: Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome (venous and lymphatic malformations in combination with capillary malformations and skeletal or soft-tissue hypertrophy), Parkes-Weber syndrome (similar to Klippel-Trenaunay but with presence of additional high-flow malformations), Sturge-Weber syndrome (cutaneous, facial venular malformations; i.e., port wine stain in the facial area supplied by the V1 branch of the trigeminal nerve and subcutaneous lymphatic malformations with secondary maxillofacial bone hypertrophy), Maffuci syndrome (a variant of Ollier’s disease, with venous malformations associated with multiple enchondromas), among others.
6.2.2 Ultrasound Characteristics
Venous malformations are anechoic or slightly hypoechoic, sponge-like structures on B-mode sonograms and they consist of multiple blood-filled caverns of different sizes. Varicose veins, complex and communicating venous channels are seen in only about 50 % of lesions [15]. Typically venous malformations have only little fibrous stroma, but the walls of the individual caverns range from very thin septae to thick fibrous bridges (Figs. 7.35, 7.36, and 7.37), which is why approximately 80 % of venous malformations are somewhat inhomogeneous on B-mode with a mixture of hypoechoic caverns and sometimes hyperechoic septations [16]. If large parts of the malformation are filled with thrombotic material, it can resemble a soft-tissue tumor with mixed echogenity making it difficult to differentiate from hemangiomas or other soft-tissue lesions [16, 17]. The inhomogeneous texture of the lesion can sometimes prevent distinction from surrounding normal tissue and exact measurement of size, this is especially the case when tiny finger-like protrusions of the lesion invade into the surrounding soft tissues. Tiny roundish calcifications resembling phleboliths inside thrombosed caverns are a diagnostic hallmark of venous malformations but are seen in only 20 % of lesions [15, 16] (Figs. 7.36, 7.37, 7.38, 7.39, 7.40, and 7.41). Echotexture alone does not allow differentiation of venous malformations from hemangioma or lymphangioma, in contrast to the latter however, venous malformations are easily compressed with the transducer. A color Doppler ultrasound compression test is a comparable and important equivalent test for the diagnosis of a venous malformation. With correct color Doppler ultrasound settings, the signal inside the blood-filled caverns shows a change from red to blue and vice versa during transducer pressure/release of pressure on the malformation (Fig. 7.10). No flow is detected in approximately 15–20 % of lesions; this may be due to either thrombosis, substantially low flow inside the malformation, or to inappropriate Doppler settings [15]. In lesions with low flow, no color signal may be seen at all unless light pressure is applied. Nevertheless, flow inside venous malformations could be quite variable, and according to Trop et al. [16], 16 % of lesions do not show any flow at all, 78 % have slow monophasic venous flow, and 6 % have biphasic low flow. Venous malformations do not harbor arteriovenous shunts, therefore, it is important to search for regions with aliasing (turbulence) using color Doppler ultrasound and for shunt flow with spectral wave analysis. If a shunt is detected, the lesion is by definition not a venous malformation but either an arteriovenous malformation and this is an important distinction in terms of treatment planning.
Teaching Point
If arteriovenous shunts are detected inside a malformation it is by definition not a simple venous malformation.
6.2.3 Direct Percutaneous Phlebography
The value of direct percutaneous phlebography in venous anomalies is twofold: it can be performed as a diagnostic procedure and if contrast-filled abnormal venous cavities are demonstrated, this confirms the presence of a venous malformation and virtually excludes the presence of a soft-tissue tumor. The second, and in our opinion, more important aspect, is to perform direct percutaneous phlebography as the first step during sclerotherapy of a venous malformation (Fig. 7.42): A 21-gauge needle is inserted into the malformation under ultrasound guidance and connected to a syringe via a length of tubing. Under suction, the needle is positioned until blood is withdrawn and 5 ml of iodinated contrast is injected by hand to observe the characteristics of venous opacification and filling of the drainage vein. According to Puig et al. [14] and Dubois et al. [15], different drainage patterns may be observed: some malformations are mere fluid-filled caverns without any detectable drainage. The most common is a cavitary pattern with late and slow venous drainage without detection of abnormal veins. The third is a malformation consisting of spongy vascular channels draining into dysplastic veins, with the fourth a venous ectasia with rapid drainage. In cases with immediate drainage, compression of the drainage vein using a tourniquet to avoid spilling of the sclerosant into the systemic circulation and to increase local exposure inside the malformation, is strongly advised (Fig. 7.42b).
Teaching Point
Direct puncture phlebography is necessary before sclerotherapy to define the type of drainage in malformations.
6.3 Lymphatic Malformations
6.3.1 Clinical Background
Lymphatic malformations also called lymphangiomas, arise from a developmental defect in the communication between lymph vessels and their draining channels during embryogenesis [17, 18]. Histologically, they are thin-walled fluid-filled cysts of different sizes surrounded by a variable amount of connective tissue stroma; while the microcystic variant consists of multiple tiny cysts within a thick solid matrix, macrocystic variants consist mainly of large thin-walled spaces filled with proteinaceous fluid. The head and neck are most frequently affected and cervicofacial lymphatic malformations represent a rough 70 % of cases. About 60 % of lymphatic malformations are present at birth and the other 40 % become symptomatic during the first 2 years of life. The macrocystic variants may enlarge with growth of the child and compress surrounding soft tissues. Involvement of the tongue and orbit is well known and may result in impaired vision or speech. Tissue overgrowth may result in macroglossia, deformities of the bony palate and jaw, and thus problems with dentition or malocclusion. The infiltrative growth is more common with microcystic variants and can result in considerable cosmetic impairment. Lymphatic malformations in the limbs can also result in progressive lymphedema and skin changes.
The distinction of lymphatic malformations from other congenital vascular anomalies is important because they represent proliferative lesions, which warrants closer observation and more aggressive treatment. Lymphatic malformations may exist alone or be part of several syndromes with a complex mixture of arteriovenous and lymphatic anomalies such as Klippel-Trenaunay or Proteus syndrome. In terms of therapy, lymphatic malformations pose a severe problem: while surgical resection is considered the gold standard, complete resection is often impossible, the recurrence rate is high, and the risk of severe cosmetic impairment is considerable. Therefore, various approaches for percutaneous treatment under ultrasound or CT/MRI guidance are reported in the literature [19, 20]: simple direct drainage, aspiration, and sclerotherapy with ethanol or picibanil (OK-432) are most frequently used with varying success.
6.3.2 Ultrasound Characteristics
Simple macrocystic lymphatic malformations are septate caverns of large size filled with anechoic fluid (Figs. 7.43, 7.44, 7.45, 7.46, 7.47, 7.48). Bleeding or infection may sometimes result in mixed echogenity of fluid in different caverns and/or the presence of debris layered at the bottom of the caverns. The lesion itself may be mobile against the surrounding soft tissues, but typically the caverns themselves are not compressible with the transducer; as previously mentioned, this is an important sign for the differential diagnosis of venous malformations. Microcystic malformations may exhibit extremely small cysts barely visible with sonography, tightly packed within a solid echoic matrix. This is why they may sometimes resemble proliferating hemangioma on B-mode.
Using color Doppler ultrasound, small arteries or veins may be found inside cyst walls or the surrounding stroma of mere lymphatic malformations, and according to Paltiel et al. [8], that is the case in approximately 60 % of cases. However, cysts themselves are not vascularized at all, unless a combined venolymphatic malformation is present. Only in the latter can a color change be seen in a color Doppler ultrasound compression test. Only slow flow is detected inside veins and arteries of lymphatic malformations using spectral wave analysis.
Teaching Point
A negative result using the color Doppler ultrasound compression test in a cavernous malformation is diagnostic for cystic lymphangioma.
7 Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Therapy
Traditionally the accepted treatment for a vascular malformation was surgery. Because of the complex architecture of vascular malformations, however, surgical resection often does not allow for complete excision of the lesion, or only at the risk of severe cosmetic impairment. This is especially true for complex AVMs with high flow. Generally speaking, malformations are lesions that respond to a variety of external stimuli: minor trauma (and thus also surgical incision) may result in accelerated growth of residual parts of a malformation with disastrous consequences. Therefore, current treatment concepts favor a multidisciplinary approach that on the one hand avoids overaggressive surgery, and overtly conservative approaches on the other. Treatment of vascular malformations has two major aims: complete destruction or resection of the lesion, if feasible, or at least amelioration of clinical symptoms by reduction of local blood flow and/or extent of the lesion. Ideally, the nidus of an AVM must be completely destroyed, complete thrombosis and later fibrous remodeling of a slow-flow malformation must be achieved, and cosmetic or functional impairment must be kept at a minimum. In this regard, sclerotherapy may be the sole treatment for a venous malformation, may be used in conjunction with arterial embolotherapy, or implemented as a preoperative or postoperative adjunct therapy.
While the nidus of an AVM is typically treated by transarterial catheter embolization, venous channels inside an AVM or slow-flow venous malformation (Fig. 7.49) may be attacked by a variety of sclerosing agents that include absolute ethanol, polidocanol (aethoxysklerol), and ethanolamine oleate. In experienced hands, percutaneous sclerotherapy is usually a safe procedure, however, certain complications exist and therefore the decision to treat must be based on a thorough clinical and imaging work-up. We generally recommend a complete color Doppler ultrasound examination with spectral wave analysis, including measurement of shunt flow in combined AVMs and MRI with inclusion of MRA. In the case of a combined AVM, conventional angiography is performed to define the configuration of the nidus and the existing feeders, and a first session of transcatheter arterial embolization is usually performed after diagnostic angiography. In selected cases, percutaneous sclerotherapy of the venous component is performed in the same session. For venous malformations, direct puncture percutaneous phlebography is performed and a first sclerotherapy session follows after definition of the venous drainage (see above). Patients with lymphangioma go directly toward sclerotherapy after diagnostic imaging with ultrasound and MRI.
The same imaging work-up detailed above is used to assess treatment success after sclerotherapy. Judging the effect of sclerotherapy is difficult because there is a high discrepancy between the clinical and morphological response [21]; while some patients show good response in terms of regression of lesion volume as defined on imaging, clinical improvement can be unsatisfactory, and vice versa.
Teaching Point
Clinical improvement and results of imaging studies after sclerotherapy are highly discrepant.
To our knowledge, there are no reliable data on how to define a “good response” based on imaging criteria, but generally a reduction of lesion volume ≥50 % is considered acceptable (Fig. 7.50). This is true for low-flow venous malformations, but for high-flow lesions, an attempt to complete devascularization should be made. If only partial reduction is achieved, the risk of recurrence with increased perfusion of the persisting feeders and subsequent enlargement of the malformation is high. In general, better success rates are achieved in malformations with low flow and only small draining vessels. Another important aspect for better success rates is even distribution of the sclerosant throughout the malformation and a longer local dwell time in the target, which are achieved by multiple punctures and repositioning of the needle and effective reduction of venous drainage by compression of drainage veins, or the use of a sclerosant with better endothelial contact (i.e., foam). Given this reasoning, lesions with distinct margins on pre-interventional imaging, few drainage veins and no or slow drainage are good candidates for sclerotherapy.
Percutaneous sclerotherapy may be used to treat lymphangiomas [19]. Withdrawal of the cyst fluid before instillation of the sclerosant is mandatory, particularly in large lymphangiomas, to achieve better contact of the drug with the cyst wall and to reduce the volume of the sclerosant.
In general, multiple sclerotherapy sessions are needed for the treatment of larger malformations and especially large lymphangiomas.
7.1 Absolute Ethanol
Absolute ethanol has long been the main agent for treatment of lesions that are surgically inaccessible. Ethanol causes endothelial damage, thrombosis with later fibrosis, and occlusion of vascular channels. A response rate between 64 and 96 % is reported for venous malformations in terms of reduction of lesion size and volume and/or improvement of symptoms [12] (Fig. 7.51). The rate of complication is not to be underestimated with skin changes (blisters, necrosis), superficial cellulitis, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, and cardiopulmonary collapse. It is possible for systemic alcohol contamination to also occur. Because of severe pain associated with the procedure, we generally only perform ethanol sclerotherapy under general anesthesia (a nerve block may be an alternative in selected cases). Blood-flow monitoring is mandatory because of the risk of cardiovascular reactions. Except for venous malformations with no detectable drainage or hemangioma, a tourniquet is used to reduce venous drainage and the sclerosant is injected slowly through an 18–22 gauge needle. In contrast to other researchers, we do not perform injection under fluoroscopic guidance, but with sonographic control only. For large cavernomatous malformations it is advised to gradually inject only small amounts of the sclerosant with frequent repositioning of the needle to achieve even distribution of the scelrosant inside the malformation. In our experience, this results in a better sclerosing effect throughout the lesion.
7.2 Polidocanol
Polidocanol (aethoxysclerol) is a substance that has been used with good success for the treatment of lower extremity and esophageal varices and thus an agent with good sclerosing potential for venous malformations [22]. It is a detergent consisting of 95 % hydroxypolyethoxydodecane, which induces overhydration of endothelial cells, resulting in a cascade of vascular injury, thrombosis, and fibrotic remodeling similar to ethanol. Because polidocanol has an anesthetic effect, it can be applied without any need for additional anesthesia, which makes it the agent of choice for sclerotherapy in an outpatient setting. Because severe cardiovascular complications are known, it should not be seen as a “Mickey-Mouse treatment,” which is why the same precautions are to be taken as in ethanol sclerotherapy (blood-flow monitoring, use of tourniquets, etc.). We observe patients for at least half an hour after treatment, or longer depending on the extent of the lesion and the type of venous drainage. Generally, 1 ml of a 1 % solution of polidocanol is used for each centimeter of the lesion, with a maximum of 6–10 ml. The injection is done with real-time ultrasound guidance and repositioning of the needle or repeat punctures as specified above for ethanol treatment (Fig. 7.52). A special type of application using a polidocanol foam preparation has been presented in the literature for the treatment of varicose veins [23], which may also be used successfully for the treatment of venous malformations [24]. An equal amount of polidocanol and air is mixed by using a disposable three-way stopcock and two syringes. The air and liquid polidocanol are pumped through the stopcock from one syringe into the other until dense foam is formed [23] (Fig. 7.53). The stopcock may be gradually locked to reduce the opening of the hole and produce foam with tinier microbubbles and thicker texture. Afterward, the foam is injected as specified above under ultrasound guidance. In our experience, foam sclerotherapy has several advantages: foam provides better surface contact with the endothelium and therefore results in a better effect on the endothelial lining; it is highly echogenic and therefore the distribution of the sclerosant inside the malformations is better visualized with ultrasound compared with a liquid preparation.
Teaching Point
Polidocanol foam allows for better sonographic control of sclerotherapy and yields better results at a lower risk for complications.
Care must be taken to first fill the deep-lying caverns of a malformation (Fig. 7.52): if superficial parts fill with bubbles at the beginning of the injection, the deep-lying parts are no longer accessible because of overshadowing and a lack of needle visualization. Based on personal experience of foam sclerotherapy of varicose veins, because to our knowledge no data from larger controlled trials exist, we know that the risk of spilling the sclerosant into draining vessels and extravasation into the surrounding soft tissues is reduced with foam for the treatment of malformations.
8 Conclusion
Hemangiomas and vascular malformations are a complex subset of soft-tissue lesions. Their differentiation from other soft-tissue tumors and the correct classification of malformations and hemangiomas is important because it is the basis for adequate treatment. Ultrasound is the ideal first line modality for imaging and may be supplemented by MRI and MRA for further work-up. Invasive imaging such as arterial angiography or direct puncture phlebography is only needed for the planning and control of interventional treatment, but otherwise unnecessary. As hemangiomas and malformations are overtly complex in terms of clinical presentation, diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis, they must be covered by an interdisciplinary team of specialists dedicated to the management of these patients.
References
Mulliken JB, Glowacki J. Hemangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children: a classification based on endothelial characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69:412–22.
Burrows PE, Mulliken JB, Fellows KE, Strand RD. Childhood hemangiomas and vascular malformations: angiographic differentiation. Am J Roentgenol. 1983;141:483–8.
Enjolras O. Classification and management of the various superficial vascular anomalies: hemangiomas and vascular malformations. J Dermatol. 1997;24:701–10.
Kawanabe T, Wakita S, Harii K, Hayashi N, Inoue Y. Sclerotherapy of hemangiomas and vascular malformations in lips. Jpn J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;16:852–62.
Inoue Y, Wakita S, Yoshikawa K, et al. Evaluation of flow characteristics of soft-tissue vascular malformations using technetium-99 m labeled red blood cells. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999;26:367–72.
Kramer U, Ernemann U, Fenchel M, et al. Pretreatment evaluation of peripheral vascular malformations using low-dose contrast-enhanced time-resolved 3D MR angiography: initial results in 22 patients. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:702–11.
Dubois J, Patriquin HB, Garel L, et al. Soft tissue hemangiomas in infants and children: diagnosis using Doppler sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:247–52.
Paltiel HJ, Burrows PE, Kozakewich HPW, Zurakowski D, Mulliken JB. Soft tissue vascular anomalies: utility of US for diagnosis. Radiology. 2000;214:747–54.
Oe Y, Orr L, Laifer-Narin S, et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography as a novel tool for assessment of vascular malformations. J Angiogenesis Res. 2010;2:25.
Enjolras O, Riche MC, Merland JJ, Escnde JP. Management of alarming hemangiomas in infancy: a review of 25 cases. Pediatrics. 1990;85:491–8.
Taylor KJW, Ramos I, Carter D, Morse SS, Snower D, Fortune K. Correlation of Doppler US tumor signals with neovascular morphologic features. Radiology. 1988;166:57–62.
Hyodoh H, Masakazu H, Akiba H, et al. Peripheral vascular malformations: imaging, treatment approaches, and therapeutic issues. Radiographics. 2005;25:159–71.
Puig S, Casati B, Staudenherz A, Paya K. Vascular low-flow malformations in children: current concepts for classification, diagnosis and therapy. Eur J Radiol. 2005;53:35–45.
Puig S, Aref H, Chigot V, Bonin B, Brunelle F. Classification of venous malformations in children and implications for sclerotherapy. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33:99–103.
Dubois J, Soulez G, Oliva VL, et al. Soft-tissue venous malformations in adult patients: imaging and therapeutic issues. Radiographics. 2001;21:1519–31.
Trop I, Dubois J, Guibaud L, et al. Soft tissue venous malformations in pediatric and young adult patients: diagnosis with Doppler US. Radiology. 1999;212:841–5.
Abernethy LJ. Classification and imaging of vascular malformations in children. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:2483–97.
Blei F. Congenital lymphatic malformations. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2008;1131:185–94.
Impellizzeri P, Romeo C, Borruto FA, et al. Sclerotherapy for cervical cystic lymphatic malformations in children. Our experience with computed tomography-guided 98 % sterile ethanol insertion and a review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:2473–8.
Bloom DC, Perkins AJ, Manning SC. Management of lymphatic malformations. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;12:500–4.
Yun WS, Kim YW, Lee KB, et al. Predictors of response to percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy (PES) in patients with venous malformations: analysis of patient self-assessment and imaging. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50:581–9.
Jain R, Bandhu S, Sawhney S, Mittal R. Sonographically guided percutaneous sclerosis using 1 % polidocanol in the treatment of vascular malformations. J Clin Ultrasound. 2002;30:416–23.
Tessari L, Cavezzi A, Frullini A. Preliminary experience with a new sclerosing foam in the treatment of varicose veins. Dematol Surg. 2001;27:58–60.
Bergan J, Cheng V. Foam sclerotherapy of venous malformations. Phlebology. 2007;22(6):299–302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Peer, S., Wortsman, X. (2013). Hemangiomas and Vascular Malformations. In: Wortsman, X. (eds) Dermatologic Ultrasound with Clinical and Histologic Correlations. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7184-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7184-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7183-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7184-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)