Abstract
In the paper a general framework of defining information semantics for nonclassical logics is discussed. Rough sets theory (Pawlak 1992) has been an inspiration for logical investigations aimed at development of logical systems and deduction methods for representing and handling incomplete information and for reasoning in the presence of incompleteness. During the last decade a representation paradigm of rough-set-based information logics and models has received a lot of attention (Orlowska and Pawlak 1984a,b, Orlowska 1985, Farinas del Cerro and Prade 1986, Rasiowa and Skowron 1986, Nakamura 1988, Vakarelov 1988, Dubois and Prade 1992, Rauszer 1992). Information logics are formalisms for representation of and reasoning about data that consist of entities of the following two types: objects and properties of objects. According to the Tarskian tradition semantic structures for formalized languages are abstract relational systems consisting of a nonempty set and a family of relations of a finite arity over this set. In the paper we define a “more concrete”, in a sense, semantics provided by a suitable class of information models. In information models we introduce explicitly objects, properties and various relationships between them. Each information model is determined by what is called an information frame, in a similar way as possible world frames (Kripke 1963) determine models. Information frames are generated by nondeterministic information systems (Orlowska and Pawlak 1984a). Completeness of logical systems with respect to classes of information frames is discussed. The notion of informational representability of frames is introduced and investigated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (1992) Putting rough sets and fuzzy sets together. In: Slowinski,R. (ed) Intelligent decision support. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 203–232.
Farinas del Cerro, L. and Prade, H. (1986) Rough sets, fuzzy sets and modal logic-Fuzziness in indiscemibility and partial information. In: Di Niola, A., Ventre, A. and Fodor, J. (eds) The mathematics of fuzzy systems. Verlag TUV Rheinland, Koeln, 103–120.
Kripke, S. (1963) Semantical analysis of modal logic I. Zeitschrift fuer Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 9, 67–96.
Nakamura, A. (1988) Fuzzy rough sets. Notes on Multiple-Valued Logic in Japan 9 (8), 1–8.
Orlowska, E. (1985) Logic of nondeterministic information. Studia Logica XLIV, 93–102.
Orlowska, E. (1989) Logic for reasoning about knowledge. Zeitschrift fuer Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 35, 559–572.
Orlowska, E. (1990) Verisimilitude based on concept analysis. Studia Logica XLIX, 307–319.
Orlowska, E. and Pawlak, Z. (1984a) Representation of nondeterministic information. Theoretical Computer Science 29, 27–39.
Orlowska, E. and Pawlak, Z. (1984b) Logical foundations of knowledge representation. ICS PAS Report 537, Warsaw.
Pawlak, Z. (1981) Information systems-theoretical foundations. Information Systems 3, 205–218.
Pawlak, Z. (1992) Rough sets. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Popper, K. (1963) Conjectures and refutations. Routledge and Kegan, London.
Rasiowa, H. and Skowron, A. (1986) Approximation logic. In: Mathematical methods of specification and synthesis of software systems’ 85. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, Band 31, 123–139.
Rauszer, C. (1992) Logic for information systems. Fundamenta Informaticae 16, 371–383.
Rodenburg, P. (1986) Intuitionistic correspondence theory. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Slowinski, R. (1992) (ed) Intelligent decision support. Handbook of applications and advances of the rough sets theory. Kluwer, Dordrecht/ Boston/London.
Stone, M. (1936) The theory of representations for Boolean algebras. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 40, 37–111.
Vakarelov, D. (1987) Abstract characterization of some knowledge representation systems and the logic NIL of nondeterministic information. In: Jorrand, P.H. and Sgurev, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence II: Methodology, Systems, Applications. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 255–260.
Vakarelov, D. (1988) Modal logics for knowledge representation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 363, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, 257–277.
Vakarelov, D. (1991a) A modal logic for similarity relations in Pawlak knowledge representation systems. Fundamenta Informaticae XV, 61–79.
Vakarelov, D. (1991b) Logical analysis of positive and negative similarity relations in property systems. In: De Glas, M. and Gabbay, D. (eds) Proceedings WOCFAI, 491–499.
Van Benthem, J. (1984) Correspondence theory. In: Gabbay, D. and Guenther, F. (eds) Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Vol II, Reidel, Dordrecht, 167–247.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 British Computer Society
About this paper
Cite this paper
Orlowska, E. (1994). Rough Set Semantics for Non-classical Logics. In: Ziarko, W.P. (eds) Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Knowledge Discovery. Workshops in Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3238-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3238-7_17
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19885-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3238-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive