Abstract
Oleiferous brassicas are interesting breeding material since they have a complete range of breeding systems ranging from complete range of cross-pollination to self-pollination. Besides improvement in production and productivity of various economically important brassicas, improvement in the nutritional profile of their oil and defatted meal, and development of traits like herbicide tolerance, male sterility, disease and insect-pest resistance, and development of hybrid cultivars remain the prime objectives for their genetic improvement. To achieve these goals, conventional breeding efforts in conjunction with modern biotechnological tools such as molecular marker-assisted selection, doubled haploidy breeding, in vitro mutagenesis, and transgenic technology offer a great promise. The doubled haploidy (DH) technology in combination with other biotechnological and conventional breeding tools has resulted in improvements in many yield and quality attributes in Brassicaceae. Interspecific and even intergeneric hybridizations have greatly helped in generating additional variability through the recovery of distant hybrids. Further, in vitro technologies such as microspore culture, and embryo and ovary rescue coupled with in vitro mutagenesis can also generate additional selection avenues by creating variability through gemetoclonal and somaclonal variation. This review focuses on breeding methods, which individually or in combination could be deployed for solving the pressing problems of male sterility and fertility restoration mechanisms for hybrid seed production in crop brassicas, their crossability improvement and generation of variability and quality improvement.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Brassicaceae
- Origin and evolution
- Double haploidy
- Molecular-assisted selection
- Transgenic technology
- Male sterility and fertility restoration
- In vitro mutagenesis
1 Introduction
Rapeseed–mustard is the most important source of vegetable oils after palm and soybean (Beckman 2005). The rapeseed production has witnessed a steady upward movement during the past 25 years. More recently, the introduction of low erucic acid varieties enhanced its value as edible oil, particularly among the health conscious consumers and varieties with low glucosinolates increased the value of its defatted meal for use as a feed for livestock. The development of double low varieties (canola) (Downey and Rakow 1987) has made rapeseed one of the major plant oil sources at the global level, and now there is a constant tendency to increase its share in the production of oilseeds (Bartkowiak-Broda et al. 2005). Oleiferous Brassicas are generally derived from two species, Brassica napus L. and B. campestris L. syn. B. rapa L. B. campestris is also referred to as toria, sarson, summer turnip rape, Polish rape, and so on. Similarly, different names are also given to B. napus such as Argentine rape, Swede rape, and colza. The name rape is derived from the Latin word “rapum,” which means turnip. All the rapeseed contributing cultivated Brassica species are highly polymorphic including oilseed crops, root crops, and vegetables such as Chinese cabbage, broccoli, and Brussels sprouts. However, a few of them are cultivated as salad, vegetable, and condiment crops as well.
B. juncea is of much importance in Asia and B. napus in Europe and Canada. Under European and Canadian conditions, both winter and summer (spring planted) forms of B. campestris (syn. B. rapa) and B. napus are being grown but in B. juncea, only spring form has evolved. Winter types of B. napus are largely grown under north-European, Chinese, and Canadian conditions (Rai et al. 2007). However, spring types of B. campestris are usually preferred and are largely grown in Sweden, Finland and some parts of Canada and north-west China. In the Indian subcontinent, genetic improvement of seed yield is the prime breeding objective while in Western world, breeding for quality receives greater attention (Jonsson 1973).
2 History
Early history suggests that rapeseed has been cultivated for several thousand years with its origins in Asia. Sanskrit writings of 2000–1500 bc directly refer to oleiferous B. napus forms (sarson types) and mustard. Seeds of B. juncea have been found in the archaeological sites in India dating back to ca 2300 bc (Prakash 1980; Weiss 1983). Two species, B. napus and B. campestris, having a range of morphotypes, are the crops of antiquity in India where much before the Christian era, they were used for many purposes including oil for cooking and frying, spice for seasoning food articles, vegetables, and for religious ceremonies (Mehra 1966). Since time immemorial, the Brassica crops have been a part and parcel of human agriculture system, and at present also they occupy a predominant place in the world’s agrarian economy. The Chinese word for rapeseed was first recorded ca 2500 years ago and the oldest archaeological discoveries may date back as far as to ca 5000 bc (Yan 1990). The Greek, Roman, and Chinese writings of 500–200 bc refer to rapiferous forms of B. rapa and also describe their medicinal values (Downey and Robellen 1989). Seeds of B. juncea have been excavated from Chanhudaro, a site of Indus Valley civilization that existed in the plains of Punjab along the river of Indus ca 2300–1750 (Piggot 1950). Species from the genus Brassica were cultivated in ancient Rome and also in Gallia (Fussel 1955), and seeds of these species had also been found in the old German graves and Swiss constructions from the Bronze Age (Neuweiller 1905; Schiemann 1932; Witmack 1904). In Dodoneus’s “Herbalist” (1578), a mention has been made regarding the growing of B. rapa var. rapifera in 1470 as a winter crop. In his “Herball,” Gerarde (1597) had very clearly differentiated between turnips (B. rapa) and nevews (B. napus). Rape has been recorded as an oilseed crop in Europe at least since the Middle Ages, but it is still uncertain which species was cultivated (Appelquist and Ohlson 1972).
Domestication of rapeseed in Europe appears to have started in the early Middle Ages, although the true turnip was probably introduced by Romans. Since many other oil-yielding plants, particularly olive tree, were available in southern Europe, B. rapa initially spread mainly as turnip rape crop within Europe. However, in more prosperous countries like the Netherlands, the farmers used almost all Brassica seeds to produce vegetable oils. Oil was extracted from “raepsaet, koolaet, and mostaert saet” according to a Dutch reference of fourteenth century, which means “the seeds of B. rapa, B. oleracea, and B. nigra (or Sinapis alba)” (Reiner et al. 1995). As B. rapa was most intensively grown at that time, it can be concluded that this crop was the major source of producing large quantities of vegetable oils. Seeds of B. rapa were first recorded in Europe in 1620 by the Swiss botanist Casper Banhin. However, Boswell (1949) was of the view that these existed much earlier than this. As per some anonymous authors, rapeseed was grown in Europe as early as in the thirteenth century.
In the Netherlands, the commercial plantings of rapeseed were recorded in the early sixteenth century. It had limited industrial use at that time until the development of steam power, when it was discovered that rape oil was an excellent lubricant for steam engines. B. rapa was the dominant species in the western Canada in the early 1970s. It is comparatively a recent introduction in Canada and the United States and is found as an occasional weed or volunteer in the cultivated fields (Muenscher 1980; Munz 1968). In late 1980s, large acreages of B. rapa and B. napus were grown in the Prairie Provinces and these crops gradually started getting established. However, the production area sown to B. rapa decreased to about 15–20% in 1990s (The Biology of Brassica rapa 1999). In Austria, the annual wild-type B. rapa is found as a weed in rye and potato crops situated in relatively cool and high areas with an altitude of about 1,000 m (Holzner 1981). In the 1970s, the information on its distribution had been very uncertain due to incross and possibility of its escape from culture (Reiner et al. 1995). Canola is a modern, high-quality form of rapeseed and it has originated in Canada through genetic modification and emerged in the 1970s as a viable oilseed, equipped with the appropriate genetics to transform the oil and meal from unacceptable to highly desired products for both human as well as livestock consumption (Shahidi 1990). Today, the fatty acid profile of canola is considered as the most desirable of all vegetable oil profiles by nutritionists (Stringam et al. 2003). Although superior edible oils had been developed by 1971, the presence of high amount of glucosinolates in the meal still remained a major concern in the expansion of market of the vegetable oil derived from Brassicas. In 1974, Dr. Baldur Stefansson from the University of Manitoba successfully developed the first “double low” variety with reduced levels of both erucic acid and glucosinolates (www.canola-council.org). This led to the evolution of a greatly improved crop, which met specific quality requirements of an oilseed fit for human as well as livestock consumption. As a result of these improvements, the FDA gave GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status to rapeseed oil in 1985 for use in the U.S. food products. The word “canola” was coined and trademarked for such type of rapeseed products, low in both glucosinolates and erucic acid to distinguish them from traditional rapeseed. The name canola was initially registered by the Western Canadian Oilseed Crushers’ Association for reference to oil, meal, protein extractions, seed, and seed hulls from or of varieties with 5% or less erucic acid in the oil and 3 mg/g of glucosinolates (www.canola-council.org). Later, the control of the term was transferred to the Rapeseed Association of Canada in 1980, which subsequently changed its name to Canola Council of Canada (2006). The new target of achieving the ideal glucosinolate level at 15 μmol is underway. Keeping the above facts in view, it may be conveniently inferred that all canola is rapeseed but all rapeseed is not canola.
3 Origin and Evolution
The Brassica genus is a very complex member of the Cruciferae family, and as such it contains many cultivated plants and wild species. It, therefore, possesses several taxonomic and classification problems. Also, there is a lack of consistency in the names of different oil-yielding Brassicas throughout the globe, which aggravates the problem further. The scientific nomenclature is highly confusing, which makes it difficult for many to decide as to what particular scientific name should be used for a particular plant. Bailey (1922) has listed many reasons responsible for the chaotic nomenclature of Brassicas.
The cytogenetic relationships between the rapeseed species as well as their closest allies were first explained systematically by U (1935) about 70 years ago. These relationships show that B. campestris (2n = 20, AA), B. nigra (2n = 16, BB) and B. oleracea (2n = 18, CC) are the primary species and B. napus (2n = 38, AACC), B. carinata (2n = 34, BBCC) and B. juncea (2n = 36, AABB) are the amphidiploids resulting from paired crossings between the primary species. Morinaga (1928, 1929a, b, 1934a, b) discussed that crop Brassicas include six cotydeme three elementary ones with 16, 18, and 20 chromosomes as diploid and three with higher chromosome numbers of 34, 36, and 38 as tetraploid, the latter having evolved through interspecific hybridization in nature between any two of the elementary taxa (Table 3.1). Morinaga and his associates carried extensive cytogenetic studies in oilseed Brassicas and clarified the relationships between them (Prakash and Hinata 1980). According to the hypothesis of Morinaga (1934a, b), the three species with the higher chromosome number, B. napus L., B. juncea L. Czern. and Coss., and B. carinata A. Braun, are amphidiploids combining in pairs the chromosome sets of the low chromosome number species B. nigra, B. oleracea, and B. rapa. U (1935) verified the hypothesis with successful resynthesis of B. napus. Resynthesis of B. juncea and B. carinata was accomplished by Frandsen (1943, 1947). Robellen (1960) suggested that the low chromosome number species might have developed from the ancestral species, which could have even lower chromosome numbers. Also the chromosome analysis of the monogenomic species revealed that only six chromosomes were distinctly different, the remaining being homologous with one or another of the basic set of six.
4 Breeding Objectives for Varietal Development
Oilseed Brassicas includes number of crop species which have an amalgam of breeding systems ranging from complete cross-pollination to a high level of self-pollination. Therefore, they are quite interesting material from the breeding point of view. The different crop species of this group of crop, B campestris var. toria, lotni brown sarson, Banarasi rai (B. nigra), taramira (Eruca sativa), and so on, are highly cross-pollinated (because of the presence of self-incompatibility, presence of bright yellow opened petals, entomophily, high sucrose content ranging from 40 to 60% in their nectaries to attract honeybees and the extrorse anther condition which turns away from the stigmatic surface at the time of dehiscence), whereas B. juncea, gobhi sarson (B. napus), karan rai (B. carinata), tora brown sarson (B. campestris), and so on, are predominantly self-pollinated (because of the absence of self-incompatibility), light pale yellow petal color, low sucrose content (5–11) in the nectaries and introrse anther condition. However, even in the self-pollinated group, due to stray pollen contamination and visit by honeybees, bumble bees, and so on, the extent of outcrossing varies from 14 to 30% (Rai and Singh 1976; Rakow and Woods 1987; Rambhajan Chauhan and Kumar 1991; Singh 1958). The self-incompatibility is of homomorphic sporophytic type (Bateman 1955) and is genetically controlled by a series of “S” alleles. The presence of same allele in the pollen and stigma will inhibit the germination of the pollen grains or will prevent the pollen tube from penetrating the stigmatic surface of the style and effecting fertilization. The evolution of mating system in genus Brassica is also very interesting. There is strong intergenomic interaction affecting the mode of pollination. The three primary, monogenomic species are highly cross-pollinated, whereas their amphidiploid products are predominantly self-pollinated. The commercially cultivated species B. campestris, however, contains both self-compatible (yellow sarson, torabrown sarson) and self-incompatible forms (toria, lotni brown sarson). In this crop species, Iotni brown sarson appears to be the logical progenitor of its different cultivated forms. The evolution in this crop species has followed two independent pathways. On one hand, toria type has evolved as an escape from the onslaught of the biotic and abiotic stresses but retained its self-incompatibility gene complex. The early maturity (75–100 days) makes it a better material to survive the stresses imposed by frost injury, aphid infestation, and the threat from Alternaria leaf blight disease in comparison to its parental form lotni brown sarson, which usually takes 125–140 days for crop maturity and suffers heavily on account of these stresses. There is very good morphological similarity, chromosomal homology, and cross-compatibility between toria and Iotni brown sarson. The only visible difference between them is their relative number of days taken to crop maturity. On the other hand, tora brown sarson has evolved from lotni types, this is primarily because of the cultivator’s preferences for the bold seeds, uniform types, and tall growing plants, which are considered very suitable for the mixed or intercropping systems being followed by the farmers. However, in the long process of human selection for uniformity, the self-incompatibility gene complex has been lost. Later, as a result of macromutation(s) in tora brown sarson, the yellow sarson types have evolved and have been retained by the farmers for better seed and quality values. However, in India these types are being replaced by the B. juncea types because of their better yield performance, stability of production, and comparatively better tolerance to various biotic and abiotic stresses. Under European and Canadian conditions, both winter and summer (spring planted) forms of B. campestris and B. napus are being grown. But in B. juncea, only the spring form has evolved. Winter types of Gobhi sarson (B. napus) are largely grown under north European, Chinese, and Canadian conditions. But because of the short crop growing period and comparatively better winter hardiness, spring types of B. campestris are usually preferred and are largely grown in Sweden, Finland, and some parts of Canada and northwest China. In Indian subcontinent, the spring types of B. juncea and B. campestris cultivars are largely grown. Serious attempts are now being made to introduce B. napus for cultivation in northwest India but on the whole, B. napus is the dominant commercial species and covers nearly 75% of the total cropped area under oilseed Brassicas. It is, thus, clear that toria, Iotni brown sarson, taramira, B. nigra, and B. tournefortii are highly cross-pollinated crops, and maintain very high degree of heterozygosity. Panmixis generation after generation in nature eventually frustrates the efforts of enforced inbreeding or the fixation of genotypes. Hence, in such outbreeding population, breeding superior performing cultivars with high yield would obviously require adoption of a breeding procedure which maintains the balanced heterozygosity for the optimum plant productivity. This could be accomplished through selection (mass selection, recurrent selection, disruptive selection, and so on), breeding of synthetic and composite varieties, and ultimately by developing superior performing hybrids. On the other hand, for breeding purpose, the predominantly self-pollinated crops, such as yellow sarson, mustard (B. juncea), gobhi sarson (B. napus), B. carinata, and so on, should be treated as often cross-pollinated crops. The breeding objectives and appropriate breeding procedures for this group of crops are discussed in this chapter.
In the Indian subcontinent, genetic improvement of seed yield is the prime breeding objective, while in the western world, breeding for quality receives greater attention. In the Asian countries, centuries of rapeseed and mustard cultivation have led to the development of local land races of B. juncea and B. campestris, and these now form the basic raw material for the breeders.
In these crops, high number of siliquae/plant and more number of seeds/siliquae have been observed to be important yield attributes associated with its higher yield expression and could form suitable criteria to breed for high seed yield (Anand et al. 1975; Nagalakshmi 1992; Ramanujam and Rai 1963; Shabana et al. 1990). Dry matter accumulation at rosette stage and leaf area index (LAI) has also been observed to be positively associated with seed yield (Olsson 1990). Early maturing varieties (80–90 days) are usually required in the Indian subcontinent for fitting in the relay, multiple, and intercropping systems. These are suitable for escaping frost injury and for growing in the drought-prone or dryland areas with scanty rainfall.
Development of high yielding, early maturing varieties is also a major breeding objective in central China and in western Canada where frost-free days in growing season are usually less than 100 days. The early maturing varieties complete their life cycle during this period and escape the frost injury. All over the world, breeding for resistance to diseases and insect pests has become as important breeding objective. In the Indian subcontinent, Alternaria leaf blight, white rust, downy, and powdery mildews are the major diseases, while in the western countries, blackleg (Leptosphaeria maculans Desm.) is important in Canada and Australia. Some other diseases which could cause considerable economic losses to these crops are clubroot (Plasmodiophora brassicae), root rot (Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn), stem root, and so on. In some areas, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) could pose an equal or even greater threat to cultivation of Brassicas than the blackleg disease. Races of white rust (Albugo candida) that could attack B. campestris (Race 7) and B. juncea (Race 2) have been identified (Pidskalny and Rimmer 1985).
European and Canadian B. napus cultivars are resistant to all known races of white rust, but many Chinese varieties are susceptible to Race 7 (Fan et al. 1983a, b). B. juncea varieties possess comparatively better field tolerance to leaf blight caused by Alternaria brassicae than that of the B. campestris selection (Rai et al. 1976). B. carinata selections have also been observed to show comparatively better tolerance to leaf blight than other B. campestris or B. juncea selections (Bansal et al. 1990). In the Indian subcontinent, mustard aphid (Lipaphis erysimi Kalt.), mustard sawfly (Athalia proxima), and leaf miner (Bagrada cruciferarum) are the important insect pests that cause considerable economic losses. B. juncea selections are reported to possess better tolerance to mustard aphid than B. campestris selection (Rai and Sehgal 1975; Rai et al. 1987). In B. campestris, two potential sources of dwarfing genes have been reported, and it has been suggested that they could be utilized meaningfully in developing semidwarf cultivars of toria and sarson for cultivation under high population densities for obtaining high seed yield (Rai and Kumar 1978; Rai and Singh 1993; Tyagi et al. 1983). The comparatively better salt tolerance of B. juncea than of B. campestris has made it a better choice for its cultivation under the salt-affected soils of north-western Indian states. The relative ability of the spring rapeseed cultivars to withstand the onslaught of frost at flowering time is considered important in northwest India and Sweden. There is a variable reaction of the Indian and Swedish cultivars for the frost tolerance (Aberg 1984). Several biotechnology groups are now working to transfer genes for tolerance to glyphosate, chlorosulfuron, and other herbicides into the agronomic background of the various oilseed Brassica varieties.
In Europe and Canada, breeding for oil and cake better suited to human nutrition, and livestock feeding has received higher research priority than anywhere in the Asian countries. While a high erucic acid rape oil is liked by industry, zero or low glucosinolate (00) oil is usually required for the human consumption. The rapeseed oil with zero erucic acid content is more or less parallel to groundnut or sesamum oil in its fatty acid composition. Consumers in east Indian states usually prefer mustard oil with pungency for frying fish or preparing pickles, while those in the west Indian states prefer oil with low pungency (Rai 1976). Now the development of “00” or canola quality varieties has been developed in different parts of the world.
4.1 Genetic Resources
The success of any crop breeding program normally depends on the extent of favorable genes available in the genetic stocks handled by the breeders. At international level, IBPGR collects, maintains, and handles the genetic diversity of a number of agrihorticultural crops. In India, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (NBPGR) conserves about 19,600 accessions of different oilseed crops including 4,584 of the oilseed Brassicas and its wild allies. These are now being conserved under long-term storagein gene banks for its possible use in future (Singh and Rana 1994).
All these genetic stocks are being maintained by either sibmating or selfing. Under field conditions, an isolation distance of 400 m is required to be maintained. In the insect proof cages, glass house chambers, sibmating of the culture is affected by introducing honeybee. Pure stocks of the self-incompatible inbred lines have to be maintained by bud pollination and by selfing under muslin cloth bags in self-compatible lines. Over years, a number of genetic stocks have been identified for desirable agronomical attributes like earliness, tolerance or resistance to diseases and insect pests, shattering, frost tolerance, and so on. Some of these genetic stocks are now being utilized in crossing programs in India in intervarietal and interspecific crosses to create new genetic variability, and some are being utilized as base population for selection work. The exotic cultivars have so far not been used for direct commercial cultivation in India because of their late maturity and low yield.
4.2 Sources of Creating New Genetic Variability
In rapeseed, hybridization is accomplished by emasculating the flower buds that are due to open the following day. Next day, stigma of emasculated buds are dusted with the freshly dehisced pollen from the stamen of selected plant. Under storage conditions, pollen viability has been observed to last up to 35 days (Chiang 1974). In oilseed Brassicas, because of the cross-pollinating nature of the primary species, enough variability is available, but for searching new desired genes or gene complexes for resistance to diseases, insect pests, male sterility, fertility restoration, and so on, it requires to resort to purposeful intervarietal or distant hybridizations. Intraspecific crosses (i.e., in case of B. campestris; crosses between tora, Iotni brown sarson, tora brown sarson, and yellow sarson cultivars) are much successful and the success rate for such crosses, if carefully made, is greater than 90% and a single emasculated and pollinated bud may yield 10–20 crossed seeds per siliquae. However, the success rate of interspecific hybridization depends much on the genetic relationship, genomic constitution of parental species used, and also on the direction of cross. In general, the interspecific hybridization is more successful, if an amphidiploids species (B. juncea, B. napus, or B. carinata) is used as the female parent, which has one genome in common with the pollen parent. Hybrid between monogenomic primary species are rather more difficult to be obtained with success rate of 0.002 and 0.03 hybrids per pollinated flower (Downey et al. 1980; Mahapatra and Bajaj 1987; Quazi 1988). The basic understanding of crossability relationship among the oilseed Brassica species is important to the breeders of these crops because there are good possibilities of transferring agronomically important attributes like diseases and insect pest resistance, cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS), fertility restoration, desirable quality attributes, and so on. Rao (1990) observed that out of six possible combinations between B. juncea, B. napus, and B. carinata including reciprocals, the B. juncea × B. napus cross was easier to be made. B. juncea × B. napus hybrid plants were observed to be more vigorous than their reciprocal. Good success was also obtained in B. napus × B. carinata, but the hybridization between B. carinata × B. juncea in either direction was rather difficult, primarily because of their nonsynchrony of flowering rather than any of its crossability barriers. In elaborate fraction I protein analysis and restriction pattern of chloroplast DNA studies, B. nigra and B. campestris have been identified as the female parental genomes in B. carinata and B. juncea, respectively (Uchimiya and Wildman 1978), and B. oleracea as the female parent of B. napus (Ichikawa and Hirai 1983; Prakash and Chopra 1991; Raut and Prakash 1985). It has now been possible to transfer blackleg-resistant genes from B. juncea to B. napus because of possible recombination between A and C genomes in B. juncea crosses and A and B genomes in B. carinata crosses (Sacristan and Gerdemann 1986). A line completely resistant to blackleg disease caused by L. maculans was selected from the F3 progenies of cross B. juncea × B. napus (Roy 1984). Resistance to P. brassicae has also been transferred from B. napus to B. oleracea (Chiang and Crete 1983). Same resistance has also been transferred to B. napus from B. campestris by subsequent backcrossing with B. napus. When a white rust-resistant line of B. carinata was crossed with that of B. juncea, the F1 was observed to be resistant to white rust with some additional resistance to A. brassicae. This has shown the possibility of transferring white rust resistance from B. carinata to B. juncea (Singh and Singh 1987, 1988). The Swedish rapeseed cultivar 821 has been developed from the cross B. napus × B. chinensis (He et al. 1987). The triazine resistance has been transferred from B. napus to B. oleracea (Ayotte et al. 1986, 1987). CMS has been transferred from B. juncea to B. napus through interspecific hybridization followed by four generations of blackcrossing (Mathias 1985). The CMS was transferred from radish to B. oleracea (Bannerot et al. 1974; Mc Collum 1988). The fertility restorer genes for Polima-type CMS system of B. napus has been found in the B. napus var. Zem (Fan and Tai 1985). Genes for earliness have also been introgressed from B. napus and B. carinata to B. napus varieties. The genes for high linoleic acid have been transferred from B. napus to B. napus through selection in F2 generation (Roy and Tarr 1985; 1986). There are good possibilities of incorporating shattering resistance from B. napus and B. carinata to B. napus cultivars (Prakash and Chopra 1988; Rao 1990). Wide hybridization has been reported with some degree of success in the crosses of B. spinescens (2n = 16) × B. campestris (2n = 20) and for the production of B. napus × Raphanobrassica hybrids (Agnihotri et al. 1990a, b, c) by embryo rescue and ovary culture techniques. Protoplast fusion has helped in obtaining somatic hybrids of B. oleracea with Moricandia arvensis which possess intermediates C3–C4 photosynthesis carbon metabolism (Toriyama et al. 1987). From the above-mentioned examples, it is clear that both interspecific and intergeneric hybridizations have much potential for creating new variability for rapeseed improvement. The fact is that the available natural variability of oilseed Brassica Landraces/germplasm has not yet been fully tapped and exploited with a few exceptions. If we search systematically, the needed characteristics could be found within the species of interest from close relatives. Few examples include spotting of the needed early maturing selections of B. napus in India and Canada, vary widely in seed size, oil content in B. napus in India, resistance to white rust, and blackleg in B. napus and B. campestris in France and Australia. But wherever usable variability is not available in the working germplasm, the induced mutagenesis could as well be explored and utilized.
4.3 Induced Mutagenesis for Creating New Variability
Induced mutagenesis is a useful tool for creating new variability hitherto not available, and a number of studies utilizing ionizing radiations (X-rays and cobalt 60) and chemicals such as ethylemethane sulfonate (EMS) have been used. Usually 60–80 Kr doses of rays are quite effective. Induced mutagenesis has been used to obtain mutant lines with 3% linolenic acid in B. napus (Rakow 1973; Robbelen and Nitsch 1974), for spotting seed color mutant in mustard (Verma and Rai 1980a), and for tolerance to leaf spot disease (Verma and Rai 1980b). It has also been very helpful in developing a number of rapeseed varieties in Sweden. Induced mutagenesis has also been used to create new variability for earliness, compact plant type, and yellow seed color in mustard at Bhaba Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, India. Two high-yielding lines of mustard (TM2 and T4) have emanated from this program.
5 Breeding Methods
Crucifers includes number of cultivated crops and wild species that have a breeding system ranging from complete cross-pollination to a high level of self-pollination. Therefore, these are quite interesting material from the breeding point of view. Selection procedure in cross-pollinated species vary from mass selection to recurrent selection and in predominantly self-pollinated ones, the desirable plants are usually selected from broad base population such as land races, segregated population, germplasm complexes, gene pools, etc., and are bulked. This bulked seed is repeatedly grown cycle after cycle. One cycle of mass selection in toria is reported to have given a yield improvement of 8.2% (Chaubey 1979).
Segregating populations or the progenies from the crosses could also make good base population for initiating recurrent selection program. In this method, the desirable individual open-pollinated plants (around 3,000) are harvested and threshed separately. A part of this seed is saved and other part of it is planted in a progeny rows, evaluated visually and superior rows are selected, tagged and harvested separately. After harvesting and threshing, the seeds are analyzed for their 1,000-seed weight, oil content, glucosinolates and protein content, etc. Thereafter, equal quantities of the reserved seed from the selected plants are composited. This way, the first of recurrent selection cycle is completed and this composited seed is grown again in field in isolation, where intercrossing takes place among the plants within the composited populations. The second cycle of recurrent selection starts with the harvesting of the single plants (around 1,000) from this population. A bulk seed sample is harvested from the remaining plants of the population for use in replicated yield trials to determine response to selection in each recurrent cycle for character under improvement viz., oil content, seed yield or tolerance to a disease. Recurrent cycle selection is continued till reasonable level of improvement is achieved.
In self-pollinated crucifers, pure line selection is usually followed in India, which involves the isolation of superior performing lines from a genetically broad base population based upon their progeny performance. Various improved varieties like Varuna, Krishna, Kranti, Shekhar, Sita, RH-30 and Durgamani have all been developed from such simple breeding efforts (Rai 1983a, b).
6 Pedigree Method
This method may be effectively utilized for concentrating favorable genes for various economic traits and has been used to produce many cultivars in B. napus and B. juncea. In India, various high yielding varieties were developed following the pedigree selection. In this method, 5–10 F1 plants are grown to obtain F2 seed and 1,000–3,000 F2 plants are grown and harvested individually from which F3 progenies are secured. In F4 generation, the selection is practiced. The variation among F4 families is a good indication for the effectiveness of further selection. This method has been utilized to develop a low erucic acid high yielding and winter hardy B. napus variety from a cross between high erucic winter B. napus variety “Rapol” and the low erucic acid spring B. napus variety “Oro.”
7 Backcross Breeding
When the desirable gene is available from unadapted or wild population, backcrossing would be the right choice, but if the favorable gene is available in an adapted or cultivated material’s background, then pedigree method of selection would be the most appropriate procedure. The spring B. napus variety “Wester” had been developed by a combination of backcross and pedigree breeding. Backcross breeding has been used to transfer the low glucosinolate content of B. napus variety Bronowski, into a number of commercial cultivars of Gobhi Sarson (B. napus) in various parts of the world. This method is also used to transfer new traits such as fatty acid composition, seed color, herbicide, and insect-pest resistance.
8 Development of Synthetics and Composites
In Indian subcontinent, development of composite varieties is being viewed as a possible way out for increasing the average yield production of Brassicas as these are largely grown under the rainfed conditions. These are subjected to all sorts of biotic and abiotic stresses (Rai 1979). Although synthetic in B. napus cultivars were also marketed in Europe, they were often not uniform and therefore this method of breeding is no longer used in B. napus. In Canada, efforts to develop synthetic in spring B. napus were not very encouraging for successful commercial cultivation. The composite breeding program in B. rapa and other Brassicas usually involves the production of number of intervarietal hybrid or by making their blends. This is followed by evaluation of inbreeding depression in seed yield from F2 and later generation and the evaluation of the performance of the experimental checks against the ruling checks (Rai 1982).
Development of synthetic varieties requires the development of inbred lines, their testing for general combining ability (GCA) by making all possible cross-combinations, predicting F2 performance constituting a number of experimental synthetic, testing the yield in trials over location and finally releasing those which excel the standard check.
9 Development of Hybrids
The basic requirement for developing commercial hybrids in crops like rapeseed is the availability of proven experimental hybrids (preferably with more than 20% standard yield heterosis), stable performing male sterile (A), maintainer (B), and fertility restoring (R) lines, good synchrony of flowering in seed and pollen parent, and adequate seed setting on male sterile seed parent through natural cross-pollination. High level of heterosis for seed yield in both spring and winter forms of B. napus, that is, quantitatively, 40% heterosis for yield has been reported in summer rape and 60–70% for winter form (Grant and Beversdorf 1985; Lefort-Buson and Datte 1982; Sernyk and Stefansson 1983).
A number of initial studies have demonstrated that there is considerable heterosis for yield in brassicas (Schuster and Michael 1976; Lefort-Buson and Dattee 1982), B. rapa (Sernyk and Stefansson 1983 ; Schuler et al. 1992) and B. juncea (Singh 1973; Larik and Hussain 1990; Pradhan et al. 1993). In India, 11–82% check parent yield heterosis has been reported in mustard (B. juncea), 10–72% in Gobhi Sarson, and 20–107% in B. campestris (Das and Rai 1972; Labana et al. 1975; Yadava et al. 1974; Doloi 1977; Srivastava and Rai 1993), which is sufficiently high for its exploitation in hybrid cultivars. A range of 14–30% natural outcrossing is usually observed in these crops. So, this is sufficient to justify the efforts to develop cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS) lines and search for usable fertility restorer lines for producing the hybrids.
In oilseed Brassicas, a number of CMS sources viz., Brassica carinata CMS, B. juncea CMS, B. oryrhina CMS, B. tournefortii CMS, Raphanus-based ogura CMS, B. napus-based Polima CMS, Siettiana CMS, Siifolia CMS, etc., are now well known and some of them are being worked with rather intensively. Out of these CMS sources, fertility restoration has been identified in Raphanus-based Ogura CMS, Polima CMS in the western countries and it has been detected in the CMS-based crosses in B. tournefortii, B. juncea CMS, Polima CMS, and Siifolia CMS in India. Fortunately, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana in India has recommended to release first CMS-based Gobhi Sarson hybrid PGSH-51 for cultivation in Punjab state in India.
9.1 Commercial Hybrids in B. campestris
High level of exploitable yield heterosis has been reported in B. campestris hybrids (Das and Rai 1972; Hutchenson et al. 1981). In this species, CMS system has been developed by backcrossing B. campestris cultivar “Yukina” into the Diplotaxis muralis cytoplasm (Hinata and Konno 1979). The B. campestris “yukina” CMS was stable and restorer genes have been identified for this CMS source but the genes for maintenance of CMS will have to be transferred into the background of the adapted commercial cultivars of B. campestris before the hybrids could be put to test in B. campestris. In China, where adequate labor is available, gobhi sarson hybrids have been produced utilizing this type of male sterility (Lee and Zhang 1983).
9.2 Self-Incompatibility and Hybrid Seed Production
On the basis of sporophytic type of self-incompatibility, a theoretical model of triple cross [(A × B) × C] × [(D × E) × F] technique has been suggested by Thompson (1964) to exploit heterosis and produce commercial hybrid in these crops. However, practically it has not been put to commercial use. The difficulties of producing commercial quantities of selfed seeds of self-incompatible parental lines of the hybrid and also difficulties in detecting the breakdown of self-incompatibility in the production plots during flowering duration make it rather economically unviable and unprofitable. Self-incompatibility is a good outbreeding mechanism in nature, but unfortunately, due to very high self-incompatibility, heterozygosity, and as a result of high inbreeding depression, it frustrates the efforts to produce and maintain the homozygous lines which could produce the hybrid cultivars. It is a difficult task to maintain the inbred lines through continued selfing, primarily because of big loss of vigor of the inbred population to grow and produce seeds.
10 Artificial Synthesis of Amphidiploids for Commercial Cultivation
The commonest choice for direct interspecific hybridization is to double the chromosome number in the sterile hybrids and to establish fertile amphidiploids. This provides stability and could help in the preservation of gene complexes of both the componential species by enhancing the preferential pairing of the homologous chromosomes. Artificial synthesis of some of the commercially cultivated amphidiploid species, viz., B. napus, B. napus, and B. carinata has been reported long back (Frandsen 1943; Ramanujam and Srinivasachar 1943; UN 1935). Artificial synthesis of B. napus and B. carinata is comparatively easier than B. napus. Synthesis of B. napus has added to the usable variability for use in India. Undoubtedly, the derivatives of synthetic B. napus, B. napus, and B. carinata could provide additional material for widening the range of genetic variability. It is now possible to use some of these resynthesized digenomic strains in interspecific hybridization via backcross to obtain useful genotypes for commercial production programs. At IARI, New Delhi, Raut and Kaul (1982), Raut and Prakash (1985), and Prakash and Raut (1983) have synthesized early maturing and productive amphidiploids of B. napus by crossing early indigenous strain of B. campestris var. Iotni brown sarson with that of B. oleracea var. botrytis. The selections obtained are now being field tested for their comparative yield performance with commercial check varieties. The efforts to produce and improve tetroploids of toria variety T22 (Rajan 1955; Sikka and Rajan 1957) and various yellow sarson strains for genetic improvement of seed and oil yield has not met with much of success, though the induced tetraploidy has been of some use in developing high yielding fodder varieties of Brassicas in west European countries.
11 Development of Herbicide Tolerant Cultivars
Herbicides provide an inexpensive and effective means of control of weeds in crop Brassica. Development of herbicide-resistant cultivar in Brassica was started in 1960. The tolerance was cytoplasmically controlled and effective against triazine family of herbicide. Identification of triazine-tolerant biotype of bird’s rape mustard led to the development of triazine-tolerant B. napus oilseed cultivars through introgression of the tolerant weed biotype cytoplasm in oilseed rape. Through an interspecific cross and backcross program, the tolerant cytoplasm of B. campestris was combined with the nucleus of B. napus to produce the first triazine-tolerant cultivar, OAC Trinton (Beversdorf et al. 1980). Triazine-tolerant B. napus cultivars are very useful and indeed essential in fields, where highly competitive weeds such as wild mustard (S. arvensis L.),stickweed (Thlaspi arvense L.), and quack grass (Agropyron repens L.) are found, suggesting that the growth rate and yield of triazine-tolerant cultivars will always be significant than that of recurrent parent (Downey and Rimmer 1993).
12 Development of Alternaria Blight and Aphid-Resistant Cultivars
Breeding for resistance to diseases and insect pests has now become an important breeding objective. In the Indian subcontinent, Alternaria leaf blight, white rust, and downy and powdery mildews are the major diseases in rapeseed, while in the Western countries, blackleg (L. maculans dasm.) is important in Canada and Australia. Yield losses may range up to 70% varying from location to location and year to year. No resistance has been reported against this disease in oilseed Brassicas. However, some of the interspecific crosses have been attempted between B. napus and B. alba with an objective to transfer Alternaria resistance from B. alba to B. napus (Brim et al. 1987; Chevre et al. 1991; Dueck and Degenhardt 1975; Rai 1976). Tewari (1991) have shown that more distantly related Crucifereae species may be very resistant to black spot. Some other diseases, which could cause considerable economic losses to these crops, are clubroot (P. brassicae), root rot (R. I Kuhn), stem rot, and so on. In some areas, S. sclerotiorum (Lib.) could pose an equal or even greater threat to the cultivation of Brassicas than blackleg disease. Races of white rust (A. candida) that could attack B. campestris (Race 7) and B. napus (Race 2) have been identified (Pidskalny and Rimmer 1985). European and Canadian B. napus cultivars are resistant to all known races of white rust but many Chinese varieties are susceptible to Race 7 (Fan et al. 1983). B. napus varieties possess comparatively better field tolerance to A. brassiceae-caused leaf blight than that of the B. campestris selections (Rai 1976). B. carinata selections have also been observed to show comparatively better tolerance than other B. campestris or B. napus selections (Bansal et al. 1990). In the Indian subcontinent, mustard aphid (L. erysimi Kalt.), mustard sawfly (Sathalia proxima), and leaf minor (B. cruciferarum) are the important insect pests that affect and cause economic losses. B. napus selections possess better tolerance to mustard aphid than B. campestris selections (Rai and Sehgal 1975; Rai et al. 1987).
13 DH Breeding and In Vitro Mutagenesis
Doubled haploidy (DH) breeding through microspore culture is very well developed in Brassicas (Maluszynski et al. 2003; Xu et al. 2007). The DH technology in Brassicas aims at developing fully homozygous plants in a single generation, which could be further used in mutation breeding, genetic engineering, in vitro screening for complex traits like drought, cold and salinity tolerance, and for developing mapping populations for linkage maps using molecular markers (Pratap et al. 2007). Several methods are available for DH production in Brassicas such as microspore culture, anther culture, and ovary/ovule culture. The possibility to produce haploids in B. napus from anther culture (Keller and Armstrong 1978) and microspore culture (Lichter 1982) has provided the breeders with a new tool for breeding improved cultivars of rapeseed and mustard (Zhou et al. 2002a, b).
The initiation of microspore culture experiments was followed by extensive investigations on various aspects of embryogenesis in anther and microspore culture and as a result, DH technology has been developed to its present form in Brassicas (Charne and Beversdorf 1988; Yu and Liu 1995; Wang et al. 1999, 2002; Shi et al. 2002). Microspore culture technique has widespread applications in Brassica breeding due to its relative simplicity, efficiency in haploid and doubled haploid production, mutation and germplasm regeneration, and gene transformation (Xu et al. 2007). Also microspore cultures provide the best material for mutation induction in haploid cells (Szarejko and Forster 2007). Microspore embryogenesis is affected by a number of factors such as donor plant genotype and conditions, pretreatment, growth stage of the anther/microspore to be cultured, culture media and environment, and diploidization process, etc. (Dunwell 1996; Gu et al. 2003, 2004; Zhang et al. 2006; Pratap et al. 2007).
Mutagenic treatments may have significant effects on the efficiency of DH breeding. McDonald et al. (1991) reported that UV light had harmful effects on embryo formation in rapeseed though regeneration remained unaffected and at the same time, gamma irradiation decreased the frequency of embryos and plants. The induction of mutation in haploid cells involves isolating the developing microspores at the late uninucleate stage followed by pretreatment and their culturing on specialized media, which lead to direct embryogenesis rather than formation of pollen (Szarejko and Forster 2007). Mutagenic treatment is given shortly after the isolation of microspores or after pretreatment, before the first nuclear division. Due to direct embryogenesis, uninucleate microspore is the ideal target for in vitro mutagenesis. Also, microspores are far more sensitive to mutagenic treatments than other explants and therefore yielded better results.
DHs also provide an efficient screening material for the desired mutants and other material for complex traits. Since through microspore-derived DHs we can obtain a very large number of synchronously developing embryos, we can modify the system to screen them in vitro for various desirable traits. For example, for development of herbicide-resistant Brassicas, the active chemical is introduced in the culture medium after mutation treatment (Beversdorf and Kott 1987) and the surviving plants after chromosome doubling could be raised under controlled conditions and later screened for this trait. Similarly, effective selection could also be done for drought, cold, and salinity tolerance. By using this technique, several herbicide-resistant mutants have been developed in rapeseed (Kott 1995, 1998; Swanson et al. 1988, 1989).
Though embryogenic microspores are the prime targets for mutagenic treatment, other haploid tissues and cells have also been treated with mutagens in Brassicas. In B. napus, isolated microspores have been treated with chemicals such as EMS (Beversdorf and Kott 1987), NaN3 (Polsoni et al. 1988), MNU (Cegielska-Taras et al. (1999) and ENU (Swanson et al. 1988, 1989) and physical mutagens such as gamma rays (Beversdorf and Kott 1987; McDonald et al. 1991), X-rays (McDonald et al. 1991) and UV rays (Ahmad et al. 1991; McDonald et al. 1991). B. napus anthers have also been treated with gamma rays and fast neutrons by Jedrzejaszek et al. (1997). Similarly, microspores of B. carinata have been treated with EMS and UV rays (Barro et al. 2001, 2002) and B. campestris with UV rays (Zhang and Takahata 1999; Ferrie and Keller 2002). In B. juncea also, isolated microspores as well as haploid embryos have been treated with chemical mutagens.
Despite great promise, the use of DH technology as a routine breeding tool for Brassica improvement is yet to be seen, mainly due to problems associated with anther/microspore culture (Pratap et al. 2007). These include low regeneration rate, highly genotype-specific response and high frequency of callogenesis but low recovery of DH plants. The focus of rapeseed breeders has lately shifted toward more specific and practical goals such as development of herbicide-tolerant varieties, development of male sterile lines for hybrid seed production, oil and meal quality improvement, and also drug production (Gupta and Pratap 2008). For this, DH breeding has to be adopted in conjugation with newer ideas such as directed in vitro mutagenesis, in vitro screening for desirable traits, and incorporation of molecular markers.
14 Genetic Transformation
Biotechnology has opened up new horizon for novel agronomic and quality traits in responsive crops such as Brassicas by providing access to novel molecules, ability to change the level and pattern of gene expression and development of transgenics with insecticidal genes. With the development of genetic transformation techniques, it has become possible to bring about quick and dramatic improvements in the tolerance to many Lepidopteran and other insect pests, and herbicides, improvement in oil quality for industrial and domestic use and development of pharmaceuticals and industrial products. Much emphasis is now placed on the transgenic technology toward the improvement of cultivated Brassicas. As a result, the global area of biotech canola has reached to an estimated 5.5 million ha in 2007 (James 2007), majority of it being under herbicide-resistant canola.
Successful genetic transformation systems have been developed in many economically important Brassicas such as B. napus (Moloney et al. 1989), B. oleracea (De Block et al. 1989), B. juncea (Barfield and Pua 1991), B. carinata (Narasimhulu et al. 1992), B. rapa (Radke et al. 1992) and B. nigra (Gupta et al. 1993). However, among all the systems, Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer is most widely used in Brassica and it is also quite efficient and practical in most of the species in the genus (Cardoza and Stewart 2004).
Rapeseed cultivars tolerant to herbicides such as imidazoline, glyphosate, and glufosinate are available commercially in USA and Canada (Cardoza and Stewart 2004). For insect resistance, the gene from Bacillus thuriengiensis has been introduced in canola cultivars (Stewart et al. 1996; Halfhill et al. 2001), which leads to overproduction of δ-endotoxins in the insects feeding on transgenic canola. This crystalline prototoxin gets inserted into the midgut plasma membrane of the insect, leading to lesion formulation and production of pores that disturb the osmotic balance. These cause swelling and lysis of the cells and as a result, the larvae stop feeding and die (Hofte and Whiteley 1989; Schnepf et al. 1998; Shelton et al. 2002).
Canola varieties with increased linolenic acid (Liu et al. 2001), stearate (Hawkins and Kridl 1998), laurate (Knutzon et al. 1999), and increased enzyme activity (Facciotti et al. 1999) have been developed through genetic transformation. Further, Brassicas have been transformed to develop various industrial and pharmacological products also. For example, B. carinata has been transformed for the production of hirudin, a blood anticoagulant protein (Chaudhary et al. 1998) while B. napus has been used for the production of carotenoids (Shewmaker et al. 1999). Development of male sterile lines and fertility restoration systems has also been achieved through genetic transformation in B. napus (Jagannath et al. 2001, 2002), which could be of tremendous potential for development of commercial hybrid cultivars. Similarly, salt- and cold-tolerant tolerant lines have also been developed in B. juncea by engineering of the bacterial codA gene (Prasad et al. 2000). Transgenic lines of “Wester” having high palmitic and stearic acids have been developed by Hitz et al. (1995) High oleic acid containing B. napus and B. juncea lines with better shelf life have also been obtained through the transgenic technology (Stoutjesdijk et al. 2000).
15 Quality Improvement
Brassica oil is nutritionally superior to most of the other edible oils due to the lowest amounts of harmful saturated fatty acids and a good proportion of mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids in it (Agnihotri et al. 2007). However, the value of its oil and meal gets restricted due to the presence of two major antinutritional substances, erucic acid – a long carbon chain unsaturated fatty acid, and glucosinolate – the sulfur-containing compounds.
Oil quality mainly relates to fatty acid composition of the seed. High contents of erucic and eicosenoic acids in Brassica oils decrease the profile of oleic, linoleic and linolenic acids, rendering them inferior in quality to those from other oilseeds (Gupta and Pratap 2007). Therefore, one of the most important breeding objectives in Brassica breeding has been the genetic modification of the seed quality by changing the proportion of fatty acids suitable for nutritional as well as industrial purposes. Modifications in the compositions in fatty acids have been achieved in past through various conventional breeding methods coupled with biotechnological techniques such as induced mutation, in vitro embryo rescue, DH technique and genetic engineering, especially posttranscriptional gene-silencing (Agnihotri et al. 2007).
Dietary recommendations in many countries focus attention on limiting total fat intake to 30% of energy and saturated fat intake to 10% of energy. Breeding approaches in reducing the saturates include interspecific crosses followed by selection, reconstitution of B. napus from B. rapa and B. oleracea strains with reduced saturate levels, and mutagenesis in both B. rapa and B. napus. For reduction in linolenic acid, both mutagenic source and genetic transformation can be used. Gas liquid chromatography (GLC) (Craig and Murphy 1959) and the technique of using only half of the cotyledon to test the erucic acid content together provide quick means to screen very large populations necessary to identify genetically changed Brassica strains with low or zero erucic acids. With this technique, the desirable strains with half cotyledon intact have been grown and carried forward and with this, low erucic acid strains of B. napus (Stefansson et al. 1961; Downey and Harvey 1963) and B. campestris (Downey 1964) had been developed in early 1960s. Later, such strains were developed in B. juncea (Kirk and Oram 1981) and B. carinata (Alono et al. 1991). Gupta et al. (1994, 1998) identified low erucic acid genetic stocks among the Indian accessions of B. juncea. Several low erucic acid B. juncea genotypes have been developed in India through interspecific hybridization (Khalatkar et al. 1991; Malode et al. 1995), and transgressive segregation through interspecific/intergeneric hybridization, followed by pedigree method (Agnihotri et al. 1995; Agnihotri and Kaushik 1998, 1999a, b). Similarly, other fatty acids have also been modified in oleiferous Brassicas and high oleic and low linolenic acid B. juncea genotypes have been developed (Oram et al. 1999; Potts et al. 1999).
Brassica seed meal is an important source of nutrition for animals. However, undesirable components in the meal such as glucosinolates render them unfit for animal and human consumption. In high concentrations, in nonruminants like swine and poultry, it hydrolyzes to form thiocynates, isothiocynates or nitriles and can adversely affect iodine uptake by the thyroid gland and can reduce their weight gains (Fenwick et al. 1983). The high-performance quantitative GLC technique (McGregor et al. 1983a, b, Spinks et al. 1984; Brazezinski et al. 1986) has made it possible to obtain the profiles of glucosinolates and also measure their absolute levels. Besides glucosinolates, other antinutritional factors such as sinapine, phenolic acid, tannins and phytic acid also interfere with the digestive enzymes, especially those affecting protein hydrolysis. To improve the quality of Brassica seed meal, the glucosinolate contents should either be decreased or altogether eliminated from the meal through appropriate breeding techniques. However, unfortunately, the genes controlling glucosinolate content in rapeseed are either pleiotropic or in linkage with the seed filling stage and have a positive correlation with 1,000-seed weight (Oliveri and Parrini 1986). This renders the strict selection difficult for quality traits in early segregating generation, lest genotypes for high seed yield could be lost. Therefore, it is advocated to keep the population heterozygous for quality characters and select the plants for these characters in advanced generation.
Till date, the “Bronowski” gene is the only known source for low glucosinolates content and no natural germplasm source for stable low glucosinolates genes has been reported (Agnihotri et al. 2007). “Bronowski” is a Polish B. napus cultivar, which has a glucosinolate content of about 12 μmol/g oil free meal and 7–10% of erucic acid in the oil. Considerable success has been achieved in Australia in the development of low glucosinolate genotypes using mutagenesis, interspecific hybridization, and tissue culture coupled with pedigrees election (Oram et al. 1999). In India, two transgressive segregants (TERI 5 and TERI 6) with low glucosinolate and a Canadian accession BJ-1058 have been used to develop low-glucosinolate genotypes in the background of B. juncea var. Pusa Bold (Agnihotri and Kaushik 2003a, b; Agnihotri et al. 2007).
Breeding of “canola” type of cultivars in Brassica with less than 2% erucic acid in the oil and less than 30 μmol/g of glucosinolate in defatted meal (commonly known as “00”) has been done and several such varieties viz., Cyclone (Denmark), Shiralee (Australia) and AC Excel (Canada) are now available (Rakow 1995). In Australia, several double low cultivars of B. juncea have shown promising yield potential (Burton et al. 2003b). In India, Agnihotri and Kaushik (2003a, b) have reported successful introgression of double low traits in B. juncea cultivar “Varuna” using low erucic acid donors TERI (OE) M21 and Zem-1, and low glucosinolate line BJ-1058. The double low B. napus varieties GSC-865 and TERI-Uttam-Jawahar have been released for commercial cultivation in the states of Punjab and Madhya Pradesh, respectively (Agnihotri et al. 2007).
Introduction of double low (low erucic acid–low glucosinolates) genotypes of B. napus has followed their extensive cultivation in many countries of the world and experimental work toward development and improvement of low erucic acid germplasm for other species is being pursued at global level (Rakow and Raney 2003). At present, the breeding efforts in the development of canola quality double low B. napus cultivars in improving the oil composition and enhancing vitamin levels are underway in many countries of the world including Germany (Luhs et al. 2003), Canada (Raney et al. 2003a,b), United States (Corbett and Sernyk 2003), Australia (Gororo et al. 2003), France (Carre et al. 2003) and Poland (Spasibionek et al. 2003). Yellow seed coat color also adds to high oil content and therefore this could also be another breeding objective for improved Brassicas.
16 Conclusion
The current trends in the rapeseed breeding research indicate that to maintain the tempo of progress in quality and yield improvement work in these crops, much expanded research efforts would be needed to solve the emerging and challenging problems ahead. Now, there would be far greater need for the collection, computerization, and creation of new usable genetic variability, greater application of cytoplasmic male-sterility techniques, chromosomal mapping studies, and assimilation of many new and novel ideas for tackling new problems. It would also be desirable to make broad-based genepools of different cross-pollinated species of oilseed Brassicas and maintain at least one gene pool having all the available collection of the group. Such a population is likely to have more natural recombination hitherto not available in nature and provide an opportunity to break some of the existing undesirable genetic linkage, and provide good base population for future recurrent selection programs. Exploitation of heterosis in oilseed Brassicas would require more intensive and concerted efforts for effective utilization of cytoplasmic male sterility. In years to come, meaningful basic work would also be needed on the stability of sterility in CMS lines, understanding of the mechanism of fertility restoration, extent of cytoplasmic penality that would normally be expected on using CMS lines from a very distant wild types/species of genera and on perfectization of hybrid seed production techniques. In the Indian subcontinent, some of recently introduced materials of the disease-resistant or canola quality lines from outside may not be high yielders per se under the local condition, but they could possibly make good parental lines for production of hybrids and if that possibility exists, it should be explored. The production of doubled haploid lines, either by microspore or anther culture techniques, is now possible to rapidly produce homozygous inbred lines from the promising B. napus and B. campestris genotypes as well. Such inbreds could be produced and used to develop more productive hybrid cultivars. The inputs available from biotechnology may more purposefully be utilized in solving the pressing problems of male sterility, fertility restoration, crossability, and oil and seed meal quality. An exciting and challenging area of rapeseed breeding research would be to develop cultivars with built-in genetic resistance to devastating insect pests like mustard aphids and Alternaria leaf blight disease in the Indian subcontinent and for the important diseases like blackleg (L. maculans Desm.), clubroot (P. brassicae), S. sclerotiorum-caused damage, and white rust diseases in some of the western countries where these diseases threaten production. Development of fertilizer responsive, nonlodging, compact plant types with high population densities would be more rewarding breeding preposition in the years to come. Incorporation of dwarfing genes and development of semidwarf varieties of B. campestris could pay rich dividends. Presently, in the Indian subcontinent, much emphasis is being laid on the genetic improvement of yield but the future will see much expanded genetical and breeding investigations to improve quality characteristics of the commercial cultivars to meet the export needs. The search for genes governing thermo- and photoinsensitivity and also better photosynthetic activity would receive far greater attention than what is at present. The incorporation of such genes in rice and wheat has proved useful in expanding the areas of their production. So, why not in rapeseed? The cultivars with these genes could be grown over a wide range of crop growing conditions and this would help in increasing the overall production of these important oil crops.
References
Aberg E (1984) Results from the scientific cooperation between Indian and Swedish institution regarding the use of cruciferous oilcrops. Sveriges, Lantbruka suneversitet Swedish Uni Agric Sci Dep Plant Husb Rep 137 Uppsala
Agnihotri A, Kaushik N (1998) Transgressive segregation and selection of zero erucic acid strains from intergeneric crosses of Brassica. Ind J Plant Genet Res 11(2):251–255
Agnihotri A, Kaushik N (1999a) Genetic enhancement for double low characteristics in Indian rapeseed mustard. In: Proceedings of 10th International Rapeseed Congress, 26–29 September 1999, Canberra, Australia
Agnihotri A, Kaushik N (1999b) Transfer of double low characteristics in Indian B.napus. J Oilseeds Res 16:227–229
Agnihotri A, Kaushik N (2003a) Towards nutritional quality improvement in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea [L]. Czern and Coss) var. Pusa Bold. In: Sorensen H, Sorensen JC, Sorensen S, Muguerza NB, Bjergegaard C et al (eds) Proceedings of 11th International Rapeseed Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark 2: 501–503. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6–10th July
Agnihotri A, Kaushik N (2003b) Combining canola quality, early maturity and shattering tolerance in B. napus for Indian growing conditions. In: Sorensen H, Sorensen JC, Sorensen S, Muguerza NB, Bjergegaard C et al (eds) Proceedings of 11th International Rapeseed Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark 2: 436–439. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6–10th July
Agnihotri A, Lakshmikumaran M, Shivanna KR, Jagannathan V (1990a) Embryo rescue of interspecific hybrids of Brassica spinescens x B. campestris and DNA analysis. Current Plant science and Biotechnology Agriculture. Prog Plant Cell Mol Biol 1990:270–274
Agnihotri A, Gupta V, Lakhmikumaran M, Shivanna KR, Prakash S, Jagannathan V (1990b) Production of Eruca-Brassica hybrids by embryo rescue. Plant Breed 104:281–289
Agnihotri A, Shivanna KR, Raina SN, Lakshmikumaran M, Prakash S, Jagannathan V (1990c) Production of Brassica napus Raphanobrassica hybrids by embryo rescue. Plant Breed 105:292–299
Agnihotri A, Shivanna KR, Raina SN, Lakshmikumaran M, Prakash S, Jagannathan V (1990c) Production of Brassica napus x Raphanobrassica hybrids by embryo rescue. Plant Breed 105:292–299
Agnihotri A, Prem D, Gupta K (2007) The chronicles of oil and meal quality improvement in rapeseed, pp 50–99. In: Gupta SK (ed) Advances in botanical research-rapeseed breeding. Academic Press/Elsevier, San Diego, p 554
Agnihotri A, Raney JP, Kaushik N, Singh NK, Downey RK (1995) Selection for better agronomical and nutritional characteristics in Indian rapeseed-mustard. In: Proceedings 9th International Rapeseed Congress, 4–7 July, Cambridge, UK, vol 2, pp 425–427
Agrawal BL (1976) Studies on Genetic Diversity and Heterosis in Rapeseed (Brassica Campestris). Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, GBPUAT, Pantnagar, India
Ahmad I, Day JP, MacDonald MV, Ingram DS (1991) Haploid culture and UV mutagenesis in rapid cycling Brassica napus for the generation of resistance to chlorsulfuron and Alternaria Brassicola. Ann Bot 67:521–525
Anand IJ, Singh JN, Khanna PP (1975) Inter relationship and diversity in yellow sarson (Brassica campestris var. Sarson Prain). Ind J Agric Sci 45:252–258
Anonymous PP (1999) Breeding and quality analysis of rapeseed. Agtrans Research, Peter Chudleigh Toowong, Brisbane, China
Appelquist LA, Ohlson R (1972) Rapeseed: cultivation, composition, processing and utilization. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Ayotte R, Harney PM, Machado VS (1986) The transfer of triazine resistance from B. napus to B. oleracea. Cruciferae Newslett 11:95–96
Ayotte R, Harney PM, Machado VS (1987) Transfer of triazine resistance from Brassica napus to B. oleraccea. I. Production of F1 hybrids through embryo rescue. Euphytica 36:615–624
Bailey LH (1922) The cultivated Brassicas I. Gentes Herbarum 1:53–108
Bannerot H, Boulidar L, Canderon Y, Tompe J (1974) Transfer of cytoplasmicmale sterility from Raphanus sativus to B. oleracea. Proceedings of Eucarpia meeting on Cruciferae. Crop Sci 25:52–54
Bannerot H, Boulidar L, Chupeau Y (1977) Unexpected difficulties met with the radish cytoplasm in B. oleracea. Cruciferae Newslett 2:16
Bansal UK, Sequin Swartz G, Rakow GFW, Petrie GA (1990) Reaction of Brassica species to infestation by Alternaria brassicae. Can J Plant Sci 70:1159–1162
Barfield DG, Pua EC (1991) Gene transfer in plants of Brassica juncea using Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation. Plant Cell Rep 10:308–314
Barro F, Fernandez-Escobar J, De La Vega M, Martin A (2001) Doubled haploid lines of Brassica carinata with modified erucic acid content through mutagenesis by EMS treatment of isolated microsporas. Plant Breed 120:262–264
Barro F, Fernandez-Escobar J, De La Vega M, Martin A (2002) Modification of glucosinolate and erucic in doubled haploid lines of Brassica carinata by UV treatment of isolated microspores. Euphytica 129:1–6
Bartkowiak-Broda I, Mikolajczyk K, Spasibionek S, Cegielska-Taras T (2005) Genetic and breeding research timing At increasing the value of rapeseed oil as a source of renewable energy. In: Jezowski S, Wojciechowicz KM, Zenkteler E (eds) Alternative plants for sustainable agriculture. Institute of Plant Genetics PAS, Poland, pp 129–139
Bateman AJ (1955) Self incompatibility system in angiosperms III. Cruciferae Heredity 9:53–68
Beckman C (2005) Vegetable oils: competition in a changing market. Bi-weeklyBulletin. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 18(11), Available at http://www.agr.gc.ca/mad-dam/e/bulletine/v18e/v18n11_e.htm
Beversdorf WD, Kott LS (1987) Development of triazine resistance in cropsby classical plant breeding. Weed Sci 35:9–11
Beversdorf WD, WeissLerman J, Erickson LR, SouzaMachado V (1980) Transfer of cytoplasmically inherited triazine resistance from bird rape to cultivated oilseed rape (Brassica Campestris L. and B. napus L.). Can J Genet Cytol 22:167–172
Beversdorf WD, WeissLerman J, Erickson LR, SouzaMachado V (1980) Transfer of cytoplasmically inherited triazine resistance from bird rape to cultivated oilseed rape (Brassica Campestris L. and B. napus L.). Can J Genet Cytol 22:167–172
Boswell VR (1949) Our vegetable travelers. Natl Geogr Mag 96:45–217
Brazezinski W, Mendelewski P, Munse BG (1986) Comparative study on determination of glucosinolates in rapeseed. Cruciferae Newslett 11:128–129
Brim H, Plessi J, Renard M (1987) Resistance of some crucifers to Alternariabrassicae (Berk.) Saacc. In: Proceedings of the 7th Rapeseed Conference, Paris, pp 1222–1227
Burton W, Salisbury P, Potts D (2003b) The potential of canola quality Brassica juncea as an oilseed crop for Australia In: Proceedings of the 11th Rapeseed Conference, pp 5–7. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6–10th July
Cardoza V, Stewart NC Jr (2004) Brassica biotechnology progress in cellular and molecular biology. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 40:542–551
Carre P, Dartenuc C, Evrard J, Judde A, Labalette F, Raoux R, Renard M (2003) Frying stability of rapeseed oils with modified fattyacid composition. In: Proceedings of 11th International Rapeseed Congress, vol. 2, pp 540–543. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6–10th July
Cegielska-Taras T, Szala L, Krzymanski J (1999) An in vitro mutagenesis-sleection system for Brassica napus L. New Horizons for an Old Crop. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Rapeseed Congress, Canberra, Australia, pp 1–4
Charne DG, Beversdorf WD (1988) Improving microspore culture as a rapeseed breeding tool: the use of auxins and cytokinins in an induction medium. Can J Bot 66:1671–1675
Chaubey CN (1979) Mass selection in toria. Ind J Genet 39:194–201
Chevre AM, Eber F, Brun H, Plessis J, Primard C, Renard M (1991) Cytogenetic studies of Brassica napus-Sinapsis alba hybrids from ovary culture and protoplast fusion. Attempts to introduce Alternaria resistanceinto rapeseed. Proc Int Rapeseed Conf 8:346–351
Chiang MS (1974) Cabbage pollen germination and longevity. Euphytica 23:579–584
Chiang MS, Crete R (1983) Transfer of resistance to Race 2 of Plasmodiophorabrassicae from B. napus to cabbage (B. oleracea var. capitata) the inheritance of resistance. Euphytica 32:479–483
Chaudhary S, Parmenter DL, Moleney MM (1998) Transgenic Brassica carinata as a vehicle for the production of recombinant proteins in seeds. Plant Cell Rep 17:195–200
Corbett P, Sernyk L (2003) Global opportunites for naturally stable canola/rapeseed oils. In: Proceedings of 11th International Rapeseed Congress, vol. 2, pp 524–527. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6–10th July
Craig BM, Murphy NL (1959) Quantitative fatty acid analysis of vegetableoil by gas liquid chromatography. J Am Oil Chem Soc 36:549–552
Das B, Rai B (1972) Heterosis in intervarietal crosses of toria. Ind J Genet 32:197–202
De Block M, De Brower D, Tenning P (1989) Transformation of Brassica napus and Brassica oleracea using Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the expression of bar and neo genes in the transgenic plants. Plant Physiol 91:694–701
Doloi PC (1977) Levels of self-incompatibility, heterosis and inbreeding depression in Brassica Campestris. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Nainital, India
Downey RK (1964) A selection of Brassica campestris L. containing no erucic acid in its seed oil. Can J Plant Sci 44:295
Downey RK, Harvey BL (1963) Method of breeding for oil quality in rape. Can J Plant Sci 43:271–275
Downey RK, Rakow G (1987) Rapeseed and mustard. In: Fehr WR (ed) Principles of cultivar development, vol. 2, Crop species. Macmillan, New York, pp 437–486
Downey RK, Rimmer SR (1993) Agronomic improvement in oilseedBrassicas. Adv Agronomy 50:1–66
Downey RK, Robellen G (1989) Brassica species. In: Robellen G, Downey RK, Ashri A (eds) Oil Crops of the world. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 339–362
Downey RK, Klassen AJ, Stringam GR (1980) Rapeseed and mustard. In: Fehr WR, Hadley HH (eds) Hybridization of crop plants. American Society of Agronomy Inc, Madison, pp 495–509
Dueck J, Degenhardt K (1975) Effect of leaf age and inoculum concentration on reaction of oilseed Brassica species to Alternaria brassicae. In: Proceedings of the American Phytopathological Society 2, 168 (Abstract)
Dunwell JM (1996) Microspore culture. In: Jain SM, Sopory SK, Veilleux RE (eds) In vitro haploid production in higher plants, vol 1. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 205–216
Facciola S (1990) Cornucopia. A source of edible plants, 1st edn. Kampong Publication, Vista California, p 678 p
Facciotti MT, Bertain PB, Yuan L (1999) Improved stearate phenotype in transgenic canola expressing a modified acyl-acyl carrier protein thioesterase. Nat Biotechnol 17:593–597
Fan Z, Tai W (1985) A cytogenetic studies of monosomics in Brassica napus. Can J Genet Cytol 27:683–688
Fan Z, Rimmer SR, Stefansson BR (1983a) Inheritance of resistance to Albugo candida in rapid cycling population of Brassica campestris. Phytopathol 77:527–532
Fan Z, Rimmer SR, Stefansson BR (1983b) Inheritance of resistance to Albugo candida in rape. Can J Genet Cyotol 25:420–424
Fenwick GR, Heaney RK, Mullim WJ (1983) Glucosinolates and theirbreakdown products in food and food plants. CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 18:123–201
Ferrie AMR, Keller WA (2002) Application of double haploidy and mutagenesis in Brassica. 13th Crucifere Genetics Workshop, March 23–26, University of California, Davis
Frandsen KJ (1943) The experimental formation of Brassica juncea (Czern andCoss). Dansk Botanisk Arkiv 11:1–17
Frandsen KJ (1947) The experimental formation of Brassica napus L. va. Oleifera DC. and Brassica carinata Braun. Dansk Bot. Arkiv 12:1–16
Fussel GE (1955) History of cole (Brassica sp). Nature 176, 48–51 glucosinolate in rapeseed. Can J Plant Sci 55:191–196
Gororo N, Salisbury P, Rebetzke G, Burton W, Bell C (2003) Genotypic variation for saturated fatty acid content of victorian canola. In: Proceedings of 11th International Rapeseed Congress, vol. 1, pp 215–217. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6–10th July
Grant I, Beversdorf WD (1985) Heterosis and combining ability estimates inspring planted rape (Brassica napus). Can J Genet Cytol 27:472–478
Gu HH, Hagberg P, Zhou WJ (2003) Cold pretreatment enhances microspore embryogenesis in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Plant Growth Regul 2004(42):137–143
Gu HH, Zhou WJ, Hagberg P (2004) High frequency spontaneous production of doubled haploid plants in microspore cultures of Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis. Euphytica 134:239–245
Gupta ML, Banga SK, Banga SS, Sandha GS, Ahuja KL, Raheja RK (1994) A new genetic stock for low erucic acid in Indian Mustard. Cruciferae Newslett 16:104–105
Gupta ML, Ahuja KL, Raheja RK, Labana KS (1998) Variation for biochemical quality traits in promising genotypes of Indian mustard. J Res 25:1–5
Gupta SK, Pratap A (2007) History, origin and evolution. In: Gupta SK (ed) Advances in Botanical Research-Rapeseed Breeding, Vol. 45, Academic Press, London, pp 1–20
Gupta SK, Pratap A (2008) Recent trends in oilseed Brassicas. In: Nayyar H (ed) Crop Improvement: Challenges and Strategies. I.K. International, New Delhi, India, pp 284–299
Gupta V, Sita GL, Shaila MS, Jagannathan V (1993) Genetic transformation in Brassica nigra by Agrobacterium based vector and direct plasmid uptake. Plant Cell Rep 12:418–421
Halfhill MD, Richards HA, Mabon SA, Stewart NC Jr (2001) Expression of GFP and Bt transgenes in Brassica napus and hybridization with Brassica rapa. Theor Appl Genet 103:151–156
Hawkins D, Kridl L (1998) Characterization of acyl-ACP thioesterase of mangosteen (Garcinia mangosteena) seed and high levels of state production in transgenic canola. Plant J 13:743–752
He YH, Yang RF, Luo SQ (1987) Selection of Swede rape cultivar 821 withhigh potential and multiple resistance: Study of characteristic structures. OilCrops China 2:11–15
Hinata K, Konno N (1979) Studies on male sterile strain having the Brassica campestris nucleus and the Diplotaxis muralis cytoplasm. I. On the breeding procedure and some characteristics of the male sterile strain. Jpn J Breed 29:305–311
Hitz WD, Mauvis CJ, Ripp KG, Reiter RJ, DeBonte L, Chen Z (1995) The use of cloned rapeseed genes for the cytoplasmic fatty acid desaturases and the plastid acyl-ACP thioesterases to alter relative levels of polyunsaturated and saturated fatty acids in rapeseed. D5-Breeding Oil Quality. GCIRC 1995 Cambridge, UK, pp 470–478
Hofte H, Whiteley HR (1989) Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiol Rev 53:242–255
Holzner W (1981) Acker-Unkra¨uter-Bestimmung, Verbreitung, Biologie undO ¨ kologie. Leopold Stocker Verlag, Graz, Stuttgart
Hutchenson DS, Downey RK, Campbell SJ (1981) Performance of anaturally occurring subspecuies hybrid in B. campestris var. oleifera. Can J Plant Sci 61:895–900
Ichikawa H, Hirai A (1983) Search for a female parent in the genesis of Brassica napus by chloroplast DNA restriction pattern. Jpn J Genet 58:419–424
Jagannath A, Bandhopadhyay P, Arumugam N, Burma PK, Pental D (2001) The use of a spacer DNA fragment insulates the tissue specific expression of a cytotoxic gene (barnase) and allows high frequency generation of transgenic male sterile lines in Brassica juncea L. Mol Breed 8:11–12
Jagannath A, Arumugam N, Guipta V, Pradhan A, Burma PK, Pental D (2002) Development of transgenic barstar lines and identification of a male sterile (barnase/restorer (barstar) combination for heterosis breeding in Indian oilseed mustard (Brassica juncea). Curr Sci 82:46–52
James C (2007) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2007, ISAAA Brief No. 37., Executive Summary, International Service for the Acquisition of Agribiotech Applications (ISAAA), New York
Jedrzejaszek K, Kruczkowska H, Pawlowska H, Skucinska B (1997) Simulating effect of mutagens on in vitro plant regeneration. MBNL 43:10–11
Jonsson (1973) Breeding for low erucic acid contents in summer turnip rape (Brassica campestris L. var. annua) Z. Pflan Zen Zu Chtz. 69:1–18
Kalia HR, Gupta SK (1997) Importance, nomenclature and origin. In: Kalia HR, Gupta SK (eds) Recent advances in oilseed brassicas. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, pp 1–11
Keller WA, Armstrong KC (1978) High frequency production of microspore derived plants from Brassica napus another cultures. Z. Pflanzenzchtg 80:100–108
Kirk JTO, Oram RN (1981) Isolation of erucic acid free lines of Brassica juncea: Indian mustard now a potential oilseed crop in Australia. J Australian Inst Agric Sci 47:51–52
Khalatkar AS, Rakow G, Downey RK (1991) Selection for quality and disease resistance in Brassica juncea cv. Pusa Bold. In: Proceedings 8th International Rapeseed Congress Saskatoon, Canada, 9–11 July, pp 198
Knutzon DS, Hayes TR, Wyrick A, Xiong H, Davies HM, Voelker TA (1999) Lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase from coconut endosperm mediates the insertion of laurate at the sn-2 position of triaglycerols in lauric rapeseed oil and can increase total laurate levels. Plant Physiol 120:739–746
Kott L (1995) Production of mutants using the rapeseed doubled haploid system. In: Induced mutations and molecular techniques for crop improvement. IAEA, Vienna, pp 505–515
Kott L (1998) Application of doubled haploid technology in breeding of oilseed Brassica napus. AgBiotech News Inform 10:69N–74N
Krzymanski J, Downey RK (1969) Inheritance of fatty acid composition inwinter forms of Brassica napus. Can J Plant Sci 49:313–319
Labana KS, Badwal SS, Chaurasia BD (1975) Heterosis and combining ability in B. juncea. Crop Improvement 2:46–51
Larik AS, Hussain M (1990) Heterosis in Indian mustard Brassica juncea (L.) Coss. Pakistan J Bot 22(2):168–171
Lee SJ, Zhang Y (1983) The utilization of genetic male sterility in Brassicamale sterility in Shanghai, China. In: Proceedings of 6th International Rapeseed Congress, Paris, France, pp 360–364
Lefort-Buson M, Datte Y (1982) Genetic study of some agronomic charactersin winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). I. Heterosis. Agronomie 2:315–322
Lichter R (1982) Induction of haploid plants from isolated pollen of Brassica napus. Z. Pflanzenphysiol 103:229–237
Liu JW, DeMichele S, Bergana M, Bobik E, Hastilow C, Chuong LT, Mukerji P, Huang YS (2001) Characterization of oil exhibiting high gamma-linolenic acid from a genetically transformed canola strain. J Am Oil Chem Soc 78:489–493
Luhs W, Weier D, Marwede V, Frauen M, Lekband G, Becker HC, Frentzen M, Friedt W (2003) Breeding of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) for modified tocopherol composition- synergy of conventional and modern approaches. In: Proceedings of 11th International Rapeseed Congress, vol 1, pp 194–197. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6–10th July
MacDonald MV, Ahgmad I, Menten JOM, Ingram DS (1991) Haploid culture and in vitro mutagenesis (UV light, X-rays, and gamma rays) of rapid cycling Brassica napus for improved resistance to disease. In: Plant mutation breeding for crop improvement, vol. 2. IAEA, Vienna, pp 129–138
Mahapatra D, Bajaj YPS (1987) Inter specific hybridization of B. juncea x B. hirta using embryo rescue. Euphytica 36:321–326
Malode SN, Swamy RV, Khalatkar AS (1995) Introgression of ‘OO’ quality characters in Brassica juncea cv. Pusa bold. In: Proceedings 9th, International Rapeseed Congress, Cambridge, UK, 4–7 July, pp 431–438
Maluszynski M, Kasha KJ, Forster BP, Szarejko I (2003) Doubled haploid production in crop plants: a manual. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, p 428
Mathias R (1985) Transfer of mustard (Brassica juncea L.) into rapeseed (BrassicaNapus L.). Plant Breed 95:371–374
Mc Collum GD (1988) CMS (ESG-508) and CMS (FSG-512) cytoplasmic male sterile cabbage germplasm with radish cytoplasm. Hort Sci 23:227–228
McGregor DI, Downey RK (1975) Arapid and simple assay for identifying low glucosinolate in rapeseed. Can J Plant Sci 55:191–196
McGregor DI, Mullim WJ, Fenwick GR (1983a) Review of analysis of glucosinolate analytical methodology for determining glucosinolate composition and content. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 66:825–849
McGregor DI, Mullim WJ, Fenwick GR (1983b) Review of analysis of glucosinolate analytical methodology for determining glucosinolate composition and content. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 66:825–849
Mehra KL (1966) History and ethnobotany of mustard in India. Advances Frontiers of Plant Science 19:51–59
Moloney MM, Walker JM, Sharma KK (1989) High efficiency transformation of Brassica napus Morinaga, T. (1928). Preliminary note on interspecific hybridization in Brassica
Moloney MM, Walker JM, Sharma KK (1989) High efficiency transformation of Brassica napus using Agrobacterium vectors. Plant Cell Rep 8:238–242
Morinaga T (1928) Preliminary note on interspecific hybridization in Brassica. Proceedings of Imperial Academy Tokyo 4:620–622
Morinaga T (1929a) Interspecific hybridization in Brassica I. The cytology of F1hybrids of B. nepella and various other species with 10 chromosomes. Cytologia 1:16–27
Morinaga T (1929b) Interspecific hybridization in Brassica II. The cytology of F1hybrids B. cerna and various other species with 10 chromosomes. Jpn J Bot 4:277–280
Morinaga T (1934a) Interspecific hybridization in Brassica VI. The cytology of F1hybrids of B. napus and. B. nigra. Cytologia 6:62–67
Morinaga T (1934b) On the chromosome number of Brassica juncea and Brassicanapus on the hybrid between these two and on offspring of the hybrid. Jpn J Genet 9:161–163
Muenscher WC (1980) Weeds, 2nd edn. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, p 586
Munz PA (1968) A California flora. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, p 1681
Nagalakshmi TV (1992) Analysis of genetic divergence, combining ability andheterosis in Indian mustard (B. napus). Ph. D. Thesis, BHU, Varanasi, India
Narasimhulu SB, Kirti PB, Mohapatra T, Prakash S, Chopra VL (1992) Shoot regeneration in stem explants and its amenability to Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated gene transfer in Brassica carinata. Plant Cell Rep 11:359–362
Neuweiller (1905) Die prahistorishe Pflanzenreste Mitteleuropas, Zurich
Ogura H (1968) Studies on a new male-sterility in Japanese radish, with special reference to utilization of this sterility towards the practical raising of hybrid seeds. Mem Fac Agr Kogoshima Univ 6:39–78
Oliveri AM, Parrini P (1986) Relationship between glucosinolate content andyield component in rapeseed. Cruciferae Newslett 11:126–127
Olsson G (1954) Crosses within the campestris group of the genus Brassica. Hereditas 40:398–418
Olsson G (1990) Rape yield. Production components. Svensk Frotidning 59:168–169
Oram RN, Salisbury PA, Krick JTO, Burton WA (1999) Development of early flowering, canola grade Brassica juncea germplasm. In: Proceedings of 10th International Rapeseed Congress, 26–29 September, Canberra, Australia
Persson C (1986) High erucic acid from white mustard (Sinapis alba) for technicaluse. Cruciferae Newslett 11:134
Pidskalny RS, Rimmer SR (1985) Virulence of Albugo candida from turniprape (Brassica campestris) and mustard (B. napus) on various crucifers. Can J Plant Pathol 7:283–286
Piggot S (1950) Prehistoric India to 1000 BC. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth
Pilgeram AL, Sanda DC, Boss D, Dale N, Wichman D, Lamb P, Lu C, Barrows R, Kirkpatrick M, Thompson B, Johnson DL (2007) Camelina sativa, a montana omega-3- and fuel crop. In: Janick J, Whipkey A (eds) Issues in new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA, pp 129–131
Polsoni L, Kott LS, Beversdorf WD (1988) Large-scale microspore culture technique for mutation-selection studies in Brassica napus. Can J Bot 66:1681–1685
Potts DA, Rakow GW, Males DR (1999) Canola-quality Brassica juncea, a new oilseed crop for the Canadian prairies. In: Proceedings of Xth GCIRC International Rapeseed Congress, 26–29 September, Canberra, Australia
Pradhan AK, Sodhi YS, Mukhopadhyay A, Pental D (1993) Heterosis breeding in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss): Analysis of component characters contributing to heterosis for yield. Euphytica 69:219–229
Prakash S (1973) Artificial Brassica juncea coss. Genetica 44:249–263
Prakash S (1980) Cruciferous oilseeds in India. In: Tsunoda S, Hinata K, Gomez Campo C (eds) Brassica crops and wild allies. Biology and breeding. Japan Scientific Society Press, Tokyo, pp 151–163
Prakash S, Chopra VL (1988) Introgression of resistance to shattering in Brassica napus from Brassica juncea through non-homologous recombination. Plant Breed 101:167–168
Prakash S, Chopra VL (1988b) Introgression of resistance to shattering in Brassica napus from Brassica juncea through non-homologus recombination. Plant Breed 101:167–168
Prakash S, Chopra VL (1991) Cytogenetics of crop brassicas and their allies. In: Chromosomal engineering in plants: genetics, breeding and evolution, Part B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 19–61
Prakash S, Hinata K (1980) Taxonomy, cytogenetics and origin of cropBrassica, a review. Opera Botanica 55:11–57
Prakash S, Raut RN (1983) Artificial synthesis of Brassica napus and its prospects as an oilseed crop in India. Ind J Genet 42:282–290
Prakash S, Kirti PB, Bhat SR, Gaikwad K, Dineshkumar V, Chopra VL (1998) A Moricandia arvensis based cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration system in Brassica juncea. Theor Appl Genet 97:488–492
Prasad KVSK, Sharmila P, Kumar PA, Saradhi PP (2000) Transformation of Brassica juncea (L.) Czern with bacterial coda gene enhances its tolerance to salt and cold stress. Mol Breed 6:489–499
Pratap A, Gupta SK (2007) Unusual floral morphology in advanced generations of intergeneric hybrids between Brassica napus and Eruca sativa. ISOR 2007. Extended summaries: National Seminar on Changing Vegetable Oils Scenario: Issue and Challenges Before India, Indian Society of Oilseeds Research, Hyderabad, India, pp 50–51
Pratap A, Gupta SK, Vikas (2007) Advances in doubled haploid technology of oilseed rape. Ind J Crop Sci 2:267–271
Pratap A, Gupta SK, Sharma M (2008) Genetic amelioration of crop brassicas through intergeneric hybridization using Diplotaxis. National Seminar on Physiological and Biotechnological Approaches to Improve Plant Productivity, March 15–17, Center for Plant Biotechnology, DST, Haryana, Hisar, India, pp 85–86
Quazi MH (1988) Interspecific hybrids between B. napus and B. oleracea developedby embryo culture. Theor Appl Genet 75:309–318
Radke SE, Turner JC, Facciotti D (1992) Transformation and regeneration of Brassica rapa using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Rep 11:499–505
Rai B (1976) Considerations in the genetic improvement of oil quality in rapeseed. Oilseed J 6:13–15
Rai B (1979) Heterosis breeding. Agro-Biological Publications, AzadNagar, New Delhi, p 183
Rai B (1982) Breeding strategy for developing high yielding varieties of toria(Brassica campestris var. toria). In: Research and development strategies for oilseeds production in India. ICAR, New Delhi, pp 131–135
Rai B (1983a) Genetic improvement of seed yield and disease resistance in rapeseed and mustard oil crops. Oil Crops J 13:6–13
Rai B (1983b) Advances in rapeseed and mustard breeding research. Ind Farm 37:16–17
Rai B (1987) PT 303 the first national variety of toria. Ind Farm 37:16–15
Rai B, Kumar A (1978) Rapeseed and mustard production programme. Ind Farm 28:27–30
Rai B, Sehgal VK (1975) Field resistance of Brassica germplasm to mustard aphids (Lipaphis Erysimi kalt). Sci and Cult 41:444–445
Rai B, Singh A (1976) Commercial seed production in rapeseed. Ind Farm 26:15–17
Rai B, Singh D (1993) A note on the potential sources of dwarfing genes in Indian rapeseed (Brassica campestris). Ind J Genet 53:153–156
Rai B, Kolte SJ, Tiwari AN (1976) Evaluation of oleiferous Brassicagermplasm for resistance to Alternaria leaf blight. Ind J Mycol Pathol 6:76–77
Rai L, Rai B, Sanaghmitra M, Rao BP (1987) Control of aphids in mustard and safflower crops. Ind Farm 37:16–19
Rai B, Gupta SK, Pratap A (2007) Breeding methods. In: Gupta SK (ed) Advances in botanical research-rapeseed breeding, pp 21–48, vol 45. Academic Press/Elsevier, San Diego, CA, p 554
Rajan SS (1955) The effectiveness of mass-pedigree system of selection improvement of seed setting in autotetraploid toria. Ind J Genet 15:47–49
Rakow G (1973) Selektion auf linol und Linolen sauregehalt in rapssamen nach mutagener behind lung. Z. Pflanzenzuchtg 69:62–82
Rakow G (1995) Developments in the breeding of oil in other Brassica species. In: Proceedings 9th International rapeseed congress. Cambridge, UK, vol 2, 401–406
Rakow G, Raney JP (2003) Present status and future perspectives of breeding for seed quality in Brassica oilseed crops. In: Proceedings 11th International Rapeseed Congress. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6–10th July, pp 181–185
Rakow G, Woods DL (1987) Outcrossing in rape and mustard underSaskatchewan prairie conditions. Can J Plant Sci 67:147–151
Ramanujam S, Rai B (1963) Analysis of yield components in yellow sarson. Ind J Genet 23:312–319
Ramanujam S, Srinivasachar D (1943) Cytogenetic investigations in genusBrassica and the artificial synthesis of Brassica juncea. Ind J Genet 3:73–88
Rambhajan Chauhan YS, Kumar K (1991) Natural cross-pollination in Indian mustard. Cruciferae Newslett 14/15:24–25
Raney JP, Olson TV, Rakow G, Ripley VL (2003a) Brassica juncea with a canola fatty acid composition from an interspecific cross with Brassica napus. In: Proceedings 11th International Rapeseed Congress.The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University Copenhagen, Denmark, 6–10 July, pp 281–283
Raney JP, Olson TV, Rakow G, Ripley VL (2003b) Selection of near zero aliphatic glucosinolate Brassica juncea from an interspecific cross with B. napus. In: Proceedings 11th International Rapeseed Congress. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6–10 July, pp 284–286
Rao MVB (1990) Widening variability in cultivated digenomic Brassica through interspecific hybridization. Ph.D Thesis, IARI, New Delhi, India
Raut RN, Kaul T (1982) Synthesis of new genotypes of Brassica napussuitable for cultivation in India. Curr Sci 51:838–839
Raut RN, Prakash S (1985) Synthetic brassicas: new oilseeds for greaterproduction. In: Genetic manipulations for crop improvement. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, p 326
Reiner H, Holzner W, Ebermann R (1995) The development of turnip typeand oilseed type Brassica rapa crops from the wild type in Europe-Anoverview of the botanical, historical and linguistic facts: Rapeseed Todayand Tomorrow, Ninth International Rapeseed Congress, Cambridge, UK, July 4–7, vol 4, pp 1066–1069
Robbelen G, Nitsch A (1974) Genetische und physiologische undersuchungenand polyen-fettsaure-mutanten von Raps. I auslese und beschreibung neuermutanten. Z Pflansenzuchtg 75:93–105
Robellen G (1960) Beitrage zur analyse des Brassica-Genoms. Chromosoma 11:205–228
Roy NN (1984) Interspefific transfer of Brassica juncea type high blackleg resistance to Brassica napus. Euphytica 33:295–303
Roy NN, Tarr AW (1985) IXLIN- an interspecific source for high linoleicacid content in rapeseed. Plant Breed 95:201–209
Roy NN, Tarr AW (1986) Development of new zero linolenic acid (18: 3)lines of rapeseed (Brassica napus L). Z Pflanzenzuchtg 96:218–233
Sacristan MD, Gerdemann M (1986) DiVerent behavior of Brassica junceaand B. carinata as source of interspecific transfer to B. napus. Plant Breed 97:304–314
Sang JP, Truscott RJW (1984) Liquid chromatographic determination ofglucosinolates in rapeseed as desulphoglucosinolates. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 67:829–833
Scheffler JA, Dale PJ (1994) Opportunities for gene tarsnfer from transgeneic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) to related species. Transgen Res 3:263–278
Schiemann E (1932) Entstehung der kulturpflan zen Handlab. Vererbwis Lfg 15
Schnepf E, Crickmore N, VanRie J, Lereclus D, Baum J, Feitelson J, Ziegler DR, Dean DH (1998) Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:775–806
Schuler TJ, Hutcheson DS, Downey RK (1992) Heterosis in intervarietal hybrids of summer turnip rape in western Canada. Can J Plant Sci 72:127–136
Schuster W, Michael J (1976) Untersuchungen uber Inzuchtdepressionen und Heterosis effekte bei Raps (Brassica napus oleifera). Zeitschrift fiir Pflanzenzuchtung 77:56–66
Sernyk JL, Stefansson BR (1983) Heterosis in summer rape (B. napus). Can J Plant Sci 63:407–413
Sernyk JL, Stefansson BR (1983) Heterosis in summer rape (Brassica napus L.)
Shabana R, Shrief SA, Ibrahim AF, Gisler G (1990) Correlation and pathanalysis for new released double zero spring rapeseed cultivars grown undercompetitive systems. J Agronomica Crop Sci 165:138–143
Shahidi F (1990) Rapeseed and canola: global production and distribution. In: Shahidi F (ed) Canola and rapeseed: production, chemistry, nutrition and processingtechnology. Van Norstrand Reinhold, New York, p 13
Shelton AM, Zhao JZ, Roush RT (2002) Economic, ecological, food safety and social consequences of the deployment of Bt transgenic plants. Annu Rev Entomol 47:845–881
Shewmaker CK, Sheehy JA, Daley M, Colburn S, Ke DY (1999) Seed-specific over expression of phytoene synthase: increase in carotenoids and other metabolic effects. Plant J 20:401–412
Shi SW, Wu JS, Zhou YM, Liu HL (2002) Diploidization techniques of haploids from in vitro culture microspores of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Chinese J Oil Crop 24:1–5
Shiga T (1970) Rape breeding by interspecific crossing between Brassica napus andBrassica campestris in Japan. Jpn Agri Res Q 5:5–10
Sikka SM, Rajan SS (1957) Breeding better Brassicas. Ind Oilseeds J I:73–81
Singh D (1958) Rape and mustard, Indian Central Oilseeds Committee, Hyderabad, India, p 105
Singh SP (1973) Heterosis and combining ability estimates in Indian mustard, Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss. Crop Sci 13:497–499
Singh J (1986) Genetic analysis of yield and its component characters in Brassicanapus. Ph. D. Thesis, Meerut University, Meerut (UP), India
Singh R, Rana RS (1994) Genetic resources programme on oilseed Brassica:Introduction and evaluation at NBPGR during 193–94. Paper Presented at the First All India apeseed-Mustard Research Workers Group Meeting, Gwalior, 19–22 Aug
Singh H, Singh D (1987) A note on the transfer of resistance to white rust fromEthiopian mustard to Indian mustard. Cruciferae Newslett 12:95
Singh D, Singh H (1988) Inheritance of white rust resistance in interspecificcrosses of B. jumcea _ B. carinata. Crops Res 1:189–193
Spasibionek S, Krzymanski J, Bartkowiak-Broda I (2003) Mutants of Brassicanapus with changed fatty acid composition. In: Proceedings of 11th International Rapeseed Congress. The Royal Veterinaryand Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6–10th July, vol 1, pp 221–224
Spinks EA, Sones K, Fenwick GR (1984) The quantitative analysis ofglucosinolates in cruciferous vegetables, oilseeds and forage crops usinghigh performance liquid chromatography. Fette Seifen Anstrichm 86:228–231
Srivastava K, Rai B (1993) Expression of heterosis for yield and its attributes inrapeseed. Ind J Agric Sci 63:243–245
Stefansson RR, Hougen FW, Downey RK (1961) Note on the isolation ofrape plants with seed oil free from erucic acid. Can J Plant Sci 41:218–219
Stewart CN, Adang MJ, All JN, Raymer PL, Ramachandran S, Parrott WA (1996) Insect control and dosage effects in transgenic canola containing a synthetic Bacillus thuringiensis cry1Ac gene. Plant Physiol 112:115–120
Stoutjesdijk PA, Hurlestone C, Singh SP, Green AG (2000) High oleic-acid Australian Brassica napus and B. juncea varieties produced by co-suppression of endogenous delta 12-desaturases. Biochem Soc Trans 28:938–940
Stringam GR, Ripley VL, Love HK, Mitchell A (2003) Transgenicherbicide tolerant canola. The Canadian experience. Crop Sci 43:1590–1593
Swanson EB, Coumans MP, Brown GL, Patel JD, Beversdorf WD (1988) The characterization of herbicide tolerant plants in Brassica napus L. after in vitro selection of microspores and protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep 7:83–87
Swanson EB, Herrgesell MJ, Arnoldo M, Sippell DW, Wong RSC (1989) Microspore mutagenesis and selection: canola plants with field tolerance to the imidazolinones. Theor Appl Genet 78:525–530
Szarejko I, Forster BP (2007) Doubled haploidy and induced mutation. Euphytica 158:359–370
Tewari JP (1991) Resistance to Alternaria brassicae in crucifers. 10 BC/WPRS Bull. 14:154–161
The Biology of Brassica rapa (1999) Regulatory Directive Govt. of Canada, p 20(available at:http://maltawildplants.com?CRUC/Docs/BRSRA/Brassicarapa.pdf)
Thompson KF (1964) Triple cross hybrid kale. Euphytica 13:173–177
Toriyama K, Hinata K, Kameye T (1987) Production of somatic hybridplants rassico-moricandia through protoplast fusion between Moricandiaarvensis and Brassica oleracea. Plant Sci 48:123–128
Tyagi DVS, Rai B, Verma RB (1983) A note on the bunchy dwarf mutantin toria. Ind J Genet 43:374–377
Uchimiya H, Wildman SG (1978) Evaluation of fraction I protein in relationto origin of amphidiploid Brassica species and other members of cruciferae. J Hered 69:299–303
UN (1935) Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and particular mode of fertilization. Jpn J Bot 7:389–452
Verma VD, Rai B (1980a) Note on induced mutagenesis for spotting outusable sources of resistance to Alternaria leaf spot in Indian mustard. Ind J Agric Sci 50:278–280
Verma VD, Rai B (1980b) Mutation in seed coat colour in Indian mustard. Ind J Agric Sci 50:545–548
Wang M, Farnham MW, Nannes JSP (1999) Ploidy of broccoli regenerated from microspore culture versus anther culture. Plant Breed 118:249–252
Wang HZ, Liu GH, Zheng YB, Wang XF, Yang Q (2002) Breeding of Brassica napus cultivar Zhongshuang No. 9 with resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Chinese J Oil Crop Sci 24:71–73
Weiss ED (1983) Rapeseed. In: Weiss EA (ed) Oilseed crops, Longman, London, pp 161–215
Witmack L (1904) U ¨ ber die in Pompej gefundenen Pflanzenreste. Englers Bot. Jahrb. Bd 33
Xu L, Najeeb U, Tang GX, Gu HH, Zhang GQ, He Y, Zhou WJ (2007) Haploid and doubled haploid technology. In: Gupta SK (ed) Advances in botanical research-rapeseed breeding, vol 45. Academic Press/Elsevier Ltd., San Diego, CA, pp 181–216
Yadava TP, Singh H, Gupta VP, Rana RK (1974) Heterosis andcombining ability in raya for yield and its components. Ind J Genet 34A:648–695
Yadava TP, Singh H, Gupta VP, Rana RK (1974b) Heterosis and combining ability in raya for yield and its component. Ind J Genet 34A:648–695
Yan Z (1990) Overview of rapeseed production and research in China. In: Proceedings of International Canola Conference, April. Potashand Phosphate Institute, Atlanta, GA, pp 29–35
Yongming Z, Houlilin Z (1991) Selective strategies on the breeding forquality in Brassica napus. Cruciferae Newslett 14(15):58–59
Yu FQ, Liu HL (1995) Effects of donor materials and media on microspore embryoid yield of Brassica napus. J Huazhong Agric Uni 14:327–332
Zhang F, Takahata Y (1999) Microspore mutagenesis and in vitro selection for resistance to soft rot disease in Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris L. ssp. pekinensis). Breed Sci 49:161–166
Zhang GQ, Zhou WJ, Gu HH, Song WJ, Momoh EJJ (2003) Plant regeneration from the hybridization of Brassica juncea and B. napus through embryo culture. J Agron Crop Sci 189:347–350
Zhang GQ, Zhang DQ, Tang GX, He Y, Zhou WJ (2006) Plant development from microspore-derived embryos in oilseed rape as affected by chilling, desiccation and cotyledon excision. Biologia Plantarum 50:180–186
Zhou WJ, Hagberg P, Tang GX (2002a) Increasing embryogenesis and doubling efficiency by immediate colchicine treatment of isolated microspores in spring Brassica napus. Euphytica 128:27–34
Zhou WJ, Tang GX, Hagberg P (2002b) Efficient production of doubled haploid plants by immediate colchicine treatment of isolated microspores in winter Brassica napus. Plant Growth Reg 37:185–192
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gupta, S.K. (2012). Brassicas. In: Gupta, S. (eds) Technological Innovations in Major World Oil Crops, Volume 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0356-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0356-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0355-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0356-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)