Skip to main content

The Role of Mnemonic Strategies in Study Effectiveness

  • Chapter
Imagery and Related Mnemonic Processes

Abstract

To achieve academic success, students must be adept in a variety of kinds of remembering. They must remember in order to recite or to make presentations in class. They must remember in a different way in order to compose coherent and convincing papers. They must remember in yet another way in order to excel in taking tests. Furthermore, variety characterizes not only the purposes of remembering but also the content to be remembered. Students must remember information, in the form of facts, concepts, or principles. In addition, they must remember procedures of the kinds involved in constructing proofs or solving problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. C. (1972). How to construct achievement tests to assess comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 42, 145–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. H. (1980). Study strategies and adjunct aids. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 483–502). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. H., & Armbruster, B. B. (1984). Studying. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 657–680). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbruster, B. B., Echols, C. H., & Brown, A. L. (1982). The role of metacognition in reading to learn: A developmental perspective. Volta Review, 84(5), 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. E., DiVesta, F. J., & Rogozinski, J. T. (1981). What is learned in note taking? Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, J. G., Carr, M., & Pressley, M. (1986). “Spontaneous” strategy use: Perspectives for metacognitive theory. Unpublished manuscript. University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Stein, B. S., Shelton, T. S., & Owings, R. A. (1981). Cognition and adaptation: The importance of learning to learn. In J. H. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior and the environment (pp. 93–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretzing, B. H., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1981). Notetaking and passage style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 242–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, L. W., & Dansereau, D. F. (1983). Effects of structural schema training and text organization on expository prose processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 811–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. H. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognitive development (Vol. 3, pp. 77–176). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., Campione, J., & Barclay, C. R. (1979). Training self checking routines for estimating test readiness: Generalization from list learning to prose recall. Child Development, 50, 501–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., Campione, J., & Day, J. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10(2), 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., Smiley, S. S., & Lawton, S. W. C. (1978). The effects of experience on the selection of suitable retrieval cues for studying texts. Child Development, 49, 829–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butkowsky, I. S., & Willows, D. M. (1980). Cognitive-motivational characteristics of children varying in reading ability: Evidence for learned helplessness in poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 408–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, C. A., & Titus, A. (1981). Effects of notetaking pretraining and test mode expectations on learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington, M. V. (1984). The motive for self worth. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Motivation in education (pp. 78–113). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, F. N., & Rohwer, W. D., Jr. (1974). Component analysis of the elaborative encoding effect in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 400–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance strategy and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1980). An analysis of learned helplessness: II. The processing of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 940–952.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • d’Ydewalle, G., Swerts, A., & De Corte, E. (1983). Study time and test performance as a function of test expectations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J. (1985). A model of the teaching-learning process derived from research on student learning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Cognitive Processes in Student Learning, July, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. New York: Nichols Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In R. Kail, Jr. & J. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 3–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. A., Plake, B. S., Roberts, B., Zimmer, J. W., & Palmere, M. (1981). Distinc tiveness of encoding: The effects of paraphrasing and drawing inferences on memory from prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 736–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. A., Plake, B. S., & Zimmer, J. W. (1982). Distinctiveness of encoding and memory for learning tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakstian, A. R. (1971). The effects of type of examination anticipated on test preparation and performance. Journal of Educational Research, 64, 319–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 485–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20, 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, A. J., & Borkowski, J. G. (1984). Attributions, intrinsic motivation, and metamemory: Determinants of strategic behavior. Unpublished manuscript, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhavy, R. W., Dyer, J. W., & Silver, L. (1975). The effects of notetaking and test expectancy on the learning of text material. Journal of Educational Research, 68, 363–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, B. E., & Borkowski, J. G. (1984). Children’s metacognition: Exploring relations among knowledge process and motivational variables. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loman, N. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 402–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., Dyck, J. L., & Cook, L. K. (1984). Techniques that help readers build mental models from scientific text: Definitions pretraining and signaling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1089–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., & Kearny, E. M. (1984). Optimal learning strategies and their spontaneous use: The importance of task-appropriate processing. Memory and Cognition, 12, 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., Friedman, A., Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1978). Remembering the levels of information in words. Memory and Cognition, 6, 156–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., & Pressley, M. (1984). Putting the keyword method in context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 598–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, J. T., & Pressley, M. (1984). Completeness of instruction and strategy transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, R., Bryan, T., & Herzog, A. (1983). Learning disabled and nondisabled children’s strategy analyses under high and low success conditions. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postman, L. (1964). Short-term memory and incidental learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., & Ahmad, M. (1986). Transfer of imagery-based mnemonics by adult learners. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & O’Sullivan, J. T. (1984). Memory strategy instruction is made of this: Metamemory and durable strategy use. Educational Psychologist, 19, 94–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & O’Sullivan, J. T. (1985). Children’s metamemory and the teaching of memory strategies. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition & human performance: Vol. 1. Theoretical perspectives (pp. 111–153). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (in press-a). Good strategy users coor dinate metacognition, strategy use and knowledge. In R. Vasta & G. Whitehurst (Eds.), Annals of child development (Vol. 4). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., & Delaney, H. D. (1982). The mnemonic keyword method. Review of Educational Research, 52, 61–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Levin, J., & McDaniel, M. (in press-b). Remembering versus inferring what a word means: Mnemonic and contextual approaches. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associ ates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickards, J. P., & Friedman, F. (1978). The encoding versus the external storage hypothesis in note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 136–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer, W. D., Jr. (1973). Elaboration and learning in childhood and adolescence. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer, W. D., Jr. (1980). An elaborative conception of learner differences. In R. E. Snow, P-A. Federico, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Aptitude, Learning and Instruction (Vol. 2, pp. 23–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer, W. D., Jr. (1984). An invitation to a developmental psychology of studying. In F. J. Morrison, C. A. Lord, & D. P. Keating (Eds.), Advances in applied developmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 75–114). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19, 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. W., & Rohwer, W. D., Jr. (1986). Academic studying: The role of learning strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21, 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1982). Synergistic ecphory in recall and recognition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 130–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rossum, E. J., & Schenk, S. M. (1984). The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1976). An attributional approach for educational psychology. In L. S. Shulman (Ed.), Review of educational research 4. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rohwer, W.D., Thomas, J.W. (1987). The Role of Mnemonic Strategies in Study Effectiveness. In: McDaniel, M.A., Pressley, M. (eds) Imagery and Related Mnemonic Processes. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4676-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4676-3_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9111-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4676-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics