Skip to main content

Contrast Sensitivity: A Viewpoint for Clinicians

  • Chapter
Glare and Contrast Sensitivity for Clinicians

Abstract

The chapters that follow will review the physiological, methodological, and theoretical aspects of spatial contrast sensitivity and glare disability in normal observers and in those with ocular and retroocular diseases. In this chapter we will consider the general state of the art and will try to place the utility of contrast sensitivity and glare disability testing in context for the clinician on the basis of both empirical and practical considerations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arden GB, Jacobson JJ: A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: Preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 17(l):23–32, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atkin A, Bodis-Wollner I, Wolkstein M, et al: Abnormalities of central contrast sensitivity in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 88:205–211, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolkstein M, Atkin A, Bodis-Wollner I: Contrast sensitivity in retinal disease. Ophthalmology 87: 1140–1149, 1980.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marmor MF: Contrast sensitivity and retinal disease. Ann Ophthalmol 13:1069–1071, 1981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sjostrand J, Frisen L: Contrast sensitivity in macular disease. Acta Ophthalmol 55:507–514, 1977.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kleiner RC, Enger C, Alexander MF, et al: Contrast sensitivity in macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 106:55–57, 1988.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sokol S, Moskowitz A, Skarf B, et al: Contrast sensitivity in diabetics with and without diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 103:51–54, 1985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Regan D, Silver R, Murray TJ: Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis, hidden visual loss; an auxiliary test. Brain 100(3):563–579, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Arden GB, Gucukoglu AG: Grating test of contrast sensitivity in patients with retrobulbar neuritis. Arch Ophthalmol 96:1626–1629, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hess R, Woo G: Vision through cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 17:428–435, 1978.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Skalka H: Arden grating test in evaluating “early” posterior subcapsular cataracts. South Med J 74(11): 1368–1370, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hess RF, Garner LF: The effect of corneal edema on visual function. Invest Ophthalmos Vis Sei 16:5–13, 1977.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hess RF, Carney LG: Vision through an abnormal cornea: A pilot study of the relationship between visual loss from corneal distortion, corneal edema, keratoconus and some allied corneal pathology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 18:476–483, 1979.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carney LG, Jacobs RJ: Mechanisms of visual loss in corneal edema. Arch Ophthamol 102:1068–1071, 1984.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Carney LG: Visual loss in keratoconus. Arch Ophthalmol 100:1282–1285, 1982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Carney LG: Contact lens correction of visual loss in keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmol 60:795–802, 1982.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mannis MJ, Zadnik K, Johnson CA: The effect of penetrating keratoplasty on contrast sensitivity in keratoconus. Arch Ophthalmol 102:1513–1516, 1984.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zadnik K, Mannis MJ, Johnson CA: An analysis of contrast sensitivity in identical twins with keratoconus. Cornea 3:99–103, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Koch DD: The role of glare testing in managing the cataract patient, in Focal Points 1988: Clinical Modules for Ophthalmologists. American Academy of Ophthalmology, Vol VI, Mod 4, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sweeney CC, Steen WH: Contrast sensitivity as a cataract practice builder. Ophthalmol Manage, May 1987, pp 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zadnik K, Mannis MJ, Johnson CA, et al: Rapid contrast sensitivity assessment in keratoconus. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 64:693–697, 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller D, Miller R: Glare sensitivity in simulated radial keratotomy. Arch Ophthalmol 99:1961–1962, 1981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Applegate RA, Trick LR, Meade DL, et al: Radial keratotomy increases the effects of disability glare: Initial results. Arch Ophthalmol 19:293–297, 1987.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Krasnov MM, Avetisov SE, Makashova NV, et al: The effect of radial keratotomy on contrast sensitivity. Am J Ophthalmol 105:651–654, 1988.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tomlinson A, Caroline P: Effect of radial keratotomy on the contrast sensitivity function. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 65:803–808, 1988.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Justin N, Asbell PA, Friedman A: Glare and contrast sensitivity testing in epikeratoplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 28(suppl):225, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mannis MJ, Zadnik K, Johnson CA, et al: Contrast sensitivity after epikeratophakia. Cornea 7(4):280–284, 1988.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Carney LG: Visual deficits remaining after penetrating keratoplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 26(suppl):148, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mannis MJ, Zadnik K, Johnson CA, et al: Contrast sensitivity after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 105:1220–1223, 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Apkarian P, Tijsson R, Spekreijse H, et al: Origin oi notches in CSF: Optical or neural? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 28:607–612, 1987.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Regan D, Whitlock JA, Murray TJ, et’al: Orientation-specific losses of contrast sensitivity in multi pie sclerosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 19:324–328, 1980.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Applegate RA, Johnson CA, Howland HC, et al: Optical aberrations of the eye following radial keratotomy initial results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 29(suppl):280, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mannis, M.J., Zadnik, K., Johnson, C.A. (1990). Contrast Sensitivity: A Viewpoint for Clinicians. In: Nadler, M.P., Miller, D., Nadler, D.J. (eds) Glare and Contrast Sensitivity for Clinicians. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3242-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3242-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7931-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3242-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics