Abstract
Electromagnetic radiation has been historically the most widely used tool in the investigation of the properties of the physical state of matter. The reason lies in the smalleness of the fine structure constant α=(e2/ℏc)=(1/137) that governs the coupling of the radiation with matter. The resulting weak interaction has a twofold advantage: on one hand the perturbation on the system under study is negligible so that one is able to investigate the properties of the unperturbed system; on the other hand from a theoretical point of view one can use the linear response theory as an interpretative scheme in which to frame the experimental observations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C.R. Natoli, M.Benfatto, C. Brouder and M.Ruiz-Lopez, to be submitted to Phys. Rev. A.
The derivation of the multichannel multiple scattering (m.s.) equations follows very closely the method used to derive the m.s. equations for general non muffin-tin potentials in C.R. Natoli, M. Benfatto and S. Doniach, Phys. Rev. A34, 4682 (1986) to which we also refer for the derivation of the various reexpansion formulae used in the text.
The problem of exchange is well known among theoretical molecular physicists and quantum chemists. They have devised a wealth of methods to cope with it. For a review see N.F. Lane, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 29 (1980) and F.A. Gianturco and A. Jane, Phys. Rep. 143, 347 (1986) and references therein.
N.F. Mott and H.S.W. Massey, The Theory of Atomic Collisions (Clarendon, Oxford, 1965) 3rd Ed.
J.J. Rehr, E.A. Stern, R.L. Martin and E.R. Davidson, Phys. Rev. B17, 560 (1978).
S.H. Chou, J.J. Rehr, E.A.Stern and E.R. Davidson, Phys; Rev. B35, 2604 (1987).
S.J. Gurman, N. Binsted, and I. Ross, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 19, 1845 (1986).
M. Benfatto, C.R. Natoli and M. Ruiz-Lopez, to be submitted to Phys. Rev. B.
G. Krill, J. de Phys. C8–907 (1986); N. Wetta, G. Krill, P. Haen, F. Lapierre, M.F. Ravet, L. Godart and F. Holtzeberg, ibidem p. 965.
J.J. Burton and D.A. Shirley, Phys. Rev. B32, 1982 (1985); M. Sagurton, E.L. Bullock, R. Saiki, A. Kaduwela, C.R. Brundle, C.S. Fadley and J.J. Rehr, Phys. Rev. B33, 2207 (1986); C.S.Fadley in Progress in Surface Science, S. Davison Editor, Vol. 16, pag. 275 ( Pergamon, N.Y. 1984 ).
J.J. Rehr, R.C. Albers, C.R. Natoli and E.A. Stern, Phys. Rev. B34, 4350 (1986)
J.J. Rehr, J. Mustre de Leon, C.R. Natoli and C.S. Fadley, J. de Phys. 47, Coll. C8, 213 (1986)
M. Benfatto, C.R. Natoli, A. Bianconi, J. Garcia, A. Marcelli, M. Fanfoni and I. Davoli, Phys. Rev. B34, 5774 (1986);
A. Bianconi, A. Di Cicco, N.V. Pavel, M. Benfatto, A. Marcelli, C.R. Natoli, P. Pianetta and J. Woicik, to appear in Phys. Rev. B; October 1987. M. Ruiz-Lopez, M. Loos, J. Goulon, M. Benfatto and C.R. Natoli to be submitted to Chem. Phys.
J.L. Dehmer, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 4496 (1972); J.L. Dehmer and D. Dill, Phys. Rev. Lett., 35, 213 (1975).
C.R. Natoli in “EXAFS and Near Edge Structure”, A. Bianconi, L. Incoccia and S. Stipcich Editors, Springer Series in Chemical Physics 27, 43 (1983).
C.R. Natoli, EXAFS and Near Edge Structure III, Vol. 2 of Springer Proceedings of Physics edited by K.O. Hodgson, B. Hedman, J.E. Penner-Hahn (Springer, Berlin, 1984) pag. 38; J. Stohr, J.L. Gland, W. Eberhardt, D. Outka, R.J. Madix, F. Sette, R.J. Koestner and U. Döbler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 2414 (1983).
U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961); L.C. Davis and L.A. Feldkamp, Phys. Rev. B15, 2961 (1977); L.C. Davis and L.A. Feldkamp, Phys. Rev. B23, 6239 (1981).
T.N. Chang and U. Fano, Phys. Rev, A13, 263 (1976).
C.R. Natoli and M. Benfatto, J. de Phys. 47, Coll. C8, 11 (1986).
J.S. Faulkner and G.M. Stocks, Phys. Rev. B21, 3232 (1980).
L. Hedin and B.I. Lundqvist, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys, 4, 2064 (1971).
L.J. Sham and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 145, 561 (1966).
P.A. Lee and G. Beni, Phys. Rev. B15, 2862 (1977).
L. Hedin and S. Lundqvist, Solid State Phys. 23, 1 (1969).
For the X-a potential see J.C. Slater, The Self-Consistent Field for Molecules and Solids, Quantum Theory of Molecules and Solids (Mc Graw-Hill, N.Y., 1974) and K. Schwarz, Phys. Rev. B5, 2466 (1972); for the Dirac-Hara potential see S. Hara, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 26, 376 (1967).
T.M. Hayes and J.B. Boyce, Solid State Phys. 37, 173 (1982).
U. Fano and J.W. Cooper, Rev. Mod. Phys. 40, 441 (1968).
J. Stohr, R. Jaeger and J.J. Rehr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 821 (1983).
W. Bardyszewski and L. Hedin, Physica Scripta 32, 439 (1985); Proc. of the X-87 Intern. Conf. Paris 14–18 September (1987), to be published on J. de Phys. Colloques.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Natoli, C.R. (1988). Inner Shell X-Ray Photoabsorption as a Structural and Electronic Probe of Matter. In: Ferreira, J.G., Ramos, M.T. (eds) X-Ray Spectroscopy in Atomic and Solid State Physics. NATO ASI Series, vol 187. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0731-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0731-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8054-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0731-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive