Abstract
Mnemonic devices have been considered by some psychologists to represent a form of “unnatural learning” (Jenkins, 1971, 1974; Neisser, 1976, pp. 141–142). In response to these objections, it will be argued here that the study of mnemonic devices is fundamental to our understanding of human learning and the operation of human memory. In fact, the notion of mental cues, so pervasive in the implementation of mnemonic techniques, plays an important role in the operation of memory schemas. The value of comparing mnemonic devices and memory schemas has been mentioned before (Battig & Bellezza, 1979; Bellezza, 1983a, 1986a) but has not been discussed in detail. The purpose of this chapter is to demonstrate the similarities between these two knowledge structures and also to note some of their differences. In fact, instead of considering a mnemonic device as an unnatural and complicated form of learning, the proposal is made that a mnemonic device operates much like a memory schema. Many contemporary theories of memory consider memory schemas as important memory structures that automatically support natural learning. It is proposed here that mnemonic devices are simpler than memory schemas but seem complicated because the learner is very much aware of their operation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alba, J. W., & Hasher, L. (1983). Is memory schematic? Psychological Bulletin, 93, 203–231.
Anderson, J. R. (1980). Concepts, propositions, and schemata: What are the cognitive units? In H. E. Howe, Jr. & J. H. Flowers (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 28, pp. 121–162). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 19, 97–123.
Anderson, R. C. (1978). Schema-directed processes in language comprehension. In A. Lesgold, J. Pellegrino, S. Fokkema, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Cognitive psychology and instruction. New York: Plenum Press.
Anderson, R. C., & Ortony, A. (1975). On putting apples into bottles-a problem of polysemy. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 167–180.
Anderson, R. C., Spiro, R. J., & Anderson, M. C. (1978). Schemata as scaffolding for the representation of information in connected discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 75, 433–440.
Battig, W. F., & Bellezza, F. S. (1979). Organization and levels of processing. In C. R. Puff (Ed.), Memory organization and structure (pp. 321–346). New York: Academic Press.
Bellezza, F. S. (1981). Mnemonic devices: Classification, characteristics, and criteria. Review of Educational Research, 57, 247–275.
Bellezza, F. S. (1982a). Improve your memory skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bellezza, F. S. (1982b). Updating memory using mnemonic devices. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 301–327.
Bellezza, F. S. (1983a). Mnemonic-device instruction with adults. In M. Pressley & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: Psychological foundations (pp. 51–73). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Bellezza, F. S. (1983b). The spatial-arrangement mnemonic. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 830–837.
Bellezza, F. S. (1983c). Recalling script-based text: The role of selective processing and schematic cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 267–270.
Bellezza, F. S. (1984a). The self as a mnemonic device: The role of internal cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 506–516.
Bellezza, F. S. (1984b). Reliability of retrieval from semantic memory: Noun meanings. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 377–380.
Bellezza, F. S. (1984c). Reliability of retrieval from semantic memory: Common categories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 324–326.
Bellezza, F. S. (1986a). Mental cues and verbal reports in learning. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 20, pp. 237–273). New York: Academic Press.
Bellezza, F. S. (1986b). A mnemonic based on arranging words on visual patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 217–224.
Bellezza, F. S., & Bower, G. H. (1981a). Person stereotypes and memory for people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 856–865.
Bellezza, F. S., & Bower, G. H. (1981b). The representational and processing characteristics of scripts. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 1–4.
Bellezza, F. S., &Bower, G. H. (1982). Remembering script-based text. Poetics, 11, 1–23.
Bellezza, F. S., & Reddy, B. G. (1978). Mnemonic devices and natural memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 277–280.
Bellezza, F. S., Cheesman, F. L., & Reddy, B. G. (1977). Organization and semantic elaboration in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 539–550.
Bellezza, F. S., Day, J. C., & Reddy, K. R. (1983). A comparison of phonetic and semantic encoding mnemonics. Human Learning, 2, 49–60.
Bousefield, W. A. (1953). The occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly arranged associates. Journal of General Psychology, 49, 229–240.
Bower, G. H. (1972). Mental imagery and associative learning. In L. Gregg (Ed.), Cognition in learning and memory (pp. 51–87). New York: Wiley.
Bower, G. H., & Clark, M. C. (1969). Narrative stories as mediators for serial learning. Psychonomic Science, 14, 181–182.
Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177–220.
Brewer, W. F., & Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207–230.
Clark, L. F., & Woll, S. B. (1981). Stereotype biases: A reconstructive analysis of their role in reconstructive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1064–1072.
Day, J. C., & Bellezza, F. S. (1983). The relation between visual-imagery mediators and recall. Memory & Cognition, 11, 251–257.
Delprato, D. J., & Baker, E. J. (1974). Concreteness of peg words in two mnemonic systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 521–522.
Ebbinghaus, E. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York: Dover Books. (Original work published 1885.)
Ekstrand, B. (1966). Backward (R-S) associations. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 50–64.
Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316–355.
Graesser, A. C., Woll, S. B., Kowalski, D. J., & Smith, D. A. (1980). Memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 503–515.
Groninger, L. D., & Groninger, L. K. (1984). Autobiographical memories: Their relation to images, definitions, and word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 745–755.
Hayes-Roth, B. (1977). Evaluation of cognitive structures and processes. Psychological Review, 84, 260–278.
Hunter, I. M. L. (1956). Mnemonic systems and devices. Science News, 39, 75–97.
Jenkins, J. J. (1971). Second discussant’s comments: What’s left to say? Human Development, 14, 279–286.
Jenkins, J. J. (1974). Can we have a theory of meaningful memory? In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories of cognitive psychology (pp. 1–20). Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67–85.
Mandler, G. (1975). Memory storage and retrieval: Some limits on the reach of attention and consciousness. In P. M. A. Rabbit & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 5, pp. 499–516). New York: Academic Press.
Mandler, J. M. (1979). Categorical and schematic organization in memory. In C. R. Puff (Ed.), Memory organization and structure (pp. 259–299). New York: Academic Press.
Mandler, J. M. (1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Miller, G. A. (1956). Information and memory. Scientific American, 195(2), 42–46.
Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–277). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Norman, D. A. (1982). Learning and memory. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1976). On the role of active memory processes in perception and cognition. In C. N. Cofer (Ed.), The structure of human memory (pp. 114–132). San Francisco: Freeman.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt.
Palmer, S. E. (1975). Visual perception and world knowledge: Notes on a model of sensory-cognitive interaction. In D. A. Norman, D. E. Rumelhart, & the LNR Research Group (Eds.), Explorations in cognition (pp. 279–307). San Francisco: Freeman.
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (in press). Cognitive strategies: Good strategy users coordinate metacognition and knowledge. In R. Vasta & G. Whitehurst (Eds.), Annals of Child Development (Vol. 4). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., & Delaney, H. D. (1982). The mnemonic keyword method. Review of Educational Research, 52, 61–91.
Reddy, B. G., & Bellezza, F. S. (1983). Encoding specificity in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 167–174.
Reddy, B. G., & Bellezza, F. S. (1986). Interference between mnemonic and categorical organization in memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 169–171.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Schank, R., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Shiffrin, R. M. (1976). Capacity limitations in information processing, attention, and memory. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 4, pp. 177–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Smith, D. A., & Graesser, A. C. (1981). Memory for actions in scripted activities as a function of typicality, retention interval, and retrieval task. Memory & Cognition, 9, 550–559.
Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A. M., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory. Memory & Cognition, 6, 342–353.
Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1979). The use of schemata in the acquisition and transfer of knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 82–106.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.
Underwood, B. J., & Schulz, R. W. (1960). Meaningfulness and verbal learning. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Yates, F. A. (1966). The art of memory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bellezza, F.S. (1987). Mnemonic Devices and Memory Schemas. In: McDaniel, M.A., Pressley, M. (eds) Imagery and Related Mnemonic Processes. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4676-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4676-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9111-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4676-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive