Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Statistics ((STS))

  • 551 Accesses

Abstract

The transformation of data takes on great importance in statistical analysis, especially as one wishes to apply inferential procedures which are highly sensitive to deviations from their underlying assumptions to the data. In this chapter we discuss a number of such transformations, each focusing on a different ill. In Section 1 we describe the Glejser suggestions for searching for a deflator to apply to a regression equation, i.e., to each of the variables in the regression (including the constant), which will rid the regression residuals of their heteroscedasticity. In Section 2 we discuss the variance stabilizing transformation, a transformation procedure which produces a random variable whose variance is functionally independent of its expected value. Section 3 describes the Box—Cox transformations, power transformations which best transform data to normality. Section 4 is an exposition of Tukey’s “letter values” and “box plots”, which provide a quick graphic way of finding the appropriate power transformation. In Section 5, we describe the Box—Tidwell procedures for systematically determining the appropriate power transformation of an independent variable in a regression.

“The simple family often does quite well in transforming to normality!”

Tukey [1957]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bickel, P. J. and Doksum, K. A. 1981. An analysis of transformations revisited. Journal of the American Statistical Association 76 (June): 296–311.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P. and Cox, D. R. 1964. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 26: 211–52.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P. and Cox, D. R. 1982. An analysis of transformations, revisited, rebutted. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77 (March): 209–10.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P. and Tidwell, P. W. 1962. Transformation of the independent variables. Technometrics 4 (November): 531–50.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, M. A. 1984. Choosing a symmetrizing power transformation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79 (March): 107–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolby, J. L. 1963. A quick method for choosing a transformation. Technometrics 5 (August): 317–25.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. 1982. Transformation theory: How normal is a family of distributions? Annals of Statistics 10 (June): 323–39.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, J. D. and Stoto, M. A. 1982. Exploratory methods for choosing power transformations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77 (March): 103–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, J. D. and Stoto, M. A. 1984. Rejoinder. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79 (March): 108–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espy, W. R. 1978. O Thou Improper, Thou Uncommon Noun. New York: Clarkson N. Potter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ģlejser, H. 1969. A new test for heteroskedasticity. Journal of the American Statistical Association 64 (March): 316–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, F. and Johnson, R. A. 1980. The large-sample behavior of transformations to normality. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75 (December): 855–61.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkley, D. V. 1975. On power transformations to symmetry. Biometrika 62 (April): 101–11.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkley, D. V. and Runger, G. 1984. The analysis of transformed data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79 (June): 302–28.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Milne-Thompson, L. M. 1951. The Calculus of Finite Differences. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesselman, J. 1971. Power families: a note on the Box and Cox transformation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 33: 307–11.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W. 1957. On the comparative anatomy of transformations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 28 (September): 602–32.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Madansky, A. (1988). Transformations. In: Prescriptions for Working Statisticians. Springer Texts in Statistics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3794-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3794-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8354-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3794-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics