Abstract
The concept of social role has always been troublesome and a source of controversy among sociologists and social psychologists. The standard Parsonian view is that roles are structures within a social system. They are sets of normative expectations specifying the attitudes and actions that are appropriate for actors in each role category or position (Parsons, 1951; Parsons & Shils, 1951). But, along with many psychologists, those sociologists who emphasize the constructive activities of actors find this view unsatisfactory (e.g., Goffman, 1969; Turner, 1962, 1968). The difficulty centers around the problem of providing a conceptualization that simultaneously and adequately handles social structures and processes and the individual production of action. All too often what happens is that the formulation of an answer to one side of the question necessarily makes inadequate the formulation of an answer to the other side. For example, the Parsonian emphasis on the systematic, orderly, and consensual nature of societal processes tends to make the individual a mere pawn of societal forces. Speaking of Parson’s system, Giddens (1979) puts the criticism aptly: “recogniseably human agents seem to elude the grasp of his scheme: the stage is set, the scripts written, the roles established, but the performers are curiously absent from the scene” (p. 253).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ardener, E. W., Ardener, S. G., & Warmington, W. A. Plantation and village in the Cameroons. London: Oxford University Press, 1960.
Becker, G. S. The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.
Bhaskar, R. A realist theory of science. Leeds, England: Leeds Books, 1975.
Bhaskar, R. The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Brighton, Sussex: Harvester Press, 1979.
Bhaskar, R. Emergence, explanation and emancipation. In P. F. Secord (Ed.), Consciousness, behavior, and social structure. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1982 (in press).
Blau, P. M. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley, 1964.
Bucher, C. Die Frauenfrage im Mittelalter. Tubingen: Verlag der H. Laupp’schen Buchhandlung, 1882.
Coulson, M. Role: A redundant concept in sociology? In J. A. Jackson (Ed.), Role. Sociological Studies 4. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
Emerson, R. M. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 1962, 27, 31–41.
Giddens, A. New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. New York: Basic Books, 1976.
Giddens, A. Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1979.
Giddens, A. On the relation of sociology to philosophy. In P. F. Secord (Ed.), Consciousness, behavior, and social structure. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1982 (in press).
Goffman, E. Where the action is: Three essays. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press, 1969.
Guttentag, M., & Secord, P. F. Too many women: The sex ratio question. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1982 (in press).
Harrè, R., & Secord, P. F. The explanation of social behavior. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell, 1972.
Homans, G. C. Social behavior: Its elementary forms (rev. ed.). New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Jovanovich, 1974.
Kelley, H. H. Personal relationships: Their structures and processes. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1979.
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley, 1978.
Manicas, P. T. The concept of social structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 1980, 10, 65–82.
Manicas, P. T. A radical separation of psychology and the human sciences. In P. F. Secord (Ed.), Consciousness, behavior, and social structure. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1982 (in press).
Parsons, T. The social system. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1951.
Parsons, T., & Shils, E. A. (Eds.). Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1951.
Polanyi, M. The tacit dimension. Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1966.
Pomeroy, S. B. Goddesses, whores, wives, and slaves: Women in classical antiquity. New York: Schocken Books, 1972.
Smith, R. E. The subtle revolution: Women at work. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute, 1979.
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley, 1959.
Tiger, L., & Fox, R. The imperial animal. New York: Dell, 1971.
Turner, R. H. Role-taking process versus conformity. In A. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes: An Interactionist approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1962.
Turner, R. H. Role: Sociological aspects. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 1968, 13, 552–557.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Secord, P.F. (1982). The Origin and Maintenance of Social Roles: The Case of Sex Roles. In: Ickes, W., Knowles, E.S. (eds) Personality, Roles, and Social Behavior. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9469-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9469-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-9471-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9469-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive