Skip to main content

Rebuilding and Prostheses in the Event of Periacetabular Tumors

  • Chapter
Biomechanics and Biomaterials in Orthopedics
  • 902 Accesses

Abstract

Surgical treatment of primary malignant periacetabular tumors is one of the most difficult orthopedic surgeries. Tumor resection always leads to significant instability of the affected extremity. Attempting wide resection margins, the femoral head may not be saved in case of small malignant periacetabular tumors. In addition, large pelvic defects lead to considerable shortening and instability of the leg, demanding functional amelioration. Limiting factors for limb salvage surgery are the vicinity of the ventral neurovascular bundle and the dorsal sciatic nerve. This often leads to neural palsies of the leg and to at least venous and lymphatic edema due to resection and replacement of vessels, both resulting in an impaired function of the hip joint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frassica FJ, Frassica DA, Pritchard DJ, et al. Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis. Clinicopathological features and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg 1993;75A: 1457–65.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ham SJ, Schraffordt Koops H, Veth RP, von Horn JR, Eisma WH, Hoekstra HJ. External and internal hemipelvectomy for sarcomas of the pelvic girdle: consequences of limb-salvage treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 1997;23:540–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamdi M, Gebhardt M, Recloux P. Internal hemipelvectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 1996;22:158–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kawai A, Huvos AG, Meyers PA, Healey JH. Osteosarcoma of the pelvis. Oncologic results of 40 patients. Clin Orthop 1998;348:196–207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mercuri M, Capanna R, Manfrini M, et al. The management of malignant bone tumors in children and adolescents. Clin Orthop 1991;264:156–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morton DL, Eilber FR, Townsend Jr CM, et al. Limb salvage from a multidisciplinary treatment approach for skeletal and soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity. Ann Surg 1976;184:268–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Winkelmann W. Treatment outcome of pelvic sarcomas in young children: Orthopaedic and oncologic analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 1998;18:350–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shin KH, Rougraff BT, Simon MA. Oncological outcomes of primary bone sarcomas of the pelvis. Clin Orthop 1994;304:207–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Steel HH. Partial or complete resection of the hemipelvis. An alternative to hindquarter amputation for periacetabular chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg 1978;60A:719–30.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stephenson RB, Kaufer H, Hankin F. Partial pelvic resection as an alternative to hindquarter amputation for skeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop 1989;242:201–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Enneking WF, Dunham WK. Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg 1978;60A:731–46.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aboulafia AL, Malawer MM. Surgical management of pelvic and extremity osteosarcoma. Cancer Supp 1993; 71:3358–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Campanacci M, Capanna R. Pelvic resections: The Rizzoli Institute experience. Orthop Clin North Am 1991;22:65–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson JTH. Reconstruction of the pelvic ring following tumor resection. J Bone Joint Surg 1978;60A:747–51.

    Google Scholar 

  15. O’Connor MI, Sim FH. Salvage of the limb in the treatment of malignant pelvic tumors. J Bone Joint Surg 1989;71A:481–94.

    Google Scholar 

  16. O’Connor MI. Malignant pelvic tumors: Limb-sparing resection and reconstruction. Semin Surg Oncol 1997; 13:49–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Harrington KD. The use of hemipelvic allografts or autoclaved grafts for reconstruction after wide resections of malignant tumors of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg 1992;74A:331–41.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Langlais F, Vielpeau C. Allografts of the hemipelvis after tumour resection. J Bone Joint Surg 1989;71B:58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mankin HJ, Doppelt SH, Sullivan TR, Tomford WW. O steo articular and intercalary allograft transplantation in the management of malignant tumors of bone. Cancer 1982;50:613–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mankin HJ, Doppelt S, Tomford W. Clinical experience with allograft implantation: The first ten years. Clin Orthop 1983;174:69–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mnaymneh W, Malinin T, Mnaymneh LG, Robinson D. Pelvic allograft. A case report with a follow-up evaluation of 5.5 years. Clin Orthop 1990;250:128–32.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Bettin D, Wuisman P, Winkelmann W High complication rates with pelvic allografts. Experience of 22 sarcoma resections. Acta Orthop Scand 1996;67:33–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nieder E, Elson RA, Engelbrecht E, et al. The saddle prosthesis for salvage of the destroyed acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg 1990;72B:1014–22.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Van der Lei B, Hoekstra HJ, Veth RPH, et al. The use of the saddle prosthesis for reconstruction of the hip joint after tumor resection of the pelvis. J Surg Oncol 1992;50:216–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Abudu A, Grimer RJ, Cannon SR, Carter SR, Sneath RS. Reconstruction of the hemipelvis after the excision of malignant tumours. Complications and functional outcome of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 1997;79B:773–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bruns J, Luessenhop SL, Dahmen G Sr. Internal hemipelvectomy and endoprosthetic pelvic replacement: long-term follow-up results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997;116:27–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gradinger R, Rechl H, Hipp E. Pelvic osteosarcoma, resection, reconstruction, local control and survival statistics. Clin Orthop 1991;270:149–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gradinger R, Rechl H, Ascherl R, Plotz W, Hipp E. Partial endoprosthetic reconstruction of the pelvis in malignant tumors. Orthopäde 1993;22:167–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Windhager R, Karner J, Kutschera HP, et al. Limb salvage in periacetabular sarcomas. Clin Orthop 1996;331: 265–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kotz R, Ritschi P, Pongracz N, Zimmermann R. Hemipelvektomie: Indikation, Operationstechnik und Ergebnisse. Acta Chir Austr 1986;18:108–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kotz R, Ritschi P, Kropej D, Schiller Ch, Wurnig Ch, Salzer-Kuntschik M. Die Grenzen der Extremitätenerhaltung — Amputation versus Resektion. Z Orthop 1992;130:299–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu KK, Guise ER, Frost HM, Mitchell CL. The surgical technique for hindquarter amputation. A report of 19 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1977;48:479–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kotz, R., Schwameis, E. (2004). Rebuilding and Prostheses in the Event of Periacetabular Tumors. In: Poitout, D.G. (eds) Biomechanics and Biomaterials in Orthopedics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3774-0_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3774-0_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-3776-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3774-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics