Skip to main content

Improving TCP Performance in Mobile Ad hoc Networks

  • Chapter
Ad Hoc Wireless Networking

Part of the book series: Network Theory and Applications ((NETA,volume 14))

  • 152 Accesses

Abstract

The performance of transport layer protocols will be a key factor in the successful extension of Internet applications and services to mobile ad hoc networks. The Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) is the most commonly used transport protocol for the Internet [33], so providing a high level of TCP performance in MANETs is of particular importance. While TCP has been extensively tuned for wireline networks, in its current form TCP does not perform well when used in MANETs. In this chapter, we investigate ways to improve TCP performance in MANETs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Ahuja, S. Agarwal, J. P. Singh, and R. Shorey. Performance of TCP over different routing protocols in mobile ad-hoc networks. Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2000), May 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Bakre and B. R. Badrinath. I-TCP: Indirect TCP for mobile hosts. In Proc. 15th International Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), pages 136–143, May 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Balakrishnan, S. Seshan, and R. H. Katz. Improving reliable transport and handoff performance in cellular wireless networks. Wireless Networks 1(4): 469–481, Dec. 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Balakrishnan, V. N. Padmanabhan, S. Seshan, and R. H. Katz. A comparison of mechanisms for improving TCP performance over wireless links. IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, 5(6): 756–769, Dec. 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. V. Boppana and S. P. Konduru. An adaptive distance vector routing algorithm for mobile, ad hoc networks. In Proc. 20th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE INFOCOM 2001), volume 3, pages 1753–1762, Mar. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Broch, D. A. Maltz, D. B. Johnson, Y.-C. Hu, and J. Jetcheva. A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols. In Proc. 4th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networking (ACM MobiCom ‘88), pages 85–97, Oct. 1998.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Caceres and L. Iftode. Improving the performance of reliable transport protocols in mobile computing environments. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 13(5): 850–857, June 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Chandran, S. Raghunathan, S. Venkatesan and R. Prakash. A feedback based scheme for improving TCP performance in ad-hoc wireless networks. In Proc. 18th International Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), pages 472–479, May 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. R. Das, C. E. Perkins, and E. M. Royer. Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks. In Proc. 19th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE INFOCOM 2000), volume 1, pages 3–12, Mar. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. D. Dyer and R.V. Boppana. A comparison of ACM performance over three routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. In Proc. 2nd ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc ‘01), pages 56–66, Oct. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. D. Dyer and R.V. Boppana. Routing HTTP traffic in a mobile ad hoc network. In Proc. MILCOM 2002, Oct. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Fall and K. Varadhan. ns Manual. The VINT Project. UC Berkeley, LBL, USC/ISI, and Xerox PARC. Available from http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/ns-documentation.html, Apr. 2002.

  13. S. Floyd, J. Mandavi, M. Mathis, and M. Podolsky. An extension to the selective acknowledgement (SACK) option for TCP. RFC 2883, July 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Floyd. A report on recent developments in TCP congestion control. IEEE Communications Magazine, 39(4): 84–90, Apr. 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Floyd. TCP and Explicit Congestion Notification. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 24(5): 8–23, Oct. 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Gerla, K. Tang, and R. Bagrodia. TCP performance in wireless multi-hop networks. In Proc. of 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (WMCSA), pages 41–50, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Goff, J. Moronski, D. S. Phatak, and V. Gupta. Freeze-TCP: A true end-to-end TCP enhancement mechanism for mobile environments. In Proc. 19th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE INFOCOM 2000), volume 3, pages 1537–1545, Mar. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Holland and N. Vaidya. Analysis of TCP performance over mobile ad hoc networks. In Proc. 5th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networking (ACM MobiCom ‘89), pages 219–230, Aug. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Y.-C Hu and D. B. Johnson. Caching strategies in on-demand routing protocols for wireless ad hoc networks. In Proc. 6th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networking (ACM MobiCom ‘00), pages 231–242, Aug. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. IEEE Computer Society LAN/MAN Standards Committee. Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications. IEEE Standard 802. 11–1999, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. IETF MANET Working Group Charter. http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/manet-charter.html.

  22. D. B. Johnson, D. A. Maltz, Y.-C. Hu, and J. Jetcheva. The dynamic source routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks (DSR). IETF Internet Draft. http://www.ietf.org/internt-drafts/draft-ietf-manet-dsr07.txt, Feb. 2002.

  23. S. Keshav and S. P. Morgan. SMART retransmission: performance with overload and random losses. In Proc. 16th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE INFOCOM ‘87), volume 3, pages 1131–1138, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Kim, C.-K. Toh, Y. Choi. TCP-BuS: Improving TCP performance in wireless ad hoc networks. Journal of Communications and Networks, 3(2): 175–186, June 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  25. S.-B. Lee, G.-S. Ahn, and A. Campbell. Improving UDP and TCP performance in mobile ad hoc networks with INSIGNIA. IEEE Communications Magazine, 39(6): 156–165, June 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Liu and S. Singh. ATOP: TCP for mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 19 (7): 1300–1315, Jul. 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Mathis, J. Mandavi, S. Floyd, and A. Romanow. TCP selective acknowledgment options. RFC 2018, Oct. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Monarch Group. Wireless and mobility extensions to ns-2. Available from http://www.monarch.cs.rice.edu/cmu-ns.html, Oct. 1999.

  29. J. P. Monks, P. Sinha, and V. Bharghavan. Limitations of TCP-ELFN for ad hoc networks. In Proc. 7th International Workshop on Mobile Multimedia Communications (MOMuC 2000), Oct. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. E. Perkins, E. M. Belding-Royer, and S. R. Das. Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing. IETF Internet Draft. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-manet-aodv-11.txt, Jun. 2002.

  31. C. E. Perkins and P. Bhagwat. Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance vector (DSDV) for mobile computers. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 24(4): 234–244, Oct. 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. J. Postel. Internet Protocol. RFC 791, Sep. 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Postel. Transmission Control Protocol. RFC 793, Sep. 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  34. K. K. Ramakrishnan and R. Jain. A binary feedback scheme for congestion avoidance in computer networks. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 8(2): 158–181, May 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. W. R. Stevens, TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 1: The Protocols. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  36. R. Yavatkar and N. Bhagwat. Improving end-to-end performance of TCP over mobile internetworks. In Proc. Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, pages 146–152, Dec. 1994.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boppana, R.V., Dyer, T.D. (2004). Improving TCP Performance in Mobile Ad hoc Networks. In: Cheng, X., Huang, X., Du, DZ. (eds) Ad Hoc Wireless Networking. Network Theory and Applications, vol 14. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0223-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0223-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7950-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0223-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics